>>> Building on sparc64-0c under devel/arm-none-eabi/binutils,arm BDEPENDS = [archivers/xz;devel/gmake] DIST = [devel/arm-none-eabi/binutils:binutils/binutils-2.40.tar.xz] FULLPKGNAME = arm-none-eabi-binutils-2.40 (Junk lock obtained for sparc64-0c at 1718926505.09) >>> Running depends in devel/arm-none-eabi/binutils,arm at 1718926505.20 last junk was in x11/wmmenu /usr/sbin/pkg_add -aI -Drepair xz-5.6.2 was: /usr/sbin/pkg_add -aI -Drepair gmake-4.4.1 xz-5.6.2 /usr/sbin/pkg_add -aI -Drepair xz-5.6.2 >>> Running show-prepare-results in devel/arm-none-eabi/binutils,arm at 1718926511.17 ===> devel/arm-none-eabi/binutils,arm ===> Building from scratch arm-none-eabi-binutils-2.40 ===> arm-none-eabi-binutils-2.40 depends on: gmake-* -> gmake-4.4.1 ===> arm-none-eabi-binutils-2.40 depends on: xz->=5.4.0 -> xz-5.6.2 ===> Verifying specs: c z ===> found c.100.1 z.7.0 gmake-4.4.1 xz-5.6.2 (Junk lock released for sparc64-0c at 1718926514.59) distfiles size=25241484 >>> Running patch in devel/arm-none-eabi/binutils,arm at 1718926514.68 ===> devel/arm-none-eabi/binutils,arm ===> Checking files for arm-none-eabi-binutils-2.40 `/usr/ports/distfiles/binutils/binutils-2.40.tar.xz' is up to date. >> (SHA256) binutils/binutils-2.40.tar.xz: OK ===> Extracting for arm-none-eabi-binutils-2.40 xz: (stdin): Compressed data is corrupt tar: End of archive volume 1 reached ===> Patching for arm-none-eabi-binutils-2.40 ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-bfd_Makefile_in Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: bfd/Makefile.in |--- bfd/Makefile.in.orig |+++ bfd/Makefile.in -------------------------- Patching file bfd/Makefile.in using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 266. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-binutils_Makefile_in Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: binutils/Makefile.in |--- binutils/Makefile.in.orig |+++ binutils/Makefile.in -------------------------- Patching file binutils/Makefile.in using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 404. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-gas_Makefile_in Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: gas/Makefile.in |--- gas/Makefile.in.orig |+++ gas/Makefile.in -------------------------- Patching file gas/Makefile.in using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 270. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-gprof_Makefile_in Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: gprof/Makefile.in |--- gprof/Makefile.in.orig |+++ gprof/Makefile.in -------------------------- File to patch: No file found--skip this patch? [y] Skipping patch... Hunk #1 ignored at 217. 1 out of 1 hunks ignored--saving rejects to Oops.rej done ***> patch-gprof_Makefile_in did not apply cleanly ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ld_Makefile_in Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ld/Makefile.in |--- ld/Makefile.in.orig |+++ ld/Makefile.in -------------------------- File to patch: No file found--skip this patch? [y] Skipping patch... Hunk #1 ignored at 301. Hunk #2 ignored at 1042. 2 out of 2 hunks ignored--saving rejects to Oops.rej done ***> patch-ld_Makefile_in did not apply cleanly ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-libctf_Makefile_in Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: libctf/Makefile.in |--- libctf/Makefile.in.orig |+++ libctf/Makefile.in -------------------------- File to patch: No file found--skip this patch? [y] Skipping patch... Hunk #1 ignored at 306. 1 out of 1 hunks ignored--saving rejects to Oops.rej done ***> patch-libctf_Makefile_in did not apply cleanly ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-libiberty_Makefile_in Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: libiberty/Makefile.in |--- libiberty/Makefile.in.orig |+++ libiberty/Makefile.in -------------------------- File to patch: No file found--skip this patch? [y] Skipping patch... Hunk #1 ignored at 376. 1 out of 1 hunks ignored--saving rejects to Oops.rej done ***> patch-libiberty_Makefile_in did not apply cleanly ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-libsframe_Makefile_in Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: libsframe/Makefile.in |--- libsframe/Makefile.in.orig |+++ libsframe/Makefile.in -------------------------- File to patch: No file found--skip this patch? [y] Skipping patch... Hunk #1 ignored at 276. 1 out of 1 hunks ignored--saving rejects to Oops.rej done ***> patch-libsframe_Makefile_in did not apply cleanly ===> Failed patches: patch-gprof_Makefile_in patch-ld_Makefile_in patch-libctf_Makefile_in patch-libiberty_Makefile_in patch-libsframe_Makefile_in *** Error 1 in devel/arm-none-eabi/binutils (/usr/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk:2931 '/usr/obj/ports/arm-none-eabi-binutils-2.40-arm/.patch_done') *** Error 2 in devel/arm-none-eabi/binutils (/usr/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk:2704 'patch': @lock=arm-none-eabi-binutils-2.40; expo...) ===> Exiting devel/arm-none-eabi/binutils,arm with an error *** Error 1 in /usr/ports (infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.subdir.mk:144 'patch': @: ${echo_msg:=echo}; : ${target:=patch}; for i in ; do eval...) >>> Ended at 1718926534.42 max_stuck=5.19/depends=5.97/show-prepare-results=3.53/patch=19.82 Error: job failed with 512 on sparc64-0c at 1718926534