>>> Building on riscv64-3 under www/chromium BDEPENDS = [graphics/libexif;print/cups,-libs;multimedia/aom;multimedia/openh264;devel/bison;x11/gtk+4,-guic;graphics/jpeg;devel/desktop-file-utils;devel/pango;multimedia/dav1d;textproc/icu4c;audio/pulseaudio;x11/gtk+3,-cups;lang/node;x11/gtk+3,-main;devel/xdg-utils;multimedia/libvpx;fonts/noto/fonts;devel/rust-bindgen;devel/gmake;shells/bash;archivers/bzip2;devel/gperf;security/nss;lang/python/3;textproc/libxslt;devel/llvm/17;devel/ninja;x11/qt5/qtbase,-main;x11/py-xcbgen,python3;lang/rust;x11/gnome/at-spi2-core;x11/xkbcommon;audio/opus;archivers/xz;sysutils/flock;sysutils/libudev-openbsd;sysutils/pciutils] DIST = [www/chromium:chrome-linux-128.0.6613.113-llvm17.profdata.tar.xz;www/chromium:chromium-128.0.6613.113.tar.xz;www/chromium:chromium-128.0.6613.113-testdata.tar.xz;www/chromium:test_fonts-336e775eec536b2d785cc80eff6ac39051931286.tar.gz] FULLPKGNAME = chromium-128.0.6613.113 RDEPENDS = [sysutils/libudev-openbsd;x11/gtk+3,-main;audio/opus;devel/xdg-utils;x11/xkbcommon;x11/gnome/at-spi2-core;x11/gtk+3,-cups;textproc/libxslt;security/nss;textproc/icu4c;multimedia/dav1d;graphics/jpeg;devel/desktop-file-utils;devel/pango;x11/gtk+4,-guic;multimedia/openh264;multimedia/aom;print/cups,-libs;fonts/noto/fonts;graphics/libexif;multimedia/libvpx] (Junk lock obtained for riscv64-3 at 1726241354.67) >>> Running depends in www/chromium at 1726241354.82 last junk was in productivity/ktimetracker /usr/sbin/pkg_add -aI -Drepair aom-3.9.1p0 at-spi2-core-2.52.0 bash-5.2.32 bison-3.8.2 bzip2-1.0.8p0 cups-libs-2.4.10 dav1d-1.2.1p3 desktop-file-utils-0.27 flock-20110525p1 gmake-4.4.1 gperf-3.1p0 gtk+3-3.24.43 gtk+3-cups-3.24.43 gtk4-update-icon-cache-4.14.5 icu4c-75.1p0v0 jpeg-3.0.3v0 libexif-0.6.24 libudev-openbsd-20230921p0 libvpx-1.14.1p0v0 libxkbcommon-1.7.0 libxslt-1.1.42 llvm-17.0.6p12 ninja-1.11.1p0v0 node-20.17.0v0 noto-fonts-20201206 nss-3.103 openh264-2.4.1p1 opus-1.5.2p0 pango-1.54.0 pciutils-3.11.1 pulseaudio-17.0p0 py3-xcbgen-1.17.0p1 python-3.11.9p3 rust-1.80.1p0 rust-bindgen-0.69.4 xdg-utils-1.2.1 was: /usr/sbin/pkg_add -aI -Drepair aom-3.9.1p0 at-spi2-core-2.52.0 bash-5.2.32 bison-3.8.2 bzip2-1.0.8p0 cups-libs-2.4.10 dav1d-1.2.1p3 desktop-file-utils-0.27 flock-20110525p1 gmake-4.4.1 gperf-3.1p0 gtk+3-3.24.43 gtk+3-cups-3.24.43 gtk4-update-icon-cache-4.14.5 icu4c-75.1p0v0 jpeg-3.0.3v0 libexif-0.6.24 libudev-openbsd-20230921p0 libvpx-1.14.1p0v0 libxkbcommon-1.7.0 libxslt-1.1.42 llvm-17.0.6p12 ninja-1.11.1p0v0 node-20.17.0v0 noto-fonts-20201206 nss-3.103 openh264-2.4.1p1 opus-1.5.2p0 pango-1.54.0 pciutils-3.11.1 pulseaudio-17.0p0 py3-xcbgen-1.17.0p1 python-3.11.9p3 qtbase-5.15.13pl145 rust-1.80.1p0 rust-bindgen-0.69.4 xdg-utils-1.2.1 xz-5.6.2 /usr/sbin/pkg_add -aI -Drepair aom-3.9.1p0 at-spi2-core-2.52.0 bash-5.2.32 bison-3.8.2 bzip2-1.0.8p0 cups-libs-2.4.10 dav1d-1.2.1p3 desktop-file-utils-0.27 flock-20110525p1 gmake-4.4.1 gperf-3.1p0 gtk+3-3.24.43 gtk+3-cups-3.24.43 gtk4-update-icon-cache-4.14.5 icu4c-75.1p0v0 jpeg-3.0.3v0 libexif-0.6.24 libudev-openbsd-20230921p0 libvpx-1.14.1p0v0 libxkbcommon-1.7.0 libxslt-1.1.42 llvm-17.0.6p12 ninja-1.11.1p0v0 node-20.17.0v0 noto-fonts-20201206 nss-3.103 openh264-2.4.1p1 opus-1.5.2p0 pango-1.54.0 pciutils-3.11.1 pulseaudio-17.0p0 py3-xcbgen-1.17.0p1 python-3.11.9p3 rust-1.80.1p0 rust-bindgen-0.69.4 xdg-utils-1.2.1 Updating font cache: ok New and changed readme(s): /usr/local/share/doc/pkg-readmes/llvm-17 /usr/local/share/doc/pkg-readmes/xdg-utils --- +node-20.17.0v0 ------------------- You may wish to add /usr/local/lib/node_modules/npm/man to /etc/man.conf --- +openssl-3.2.2p4v0 ------------------- You may wish to add /usr/local/lib/eopenssl32/man to /etc/man.conf >>> Running show-prepare-results in www/chromium at 1726241677.43 ===> www/chromium ===> Building from scratch chromium-128.0.6613.113 ===> chromium-128.0.6613.113 depends on: bzip2-* -> bzip2-1.0.8p0 ===> chromium-128.0.6613.113 depends on: pulseaudio-* -> pulseaudio-17.0p0 ===> chromium-128.0.6613.113 depends on: gperf-* -> gperf-3.1p0 ===> chromium-128.0.6613.113 depends on: bison-* -> bison-3.8.2 ===> chromium-128.0.6613.113 depends on: rust-bindgen-* -> rust-bindgen-0.69.4 ===> chromium-128.0.6613.113 depends on: node-* -> node-20.17.0v0 ===> chromium-128.0.6613.113 depends on: rust-* -> rust-1.80.1p0 ===> chromium-128.0.6613.113 depends on: bash-* -> bash-5.2.32 ===> chromium-128.0.6613.113 depends on: flock-* -> flock-20110525p1 ===> chromium-128.0.6613.113 depends on: pciutils-* -> pciutils-3.11.1 ===> chromium-128.0.6613.113 depends on: ninja-* -> ninja-1.11.1p0v0 ===> chromium-128.0.6613.113 depends on: py3-xcbgen-* -> py3-xcbgen-1.17.0p1 ===> chromium-128.0.6613.113 depends on: qtbase-* -> qtbase-5.15.13pl145 ===> chromium-128.0.6613.113 depends on: xdg-utils-* -> xdg-utils-1.2.1 ===> chromium-128.0.6613.113 depends on: desktop-file-utils-* -> desktop-file-utils-0.27 ===> chromium-128.0.6613.113 depends on: noto-fonts-* -> noto-fonts-20201206 ===> chromium-128.0.6613.113 depends on: libexif-* -> libexif-0.6.24 ===> chromium-128.0.6613.113 depends on: libudev-openbsd-* -> libudev-openbsd-20230921p0 ===> chromium-128.0.6613.113 depends on: gtk+3-* -> gtk+3-3.24.43 ===> chromium-128.0.6613.113 depends on: gtk4-update-icon-cache-* -> gtk4-update-icon-cache-4.14.5 ===> chromium-128.0.6613.113 depends on: gtk+3-cups-* -> gtk+3-cups-3.24.43 ===> chromium-128.0.6613.113 depends on: llvm->=17,<18 -> llvm-17.0.6p12 ===> chromium-128.0.6613.113 depends on: python->=3.11,<3.12 -> python-3.11.9p3 ===> chromium-128.0.6613.113 depends on: gmake-* -> gmake-4.4.1 ===> chromium-128.0.6613.113 depends on: xz->=5.4.0 -> xz-5.6.2 ===> chromium-128.0.6613.113 depends on: opus-* -> opus-1.5.2p0 ===> chromium-128.0.6613.113 depends on: pango-* -> pango-1.54.0 ===> chromium-128.0.6613.113 depends on: jpeg-* -> jpeg-3.0.3v0 ===> chromium-128.0.6613.113 depends on: aom-* -> aom-3.9.1p0 ===> chromium-128.0.6613.113 depends on: dav1d-* -> dav1d-1.2.1p3 ===> chromium-128.0.6613.113 depends on: libvpx-* -> libvpx-1.14.1p0v0 ===> chromium-128.0.6613.113 depends on: openh264-* -> openh264-2.4.1p1 ===> chromium-128.0.6613.113 depends on: nss-* -> nss-3.103 ===> chromium-128.0.6613.113 depends on: icu4c-* -> icu4c-75.1p0v0 ===> chromium-128.0.6613.113 depends on: libxslt-* -> libxslt-1.1.42 ===> chromium-128.0.6613.113 depends on: at-spi2-core-* -> at-spi2-core-2.52.0 ===> chromium-128.0.6613.113 depends on: libxkbcommon-* -> libxkbcommon-1.7.0 ===> chromium-128.0.6613.113 depends on: cups-libs-* -> cups-libs-2.4.10 ===> Verifying specs: GL X11 Xau Xcomposite Xdamage Xdmcp Xext Xfixes Xft Xi Xrandr Xrender Xtst aom atk-1.0 atk-bridge-2.0 atspi c cairo cbor crypto cups dav1d dbus-1 drm event execinfo expat ffi fido2 fontconfig freetype fribidi gbm gio-2.0 glib-2.0 gmodule-2.0 gobject-2.0 graphite2 gthread-2.0 harfbuzz harfbuzz-gobject harfbuzz-subset iconv icudata icui18n icuuc intl jpeg kvm m nspr4 nss3 nssutil3 openh264 opus pango-1.0 pangocairo-1.0 pangoft2-1.0 pcre2-8 pixman-1 plc4 plds4 png pthread pthread smime3 sndio usbhid util vpx xcb xcb-render xcb-shm xkbcommon xml2 xshmfence xslt z c++ c++abi pthread ===> found GL.19.1 X11.18.2 Xau.10.0 Xcomposite.4.0 Xdamage.4.0 Xdmcp.11.0 Xext.13.0 Xfixes.6.1 Xft.12.0 Xi.12.2 Xrandr.7.1 Xrender.6.0 Xtst.11.0 aom.4.2 atk-1.0.21810.2 atk-bridge-2.0.0.4 atspi.1.4 c.100.3 cairo.13.5 cbor.2.0 crypto.55.0 cups.7.3 dav1d.2.3 dbus-1.11.3 drm.7.13 event.4.1 execinfo.3.0 expat.14.1 ffi.2.1 fido2.7.0 fontconfig.13.1 freetype.30.4 fribidi.3.1 gbm.0.6 gio-2.0.4200.19 glib-2.0.4201.12 gmodule-2.0.4200.19 gobject-2.0.4200.19 graphite2.2.0 gthread-2.0.4200.19 harfbuzz.18.9 harfbuzz-gobject.1.2 harfbuzz-subset.2.5 iconv.7.1 icudata.22.3 icui18n.22.3 icuuc.22.3 intl.8.0 jpeg.71.0 kvm.17.0 m.10.1 nspr4.24.1 nss3.58.16 nssutil3.58.16 openh264.1.0 opus.1.5 pango-1.0.3801.5 pangocairo-1.0.3801.3 pangoft2-1.0.3801.3 pcre2-8.0.6 pixman-1.40.0 plc4.24.1 plds4.24.1 png.18.0 pthread.27.1 smime3.58.16 sndio.7.3 usbhid.7.1 util.18.0 vpx.17.0 xcb.4.1 xcb-render.1.1 xcb-shm.1.1 xkbcommon.2.1 xml2.21.0 xshmfence.0.0 xslt.4.1 z.7.1 c++.10.0 c++abi.7.0 aom-3.9.1p0 at-spi2-core-2.52.0 bash-5.2.32 bison-3.8.2 bzip2-1.0.8p0 cups-libs-2.4.10 dav1d-1.2.1p3 desktop-file-utils-0.27 flock-20110525p1 gmake-4.4.1 gperf-3.1p0 gtk+3-3.24.43 gtk+3-cups-3.24.43 gtk4-update-icon-cache-4.14.5 icu4c-75.1p0v0 jpeg-3.0.3v0 libexif-0.6.24 libudev-openbsd-20230921p0 libvpx-1.14.1p0v0 libxkbcommon-1.7.0 libxslt-1.1.42 llvm-17.0.6p12 ninja-1.11.1p0v0 node-20.17.0v0 noto-fonts-20201206 nss-3.103 openh264-2.4.1p1 opus-1.5.2p0 pango-1.54.0 pciutils-3.11.1 pulseaudio-17.0p0 py3-xcbgen-1.17.0p1 python-3.11.9p3 qtbase-5.15.13pl145 rust-1.80.1p0 rust-bindgen-0.69.4 xdg-utils-1.2.1 xz-5.6.2 Don't run junk because nojunk in cad/librecad (Junk lock released for riscv64-3 at 1726241723.84) distfiles size=7056066022 >>> Running patch in www/chromium at 1726241723.97 ===> www/chromium ===> Checking files for chromium-128.0.6613.113 `/usr/ports/distfiles/chromium-128.0.6613.113.tar.xz' is up to date. `/usr/ports/distfiles/chromium-128.0.6613.113-testdata.tar.xz' is up to date. `/usr/ports/distfiles/chrome-linux-128.0.6613.113-llvm17.profdata.tar.xz' is up to date. `/usr/ports/distfiles/test_fonts-336e775eec536b2d785cc80eff6ac39051931286.tar.gz' is up to date. >> (SHA256) chromium-128.0.6613.113.tar.xz: OK >> (SHA256) chromium-128.0.6613.113-testdata.tar.xz: OK >> (SHA256) chrome-linux-128.0.6613.113-llvm17.profdata.tar.xz: OK >> (SHA256) test_fonts-336e775eec536b2d785cc80eff6ac39051931286.tar.gz: OK ===> Extracting for chromium-128.0.6613.113 ===> Patching for chromium-128.0.6613.113 ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-BUILD_gn Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: BUILD.gn |--- BUILD.gn.orig |+++ BUILD.gn -------------------------- Patching file BUILD.gn using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 66. Hunk #2 succeeded at 98. Hunk #3 succeeded at 430. Hunk #4 succeeded at 625. Hunk #5 succeeded at 682. Hunk #6 succeeded at 1132. Hunk #7 succeeded at 1229. Hunk #8 succeeded at 1243. Hunk #9 succeeded at 1710. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-apps_ui_views_app_window_frame_view_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: apps/ui/views/app_window_frame_view.cc |--- apps/ui/views/app_window_frame_view.cc.orig |+++ apps/ui/views/app_window_frame_view.cc -------------------------- Patching file apps/ui/views/app_window_frame_view.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 149. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ash_display_mirror_window_controller_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ash/display/mirror_window_controller.cc |--- ash/display/mirror_window_controller.cc.orig |+++ ash/display/mirror_window_controller.cc -------------------------- Patching file ash/display/mirror_window_controller.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 294. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-base_BUILD_gn Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: base/BUILD.gn |--- base/BUILD.gn.orig |+++ base/BUILD.gn -------------------------- Patching file base/BUILD.gn using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 176. Hunk #2 succeeded at 1119. Hunk #3 succeeded at 1155. Hunk #4 succeeded at 2133. Hunk #5 succeeded at 2294. Hunk #6 succeeded at 2331. Hunk #7 succeeded at 3132. Hunk #8 succeeded at 3785. Hunk #9 succeeded at 3812. Hunk #10 succeeded at 3823. Hunk #11 succeeded at 4008. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-base_allocator_dispatcher_tls_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: base/allocator/dispatcher/tls.h |--- base/allocator/dispatcher/tls.h.orig |+++ base/allocator/dispatcher/tls.h -------------------------- Patching file base/allocator/dispatcher/tls.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 77. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-base_allocator_partition_allocator_partition_alloc_gni Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: base/allocator/partition_allocator/partition_alloc.gni |--- base/allocator/partition_allocator/partition_alloc.gni.orig |+++ base/allocator/partition_allocator/partition_alloc.gni -------------------------- Patching file base/allocator/partition_allocator/partition_alloc.gni using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 31. Hunk #2 succeeded at 361. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-base_allocator_partition_allocator_src_partition_alloc_BUILD_gn Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: base/allocator/partition_allocator/src/partition_alloc/BUILD.gn |--- base/allocator/partition_allocator/src/partition_alloc/BUILD.gn.orig |+++ base/allocator/partition_allocator/src/partition_alloc/BUILD.gn -------------------------- Patching file base/allocator/partition_allocator/src/partition_alloc/BUILD.gn using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 796. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-base_allocator_partition_allocator_src_partition_alloc_address_space_randomization_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: base/allocator/partition_allocator/src/partition_alloc/address_space_randomization.h |--- base/allocator/partition_allocator/src/partition_alloc/address_space_randomization.h.orig |+++ base/allocator/partition_allocator/src/partition_alloc/address_space_randomization.h -------------------------- Patching file base/allocator/partition_allocator/src/partition_alloc/address_space_randomization.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 38. Hunk #2 succeeded at 125. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-base_allocator_partition_allocator_src_partition_alloc_page_allocator_constants_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: base/allocator/partition_allocator/src/partition_alloc/page_allocator_constants.h |--- base/allocator/partition_allocator/src/partition_alloc/page_allocator_constants.h.orig |+++ base/allocator/partition_allocator/src/partition_alloc/page_allocator_constants.h -------------------------- Patching file base/allocator/partition_allocator/src/partition_alloc/page_allocator_constants.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 26. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-base_allocator_partition_allocator_src_partition_alloc_page_allocator_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: base/allocator/partition_allocator/src/partition_alloc/page_allocator.h |--- base/allocator/partition_allocator/src/partition_alloc/page_allocator.h.orig |+++ base/allocator/partition_allocator/src/partition_alloc/page_allocator.h -------------------------- Patching file base/allocator/partition_allocator/src/partition_alloc/page_allocator.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 269. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-base_allocator_partition_allocator_src_partition_alloc_page_allocator_internals_posix_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: base/allocator/partition_allocator/src/partition_alloc/page_allocator_internals_posix.cc |--- base/allocator/partition_allocator/src/partition_alloc/page_allocator_internals_posix.cc.orig |+++ base/allocator/partition_allocator/src/partition_alloc/page_allocator_internals_posix.cc -------------------------- Patching file base/allocator/partition_allocator/src/partition_alloc/page_allocator_internals_posix.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 9. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-base_allocator_partition_allocator_src_partition_alloc_page_allocator_internals_posix_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: base/allocator/partition_allocator/src/partition_alloc/page_allocator_internals_posix.h |--- base/allocator/partition_allocator/src/partition_alloc/page_allocator_internals_posix.h.orig |+++ base/allocator/partition_allocator/src/partition_alloc/page_allocator_internals_posix.h -------------------------- Patching file base/allocator/partition_allocator/src/partition_alloc/page_allocator_internals_posix.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 411. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-base_allocator_partition_allocator_src_partition_alloc_partition_alloc_base_debug_proc_maps_linux_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: base/allocator/partition_allocator/src/partition_alloc/partition_alloc_base/debug/proc_maps_linux.cc |--- base/allocator/partition_allocator/src/partition_alloc/partition_alloc_base/debug/proc_maps_linux.cc.orig |+++ base/allocator/partition_allocator/src/partition_alloc/partition_alloc_base/debug/proc_maps_linux.cc -------------------------- Patching file base/allocator/partition_allocator/src/partition_alloc/partition_alloc_base/debug/proc_maps_linux.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 19. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-base_allocator_partition_allocator_src_partition_alloc_partition_alloc_base_debug_stack_trace_posix_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: base/allocator/partition_allocator/src/partition_alloc/partition_alloc_base/debug/stack_trace_posix.cc |--- base/allocator/partition_allocator/src/partition_alloc/partition_alloc_base/debug/stack_trace_posix.cc.orig |+++ base/allocator/partition_allocator/src/partition_alloc/partition_alloc_base/debug/stack_trace_posix.cc -------------------------- Patching file base/allocator/partition_allocator/src/partition_alloc/partition_alloc_base/debug/stack_trace_posix.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 13. Hunk #2 succeeded at 25. Hunk #3 succeeded at 369. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-base_allocator_partition_allocator_src_partition_alloc_partition_alloc_base_rand_util_posix_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: base/allocator/partition_allocator/src/partition_alloc/partition_alloc_base/rand_util_posix.cc |--- base/allocator/partition_allocator/src/partition_alloc/partition_alloc_base/rand_util_posix.cc.orig |+++ base/allocator/partition_allocator/src/partition_alloc/partition_alloc_base/rand_util_posix.cc -------------------------- Patching file base/allocator/partition_allocator/src/partition_alloc/partition_alloc_base/rand_util_posix.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 102. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-base_allocator_partition_allocator_src_partition_alloc_partition_alloc_base_threading_platform_thread_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: base/allocator/partition_allocator/src/partition_alloc/partition_alloc_base/threading/platform_thread.h |--- base/allocator/partition_allocator/src/partition_alloc/partition_alloc_base/threading/platform_thread.h.orig |+++ base/allocator/partition_allocator/src/partition_alloc/partition_alloc_base/threading/platform_thread.h -------------------------- Patching file base/allocator/partition_allocator/src/partition_alloc/partition_alloc_base/threading/platform_thread.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 37. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-base_allocator_partition_allocator_src_partition_alloc_partition_alloc_base_threading_platform_thread_internal_posix_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: base/allocator/partition_allocator/src/partition_alloc/partition_alloc_base/threading/platform_thread_internal_posix.h |--- base/allocator/partition_allocator/src/partition_alloc/partition_alloc_base/threading/platform_thread_internal_posix.h.orig |+++ base/allocator/partition_allocator/src/partition_alloc/partition_alloc_base/threading/platform_thread_internal_posix.h -------------------------- Patching file base/allocator/partition_allocator/src/partition_alloc/partition_alloc_base/threading/platform_thread_internal_posix.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 10. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-base_allocator_partition_allocator_src_partition_alloc_partition_alloc_base_threading_platform_thread_posix_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: base/allocator/partition_allocator/src/partition_alloc/partition_alloc_base/threading/platform_thread_posix.cc |--- base/allocator/partition_allocator/src/partition_alloc/partition_alloc_base/threading/platform_thread_posix.cc.orig |+++ base/allocator/partition_allocator/src/partition_alloc/partition_alloc_base/threading/platform_thread_posix.cc -------------------------- Patching file base/allocator/partition_allocator/src/partition_alloc/partition_alloc_base/threading/platform_thread_posix.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 18. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-base_allocator_partition_allocator_src_partition_alloc_partition_alloc_config_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: base/allocator/partition_allocator/src/partition_alloc/partition_alloc_config.h |--- base/allocator/partition_allocator/src/partition_alloc/partition_alloc_config.h.orig |+++ base/allocator/partition_allocator/src/partition_alloc/partition_alloc_config.h -------------------------- Patching file base/allocator/partition_allocator/src/partition_alloc/partition_alloc_config.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 168. Hunk #2 succeeded at 216. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-base_allocator_partition_allocator_src_partition_alloc_partition_alloc_constants_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: base/allocator/partition_allocator/src/partition_alloc/partition_alloc_constants.h |--- base/allocator/partition_allocator/src/partition_alloc/partition_alloc_constants.h.orig |+++ base/allocator/partition_allocator/src/partition_alloc/partition_alloc_constants.h -------------------------- Patching file base/allocator/partition_allocator/src/partition_alloc/partition_alloc_constants.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 329. Hunk #2 succeeded at 458. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-base_allocator_partition_allocator_src_partition_alloc_partition_alloc_forward_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: base/allocator/partition_allocator/src/partition_alloc/partition_alloc_forward.h |--- base/allocator/partition_allocator/src/partition_alloc/partition_alloc_forward.h.orig |+++ base/allocator/partition_allocator/src/partition_alloc/partition_alloc_forward.h -------------------------- Patching file base/allocator/partition_allocator/src/partition_alloc/partition_alloc_forward.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 28. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-base_allocator_partition_allocator_src_partition_alloc_partition_root_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: base/allocator/partition_allocator/src/partition_alloc/partition_root.cc |--- base/allocator/partition_allocator/src/partition_alloc/partition_root.cc.orig |+++ base/allocator/partition_allocator/src/partition_alloc/partition_root.cc -------------------------- Patching file base/allocator/partition_allocator/src/partition_alloc/partition_root.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 43. Hunk #2 succeeded at 277. Hunk #3 succeeded at 1074. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-base_allocator_partition_allocator_src_partition_alloc_spinning_mutex_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: base/allocator/partition_allocator/src/partition_alloc/spinning_mutex.cc |--- base/allocator/partition_allocator/src/partition_alloc/spinning_mutex.cc.orig |+++ base/allocator/partition_allocator/src/partition_alloc/spinning_mutex.cc -------------------------- Patching file base/allocator/partition_allocator/src/partition_alloc/spinning_mutex.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 17. Hunk #2 succeeded at 115. Hunk #3 succeeded at 136. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-base_allocator_partition_allocator_src_partition_alloc_stack_stack_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: base/allocator/partition_allocator/src/partition_alloc/stack/stack.cc |--- base/allocator/partition_allocator/src/partition_alloc/stack/stack.cc.orig |+++ base/allocator/partition_allocator/src/partition_alloc/stack/stack.cc -------------------------- Patching file base/allocator/partition_allocator/src/partition_alloc/stack/stack.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 18. Hunk #2 succeeded at 52. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-base_allocator_partition_allocator_src_partition_alloc_thread_isolation_pkey_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: base/allocator/partition_allocator/src/partition_alloc/thread_isolation/pkey.cc |--- base/allocator/partition_allocator/src/partition_alloc/thread_isolation/pkey.cc.orig |+++ base/allocator/partition_allocator/src/partition_alloc/thread_isolation/pkey.cc -------------------------- Patching file base/allocator/partition_allocator/src/partition_alloc/thread_isolation/pkey.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 16. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-base_atomicops_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: base/atomicops.h |--- base/atomicops.h.orig |+++ base/atomicops.h -------------------------- Patching file base/atomicops.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 71. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-base_base_paths_posix_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: base/base_paths_posix.cc |--- base/base_paths_posix.cc.orig |+++ base/base_paths_posix.cc -------------------------- Patching file base/base_paths_posix.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 15. Hunk #2 succeeded at 27. Hunk #3 succeeded at 54. Hunk #4 succeeded at 71. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-base_compiler_specific_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: base/compiler_specific.h |--- base/compiler_specific.h.orig |+++ base/compiler_specific.h -------------------------- Patching file base/compiler_specific.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 326. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-base_debug_debugger_posix_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: base/debug/debugger_posix.cc |--- base/debug/debugger_posix.cc.orig |+++ base/debug/debugger_posix.cc -------------------------- Patching file base/debug/debugger_posix.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 41. Hunk #2 succeeded at 104. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-base_debug_elf_reader_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: base/debug/elf_reader.cc |--- base/debug/elf_reader.cc.orig |+++ base/debug/elf_reader.cc -------------------------- Patching file base/debug/elf_reader.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 50. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-base_debug_proc_maps_linux_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: base/debug/proc_maps_linux.cc |--- base/debug/proc_maps_linux.cc.orig |+++ base/debug/proc_maps_linux.cc -------------------------- Patching file base/debug/proc_maps_linux.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 18. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-base_debug_stack_trace_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: base/debug/stack_trace.cc |--- base/debug/stack_trace.cc.orig |+++ base/debug/stack_trace.cc -------------------------- Patching file base/debug/stack_trace.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 255. Hunk #2 succeeded at 317. Hunk #3 succeeded at 341. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-base_debug_stack_trace_posix_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: base/debug/stack_trace_posix.cc |--- base/debug/stack_trace_posix.cc.orig |+++ base/debug/stack_trace_posix.cc -------------------------- Patching file base/debug/stack_trace_posix.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 46. Hunk #2 succeeded at 64. Hunk #3 succeeded at 309. Hunk #4 succeeded at 326. Hunk #5 succeeded at 547. Hunk #6 succeeded at 572. Hunk #7 succeeded at 587. Hunk #8 succeeded at 777. Hunk #9 succeeded at 870. Hunk #10 succeeded at 896. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-base_features_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: base/features.cc |--- base/features.cc.orig |+++ base/features.cc -------------------------- Patching file base/features.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 9. Hunk #2 succeeded at 118. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-base_files_dir_reader_linux_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: base/files/dir_reader_linux.h |--- base/files/dir_reader_linux.h.orig |+++ base/files/dir_reader_linux.h -------------------------- Patching file base/files/dir_reader_linux.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 21. Hunk #2 succeeded at 38. Hunk #3 succeeded at 73. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-base_files_dir_reader_posix_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: base/files/dir_reader_posix.h |--- base/files/dir_reader_posix.h.orig |+++ base/files/dir_reader_posix.h -------------------------- Patching file base/files/dir_reader_posix.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 17. Hunk #2 succeeded at 25. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-base_files_file_path_watcher_bsd_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: base/files/file_path_watcher_bsd.cc |--- base/files/file_path_watcher_bsd.cc.orig |+++ base/files/file_path_watcher_bsd.cc -------------------------- (Creating file base/files/file_path_watcher_bsd.cc...) Patching file base/files/file_path_watcher_bsd.cc using Plan A... Empty context always matches. Hunk #1 succeeded at 1. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-base_files_file_path_watcher_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: base/files/file_path_watcher.h |--- base/files/file_path_watcher.h.orig |+++ base/files/file_path_watcher.h -------------------------- Patching file base/files/file_path_watcher.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 105. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-base_files_file_path_watcher_kqueue_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: base/files/file_path_watcher_kqueue.h |--- base/files/file_path_watcher_kqueue.h.orig |+++ base/files/file_path_watcher_kqueue.h -------------------------- Patching file base/files/file_path_watcher_kqueue.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 5. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-base_files_file_path_watcher_unittest_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: base/files/file_path_watcher_unittest.cc |--- base/files/file_path_watcher_unittest.cc.orig |+++ base/files/file_path_watcher_unittest.cc -------------------------- Patching file base/files/file_path_watcher_unittest.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 902. Hunk #2 succeeded at 1848. Hunk #3 succeeded at 1882. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-base_files_file_util_posix_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: base/files/file_util_posix.cc |--- base/files/file_util_posix.cc.orig |+++ base/files/file_util_posix.cc -------------------------- Patching file base/files/file_util_posix.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 889. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-base_files_file_util_unittest_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: base/files/file_util_unittest.cc |--- base/files/file_util_unittest.cc.orig |+++ base/files/file_util_unittest.cc -------------------------- Patching file base/files/file_util_unittest.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 3903. Hunk #2 succeeded at 4620. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-base_files_important_file_writer_cleaner_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: base/files/important_file_writer_cleaner.cc |--- base/files/important_file_writer_cleaner.cc.orig |+++ base/files/important_file_writer_cleaner.cc -------------------------- Patching file base/files/important_file_writer_cleaner.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 25. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-base_files_scoped_file_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: base/files/scoped_file.cc |--- base/files/scoped_file.cc.orig |+++ base/files/scoped_file.cc -------------------------- Patching file base/files/scoped_file.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 32. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-base_functional_unretained_traits_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: base/functional/unretained_traits.h |--- base/functional/unretained_traits.h.orig |+++ base/functional/unretained_traits.h -------------------------- Patching file base/functional/unretained_traits.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 93. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-base_i18n_icu_util_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: base/i18n/icu_util.cc |--- base/i18n/icu_util.cc.orig |+++ base/i18n/icu_util.cc -------------------------- Patching file base/i18n/icu_util.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 52. Hunk #2 succeeded at 328. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-base_linux_util_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: base/linux_util.cc |--- base/linux_util.cc.orig |+++ base/linux_util.cc -------------------------- Patching file base/linux_util.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 154. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-base_logging_unittest_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: base/logging_unittest.cc |--- base/logging_unittest.cc.orig |+++ base/logging_unittest.cc -------------------------- Patching file base/logging_unittest.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 41. Hunk #2 succeeded at 579. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-base_memory_discardable_memory_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: base/memory/discardable_memory.cc |--- base/memory/discardable_memory.cc.orig |+++ base/memory/discardable_memory.cc -------------------------- Patching file base/memory/discardable_memory.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 26. Hunk #2 succeeded at 52. Hunk #3 succeeded at 71. Hunk #4 succeeded at 101. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-base_memory_discardable_memory_internal_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: base/memory/discardable_memory_internal.h |--- base/memory/discardable_memory_internal.h.orig |+++ base/memory/discardable_memory_internal.h -------------------------- Patching file base/memory/discardable_memory_internal.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 10. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-base_memory_madv_free_discardable_memory_posix_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: base/memory/madv_free_discardable_memory_posix.cc |--- base/memory/madv_free_discardable_memory_posix.cc.orig |+++ base/memory/madv_free_discardable_memory_posix.cc -------------------------- Patching file base/memory/madv_free_discardable_memory_posix.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 311. Hunk #2 succeeded at 330. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-base_memory_platform_shared_memory_region_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: base/memory/platform_shared_memory_region.h |--- base/memory/platform_shared_memory_region.h.orig |+++ base/memory/platform_shared_memory_region.h -------------------------- Patching file base/memory/platform_shared_memory_region.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 17. Hunk #2 succeeded at 84. Hunk #3 succeeded at 216. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-base_memory_platform_shared_memory_region_posix_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: base/memory/platform_shared_memory_region_posix.cc |--- base/memory/platform_shared_memory_region_posix.cc.orig |+++ base/memory/platform_shared_memory_region_posix.cc -------------------------- Patching file base/memory/platform_shared_memory_region_posix.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 55. Hunk #2 succeeded at 168. Hunk #3 succeeded at 197. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-base_message_loop_message_pump_glib_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: base/message_loop/message_pump_glib.cc |--- base/message_loop/message_pump_glib.cc.orig |+++ base/message_loop/message_pump_glib.cc -------------------------- Patching file base/message_loop/message_pump_glib.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 8. Hunk #2 succeeded at 56. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-base_native_library_posix_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: base/native_library_posix.cc |--- base/native_library_posix.cc.orig |+++ base/native_library_posix.cc -------------------------- Patching file base/native_library_posix.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 34. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-base_native_library_unittest_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: base/native_library_unittest.cc |--- base/native_library_unittest.cc.orig |+++ base/native_library_unittest.cc -------------------------- Patching file base/native_library_unittest.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 133. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-base_posix_can_lower_nice_to_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: base/posix/can_lower_nice_to.cc |--- base/posix/can_lower_nice_to.cc.orig |+++ base/posix/can_lower_nice_to.cc -------------------------- Patching file base/posix/can_lower_nice_to.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 11. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-base_posix_sysctl_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: base/posix/sysctl.cc |--- base/posix/sysctl.cc.orig |+++ base/posix/sysctl.cc -------------------------- Patching file base/posix/sysctl.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 4. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-base_posix_unix_domain_socket_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: base/posix/unix_domain_socket.cc |--- base/posix/unix_domain_socket.cc.orig |+++ base/posix/unix_domain_socket.cc -------------------------- Patching file base/posix/unix_domain_socket.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 56. Hunk #2 succeeded at 82. Hunk #3 succeeded at 90. Hunk #4 succeeded at 154. Hunk #5 succeeded at 182. Hunk #6 succeeded at 216. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-base_posix_unix_domain_socket_unittest_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: base/posix/unix_domain_socket_unittest.cc |--- base/posix/unix_domain_socket_unittest.cc.orig |+++ base/posix/unix_domain_socket_unittest.cc -------------------------- Patching file base/posix/unix_domain_socket_unittest.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 15. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-base_process_internal_linux_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: base/process/internal_linux.h |--- base/process/internal_linux.h.orig |+++ base/process/internal_linux.h -------------------------- Patching file base/process/internal_linux.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 140. Hunk #2 succeeded at 162. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-base_process_kill_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: base/process/kill.h |--- base/process/kill.h.orig |+++ base/process/kill.h -------------------------- Patching file base/process/kill.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 123. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-base_process_kill_posix_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: base/process/kill_posix.cc |--- base/process/kill_posix.cc.orig |+++ base/process/kill_posix.cc -------------------------- Patching file base/process/kill_posix.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 157. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-base_process_launch_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: base/process/launch.h |--- base/process/launch.h.orig |+++ base/process/launch.h -------------------------- Patching file base/process/launch.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 211. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-base_process_launch_posix_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: base/process/launch_posix.cc |--- base/process/launch_posix.cc.orig |+++ base/process/launch_posix.cc -------------------------- Patching file base/process/launch_posix.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 66. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-base_process_memory_linux_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: base/process/memory_linux.cc |--- base/process/memory_linux.cc.orig |+++ base/process/memory_linux.cc -------------------------- Patching file base/process/memory_linux.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 28. Hunk #2 succeeded at 38. Hunk #3 succeeded at 54. Hunk #4 succeeded at 115. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-base_process_process_handle_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: base/process/process_handle.cc |--- base/process/process_handle.cc.orig |+++ base/process/process_handle.cc -------------------------- Patching file base/process/process_handle.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 30. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-base_process_process_handle_freebsd_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: base/process/process_handle_freebsd.cc |--- base/process/process_handle_freebsd.cc.orig |+++ base/process/process_handle_freebsd.cc -------------------------- Patching file base/process/process_handle_freebsd.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 3. Hunk #2 succeeded at 21. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-base_process_process_handle_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: base/process/process_handle.h |--- base/process/process_handle.h.orig |+++ base/process/process_handle.h -------------------------- Patching file base/process/process_handle.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 86. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-base_process_process_handle_openbsd_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: base/process/process_handle_openbsd.cc |--- base/process/process_handle_openbsd.cc.orig |+++ base/process/process_handle_openbsd.cc -------------------------- Patching file base/process/process_handle_openbsd.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 3. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-base_process_process_iterator_freebsd_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: base/process/process_iterator_freebsd.cc |--- base/process/process_iterator_freebsd.cc.orig |+++ base/process/process_iterator_freebsd.cc -------------------------- Patching file base/process/process_iterator_freebsd.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 18. Hunk #2 succeeded at 37. Hunk #3 succeeded at 47. Hunk #4 succeeded at 68. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-base_process_process_iterator_openbsd_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: base/process/process_iterator_openbsd.cc |--- base/process/process_iterator_openbsd.cc.orig |+++ base/process/process_iterator_openbsd.cc -------------------------- Patching file base/process/process_iterator_openbsd.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 6. Hunk #2 succeeded at 19. Hunk #3 succeeded at 34. Hunk #4 succeeded at 50. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-base_process_process_metrics_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: base/process/process_metrics.cc |--- base/process/process_metrics.cc.orig |+++ base/process/process_metrics.cc -------------------------- Patching file base/process/process_metrics.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 17. Hunk #2 succeeded at 54. Hunk #3 succeeded at 73. Hunk #4 succeeded at 100. Hunk #5 succeeded at 128. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-base_process_process_metrics_freebsd_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: base/process/process_metrics_freebsd.cc |--- base/process/process_metrics_freebsd.cc.orig |+++ base/process/process_metrics_freebsd.cc -------------------------- Patching file base/process/process_metrics_freebsd.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 3. Hunk #2 succeeded at 76. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-base_process_process_metrics_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: base/process/process_metrics.h |--- base/process/process_metrics.h.orig |+++ base/process/process_metrics.h -------------------------- Patching file base/process/process_metrics.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 38. Hunk #2 succeeded at 48. Hunk #3 succeeded at 116. Hunk #4 succeeded at 150. Hunk #5 succeeded at 195. Hunk #6 succeeded at 216. Hunk #7 succeeded at 238. Hunk #8 succeeded at 282. Hunk #9 succeeded at 317. Hunk #10 succeeded at 332. Hunk #11 succeeded at 369. Hunk #12 succeeded at 564. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-base_process_process_metrics_openbsd_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: base/process/process_metrics_openbsd.cc |--- base/process/process_metrics_openbsd.cc.orig |+++ base/process/process_metrics_openbsd.cc -------------------------- Patching file base/process/process_metrics_openbsd.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 6. Hunk #2 succeeded at 61. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-base_process_process_metrics_posix_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: base/process/process_metrics_posix.cc |--- base/process/process_metrics_posix.cc.orig |+++ base/process/process_metrics_posix.cc -------------------------- Patching file base/process/process_metrics_posix.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 21. Hunk #2 succeeded at 136. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-base_process_process_metrics_unittest_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: base/process/process_metrics_unittest.cc |--- base/process/process_metrics_unittest.cc.orig |+++ base/process/process_metrics_unittest.cc -------------------------- Patching file base/process/process_metrics_unittest.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 62. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-base_process_process_posix_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: base/process/process_posix.cc |--- base/process/process_posix.cc.orig |+++ base/process/process_posix.cc -------------------------- Patching file base/process/process_posix.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 23. Hunk #2 succeeded at 104. Hunk #3 succeeded at 381. Hunk #4 succeeded at 418. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-base_process_process_unittest_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: base/process/process_unittest.cc |--- base/process/process_unittest.cc.orig |+++ base/process/process_unittest.cc -------------------------- Patching file base/process/process_unittest.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 199. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-base_profiler_module_cache_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: base/profiler/module_cache.cc |--- base/profiler/module_cache.cc.orig |+++ base/profiler/module_cache.cc -------------------------- Patching file base/profiler/module_cache.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 38. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-base_profiler_sampling_profiler_thread_token_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: base/profiler/sampling_profiler_thread_token.cc |--- base/profiler/sampling_profiler_thread_token.cc.orig |+++ base/profiler/sampling_profiler_thread_token.cc -------------------------- Patching file base/profiler/sampling_profiler_thread_token.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 6. Hunk #2 succeeded at 18. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-base_profiler_sampling_profiler_thread_token_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: base/profiler/sampling_profiler_thread_token.h |--- base/profiler/sampling_profiler_thread_token.h.orig |+++ base/profiler/sampling_profiler_thread_token.h -------------------------- Patching file base/profiler/sampling_profiler_thread_token.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 13. Hunk #2 succeeded at 27. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-base_profiler_stack_base_address_posix_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: base/profiler/stack_base_address_posix.cc |--- base/profiler/stack_base_address_posix.cc.orig |+++ base/profiler/stack_base_address_posix.cc -------------------------- Patching file base/profiler/stack_base_address_posix.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 17. Hunk #2 succeeded at 49. Hunk #3 succeeded at 76. Hunk #4 succeeded at 100. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-base_profiler_stack_sampling_profiler_test_util_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: base/profiler/stack_sampling_profiler_test_util.cc |--- base/profiler/stack_sampling_profiler_test_util.cc.orig |+++ base/profiler/stack_sampling_profiler_test_util.cc -------------------------- Patching file base/profiler/stack_sampling_profiler_test_util.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 42. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-base_profiler_stack_sampling_profiler_unittest_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: base/profiler/stack_sampling_profiler_unittest.cc |--- base/profiler/stack_sampling_profiler_unittest.cc.orig |+++ base/profiler/stack_sampling_profiler_unittest.cc -------------------------- Patching file base/profiler/stack_sampling_profiler_unittest.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 45. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-base_profiler_thread_delegate_posix_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: base/profiler/thread_delegate_posix.cc |--- base/profiler/thread_delegate_posix.cc.orig |+++ base/profiler/thread_delegate_posix.cc -------------------------- Patching file base/profiler/thread_delegate_posix.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 19. Hunk #2 succeeded at 28. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-base_rand_util_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: base/rand_util.h |--- base/rand_util.h.orig |+++ base/rand_util.h -------------------------- Patching file base/rand_util.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 147. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-base_rand_util_posix_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: base/rand_util_posix.cc |--- base/rand_util_posix.cc.orig |+++ base/rand_util_posix.cc -------------------------- Patching file base/rand_util_posix.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 28. Hunk #2 succeeded at 44. Hunk #3 succeeded at 69. Hunk #4 succeeded at 183. Hunk #5 succeeded at 220. Hunk #6 succeeded at 242. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-base_strings_safe_sprintf_unittest_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: base/strings/safe_sprintf_unittest.cc |--- base/strings/safe_sprintf_unittest.cc.orig |+++ base/strings/safe_sprintf_unittest.cc -------------------------- Patching file base/strings/safe_sprintf_unittest.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 740. Hunk #2 succeeded at 757. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-base_synchronization_lock_impl_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: base/synchronization/lock_impl.h |--- base/synchronization/lock_impl.h.orig |+++ base/synchronization/lock_impl.h -------------------------- Patching file base/synchronization/lock_impl.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 109. Hunk #2 succeeded at 133. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-base_syslog_logging_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: base/syslog_logging.cc |--- base/syslog_logging.cc.orig |+++ base/syslog_logging.cc -------------------------- Patching file base/syslog_logging.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 17. Hunk #2 succeeded at 149. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-base_system_sys_info_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: base/system/sys_info.cc |--- base/system/sys_info.cc.orig |+++ base/system/sys_info.cc -------------------------- Patching file base/system/sys_info.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 223. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-base_system_sys_info_freebsd_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: base/system/sys_info_freebsd.cc |--- base/system/sys_info_freebsd.cc.orig |+++ base/system/sys_info_freebsd.cc -------------------------- Patching file base/system/sys_info_freebsd.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 9. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-base_system_sys_info_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: base/system/sys_info.h |--- base/system/sys_info.h.orig |+++ base/system/sys_info.h -------------------------- Patching file base/system/sys_info.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 325. Hunk #2 succeeded at 339. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-base_system_sys_info_openbsd_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: base/system/sys_info_openbsd.cc |--- base/system/sys_info_openbsd.cc.orig |+++ base/system/sys_info_openbsd.cc -------------------------- Patching file base/system/sys_info_openbsd.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 3. Hunk #2 succeeded at 11. Hunk #3 succeeded at 27. Hunk #4 succeeded at 46. Hunk #5 succeeded at 77. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-base_system_sys_info_posix_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: base/system/sys_info_posix.cc |--- base/system/sys_info_posix.cc.orig |+++ base/system/sys_info_posix.cc -------------------------- Patching file base/system/sys_info_posix.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 118. Hunk #2 succeeded at 175. Hunk #3 succeeded at 265. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-base_system_sys_info_unittest_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: base/system/sys_info_unittest.cc |--- base/system/sys_info_unittest.cc.orig |+++ base/system/sys_info_unittest.cc -------------------------- Patching file base/system/sys_info_unittest.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 265. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-base_task_thread_pool_environment_config_unittest_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: base/task/thread_pool/environment_config_unittest.cc |--- base/task/thread_pool/environment_config_unittest.cc.orig |+++ base/task/thread_pool/environment_config_unittest.cc -------------------------- Patching file base/task/thread_pool/environment_config_unittest.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 15. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-base_test_launcher_test_launcher_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: base/test/launcher/test_launcher.cc |--- base/test/launcher/test_launcher.cc.orig |+++ base/test/launcher/test_launcher.cc -------------------------- Patching file base/test/launcher/test_launcher.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 74. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-base_test_test_file_util_linux_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: base/test/test_file_util_linux.cc |--- base/test/test_file_util_linux.cc.orig |+++ base/test/test_file_util_linux.cc -------------------------- Patching file base/test/test_file_util_linux.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 54. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-base_test_test_file_util_posix_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: base/test/test_file_util_posix.cc |--- base/test/test_file_util_posix.cc.orig |+++ base/test/test_file_util_posix.cc -------------------------- Patching file base/test/test_file_util_posix.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 91. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-base_threading_hang_watcher_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: base/threading/hang_watcher.cc |--- base/threading/hang_watcher.cc.orig |+++ base/threading/hang_watcher.cc -------------------------- Patching file base/threading/hang_watcher.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 354. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-base_threading_platform_thread_bsd_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: base/threading/platform_thread_bsd.cc |--- base/threading/platform_thread_bsd.cc.orig |+++ base/threading/platform_thread_bsd.cc -------------------------- (Creating file base/threading/platform_thread_bsd.cc...) Patching file base/threading/platform_thread_bsd.cc using Plan A... Empty context always matches. Hunk #1 succeeded at 1. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-base_threading_platform_thread_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: base/threading/platform_thread.h |--- base/threading/platform_thread.h.orig |+++ base/threading/platform_thread.h -------------------------- Patching file base/threading/platform_thread.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 49. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-base_threading_platform_thread_internal_posix_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: base/threading/platform_thread_internal_posix.cc |--- base/threading/platform_thread_internal_posix.cc.orig |+++ base/threading/platform_thread_internal_posix.cc -------------------------- Patching file base/threading/platform_thread_internal_posix.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 42. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-base_threading_platform_thread_posix_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: base/threading/platform_thread_posix.cc |--- base/threading/platform_thread_posix.cc.orig |+++ base/threading/platform_thread_posix.cc -------------------------- Patching file base/threading/platform_thread_posix.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 77. Hunk #2 succeeded at 265. Hunk #3 succeeded at 357. Hunk #4 succeeded at 378. Hunk #5 succeeded at 403. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-base_threading_platform_thread_unittest_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: base/threading/platform_thread_unittest.cc |--- base/threading/platform_thread_unittest.cc.orig |+++ base/threading/platform_thread_unittest.cc -------------------------- Patching file base/threading/platform_thread_unittest.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 38. Hunk #2 succeeded at 429. Hunk #3 succeeded at 713. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-base_trace_event_malloc_dump_provider_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: base/trace_event/malloc_dump_provider.cc |--- base/trace_event/malloc_dump_provider.cc.orig |+++ base/trace_event/malloc_dump_provider.cc -------------------------- Patching file base/trace_event/malloc_dump_provider.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 28. Hunk #2 succeeded at 180. Hunk #3 succeeded at 370. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-base_trace_event_memory_dump_manager_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: base/trace_event/memory_dump_manager.cc |--- base/trace_event/memory_dump_manager.cc.orig |+++ base/trace_event/memory_dump_manager.cc -------------------------- Patching file base/trace_event/memory_dump_manager.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 87. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-base_trace_event_process_memory_dump_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: base/trace_event/process_memory_dump.cc |--- base/trace_event/process_memory_dump.cc.orig |+++ base/trace_event/process_memory_dump.cc -------------------------- Patching file base/trace_event/process_memory_dump.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 120. Hunk #2 succeeded at 143. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-base_tracing_trace_time_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: base/tracing/trace_time.cc |--- base/tracing/trace_time.cc.orig |+++ base/tracing/trace_time.cc -------------------------- Patching file base/tracing/trace_time.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 8. Hunk #2 succeeded at 28. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-base_tracing_trace_time_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: base/tracing/trace_time.h |--- base/tracing/trace_time.h.orig |+++ base/tracing/trace_time.h -------------------------- Patching file base/tracing/trace_time.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 12. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-build_config_BUILDCONFIG_gn Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: build/config/BUILDCONFIG.gn |--- build/config/BUILDCONFIG.gn.orig |+++ build/config/BUILDCONFIG.gn -------------------------- Patching file build/config/BUILDCONFIG.gn using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 136. Hunk #2 succeeded at 232. Hunk #3 succeeded at 279. Hunk #4 succeeded at 315. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-build_config_BUILD_gn Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: build/config/BUILD.gn |--- build/config/BUILD.gn.orig |+++ build/config/BUILD.gn -------------------------- Patching file build/config/BUILD.gn using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 213. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-build_config_clang_BUILD_gn Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: build/config/clang/BUILD.gn |--- build/config/clang/BUILD.gn.orig |+++ build/config/clang/BUILD.gn -------------------------- Patching file build/config/clang/BUILD.gn using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 237. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-build_config_compiler_BUILD_gn Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: build/config/compiler/BUILD.gn |--- build/config/compiler/BUILD.gn.orig |+++ build/config/compiler/BUILD.gn -------------------------- Patching file build/config/compiler/BUILD.gn using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 199. Hunk #2 succeeded at 251. Hunk #3 succeeded at 506. Hunk #4 succeeded at 563. Hunk #5 succeeded at 1204. Hunk #6 succeeded at 1219. Hunk #7 succeeded at 1554. Hunk #8 succeeded at 1612. Hunk #9 succeeded at 1945. Hunk #10 succeeded at 1952. Hunk #11 succeeded at 2677. Hunk #12 succeeded at 2704. Hunk #13 succeeded at 2869. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-build_config_linux_BUILD_gn Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: build/config/linux/BUILD.gn |--- build/config/linux/BUILD.gn.orig |+++ build/config/linux/BUILD.gn -------------------------- Patching file build/config/linux/BUILD.gn using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 41. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-build_config_linux_pkg-config_py Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: build/config/linux/pkg-config.py |--- build/config/linux/pkg-config.py.orig |+++ build/config/linux/pkg-config.py -------------------------- Patching file build/config/linux/pkg-config.py using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 108. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-build_config_ozone_gni Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: build/config/ozone.gni |--- build/config/ozone.gni.orig |+++ build/config/ozone.gni -------------------------- Patching file build/config/ozone.gni using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 84. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-build_config_rust_gni Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: build/config/rust.gni |--- build/config/rust.gni.orig |+++ build/config/rust.gni -------------------------- Patching file build/config/rust.gni using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 270. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-build_config_v8_target_cpu_gni Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: build/config/v8_target_cpu.gni |--- build/config/v8_target_cpu.gni.orig |+++ build/config/v8_target_cpu.gni -------------------------- Patching file build/config/v8_target_cpu.gni using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 36. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-build_detect_host_arch_py Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: build/detect_host_arch.py |--- build/detect_host_arch.py.orig |+++ build/detect_host_arch.py -------------------------- Patching file build/detect_host_arch.py using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 20. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-build_gn_run_binary_py Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: build/gn_run_binary.py |--- build/gn_run_binary.py.orig |+++ build/gn_run_binary.py -------------------------- Patching file build/gn_run_binary.py using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 23. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-build_linux_chrome_map Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: build/linux/chrome.map |--- build/linux/chrome.map.orig |+++ build/linux/chrome.map -------------------------- Patching file build/linux/chrome.map using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 20. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-build_linux_strip_binary_py Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: build/linux/strip_binary.py |--- build/linux/strip_binary.py.orig |+++ build/linux/strip_binary.py -------------------------- Patching file build/linux/strip_binary.py using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 10. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-build_linux_unbundle_icu_gn Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: build/linux/unbundle/icu.gn |--- build/linux/unbundle/icu.gn.orig |+++ build/linux/unbundle/icu.gn -------------------------- Patching file build/linux/unbundle/icu.gn using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 17. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-build_linux_unbundle_libevent_gn Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: build/linux/unbundle/libevent.gn |--- build/linux/unbundle/libevent.gn.orig |+++ build/linux/unbundle/libevent.gn -------------------------- Patching file build/linux/unbundle/libevent.gn using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 9. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-build_linux_unbundle_libusb_gn Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: build/linux/unbundle/libusb.gn |--- build/linux/unbundle/libusb.gn.orig |+++ build/linux/unbundle/libusb.gn -------------------------- Patching file build/linux/unbundle/libusb.gn using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 1. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-build_rust_rust_bindgen_gni Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: build/rust/rust_bindgen.gni |--- build/rust/rust_bindgen.gni.orig |+++ build/rust/rust_bindgen.gni -------------------------- Patching file build/rust/rust_bindgen.gni using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 11. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-build_rust_std_BUILD_gn Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: build/rust/std/BUILD.gn |--- build/rust/std/BUILD.gn.orig |+++ build/rust/std/BUILD.gn -------------------------- Patching file build/rust/std/BUILD.gn using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 100. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-build_toolchain_freebsd_BUILD_gn Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: build/toolchain/freebsd/BUILD.gn |--- build/toolchain/freebsd/BUILD.gn.orig |+++ build/toolchain/freebsd/BUILD.gn -------------------------- (Creating file build/toolchain/freebsd/BUILD.gn...) Patching file build/toolchain/freebsd/BUILD.gn using Plan A... Empty context always matches. Hunk #1 succeeded at 1. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-build_toolchain_gcc_solink_wrapper_py Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: build/toolchain/gcc_solink_wrapper.py |--- build/toolchain/gcc_solink_wrapper.py.orig |+++ build/toolchain/gcc_solink_wrapper.py -------------------------- Patching file build/toolchain/gcc_solink_wrapper.py using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 39. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-build_toolchain_gcc_toolchain_gni Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: build/toolchain/gcc_toolchain.gni |--- build/toolchain/gcc_toolchain.gni.orig |+++ build/toolchain/gcc_toolchain.gni -------------------------- Patching file build/toolchain/gcc_toolchain.gni using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 56. Hunk #2 succeeded at 911. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-build_toolchain_openbsd_BUILD_gn Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: build/toolchain/openbsd/BUILD.gn |--- build/toolchain/openbsd/BUILD.gn.orig |+++ build/toolchain/openbsd/BUILD.gn -------------------------- (Creating file build/toolchain/openbsd/BUILD.gn...) Patching file build/toolchain/openbsd/BUILD.gn using Plan A... Empty context always matches. Hunk #1 succeeded at 1. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-build_toolchain_toolchain_gni Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: build/toolchain/toolchain.gni |--- build/toolchain/toolchain.gni.orig |+++ build/toolchain/toolchain.gni -------------------------- Patching file build/toolchain/toolchain.gni using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 72. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-cc_BUILD_gn Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: cc/BUILD.gn |--- cc/BUILD.gn.orig |+++ cc/BUILD.gn -------------------------- Patching file cc/BUILD.gn using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 685. Hunk #2 succeeded at 944. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-cc_base_features_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: cc/base/features.cc |--- cc/base/features.cc.orig |+++ cc/base/features.cc -------------------------- Patching file cc/base/features.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 85. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_app_chrome_command_ids_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/app/chrome_command_ids.h |--- chrome/app/chrome_command_ids.h.orig |+++ chrome/app/chrome_command_ids.h -------------------------- Patching file chrome/app/chrome_command_ids.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 68. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_app_chrome_main_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/app/chrome_main.cc |--- chrome/app/chrome_main.cc.orig |+++ chrome/app/chrome_main.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/app/chrome_main.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 30. Hunk #2 succeeded at 55. Hunk #3 succeeded at 119. Hunk #4 succeeded at 185. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_app_chrome_main_delegate_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/app/chrome_main_delegate.cc |--- chrome/app/chrome_main_delegate.cc.orig |+++ chrome/app/chrome_main_delegate.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/app/chrome_main_delegate.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 139. Hunk #2 succeeded at 183. Hunk #3 succeeded at 341. Hunk #4 succeeded at 426. Hunk #5 succeeded at 472. Hunk #6 succeeded at 554. Hunk #7 succeeded at 638. Hunk #8 succeeded at 768. Hunk #9 succeeded at 962. Hunk #10 succeeded at 1160. Hunk #11 succeeded at 1315. Hunk #12 succeeded at 1345. Hunk #13 succeeded at 1732. Hunk #14 succeeded at 1828. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_BUILD_gn Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/BUILD.gn |--- chrome/browser/BUILD.gn.orig |+++ chrome/browser/BUILD.gn -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/BUILD.gn using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 7013. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_about_flags_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/about_flags.cc |--- chrome/browser/about_flags.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/about_flags.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/about_flags.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 238. Hunk #2 succeeded at 332. Hunk #3 succeeded at 341. Hunk #4 succeeded at 351. Hunk #5 succeeded at 493. Hunk #6 succeeded at 893. Hunk #7 succeeded at 1326. Hunk #8 succeeded at 1370. Hunk #9 succeeded at 3799. Hunk #10 succeeded at 4878. Hunk #11 succeeded at 5297. Hunk #12 succeeded at 5433. Hunk #13 succeeded at 5456. Hunk #14 succeeded at 6463. Hunk #15 succeeded at 6758. Hunk #16 succeeded at 7427. Hunk #17 succeeded at 8447. Hunk #18 succeeded at 8471. Hunk #19 succeeded at 9322. Hunk #20 succeeded at 9361. Hunk #21 succeeded at 9586. Hunk #22 succeeded at 9926. Hunk #23 succeeded at 10826. Hunk #24 succeeded at 10864. Hunk #25 succeeded at 10989. Hunk #26 succeeded at 11032. Hunk #27 succeeded at 11348. Hunk #28 succeeded at 12011. Hunk #29 succeeded at 12037. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_accessibility_page_colors_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/accessibility/page_colors.cc |--- chrome/browser/accessibility/page_colors.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/accessibility/page_colors.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/accessibility/page_colors.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 12. Hunk #2 succeeded at 55. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_after_startup_task_utils_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/after_startup_task_utils.cc |--- chrome/browser/after_startup_task_utils.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/after_startup_task_utils.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/after_startup_task_utils.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 117. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_apps_app_service_publishers_extension_apps_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/apps/app_service/publishers/extension_apps.cc |--- chrome/browser/apps/app_service/publishers/extension_apps.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/apps/app_service/publishers/extension_apps.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/apps/app_service/publishers/extension_apps.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 23. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_apps_platform_apps_platform_app_launch_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/apps/platform_apps/platform_app_launch.cc |--- chrome/browser/apps/platform_apps/platform_app_launch.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/apps/platform_apps/platform_app_launch.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/apps/platform_apps/platform_app_launch.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 19. Hunk #2 succeeded at 86. Hunk #3 succeeded at 118. Hunk #4 succeeded at 134. Hunk #5 succeeded at 170. Hunk #6 succeeded at 192. Hunk #7 succeeded at 215. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_apps_platform_apps_platform_app_launch_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/apps/platform_apps/platform_app_launch.h |--- chrome/browser/apps/platform_apps/platform_app_launch.h.orig |+++ chrome/browser/apps/platform_apps/platform_app_launch.h -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/apps/platform_apps/platform_app_launch.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 38. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_autocomplete_chrome_autocomplete_scheme_classifier_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/autocomplete/chrome_autocomplete_scheme_classifier.cc |--- chrome/browser/autocomplete/chrome_autocomplete_scheme_classifier.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/autocomplete/chrome_autocomplete_scheme_classifier.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/autocomplete/chrome_autocomplete_scheme_classifier.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 88. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_background_background_mode_manager_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/background/background_mode_manager.cc |--- chrome/browser/background/background_mode_manager.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/background/background_mode_manager.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/background/background_mode_manager.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 872. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_background_background_mode_optimizer_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/background/background_mode_optimizer.cc |--- chrome/browser/background/background_mode_optimizer.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/background/background_mode_optimizer.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/background/background_mode_optimizer.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 31. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_browser_features_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/browser_features.cc |--- chrome/browser/browser_features.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/browser_features.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/browser_features.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 69. Hunk #2 succeeded at 316. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_browser_process_impl_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/browser_process_impl.cc |--- chrome/browser/browser_process_impl.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/browser_process_impl.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/browser_process_impl.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 227. Hunk #2 succeeded at 1277. Hunk #3 succeeded at 1615. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_browser_process_impl_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/browser_process_impl.h |--- chrome/browser/browser_process_impl.h.orig |+++ chrome/browser/browser_process_impl.h -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/browser_process_impl.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 404. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_chrome_browser_field_trials_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/chrome_browser_field_trials.cc |--- chrome/browser/chrome_browser_field_trials.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/chrome_browser_field_trials.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/chrome_browser_field_trials.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 48. Hunk #2 succeeded at 155. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_chrome_browser_field_trials_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/chrome_browser_field_trials.h |--- chrome/browser/chrome_browser_field_trials.h.orig |+++ chrome/browser/chrome_browser_field_trials.h -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/chrome_browser_field_trials.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 34. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_chrome_browser_interface_binders_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/chrome_browser_interface_binders.cc |--- chrome/browser/chrome_browser_interface_binders.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/chrome_browser_interface_binders.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/chrome_browser_interface_binders.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 133. Hunk #2 succeeded at 226. Hunk #3 succeeded at 237. Hunk #4 succeeded at 864. Hunk #5 succeeded at 1060. Hunk #6 succeeded at 1158. Hunk #7 succeeded at 1169. Hunk #8 succeeded at 1261. Hunk #9 succeeded at 1753. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_chrome_browser_main_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/chrome_browser_main.cc |--- chrome/browser/chrome_browser_main.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/chrome_browser_main.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/chrome_browser_main.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 251. Hunk #2 succeeded at 292. Hunk #3 succeeded at 371. Hunk #4 succeeded at 543. Hunk #5 succeeded at 1109. Hunk #6 succeeded at 1157. Hunk #7 succeeded at 1344. Hunk #8 succeeded at 1393. Hunk #9 succeeded at 1505. Hunk #10 succeeded at 2056. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_chrome_browser_main_extra_parts_linux_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/chrome_browser_main_extra_parts_linux.cc |--- chrome/browser/chrome_browser_main_extra_parts_linux.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/chrome_browser_main_extra_parts_linux.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/chrome_browser_main_extra_parts_linux.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 58. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_chrome_browser_main_extra_parts_ozone_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/chrome_browser_main_extra_parts_ozone.cc |--- chrome/browser/chrome_browser_main_extra_parts_ozone.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/chrome_browser_main_extra_parts_ozone.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/chrome_browser_main_extra_parts_ozone.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 27. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_chrome_browser_main_linux_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/chrome_browser_main_linux.cc |--- chrome/browser/chrome_browser_main_linux.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/chrome_browser_main_linux.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/chrome_browser_main_linux.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 25. Hunk #2 succeeded at 84. Hunk #3 succeeded at 112. Hunk #4 succeeded at 171. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_chrome_browser_main_linux_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/chrome_browser_main_linux.h |--- chrome/browser/chrome_browser_main_linux.h.orig |+++ chrome/browser/chrome_browser_main_linux.h -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/chrome_browser_main_linux.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 30. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_chrome_browser_main_posix_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/chrome_browser_main_posix.cc |--- chrome/browser/chrome_browser_main_posix.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/chrome_browser_main_posix.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/chrome_browser_main_posix.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 79. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_chrome_content_browser_client_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/chrome_content_browser_client.cc |--- chrome/browser/chrome_content_browser_client.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/chrome_content_browser_client.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/chrome_content_browser_client.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 477. Hunk #2 succeeded at 593. Hunk #3 succeeded at 609. Hunk #4 succeeded at 617. Hunk #5 succeeded at 632. Hunk #6 succeeded at 1572. Hunk #7 succeeded at 1772. Hunk #8 succeeded at 1806. Hunk #9 succeeded at 1827. Hunk #10 succeeded at 1846. Hunk #11 succeeded at 2708. Hunk #12 succeeded at 3060. Hunk #13 succeeded at 4888. Hunk #14 succeeded at 5479. Hunk #15 succeeded at 5493. Hunk #16 succeeded at 5532. Hunk #17 succeeded at 7442. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_chrome_content_browser_client_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/chrome_content_browser_client.h |--- chrome/browser/chrome_content_browser_client.h.orig |+++ chrome/browser/chrome_content_browser_client.h -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/chrome_content_browser_client.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 523. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_component_updater_widevine_cdm_component_installer_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/component_updater/widevine_cdm_component_installer.cc |--- chrome/browser/component_updater/widevine_cdm_component_installer.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/component_updater/widevine_cdm_component_installer.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/component_updater/widevine_cdm_component_installer.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 41. Hunk #2 succeeded at 74. Hunk #3 succeeded at 102. Hunk #4 succeeded at 398. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_custom_handlers_chrome_protocol_handler_registry_delegate_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/custom_handlers/chrome_protocol_handler_registry_delegate.cc |--- chrome/browser/custom_handlers/chrome_protocol_handler_registry_delegate.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/custom_handlers/chrome_protocol_handler_registry_delegate.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/custom_handlers/chrome_protocol_handler_registry_delegate.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 68. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_defaults_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/defaults.cc |--- chrome/browser/defaults.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/defaults.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/defaults.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 44. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_device_identity_device_oauth2_token_service_factory_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/device_identity/device_oauth2_token_service_factory.cc |--- chrome/browser/device_identity/device_oauth2_token_service_factory.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/device_identity/device_oauth2_token_service_factory.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/device_identity/device_oauth2_token_service_factory.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 28. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_diagnostics_diagnostics_writer_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/diagnostics/diagnostics_writer.h |--- chrome/browser/diagnostics/diagnostics_writer.h.orig |+++ chrome/browser/diagnostics/diagnostics_writer.h -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/diagnostics/diagnostics_writer.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 14. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_download_chrome_download_manager_delegate_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/download/chrome_download_manager_delegate.cc |--- chrome/browser/download/chrome_download_manager_delegate.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/download/chrome_download_manager_delegate.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/download/chrome_download_manager_delegate.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 1753. Hunk #2 succeeded at 1901. Hunk #3 succeeded at 1979. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_download_download_commands_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/download/download_commands.cc |--- chrome/browser/download/download_commands.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/download/download_commands.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/download/download_commands.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 26. Hunk #2 succeeded at 167. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_download_download_commands_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/download/download_commands.h |--- chrome/browser/download/download_commands.h.orig |+++ chrome/browser/download/download_commands.h -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/download/download_commands.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 66. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_download_download_file_picker_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/download/download_file_picker.cc |--- chrome/browser/download/download_file_picker.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/download/download_file_picker.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/download/download_file_picker.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 18. Hunk #2 succeeded at 83. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_download_download_item_model_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/download/download_item_model.cc |--- chrome/browser/download/download_item_model.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/download/download_item_model.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/download/download_item_model.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 814. Hunk #2 succeeded at 862. Hunk #3 succeeded at 1260. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_download_download_prefs_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/download/download_prefs.cc |--- chrome/browser/download/download_prefs.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/download/download_prefs.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/download/download_prefs.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 11. Hunk #2 succeeded at 65. Hunk #3 succeeded at 79. Hunk #4 succeeded at 185. Hunk #5 succeeded at 309. Hunk #6 succeeded at 474. Hunk #7 succeeded at 506. Hunk #8 succeeded at 543. Hunk #9 succeeded at 695. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_download_download_prefs_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/download/download_prefs.h |--- chrome/browser/download/download_prefs.h.orig |+++ chrome/browser/download/download_prefs.h -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/download/download_prefs.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 115. Hunk #2 succeeded at 179. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_enterprise_connectors_analysis_analysis_service_settings_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/enterprise/connectors/analysis/analysis_service_settings.cc |--- chrome/browser/enterprise/connectors/analysis/analysis_service_settings.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/enterprise/connectors/analysis/analysis_service_settings.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/enterprise/connectors/analysis/analysis_service_settings.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 151. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_enterprise_connectors_connectors_service_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/enterprise/connectors/connectors_service.cc |--- chrome/browser/enterprise/connectors/connectors_service.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/enterprise/connectors/connectors_service.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/enterprise/connectors/connectors_service.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 570. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_enterprise_connectors_device_trust_device_trust_connector_service_factory_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/enterprise/connectors/device_trust/device_trust_connector_service_factory.cc |--- chrome/browser/enterprise/connectors/device_trust/device_trust_connector_service_factory.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/enterprise/connectors/device_trust/device_trust_connector_service_factory.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/enterprise/connectors/device_trust/device_trust_connector_service_factory.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 10. Hunk #2 succeeded at 40. Hunk #3 succeeded at 84. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_enterprise_connectors_device_trust_device_trust_service_factory_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/enterprise/connectors/device_trust/device_trust_service_factory.cc |--- chrome/browser/enterprise/connectors/device_trust/device_trust_service_factory.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/enterprise/connectors/device_trust/device_trust_service_factory.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/enterprise/connectors/device_trust/device_trust_service_factory.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 23. Hunk #2 succeeded at 54. Hunk #3 succeeded at 106. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_enterprise_connectors_device_trust_key_management_browser_commands_key_rotation_command_factory_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/enterprise/connectors/device_trust/key_management/browser/commands/key_rotation_command_factory.cc |--- chrome/browser/enterprise/connectors/device_trust/key_management/browser/commands/key_rotation_command_factory.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/enterprise/connectors/device_trust/key_management/browser/commands/key_rotation_command_factory.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/enterprise/connectors/device_trust/key_management/browser/commands/key_rotation_command_factory.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 14. Hunk #2 succeeded at 47. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_enterprise_connectors_device_trust_key_management_core_persistence_key_persistence_delegate_factory_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/enterprise/connectors/device_trust/key_management/core/persistence/key_persistence_delegate_factory.cc |--- chrome/browser/enterprise/connectors/device_trust/key_management/core/persistence/key_persistence_delegate_factory.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/enterprise/connectors/device_trust/key_management/core/persistence/key_persistence_delegate_factory.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/enterprise/connectors/device_trust/key_management/core/persistence/key_persistence_delegate_factory.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 13. Hunk #2 succeeded at 45. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_enterprise_connectors_device_trust_signals_signals_service_factory_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/enterprise/connectors/device_trust/signals/signals_service_factory.cc |--- chrome/browser/enterprise/connectors/device_trust/signals/signals_service_factory.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/enterprise/connectors/device_trust/signals/signals_service_factory.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/enterprise/connectors/device_trust/signals/signals_service_factory.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 21. Hunk #2 succeeded at 58. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_enterprise_connectors_reporting_browser_crash_event_router_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/enterprise/connectors/reporting/browser_crash_event_router.cc |--- chrome/browser/enterprise/connectors/reporting/browser_crash_event_router.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/enterprise/connectors/reporting/browser_crash_event_router.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/enterprise/connectors/reporting/browser_crash_event_router.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 13. Hunk #2 succeeded at 23. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_enterprise_connectors_reporting_crash_reporting_context_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/enterprise/connectors/reporting/crash_reporting_context.cc |--- chrome/browser/enterprise/connectors/reporting/crash_reporting_context.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/enterprise/connectors/reporting/crash_reporting_context.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/enterprise/connectors/reporting/crash_reporting_context.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 19. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_enterprise_connectors_reporting_realtime_reporting_client_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/enterprise/connectors/reporting/realtime_reporting_client.cc |--- chrome/browser/enterprise/connectors/reporting/realtime_reporting_client.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/enterprise/connectors/reporting/realtime_reporting_client.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/enterprise/connectors/reporting/realtime_reporting_client.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 58. Hunk #2 succeeded at 133. Hunk #3 succeeded at 421. Hunk #4 succeeded at 480. Hunk #5 succeeded at 505. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_enterprise_connectors_reporting_realtime_reporting_client_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/enterprise/connectors/reporting/realtime_reporting_client.h |--- chrome/browser/enterprise/connectors/reporting/realtime_reporting_client.h.orig |+++ chrome/browser/enterprise/connectors/reporting/realtime_reporting_client.h -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/enterprise/connectors/reporting/realtime_reporting_client.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 16. Hunk #2 succeeded at 184. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_enterprise_identifiers_profile_id_delegate_impl_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/enterprise/identifiers/profile_id_delegate_impl.cc |--- chrome/browser/enterprise/identifiers/profile_id_delegate_impl.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/enterprise/identifiers/profile_id_delegate_impl.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/enterprise/identifiers/profile_id_delegate_impl.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 13. Hunk #2 succeeded at 94. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_enterprise_profile_management_profile_management_navigation_throttle_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/enterprise/profile_management/profile_management_navigation_throttle.cc |--- chrome/browser/enterprise/profile_management/profile_management_navigation_throttle.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/enterprise/profile_management/profile_management_navigation_throttle.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/enterprise/profile_management/profile_management_navigation_throttle.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 67. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_enterprise_remote_commands_cbcm_remote_commands_factory_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/enterprise/remote_commands/cbcm_remote_commands_factory.cc |--- chrome/browser/enterprise/remote_commands/cbcm_remote_commands_factory.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/enterprise/remote_commands/cbcm_remote_commands_factory.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/enterprise/remote_commands/cbcm_remote_commands_factory.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 11. Hunk #2 succeeded at 30. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_enterprise_signals_device_info_fetcher_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/enterprise/signals/device_info_fetcher.cc |--- chrome/browser/enterprise/signals/device_info_fetcher.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/enterprise/signals/device_info_fetcher.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/enterprise/signals/device_info_fetcher.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 10. Hunk #2 succeeded at 67. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_enterprise_signals_device_info_fetcher_linux_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/enterprise/signals/device_info_fetcher_linux.cc |--- chrome/browser/enterprise/signals/device_info_fetcher_linux.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/enterprise/signals/device_info_fetcher_linux.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/enterprise/signals/device_info_fetcher_linux.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 4. Hunk #2 succeeded at 128. Hunk #3 succeeded at 150. Hunk #4 succeeded at 201. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_enterprise_signin_enterprise_signin_service_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/enterprise/signin/enterprise_signin_service.h |--- chrome/browser/enterprise/signin/enterprise_signin_service.h.orig |+++ chrome/browser/enterprise/signin/enterprise_signin_service.h -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/enterprise/signin/enterprise_signin_service.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 9. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_extensions_BUILD_gn Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/extensions/BUILD.gn |--- chrome/browser/extensions/BUILD.gn.orig |+++ chrome/browser/extensions/BUILD.gn -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/extensions/BUILD.gn using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 1513. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_extensions_api_api_browser_context_keyed_service_factories_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/extensions/api/api_browser_context_keyed_service_factories.cc |--- chrome/browser/extensions/api/api_browser_context_keyed_service_factories.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/extensions/api/api_browser_context_keyed_service_factories.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/extensions/api/api_browser_context_keyed_service_factories.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 44. Hunk #2 succeeded at 120. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_extensions_api_enterprise_reporting_private_chrome_desktop_report_request_helper_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/extensions/api/enterprise_reporting_private/chrome_desktop_report_request_helper.cc |--- chrome/browser/extensions/api/enterprise_reporting_private/chrome_desktop_report_request_helper.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/extensions/api/enterprise_reporting_private/chrome_desktop_report_request_helper.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/extensions/api/enterprise_reporting_private/chrome_desktop_report_request_helper.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 24. Hunk #2 succeeded at 255. Hunk #3 succeeded at 266. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_extensions_api_enterprise_reporting_private_conversion_utils_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/extensions/api/enterprise_reporting_private/conversion_utils.cc |--- chrome/browser/extensions/api/enterprise_reporting_private/conversion_utils.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/extensions/api/enterprise_reporting_private/conversion_utils.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/extensions/api/enterprise_reporting_private/conversion_utils.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 8. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_extensions_api_enterprise_reporting_private_conversion_utils_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/extensions/api/enterprise_reporting_private/conversion_utils.h |--- chrome/browser/extensions/api/enterprise_reporting_private/conversion_utils.h.orig |+++ chrome/browser/extensions/api/enterprise_reporting_private/conversion_utils.h -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/extensions/api/enterprise_reporting_private/conversion_utils.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 7. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_extensions_api_enterprise_reporting_private_enterprise_reporting_private_api_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/extensions/api/enterprise_reporting_private/enterprise_reporting_private_api.cc |--- chrome/browser/extensions/api/enterprise_reporting_private/enterprise_reporting_private_api.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/extensions/api/enterprise_reporting_private/enterprise_reporting_private_api.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/extensions/api/enterprise_reporting_private/enterprise_reporting_private_api.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 33. Hunk #2 succeeded at 150. Hunk #3 succeeded at 211. Hunk #4 succeeded at 637. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_extensions_api_enterprise_reporting_private_enterprise_reporting_private_api_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/extensions/api/enterprise_reporting_private/enterprise_reporting_private_api.h |--- chrome/browser/extensions/api/enterprise_reporting_private/enterprise_reporting_private_api.h.orig |+++ chrome/browser/extensions/api/enterprise_reporting_private/enterprise_reporting_private_api.h -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/extensions/api/enterprise_reporting_private/enterprise_reporting_private_api.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 20. Hunk #2 succeeded at 56. Hunk #3 succeeded at 266. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_extensions_api_image_writer_private_removable_storage_provider_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/extensions/api/image_writer_private/removable_storage_provider.cc |--- chrome/browser/extensions/api/image_writer_private/removable_storage_provider.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/extensions/api/image_writer_private/removable_storage_provider.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/extensions/api/image_writer_private/removable_storage_provider.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 20. Hunk #2 succeeded at 34. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_extensions_api_management_chrome_management_api_delegate_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/extensions/api/management/chrome_management_api_delegate.cc |--- chrome/browser/extensions/api/management/chrome_management_api_delegate.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/extensions/api/management/chrome_management_api_delegate.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/extensions/api/management/chrome_management_api_delegate.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 417. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_extensions_api_messaging_launch_context_posix_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/extensions/api/messaging/launch_context_posix.cc |--- chrome/browser/extensions/api/messaging/launch_context_posix.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/extensions/api/messaging/launch_context_posix.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/extensions/api/messaging/launch_context_posix.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 86. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_extensions_api_passwords_private_passwords_private_delegate_impl_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/extensions/api/passwords_private/passwords_private_delegate_impl.cc |--- chrome/browser/extensions/api/passwords_private/passwords_private_delegate_impl.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/extensions/api/passwords_private/passwords_private_delegate_impl.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/extensions/api/passwords_private/passwords_private_delegate_impl.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 630. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_extensions_api_runtime_chrome_runtime_api_delegate_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/extensions/api/runtime/chrome_runtime_api_delegate.cc |--- chrome/browser/extensions/api/runtime/chrome_runtime_api_delegate.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/extensions/api/runtime/chrome_runtime_api_delegate.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/extensions/api/runtime/chrome_runtime_api_delegate.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 284. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_extensions_api_settings_private_prefs_util_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/extensions/api/settings_private/prefs_util.cc |--- chrome/browser/extensions/api/settings_private/prefs_util.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/extensions/api/settings_private/prefs_util.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/extensions/api/settings_private/prefs_util.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 205. Hunk #2 succeeded at 217. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_extensions_api_tabs_tabs_api_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/extensions/api/tabs/tabs_api.cc |--- chrome/browser/extensions/api/tabs/tabs_api.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/extensions/api/tabs/tabs_api.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/extensions/api/tabs/tabs_api.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 892. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_extensions_api_webrtc_logging_private_webrtc_logging_private_api_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/extensions/api/webrtc_logging_private/webrtc_logging_private_api.cc |--- chrome/browser/extensions/api/webrtc_logging_private/webrtc_logging_private_api.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/extensions/api/webrtc_logging_private/webrtc_logging_private_api.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/extensions/api/webrtc_logging_private/webrtc_logging_private_api.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 29. Hunk #2 succeeded at 38. Hunk #3 succeeded at 576. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_extensions_api_webstore_private_webstore_private_api_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/extensions/api/webstore_private/webstore_private_api.cc |--- chrome/browser/extensions/api/webstore_private/webstore_private_api.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/extensions/api/webstore_private/webstore_private_api.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/extensions/api/webstore_private/webstore_private_api.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 910. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_extensions_external_provider_impl_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/extensions/external_provider_impl.cc |--- chrome/browser/extensions/external_provider_impl.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/extensions/external_provider_impl.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/extensions/external_provider_impl.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 834. Hunk #2 succeeded at 862. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_file_system_access_chrome_file_system_access_permission_context_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/file_system_access/chrome_file_system_access_permission_context.cc |--- chrome/browser/file_system_access/chrome_file_system_access_permission_context.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/file_system_access/chrome_file_system_access_permission_context.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/file_system_access/chrome_file_system_access_permission_context.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 318. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_first_run_first_run_dialog_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/first_run/first_run_dialog.h |--- chrome/browser/first_run/first_run_dialog.h.orig |+++ chrome/browser/first_run/first_run_dialog.h -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/first_run/first_run_dialog.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 12. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_first_run_first_run_internal_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/first_run/first_run_internal.h |--- chrome/browser/first_run/first_run_internal.h.orig |+++ chrome/browser/first_run/first_run_internal.h -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/first_run/first_run_internal.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 54. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_flag_descriptions_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/flag_descriptions.cc |--- chrome/browser/flag_descriptions.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/flag_descriptions.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/flag_descriptions.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 419. Hunk #2 succeeded at 856. Hunk #3 succeeded at 3050. Hunk #4 succeeded at 3385. Hunk #5 succeeded at 3422. Hunk #6 succeeded at 7869. Hunk #7 succeeded at 8126. Hunk #8 succeeded at 8156. Hunk #9 succeeded at 8194. Hunk #10 succeeded at 8233. Hunk #11 succeeded at 8387. Hunk #12 succeeded at 8461. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_flag_descriptions_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/flag_descriptions.h |--- chrome/browser/flag_descriptions.h.orig |+++ chrome/browser/flag_descriptions.h -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/flag_descriptions.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 273. Hunk #2 succeeded at 660. Hunk #3 succeeded at 1764. Hunk #4 succeeded at 1958. Hunk #5 succeeded at 1980. Hunk #6 succeeded at 4557. Hunk #7 succeeded at 4705. Hunk #8 succeeded at 4724. Hunk #9 succeeded at 4756. Hunk #10 succeeded at 4775. Hunk #11 succeeded at 4880. Hunk #12 succeeded at 4934. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_gcm_gcm_profile_service_factory_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/gcm/gcm_profile_service_factory.cc |--- chrome/browser/gcm/gcm_profile_service_factory.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/gcm/gcm_profile_service_factory.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/gcm/gcm_profile_service_factory.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 89. Hunk #2 succeeded at 132. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_gcm_instance_id_instance_id_profile_service_factory_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/gcm/instance_id/instance_id_profile_service_factory.cc |--- chrome/browser/gcm/instance_id/instance_id_profile_service_factory.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/gcm/instance_id/instance_id_profile_service_factory.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/gcm/instance_id/instance_id_profile_service_factory.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 16. Hunk #2 succeeded at 64. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_global_desktop_features_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/global_desktop_features.cc |--- chrome/browser/global_desktop_features.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/global_desktop_features.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/global_desktop_features.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 45. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_global_desktop_features_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/global_desktop_features.h |--- chrome/browser/global_desktop_features.h.orig |+++ chrome/browser/global_desktop_features.h -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/global_desktop_features.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 9. Hunk #2 succeeded at 37. Hunk #3 succeeded at 50. Hunk #4 succeeded at 58. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_headless_headless_mode_util_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/headless/headless_mode_util.cc |--- chrome/browser/headless/headless_mode_util.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/headless/headless_mode_util.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/headless/headless_mode_util.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 19. Hunk #2 succeeded at 87. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_intranet_redirect_detector_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/intranet_redirect_detector.h |--- chrome/browser/intranet_redirect_detector.h.orig |+++ chrome/browser/intranet_redirect_detector.h -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/intranet_redirect_detector.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 25. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_media_audio_service_util_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/media/audio_service_util.cc |--- chrome/browser/media/audio_service_util.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/media/audio_service_util.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/media/audio_service_util.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 21. Hunk #2 succeeded at 43. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_media_galleries_fileapi_mtp_device_map_service_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/media_galleries/fileapi/mtp_device_map_service.cc |--- chrome/browser/media_galleries/fileapi/mtp_device_map_service.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/media_galleries/fileapi/mtp_device_map_service.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/media_galleries/fileapi/mtp_device_map_service.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 40. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_media_galleries_media_file_system_registry_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/media_galleries/media_file_system_registry.cc |--- chrome/browser/media_galleries/media_file_system_registry.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/media_galleries/media_file_system_registry.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/media_galleries/media_file_system_registry.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 585. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_media_router_discovery_BUILD_gn Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/media/router/discovery/BUILD.gn |--- chrome/browser/media/router/discovery/BUILD.gn.orig |+++ chrome/browser/media/router/discovery/BUILD.gn -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/media/router/discovery/BUILD.gn using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 82. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_media_router_discovery_discovery_network_list_posix_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/media/router/discovery/discovery_network_list_posix.cc |--- chrome/browser/media/router/discovery/discovery_network_list_posix.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/media/router/discovery/discovery_network_list_posix.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/media/router/discovery/discovery_network_list_posix.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 5. Hunk #2 succeeded at 19. Hunk #3 succeeded at 28. Hunk #4 succeeded at 39. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_media_router_discovery_discovery_network_list_wifi_linux_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/media/router/discovery/discovery_network_list_wifi_linux.cc |--- chrome/browser/media/router/discovery/discovery_network_list_wifi_linux.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/media/router/discovery/discovery_network_list_wifi_linux.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/media/router/discovery/discovery_network_list_wifi_linux.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 9. Hunk #2 succeeded at 24. Hunk #3 succeeded at 46. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_media_webrtc_chrome_screen_enumerator_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/media/webrtc/chrome_screen_enumerator.cc |--- chrome/browser/media/webrtc/chrome_screen_enumerator.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/media/webrtc/chrome_screen_enumerator.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/media/webrtc/chrome_screen_enumerator.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 21. Hunk #2 succeeded at 32. Hunk #3 succeeded at 79. Hunk #4 succeeded at 130. Hunk #5 succeeded at 143. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_media_webrtc_chrome_screen_enumerator_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/media/webrtc/chrome_screen_enumerator.h |--- chrome/browser/media/webrtc/chrome_screen_enumerator.h.orig |+++ chrome/browser/media/webrtc/chrome_screen_enumerator.h -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/media/webrtc/chrome_screen_enumerator.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 20. Hunk #2 succeeded at 42. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_media_webrtc_desktop_media_picker_controller_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/media/webrtc/desktop_media_picker_controller.cc |--- chrome/browser/media/webrtc/desktop_media_picker_controller.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/media/webrtc/desktop_media_picker_controller.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/media/webrtc/desktop_media_picker_controller.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 89. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_media_webrtc_webrtc_log_uploader_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/media/webrtc/webrtc_log_uploader.cc |--- chrome/browser/media/webrtc/webrtc_log_uploader.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/media/webrtc/webrtc_log_uploader.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/media/webrtc/webrtc_log_uploader.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 101. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_media_webrtc_webrtc_logging_controller_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/media/webrtc/webrtc_logging_controller.cc |--- chrome/browser/media/webrtc/webrtc_logging_controller.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/media/webrtc/webrtc_logging_controller.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/media/webrtc/webrtc_logging_controller.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 25. Hunk #2 succeeded at 288. Hunk #3 succeeded at 334. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_media_webrtc_webrtc_logging_controller_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/media/webrtc/webrtc_logging_controller.h |--- chrome/browser/media/webrtc/webrtc_logging_controller.h.orig |+++ chrome/browser/media/webrtc/webrtc_logging_controller.h -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/media/webrtc/webrtc_logging_controller.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 133. Hunk #2 succeeded at 197. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_memory_details_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/memory_details.cc |--- chrome/browser/memory_details.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/memory_details.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/memory_details.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 38. Hunk #2 succeeded at 334. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_metrics_chrome_browser_main_extra_parts_metrics_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/metrics/chrome_browser_main_extra_parts_metrics.cc |--- chrome/browser/metrics/chrome_browser_main_extra_parts_metrics.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/metrics/chrome_browser_main_extra_parts_metrics.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/metrics/chrome_browser_main_extra_parts_metrics.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 83. Hunk #2 succeeded at 110. Hunk #3 succeeded at 119. Hunk #4 succeeded at 866. Hunk #5 succeeded at 1165. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_metrics_chrome_browser_main_extra_parts_metrics_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/metrics/chrome_browser_main_extra_parts_metrics.h |--- chrome/browser/metrics/chrome_browser_main_extra_parts_metrics.h.orig |+++ chrome/browser/metrics/chrome_browser_main_extra_parts_metrics.h -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/metrics/chrome_browser_main_extra_parts_metrics.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 29. Hunk #2 succeeded at 119. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_metrics_chrome_metrics_service_client_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/metrics/chrome_metrics_service_client.cc |--- chrome/browser/metrics/chrome_metrics_service_client.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/metrics/chrome_metrics_service_client.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/metrics/chrome_metrics_service_client.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 196. Hunk #2 succeeded at 213. Hunk #3 succeeded at 535. Hunk #4 succeeded at 707. Hunk #5 succeeded at 758. Hunk #6 succeeded at 843. Hunk #7 succeeded at 950. Hunk #8 succeeded at 1137. Hunk #9 succeeded at 1471. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_metrics_perf_cpu_identity_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/metrics/perf/cpu_identity.cc |--- chrome/browser/metrics/perf/cpu_identity.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/metrics/perf/cpu_identity.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/metrics/perf/cpu_identity.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 147. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_metrics_power_process_metrics_recorder_util_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/metrics/power/process_metrics_recorder_util.cc |--- chrome/browser/metrics/power/process_metrics_recorder_util.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/metrics/power/process_metrics_recorder_util.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/metrics/power/process_metrics_recorder_util.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 65. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_metrics_power_process_monitor_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/metrics/power/process_monitor.cc |--- chrome/browser/metrics/power/process_monitor.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/metrics/power/process_monitor.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/metrics/power/process_monitor.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 65. Hunk #2 succeeded at 83. Hunk #3 succeeded at 158. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_metrics_power_process_monitor_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/metrics/power/process_monitor.h |--- chrome/browser/metrics/power/process_monitor.h.orig |+++ chrome/browser/metrics/power/process_monitor.h -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/metrics/power/process_monitor.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 76. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_net_profile_network_context_service_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/net/profile_network_context_service.cc |--- chrome/browser/net/profile_network_context_service.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/net/profile_network_context_service.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/net/profile_network_context_service.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 140. Hunk #2 succeeded at 260. Hunk #3 succeeded at 939. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_net_system_network_context_manager_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/net/system_network_context_manager.cc |--- chrome/browser/net/system_network_context_manager.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/net/system_network_context_manager.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/net/system_network_context_manager.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 96. Hunk #2 succeeded at 140. Hunk #3 succeeded at 148. Hunk #4 succeeded at 194. Hunk #5 succeeded at 209. Hunk #6 succeeded at 219. Hunk #7 succeeded at 261. Hunk #8 succeeded at 281. Hunk #9 succeeded at 511. Hunk #10 succeeded at 569. Hunk #11 succeeded at 583. Hunk #12 succeeded at 653. Hunk #13 succeeded at 678. Hunk #14 succeeded at 735. Hunk #15 succeeded at 950. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_net_system_network_context_manager_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/net/system_network_context_manager.h |--- chrome/browser/net/system_network_context_manager.h.orig |+++ chrome/browser/net/system_network_context_manager.h -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/net/system_network_context_manager.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 197. Hunk #2 succeeded at 278. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_new_tab_page_modules_file_suggestion_drive_service_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/new_tab_page/modules/file_suggestion/drive_service.cc |--- chrome/browser/new_tab_page/modules/file_suggestion/drive_service.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/new_tab_page/modules/file_suggestion/drive_service.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/new_tab_page/modules/file_suggestion/drive_service.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 32. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_new_tab_page_new_tab_page_util_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/new_tab_page/new_tab_page_util.cc |--- chrome/browser/new_tab_page/new_tab_page_util.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/new_tab_page/new_tab_page_util.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/new_tab_page/new_tab_page_util.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 20. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_notifications_notification_display_service_impl_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/notifications/notification_display_service_impl.cc |--- chrome/browser/notifications/notification_display_service_impl.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/notifications/notification_display_service_impl.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/notifications/notification_display_service_impl.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 32. Hunk #2 succeeded at 65. Hunk #3 succeeded at 81. Hunk #4 succeeded at 89. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_notifications_notification_platform_bridge_delegator_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/notifications/notification_platform_bridge_delegator.cc |--- chrome/browser/notifications/notification_platform_bridge_delegator.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/notifications/notification_platform_bridge_delegator.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/notifications/notification_platform_bridge_delegator.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 57. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_password_manager_chrome_password_manager_client_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/password_manager/chrome_password_manager_client.cc |--- chrome/browser/password_manager/chrome_password_manager_client.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/password_manager/chrome_password_manager_client.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/password_manager/chrome_password_manager_client.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 560. Hunk #2 succeeded at 798. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_password_manager_password_reuse_manager_factory_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/password_manager/password_reuse_manager_factory.cc |--- chrome/browser/password_manager/password_reuse_manager_factory.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/password_manager/password_reuse_manager_factory.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/password_manager/password_reuse_manager_factory.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 141. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_platform_util_linux_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/platform_util_linux.cc |--- chrome/browser/platform_util_linux.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/platform_util_linux.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/platform_util_linux.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 300. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_policy_browser_signin_policy_handler_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/policy/browser_signin_policy_handler.cc |--- chrome/browser/policy/browser_signin_policy_handler.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/policy/browser_signin_policy_handler.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/policy/browser_signin_policy_handler.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 45. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_policy_chrome_browser_cloud_management_controller_desktop_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/policy/chrome_browser_cloud_management_controller_desktop.cc |--- chrome/browser/policy/chrome_browser_cloud_management_controller_desktop.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/policy/chrome_browser_cloud_management_controller_desktop.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/policy/chrome_browser_cloud_management_controller_desktop.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 50. Hunk #2 succeeded at 59. Hunk #3 succeeded at 87. Hunk #4 succeeded at 255. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_policy_configuration_policy_handler_list_factory_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/policy/configuration_policy_handler_list_factory.cc |--- chrome/browser/policy/configuration_policy_handler_list_factory.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/policy/configuration_policy_handler_list_factory.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/policy/configuration_policy_handler_list_factory.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 236. Hunk #2 succeeded at 262. Hunk #3 succeeded at 542. Hunk #4 succeeded at 884. Hunk #5 succeeded at 893. Hunk #6 succeeded at 1721. Hunk #7 succeeded at 1778. Hunk #8 succeeded at 1804. Hunk #9 succeeded at 1817. Hunk #10 succeeded at 1829. Hunk #11 succeeded at 1930. Hunk #12 succeeded at 2041. Hunk #13 succeeded at 2120. Hunk #14 succeeded at 2149. Hunk #15 succeeded at 2192. Hunk #16 succeeded at 2212. Hunk #17 succeeded at 2346. Hunk #18 succeeded at 2362. Hunk #19 succeeded at 2575. Hunk #20 succeeded at 2627. Hunk #21 succeeded at 2712. Hunk #22 succeeded at 3070. Hunk #23 succeeded at 3078. Hunk #24 succeeded at 3096. Hunk #25 succeeded at 3119. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_policy_device_management_service_configuration_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/policy/device_management_service_configuration.cc |--- chrome/browser/policy/device_management_service_configuration.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/policy/device_management_service_configuration.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/policy/device_management_service_configuration.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 24. Hunk #2 succeeded at 102. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_policy_policy_value_and_status_aggregator_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/policy/policy_value_and_status_aggregator.cc |--- chrome/browser/policy/policy_value_and_status_aggregator.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/policy/policy_value_and_status_aggregator.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/policy/policy_value_and_status_aggregator.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 53. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_prefs_browser_prefs_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/prefs/browser_prefs.cc |--- chrome/browser/prefs/browser_prefs.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/prefs/browser_prefs.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/prefs/browser_prefs.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 314. Hunk #2 succeeded at 496. Hunk #3 succeeded at 542. Hunk #4 succeeded at 1562. Hunk #5 succeeded at 1735. Hunk #6 succeeded at 2094. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_prefs_pref_service_incognito_allowlist_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/prefs/pref_service_incognito_allowlist.cc |--- chrome/browser/prefs/pref_service_incognito_allowlist.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/prefs/pref_service_incognito_allowlist.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/prefs/pref_service_incognito_allowlist.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 188. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_printing_print_backend_service_manager_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/printing/print_backend_service_manager.cc |--- chrome/browser/printing/print_backend_service_manager.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/printing/print_backend_service_manager.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/printing/print_backend_service_manager.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 36. Hunk #2 succeeded at 877. Hunk #3 succeeded at 1054. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_printing_printer_query_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/printing/printer_query.cc |--- chrome/browser/printing/printer_query.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/printing/printer_query.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/printing/printer_query.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 341. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_process_singleton_posix_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/process_singleton_posix.cc |--- chrome/browser/process_singleton_posix.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/process_singleton_posix.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/process_singleton_posix.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 97. Hunk #2 succeeded at 355. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_profiles_chrome_browser_main_extra_parts_profiles_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/profiles/chrome_browser_main_extra_parts_profiles.cc |--- chrome/browser/profiles/chrome_browser_main_extra_parts_profiles.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/profiles/chrome_browser_main_extra_parts_profiles.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/profiles/chrome_browser_main_extra_parts_profiles.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 342. Hunk #2 succeeded at 428. Hunk #3 succeeded at 681. Hunk #4 succeeded at 810. Hunk #5 succeeded at 818. Hunk #6 succeeded at 969. Hunk #7 succeeded at 1075. Hunk #8 succeeded at 1119. Hunk #9 succeeded at 1135. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_profiles_profile_impl_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/profiles/profile_impl.cc |--- chrome/browser/profiles/profile_impl.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/profiles/profile_impl.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/profiles/profile_impl.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 266. Hunk #2 succeeded at 604. Hunk #3 succeeded at 905. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_profiles_profiles_state_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/profiles/profiles_state.cc |--- chrome/browser/profiles/profiles_state.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/profiles/profiles_state.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/profiles/profiles_state.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 196. Hunk #2 succeeded at 243. Hunk #3 succeeded at 259. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_renderer_preferences_util_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/renderer_preferences_util.cc |--- chrome/browser/renderer_preferences_util.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/renderer_preferences_util.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/renderer_preferences_util.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 39. Hunk #2 succeeded at 154. Hunk #3 succeeded at 177. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_resources_settings_autofill_page_passwords_shared_css Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/resources/settings/autofill_page/passwords_shared.css |--- chrome/browser/resources/settings/autofill_page/passwords_shared.css.orig |+++ chrome/browser/resources/settings/autofill_page/passwords_shared.css -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/resources/settings/autofill_page/passwords_shared.css using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 100. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_resources_signin_signin_shared_css Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/resources/signin/signin_shared.css |--- chrome/browser/resources/signin/signin_shared.css.orig |+++ chrome/browser/resources/signin/signin_shared.css -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/resources/signin/signin_shared.css using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 54. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_safe_browsing_cloud_content_scanning_binary_upload_service_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/safe_browsing/cloud_content_scanning/binary_upload_service.cc |--- chrome/browser/safe_browsing/cloud_content_scanning/binary_upload_service.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/safe_browsing/cloud_content_scanning/binary_upload_service.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/safe_browsing/cloud_content_scanning/binary_upload_service.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 18. Hunk #2 succeeded at 434. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_safe_browsing_cloud_content_scanning_deep_scanning_utils_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/safe_browsing/cloud_content_scanning/deep_scanning_utils.cc |--- chrome/browser/safe_browsing/cloud_content_scanning/deep_scanning_utils.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/safe_browsing/cloud_content_scanning/deep_scanning_utils.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/safe_browsing/cloud_content_scanning/deep_scanning_utils.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 16. Hunk #2 succeeded at 416. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_safe_browsing_incident_reporting_incident_reporting_service_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/safe_browsing/incident_reporting/incident_reporting_service.cc |--- chrome/browser/safe_browsing/incident_reporting/incident_reporting_service.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/safe_browsing/incident_reporting/incident_reporting_service.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/safe_browsing/incident_reporting/incident_reporting_service.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 695. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_screen_ai_screen_ai_install_state_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/screen_ai/screen_ai_install_state.cc |--- chrome/browser/screen_ai/screen_ai_install_state.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/screen_ai/screen_ai_install_state.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/screen_ai/screen_ai_install_state.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 17. Hunk #2 succeeded at 27. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_screen_ai_screen_ai_service_router_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/screen_ai/screen_ai_service_router.cc |--- chrome/browser/screen_ai/screen_ai_service_router.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/screen_ai/screen_ai_service_router.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/screen_ai/screen_ai_service_router.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 293. Hunk #2 succeeded at 307. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_send_tab_to_self_receiving_ui_handler_registry_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/send_tab_to_self/receiving_ui_handler_registry.cc |--- chrome/browser/send_tab_to_self/receiving_ui_handler_registry.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/send_tab_to_self/receiving_ui_handler_registry.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/send_tab_to_self/receiving_ui_handler_registry.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 15. Hunk #2 succeeded at 47. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_send_tab_to_self_send_tab_to_self_client_service_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/send_tab_to_self/send_tab_to_self_client_service.cc |--- chrome/browser/send_tab_to_self/send_tab_to_self_client_service.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/send_tab_to_self/send_tab_to_self_client_service.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/send_tab_to_self/send_tab_to_self_client_service.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 16. Hunk #2 succeeded at 50. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_sessions_session_restore_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/sessions/session_restore.cc |--- chrome/browser/sessions/session_restore.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/sessions/session_restore.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/sessions/session_restore.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 99. Hunk #2 succeeded at 1049. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_sharing_sharing_device_registration_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/sharing/sharing_device_registration.cc |--- chrome/browser/sharing/sharing_device_registration.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/sharing/sharing_device_registration.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/sharing/sharing_device_registration.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 331. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_sharing_sharing_handler_registry_impl_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/sharing/sharing_handler_registry_impl.cc |--- chrome/browser/sharing/sharing_handler_registry_impl.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/sharing/sharing_handler_registry_impl.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/sharing/sharing_handler_registry_impl.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 22. Hunk #2 succeeded at 74. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_shortcuts_icon_badging_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/shortcuts/icon_badging.cc |--- chrome/browser/shortcuts/icon_badging.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/shortcuts/icon_badging.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/shortcuts/icon_badging.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 59. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_signin_signin_util_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/signin/signin_util.cc |--- chrome/browser/signin/signin_util.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/signin/signin_util.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/signin/signin_util.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 81. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_supervised_user_supervised_user_extensions_delegate_impl_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/supervised_user/supervised_user_extensions_delegate_impl.cc |--- chrome/browser/supervised_user/supervised_user_extensions_delegate_impl.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/supervised_user/supervised_user_extensions_delegate_impl.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/supervised_user/supervised_user_extensions_delegate_impl.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 196. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_supervised_user_supervised_user_extensions_manager_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/supervised_user/supervised_user_extensions_manager.cc |--- chrome/browser/supervised_user/supervised_user_extensions_manager.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/supervised_user/supervised_user_extensions_manager.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/supervised_user/supervised_user_extensions_manager.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 359. Hunk #2 succeeded at 476. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_supervised_user_supervised_user_extensions_manager_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/supervised_user/supervised_user_extensions_manager.h |--- chrome/browser/supervised_user/supervised_user_extensions_manager.h.orig |+++ chrome/browser/supervised_user/supervised_user_extensions_manager.h -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/supervised_user/supervised_user_extensions_manager.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 154. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_supervised_user_supervised_user_google_auth_navigation_throttle_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/supervised_user/supervised_user_google_auth_navigation_throttle.cc |--- chrome/browser/supervised_user/supervised_user_google_auth_navigation_throttle.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/supervised_user/supervised_user_google_auth_navigation_throttle.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/supervised_user/supervised_user_google_auth_navigation_throttle.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 25. Hunk #2 succeeded at 139. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_supervised_user_supervised_user_metrics_service_factory_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/supervised_user/supervised_user_metrics_service_factory.cc |--- chrome/browser/supervised_user/supervised_user_metrics_service_factory.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/supervised_user/supervised_user_metrics_service_factory.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/supervised_user/supervised_user_metrics_service_factory.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 14. Hunk #2 succeeded at 61. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_supervised_user_supervised_user_navigation_observer_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/supervised_user/supervised_user_navigation_observer.cc |--- chrome/browser/supervised_user/supervised_user_navigation_observer.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/supervised_user/supervised_user_navigation_observer.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/supervised_user/supervised_user_navigation_observer.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 47. Hunk #2 succeeded at 67. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_sync_chrome_sync_client_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/sync/chrome_sync_client.cc |--- chrome/browser/sync/chrome_sync_client.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/sync/chrome_sync_client.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/sync/chrome_sync_client.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 119. Hunk #2 succeeded at 233. Hunk #3 succeeded at 251. Hunk #4 succeeded at 545. Hunk #5 succeeded at 586. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_sync_device_info_sync_client_impl_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/sync/device_info_sync_client_impl.cc |--- chrome/browser/sync/device_info_sync_client_impl.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/sync/device_info_sync_client_impl.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/sync/device_info_sync_client_impl.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 41. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_sync_sync_service_factory_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/sync/sync_service_factory.cc |--- chrome/browser/sync/sync_service_factory.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/sync/sync_service_factory.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/sync/sync_service_factory.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 85. Hunk #2 succeeded at 134. Hunk #3 succeeded at 271. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_tab_group_sync_tab_group_sync_service_factory_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/tab_group_sync/tab_group_sync_service_factory.cc |--- chrome/browser/tab_group_sync/tab_group_sync_service_factory.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/tab_group_sync/tab_group_sync_service_factory.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/tab_group_sync/tab_group_sync_service_factory.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 110. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_task_manager_sampling_task_group_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/task_manager/sampling/task_group.cc |--- chrome/browser/task_manager/sampling/task_group.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/task_manager/sampling/task_group.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/task_manager/sampling/task_group.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 38. Hunk #2 succeeded at 123. Hunk #3 succeeded at 142. Hunk #4 succeeded at 322. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_task_manager_sampling_task_group_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/task_manager/sampling/task_group.h |--- chrome/browser/task_manager/sampling/task_group.h.orig |+++ chrome/browser/task_manager/sampling/task_group.h -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/task_manager/sampling/task_group.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 44. Hunk #2 succeeded at 152. Hunk #3 succeeded at 172. Hunk #4 succeeded at 244. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_task_manager_sampling_task_group_sampler_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/task_manager/sampling/task_group_sampler.cc |--- chrome/browser/task_manager/sampling/task_group_sampler.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/task_manager/sampling/task_group_sampler.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/task_manager/sampling/task_group_sampler.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 46. Hunk #2 succeeded at 56. Hunk #3 succeeded at 86. Hunk #4 succeeded at 96. Hunk #5 succeeded at 150. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_task_manager_sampling_task_group_sampler_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/task_manager/sampling/task_group_sampler.h |--- chrome/browser/task_manager/sampling/task_group_sampler.h.orig |+++ chrome/browser/task_manager/sampling/task_group_sampler.h -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/task_manager/sampling/task_group_sampler.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 31. Hunk #2 succeeded at 43. Hunk #3 succeeded at 63. Hunk #4 succeeded at 87. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_task_manager_sampling_task_manager_impl_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/task_manager/sampling/task_manager_impl.cc |--- chrome/browser/task_manager/sampling/task_manager_impl.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/task_manager/sampling/task_manager_impl.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/task_manager/sampling/task_manager_impl.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 219. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_task_manager_task_manager_observer_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/task_manager/task_manager_observer.h |--- chrome/browser/task_manager/task_manager_observer.h.orig |+++ chrome/browser/task_manager/task_manager_observer.h -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/task_manager/task_manager_observer.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 47. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_themes_theme_helper_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/themes/theme_helper.cc |--- chrome/browser/themes/theme_helper.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/themes/theme_helper.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/themes/theme_helper.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 18. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_themes_theme_service_aura_linux_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/themes/theme_service_aura_linux.cc |--- chrome/browser/themes/theme_service_aura_linux.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/themes/theme_service_aura_linux.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/themes/theme_service_aura_linux.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 23. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_themes_theme_service_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/themes/theme_service.cc |--- chrome/browser/themes/theme_service.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/themes/theme_service.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/themes/theme_service.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 70. Hunk #2 succeeded at 326. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_themes_theme_service_factory_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/themes/theme_service_factory.cc |--- chrome/browser/themes/theme_service_factory.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/themes/theme_service_factory.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/themes/theme_service_factory.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 27. Hunk #2 succeeded at 106. Hunk #3 succeeded at 120. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_ui_actions_chrome_action_id_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/ui/actions/chrome_action_id.h |--- chrome/browser/ui/actions/chrome_action_id.h.orig |+++ chrome/browser/ui/actions/chrome_action_id.h -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/ui/actions/chrome_action_id.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 510. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_ui_autofill_payments_desktop_payments_window_manager_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/ui/autofill/payments/desktop_payments_window_manager.cc |--- chrome/browser/ui/autofill/payments/desktop_payments_window_manager.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/ui/autofill/payments/desktop_payments_window_manager.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/ui/autofill/payments/desktop_payments_window_manager.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 49. Hunk #2 succeeded at 109. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_ui_autofill_payments_desktop_payments_window_manager_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/ui/autofill/payments/desktop_payments_window_manager.h |--- chrome/browser/ui/autofill/payments/desktop_payments_window_manager.h.orig |+++ chrome/browser/ui/autofill/payments/desktop_payments_window_manager.h -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/ui/autofill/payments/desktop_payments_window_manager.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 14. Hunk #2 succeeded at 39. Hunk #3 succeeded at 58. Hunk #4 succeeded at 136. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_ui_browser_command_controller_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/ui/browser_command_controller.cc |--- chrome/browser/ui/browser_command_controller.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/ui/browser_command_controller.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/ui/browser_command_controller.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 129. Hunk #2 succeeded at 138. Hunk #3 succeeded at 315. Hunk #4 succeeded at 567. Hunk #5 succeeded at 579. Hunk #6 succeeded at 773. Hunk #7 succeeded at 1272. Hunk #8 succeeded at 1592. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_ui_browser_commands_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/ui/browser_commands.cc |--- chrome/browser/ui/browser_commands.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/ui/browser_commands.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/ui/browser_commands.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 2005. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_ui_browser_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/ui/browser.h |--- chrome/browser/ui/browser.h.orig |+++ chrome/browser/ui/browser.h -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/ui/browser.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 338. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_ui_browser_ui_prefs_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/ui/browser_ui_prefs.cc |--- chrome/browser/ui/browser_ui_prefs.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/ui/browser_ui_prefs.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/ui/browser_ui_prefs.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 72. Hunk #2 succeeded at 179. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_ui_browser_view_prefs_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/ui/browser_view_prefs.cc |--- chrome/browser/ui/browser_view_prefs.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/ui/browser_view_prefs.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/ui/browser_view_prefs.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 15. Hunk #2 succeeded at 31. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_ui_chrome_pages_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/ui/chrome_pages.cc |--- chrome/browser/ui/chrome_pages.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/ui/chrome_pages.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/ui/chrome_pages.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 87. Hunk #2 succeeded at 380. Hunk #3 succeeded at 722. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_ui_chrome_pages_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/ui/chrome_pages.h |--- chrome/browser/ui/chrome_pages.h.orig |+++ chrome/browser/ui/chrome_pages.h -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/ui/chrome_pages.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 39. Hunk #2 succeeded at 196. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_ui_color_native_chrome_color_mixer_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/ui/color/native_chrome_color_mixer.cc |--- chrome/browser/ui/color/native_chrome_color_mixer.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/ui/color/native_chrome_color_mixer.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/ui/color/native_chrome_color_mixer.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 7. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_ui_omnibox_omnibox_pedal_implementations_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/ui/omnibox/omnibox_pedal_implementations.cc |--- chrome/browser/ui/omnibox/omnibox_pedal_implementations.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/ui/omnibox/omnibox_pedal_implementations.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/ui/omnibox/omnibox_pedal_implementations.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 1976. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_ui_passwords_bubble_controllers_relaunch_chrome_bubble_controller_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/ui/passwords/bubble_controllers/relaunch_chrome_bubble_controller.cc |--- chrome/browser/ui/passwords/bubble_controllers/relaunch_chrome_bubble_controller.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/ui/passwords/bubble_controllers/relaunch_chrome_bubble_controller.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/ui/passwords/bubble_controllers/relaunch_chrome_bubble_controller.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 44. Hunk #2 succeeded at 57. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_ui_passwords_manage_passwords_ui_controller_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/ui/passwords/manage_passwords_ui_controller.cc |--- chrome/browser/ui/passwords/manage_passwords_ui_controller.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/ui/passwords/manage_passwords_ui_controller.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/ui/passwords/manage_passwords_ui_controller.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 97. Hunk #2 succeeded at 502. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_ui_sad_tab_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/ui/sad_tab.cc |--- chrome/browser/ui/sad_tab.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/ui/sad_tab.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/ui/sad_tab.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 176. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_ui_sharing_hub_sharing_hub_bubble_controller_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/ui/sharing_hub/sharing_hub_bubble_controller.h |--- chrome/browser/ui/sharing_hub/sharing_hub_bubble_controller.h.orig |+++ chrome/browser/ui/sharing_hub/sharing_hub_bubble_controller.h -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/ui/sharing_hub/sharing_hub_bubble_controller.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 36. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_ui_signin_signin_view_controller_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/ui/signin/signin_view_controller.cc |--- chrome/browser/ui/signin/signin_view_controller.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/ui/signin/signin_view_controller.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/ui/signin/signin_view_controller.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 492. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_ui_signin_signin_view_controller_delegate_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/ui/signin/signin_view_controller_delegate.h |--- chrome/browser/ui/signin/signin_view_controller_delegate.h.orig |+++ chrome/browser/ui/signin/signin_view_controller_delegate.h -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/ui/signin/signin_view_controller_delegate.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 83. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_ui_startup_bad_flags_prompt_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/ui/startup/bad_flags_prompt.cc |--- chrome/browser/ui/startup/bad_flags_prompt.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/ui/startup/bad_flags_prompt.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/ui/startup/bad_flags_prompt.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 107. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_ui_startup_startup_browser_creator_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/ui/startup/startup_browser_creator.cc |--- chrome/browser/ui/startup/startup_browser_creator.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/ui/startup/startup_browser_creator.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/ui/startup/startup_browser_creator.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 138. Hunk #2 succeeded at 967. Hunk #3 succeeded at 1084. Hunk #4 succeeded at 1294. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_ui_startup_startup_browser_creator_impl_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/ui/startup/startup_browser_creator_impl.cc |--- chrome/browser/ui/startup/startup_browser_creator_impl.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/ui/startup/startup_browser_creator_impl.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/ui/startup/startup_browser_creator_impl.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 86. Hunk #2 succeeded at 237. Hunk #3 succeeded at 267. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_ui_startup_startup_tab_provider_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/ui/startup/startup_tab_provider.cc |--- chrome/browser/ui/startup/startup_tab_provider.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/ui/startup/startup_tab_provider.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/ui/startup/startup_tab_provider.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 61. Hunk #2 succeeded at 105. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_ui_tab_helpers_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/ui/tab_helpers.cc |--- chrome/browser/ui/tab_helpers.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/ui/tab_helpers.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/ui/tab_helpers.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 241. Hunk #2 succeeded at 719. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_ui_tabs_features_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/ui/tabs/features.cc |--- chrome/browser/ui/tabs/features.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/ui/tabs/features.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/ui/tabs/features.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 48. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_ui_tabs_tab_strip_prefs_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/ui/tabs/tab_strip_prefs.cc |--- chrome/browser/ui/tabs/tab_strip_prefs.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/ui/tabs/tab_strip_prefs.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/ui/tabs/tab_strip_prefs.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 20. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_ui_task_manager_task_manager_columns_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/ui/task_manager/task_manager_columns.cc |--- chrome/browser/ui/task_manager/task_manager_columns.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/ui/task_manager/task_manager_columns.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/ui/task_manager/task_manager_columns.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 93. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_ui_task_manager_task_manager_table_model_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/ui/task_manager/task_manager_table_model.cc |--- chrome/browser/ui/task_manager/task_manager_table_model.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/ui/task_manager/task_manager_table_model.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/ui/task_manager/task_manager_table_model.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 454. Hunk #2 succeeded at 621. Hunk #3 succeeded at 806. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_ui_test_popup_browsertest_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/ui/test/popup_browsertest.cc |--- chrome/browser/ui/test/popup_browsertest.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/ui/test/popup_browsertest.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/ui/test/popup_browsertest.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 74. Hunk #2 succeeded at 106. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_ui_test_test_browser_ui_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/ui/test/test_browser_ui.cc |--- chrome/browser/ui/test/test_browser_ui.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/ui/test/test_browser_ui.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/ui/test/test_browser_ui.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 22. Hunk #2 succeeded at 39. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_ui_ui_features_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/ui/ui_features.cc |--- chrome/browser/ui/ui_features.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/ui/ui_features.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/ui/ui_features.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 108. Hunk #2 succeeded at 381. Hunk #3 succeeded at 457. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_ui_ui_features_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/ui/ui_features.h |--- chrome/browser/ui/ui_features.h.orig |+++ chrome/browser/ui/ui_features.h -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/ui/ui_features.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 80. Hunk #2 succeeded at 239. Hunk #3 succeeded at 266. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_ui_views_accelerator_table_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/ui/views/accelerator_table.cc |--- chrome/browser/ui/views/accelerator_table.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/ui/views/accelerator_table.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/ui/views/accelerator_table.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 72. Hunk #2 succeeded at 104. Hunk #3 succeeded at 156. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_ui_views_apps_chrome_native_app_window_views_aura_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/ui/views/apps/chrome_native_app_window_views_aura.cc |--- chrome/browser/ui/views/apps/chrome_native_app_window_views_aura.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/ui/views/apps/chrome_native_app_window_views_aura.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/ui/views/apps/chrome_native_app_window_views_aura.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 19. Hunk #2 succeeded at 55. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_ui_views_chrome_browser_main_extra_parts_views_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/ui/views/chrome_browser_main_extra_parts_views.cc |--- chrome/browser/ui/views/chrome_browser_main_extra_parts_views.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/ui/views/chrome_browser_main_extra_parts_views.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/ui/views/chrome_browser_main_extra_parts_views.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 38. Hunk #2 succeeded at 131. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_ui_views_chrome_views_delegate_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/ui/views/chrome_views_delegate.h |--- chrome/browser/ui/views/chrome_views_delegate.h.orig |+++ chrome/browser/ui/views/chrome_views_delegate.h -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/ui/views/chrome_views_delegate.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 59. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_ui_views_chrome_views_delegate_linux_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/ui/views/chrome_views_delegate_linux.cc |--- chrome/browser/ui/views/chrome_views_delegate_linux.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/ui/views/chrome_views_delegate_linux.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/ui/views/chrome_views_delegate_linux.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 26. Hunk #2 succeeded at 80. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_ui_views_compose_compose_dialog_view_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/ui/views/compose/compose_dialog_view.cc |--- chrome/browser/ui/views/compose/compose_dialog_view.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/ui/views/compose/compose_dialog_view.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/ui/views/compose/compose_dialog_view.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 159. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_ui_views_frame_browser_frame_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/ui/views/frame/browser_frame.cc |--- chrome/browser/ui/views/frame/browser_frame.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/ui/views/frame/browser_frame.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/ui/views/frame/browser_frame.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 54. Hunk #2 succeeded at 89. Hunk #3 succeeded at 184. Hunk #4 succeeded at 370. Hunk #5 succeeded at 563. Hunk #6 succeeded at 604. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_ui_views_frame_browser_frame_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/ui/views/frame/browser_frame.h |--- chrome/browser/ui/views/frame/browser_frame.h.orig |+++ chrome/browser/ui/views/frame/browser_frame.h -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/ui/views/frame/browser_frame.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 65. Hunk #2 succeeded at 225. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_ui_views_frame_browser_frame_view_layout_linux_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/ui/views/frame/browser_frame_view_layout_linux.cc |--- chrome/browser/ui/views/frame/browser_frame_view_layout_linux.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/ui/views/frame/browser_frame_view_layout_linux.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/ui/views/frame/browser_frame_view_layout_linux.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 53. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_ui_views_frame_browser_frame_view_layout_linux_native_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/ui/views/frame/browser_frame_view_layout_linux_native.cc |--- chrome/browser/ui/views/frame/browser_frame_view_layout_linux_native.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/ui/views/frame/browser_frame_view_layout_linux_native.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/ui/views/frame/browser_frame_view_layout_linux_native.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 18. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_ui_views_frame_browser_frame_view_linux_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/ui/views/frame/browser_frame_view_linux.cc |--- chrome/browser/ui/views/frame/browser_frame_view_linux.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/ui/views/frame/browser_frame_view_linux.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/ui/views/frame/browser_frame_view_linux.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 60. Hunk #2 succeeded at 104. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_ui_views_frame_browser_non_client_frame_view_factory_views_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/ui/views/frame/browser_non_client_frame_view_factory_views.cc |--- chrome/browser/ui/views/frame/browser_non_client_frame_view_factory_views.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/ui/views/frame/browser_non_client_frame_view_factory_views.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/ui/views/frame/browser_non_client_frame_view_factory_views.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 16. Hunk #2 succeeded at 33. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_ui_views_frame_browser_view_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/ui/views/frame/browser_view.cc |--- chrome/browser/ui/views/frame/browser_view.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/ui/views/frame/browser_view.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/ui/views/frame/browser_view.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 2258. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_ui_views_frame_opaque_browser_frame_view_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/ui/views/frame/opaque_browser_frame_view.cc |--- chrome/browser/ui/views/frame/opaque_browser_frame_view.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/ui/views/frame/opaque_browser_frame_view.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/ui/views/frame/opaque_browser_frame_view.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 54. Hunk #2 succeeded at 564. Hunk #3 succeeded at 583. Hunk #4 succeeded at 782. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_ui_views_frame_opaque_browser_frame_view_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/ui/views/frame/opaque_browser_frame_view.h |--- chrome/browser/ui/views/frame/opaque_browser_frame_view.h.orig |+++ chrome/browser/ui/views/frame/opaque_browser_frame_view.h -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/ui/views/frame/opaque_browser_frame_view.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 114. Hunk #2 succeeded at 231. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_ui_views_frame_opaque_browser_frame_view_layout_delegate_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/ui/views/frame/opaque_browser_frame_view_layout_delegate.h |--- chrome/browser/ui/views/frame/opaque_browser_frame_view_layout_delegate.h.orig |+++ chrome/browser/ui/views/frame/opaque_browser_frame_view_layout_delegate.h -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/ui/views/frame/opaque_browser_frame_view_layout_delegate.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 10. Hunk #2 succeeded at 93. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_ui_views_frame_picture_in_picture_browser_frame_view_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/ui/views/frame/picture_in_picture_browser_frame_view.cc |--- chrome/browser/ui/views/frame/picture_in_picture_browser_frame_view.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/ui/views/frame/picture_in_picture_browser_frame_view.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/ui/views/frame/picture_in_picture_browser_frame_view.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 61. Hunk #2 succeeded at 93. Hunk #3 succeeded at 185. Hunk #4 succeeded at 581. Hunk #5 succeeded at 803. Hunk #6 succeeded at 885. Hunk #7 succeeded at 1153. Hunk #8 succeeded at 1287. Hunk #9 succeeded at 1305. Hunk #10 succeeded at 1326. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_ui_views_frame_picture_in_picture_browser_frame_view_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/ui/views/frame/picture_in_picture_browser_frame_view.h |--- chrome/browser/ui/views/frame/picture_in_picture_browser_frame_view.h.orig |+++ chrome/browser/ui/views/frame/picture_in_picture_browser_frame_view.h -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/ui/views/frame/picture_in_picture_browser_frame_view.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 27. Hunk #2 succeeded at 35. Hunk #3 succeeded at 103. Hunk #4 succeeded at 195. Hunk #5 succeeded at 371. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_ui_views_frame_system_menu_model_builder_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/ui/views/frame/system_menu_model_builder.cc |--- chrome/browser/ui/views/frame/system_menu_model_builder.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/ui/views/frame/system_menu_model_builder.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/ui/views/frame/system_menu_model_builder.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 75. Hunk #2 succeeded at 91. Hunk #3 succeeded at 155. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_ui_views_frame_system_menu_model_delegate_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/ui/views/frame/system_menu_model_delegate.cc |--- chrome/browser/ui/views/frame/system_menu_model_delegate.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/ui/views/frame/system_menu_model_delegate.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/ui/views/frame/system_menu_model_delegate.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 21. Hunk #2 succeeded at 36. Hunk #3 succeeded at 58. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_ui_views_frame_tab_strip_region_view_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/ui/views/frame/tab_strip_region_view.cc |--- chrome/browser/ui/views/frame/tab_strip_region_view.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/ui/views/frame/tab_strip_region_view.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/ui/views/frame/tab_strip_region_view.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 201. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_ui_views_hung_renderer_view_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/ui/views/hung_renderer_view.cc |--- chrome/browser/ui/views/hung_renderer_view.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/ui/views/hung_renderer_view.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/ui/views/hung_renderer_view.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 406. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_ui_views_omnibox_omnibox_view_views_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/ui/views/omnibox/omnibox_view_views.cc |--- chrome/browser/ui/views/omnibox/omnibox_view_views.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/ui/views/omnibox/omnibox_view_views.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/ui/views/omnibox/omnibox_view_views.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 1972. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_ui_views_passwords_password_bubble_view_base_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/ui/views/passwords/password_bubble_view_base.cc |--- chrome/browser/ui/views/passwords/password_bubble_view_base.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/ui/views/passwords/password_bubble_view_base.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/ui/views/passwords/password_bubble_view_base.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 37. Hunk #2 succeeded at 141. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_ui_views_profiles_profile_menu_view_base_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/ui/views/profiles/profile_menu_view_base.cc |--- chrome/browser/ui/views/profiles/profile_menu_view_base.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/ui/views/profiles/profile_menu_view_base.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/ui/views/profiles/profile_menu_view_base.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 687. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_ui_views_profiles_profile_menu_view_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/ui/views/profiles/profile_menu_view.cc |--- chrome/browser/ui/views/profiles/profile_menu_view.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/ui/views/profiles/profile_menu_view.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/ui/views/profiles/profile_menu_view.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 83. Hunk #2 succeeded at 568. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_ui_views_profiles_profile_picker_view_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/ui/views/profiles/profile_picker_view.cc |--- chrome/browser/ui/views/profiles/profile_picker_view.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/ui/views/profiles/profile_picker_view.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/ui/views/profiles/profile_picker_view.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 87. Hunk #2 succeeded at 117. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_ui_views_profiles_signin_view_controller_delegate_views_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/ui/views/profiles/signin_view_controller_delegate_views.cc |--- chrome/browser/ui/views/profiles/signin_view_controller_delegate_views.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/ui/views/profiles/signin_view_controller_delegate_views.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/ui/views/profiles/signin_view_controller_delegate_views.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 55. Hunk #2 succeeded at 173. Hunk #3 succeeded at 335. Hunk #4 succeeded at 425. Hunk #5 succeeded at 499. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_ui_views_profiles_signin_view_controller_delegate_views_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/ui/views/profiles/signin_view_controller_delegate_views.h |--- chrome/browser/ui/views/profiles/signin_view_controller_delegate_views.h.orig |+++ chrome/browser/ui/views/profiles/signin_view_controller_delegate_views.h -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/ui/views/profiles/signin_view_controller_delegate_views.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 75. Hunk #2 succeeded at 141. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_ui_views_tabs_tab_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/ui/views/tabs/tab.cc |--- chrome/browser/ui/views/tabs/tab.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/ui/views/tabs/tab.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/ui/views/tabs/tab.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 616. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_ui_views_tabs_tab_drag_controller_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/ui/views/tabs/tab_drag_controller.cc |--- chrome/browser/ui/views/tabs/tab_drag_controller.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/ui/views/tabs/tab_drag_controller.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/ui/views/tabs/tab_drag_controller.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 98. Hunk #2 succeeded at 218. Hunk #3 succeeded at 416. Hunk #4 succeeded at 1065. Hunk #5 succeeded at 2151. Hunk #6 succeeded at 2597. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_ui_views_tabs_tab_hover_card_bubble_view_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/ui/views/tabs/tab_hover_card_bubble_view.cc |--- chrome/browser/ui/views/tabs/tab_hover_card_bubble_view.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/ui/views/tabs/tab_hover_card_bubble_view.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/ui/views/tabs/tab_hover_card_bubble_view.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 374. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_ui_views_tabs_tab_style_views_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/ui/views/tabs/tab_style_views.cc |--- chrome/browser/ui/views/tabs/tab_style_views.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/ui/views/tabs/tab_style_views.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/ui/views/tabs/tab_style_views.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 550. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_ui_views_user_education_browser_user_education_service_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/ui/views/user_education/browser_user_education_service.cc |--- chrome/browser/ui/views/user_education/browser_user_education_service.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/ui/views/user_education/browser_user_education_service.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/ui/views/user_education/browser_user_education_service.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 1008. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_ui_views_web_apps_web_app_integration_test_driver_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/ui/views/web_apps/web_app_integration_test_driver.cc |--- chrome/browser/ui/views/web_apps/web_app_integration_test_driver.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/ui/views/web_apps/web_app_integration_test_driver.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/ui/views/web_apps/web_app_integration_test_driver.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 516. Hunk #2 succeeded at 2104. Hunk #3 succeeded at 3431. Hunk #4 succeeded at 3446. Hunk #5 succeeded at 3456. Hunk #6 succeeded at 3472. Hunk #7 succeeded at 4289. Hunk #8 succeeded at 4489. Hunk #9 succeeded at 4533. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_ui_web_applications_web_app_dialogs_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/ui/web_applications/web_app_dialogs.h |--- chrome/browser/ui/web_applications/web_app_dialogs.h.orig |+++ chrome/browser/ui/web_applications/web_app_dialogs.h -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/ui/web_applications/web_app_dialogs.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 22. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_ui_web_applications_web_app_ui_manager_impl_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/ui/web_applications/web_app_ui_manager_impl.cc |--- chrome/browser/ui/web_applications/web_app_ui_manager_impl.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/ui/web_applications/web_app_ui_manager_impl.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/ui/web_applications/web_app_ui_manager_impl.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 577. Hunk #2 succeeded at 797. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_ui_web_applications_web_app_ui_manager_impl_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/ui/web_applications/web_app_ui_manager_impl.h |--- chrome/browser/ui/web_applications/web_app_ui_manager_impl.h.orig |+++ chrome/browser/ui/web_applications/web_app_ui_manager_impl.h -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/ui/web_applications/web_app_ui_manager_impl.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 222. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_ui_webui_about_about_ui_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/ui/webui/about/about_ui.cc |--- chrome/browser/ui/webui/about/about_ui.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/ui/webui/about/about_ui.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/ui/webui/about/about_ui.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 596. Hunk #2 succeeded at 651. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_ui_webui_app_home_app_home_page_handler_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/ui/webui/app_home/app_home_page_handler.cc |--- chrome/browser/ui/webui/app_home/app_home_page_handler.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/ui/webui/app_home/app_home_page_handler.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/ui/webui/app_home/app_home_page_handler.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 61. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_ui_webui_app_home_app_home_page_handler_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/ui/webui/app_home/app_home_page_handler.h |--- chrome/browser/ui/webui/app_home/app_home_page_handler.h.orig |+++ chrome/browser/ui/webui/app_home/app_home_page_handler.h -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/ui/webui/app_home/app_home_page_handler.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 24. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_ui_webui_certificate_manager_certificate_manager_handler_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/ui/webui/certificate_manager/certificate_manager_handler.cc |--- chrome/browser/ui/webui/certificate_manager/certificate_manager_handler.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/ui/webui/certificate_manager/certificate_manager_handler.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/ui/webui/certificate_manager/certificate_manager_handler.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 147. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_ui_webui_certificate_manager_client_cert_sources_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/ui/webui/certificate_manager/client_cert_sources.cc |--- chrome/browser/ui/webui/certificate_manager/client_cert_sources.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/ui/webui/certificate_manager/client_cert_sources.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/ui/webui/certificate_manager/client_cert_sources.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 36. Hunk #2 succeeded at 98. Hunk #3 succeeded at 373. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_ui_webui_certificate_manager_client_cert_sources_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/ui/webui/certificate_manager/client_cert_sources.h |--- chrome/browser/ui/webui/certificate_manager/client_cert_sources.h.orig |+++ chrome/browser/ui/webui/certificate_manager/client_cert_sources.h -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/ui/webui/certificate_manager/client_cert_sources.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 15. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_ui_webui_chrome_web_ui_controller_factory_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/ui/webui/chrome_web_ui_controller_factory.cc |--- chrome/browser/ui/webui/chrome_web_ui_controller_factory.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/ui/webui/chrome_web_ui_controller_factory.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/ui/webui/chrome_web_ui_controller_factory.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 189. Hunk #2 succeeded at 214. Hunk #3 succeeded at 378. Hunk #4 succeeded at 572. Hunk #5 succeeded at 628. Hunk #6 succeeded at 659. Hunk #7 succeeded at 678. Hunk #8 succeeded at 936. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_ui_webui_connectors_internals_device_trust_utils_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/ui/webui/connectors_internals/device_trust_utils.cc |--- chrome/browser/ui/webui/connectors_internals/device_trust_utils.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/ui/webui/connectors_internals/device_trust_utils.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/ui/webui/connectors_internals/device_trust_utils.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 7. Hunk #2 succeeded at 38. Hunk #3 succeeded at 173. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_ui_webui_interstitials_interstitial_ui_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/ui/webui/interstitials/interstitial_ui.cc |--- chrome/browser/ui/webui/interstitials/interstitial_ui.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/ui/webui/interstitials/interstitial_ui.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/ui/webui/interstitials/interstitial_ui.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 70. Hunk #2 succeeded at 376. Hunk #3 succeeded at 570. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_ui_webui_management_management_ui_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/ui/webui/management/management_ui.cc |--- chrome/browser/ui/webui/management/management_ui.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/ui/webui/management/management_ui.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/ui/webui/management/management_ui.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 100. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_ui_webui_management_management_ui_constants_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/ui/webui/management/management_ui_constants.cc |--- chrome/browser/ui/webui/management/management_ui_constants.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/ui/webui/management/management_ui_constants.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/ui/webui/management/management_ui_constants.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 82. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_ui_webui_management_management_ui_constants_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/ui/webui/management/management_ui_constants.h |--- chrome/browser/ui/webui/management/management_ui_constants.h.orig |+++ chrome/browser/ui/webui/management/management_ui_constants.h -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/ui/webui/management/management_ui_constants.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 8. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_ui_webui_management_management_ui_handler_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/ui/webui/management/management_ui_handler.cc |--- chrome/browser/ui/webui/management/management_ui_handler.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/ui/webui/management/management_ui_handler.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/ui/webui/management/management_ui_handler.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 58. Hunk #2 succeeded at 365. Hunk #3 succeeded at 543. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_ui_webui_management_management_ui_handler_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/ui/webui/management/management_ui_handler.h |--- chrome/browser/ui/webui/management/management_ui_handler.h.orig |+++ chrome/browser/ui/webui/management/management_ui_handler.h -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/ui/webui/management/management_ui_handler.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 31. Hunk #2 succeeded at 72. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_ui_webui_password_manager_promo_cards_handler_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/ui/webui/password_manager/promo_cards_handler.cc |--- chrome/browser/ui/webui/password_manager/promo_cards_handler.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/ui/webui/password_manager/promo_cards_handler.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/ui/webui/password_manager/promo_cards_handler.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 28. Hunk #2 succeeded at 75. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_ui_webui_password_manager_promo_cards_relaunch_chrome_promo_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/ui/webui/password_manager/promo_cards/relaunch_chrome_promo.cc |--- chrome/browser/ui/webui/password_manager/promo_cards/relaunch_chrome_promo.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/ui/webui/password_manager/promo_cards/relaunch_chrome_promo.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/ui/webui/password_manager/promo_cards/relaunch_chrome_promo.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 37. Hunk #2 succeeded at 47. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_ui_webui_searchbox_searchbox_handler_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/ui/webui/searchbox/searchbox_handler.cc |--- chrome/browser/ui/webui/searchbox/searchbox_handler.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/ui/webui/searchbox/searchbox_handler.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/ui/webui/searchbox/searchbox_handler.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 108. Hunk #2 succeeded at 168. Hunk #3 succeeded at 675. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_ui_webui_settings_appearance_handler_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/ui/webui/settings/appearance_handler.cc |--- chrome/browser/ui/webui/settings/appearance_handler.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/ui/webui/settings/appearance_handler.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/ui/webui/settings/appearance_handler.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 34. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_ui_webui_settings_settings_localized_strings_provider_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/ui/webui/settings/settings_localized_strings_provider.cc |--- chrome/browser/ui/webui/settings/settings_localized_strings_provider.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/ui/webui/settings/settings_localized_strings_provider.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/ui/webui/settings/settings_localized_strings_provider.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 141. Hunk #2 succeeded at 160. Hunk #3 succeeded at 280. Hunk #4 succeeded at 405. Hunk #5 succeeded at 413. Hunk #6 succeeded at 441. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_ui_webui_signin_profile_picker_handler_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/ui/webui/signin/profile_picker_handler.cc |--- chrome/browser/ui/webui/signin/profile_picker_handler.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/ui/webui/signin/profile_picker_handler.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/ui/webui/signin/profile_picker_handler.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 203. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_ui_window_sizer_window_sizer_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/ui/window_sizer/window_sizer.cc |--- chrome/browser/ui/window_sizer/window_sizer.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/ui/window_sizer/window_sizer.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/ui/window_sizer/window_sizer.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 210. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_visited_url_ranking_visited_url_ranking_service_factory_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/visited_url_ranking/visited_url_ranking_service_factory.cc |--- chrome/browser/visited_url_ranking/visited_url_ranking_service_factory.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/visited_url_ranking/visited_url_ranking_service_factory.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/visited_url_ranking/visited_url_ranking_service_factory.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 41. Hunk #2 succeeded at 114. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_web_applications_commands_launch_web_app_command_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/web_applications/commands/launch_web_app_command.cc |--- chrome/browser/web_applications/commands/launch_web_app_command.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/web_applications/commands/launch_web_app_command.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/web_applications/commands/launch_web_app_command.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 98. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_web_applications_commands_set_user_display_mode_command_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/web_applications/commands/set_user_display_mode_command.cc |--- chrome/browser/web_applications/commands/set_user_display_mode_command.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/web_applications/commands/set_user_display_mode_command.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/web_applications/commands/set_user_display_mode_command.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 57. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_web_applications_extension_status_utils_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/web_applications/extension_status_utils.h |--- chrome/browser/web_applications/extension_status_utils.h.orig |+++ chrome/browser/web_applications/extension_status_utils.h -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/web_applications/extension_status_utils.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 55. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_web_applications_extensions_extension_status_utils_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/web_applications/extensions/extension_status_utils.cc |--- chrome/browser/web_applications/extensions/extension_status_utils.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/web_applications/extensions/extension_status_utils.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/web_applications/extensions/extension_status_utils.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 25. Hunk #2 succeeded at 113. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_web_applications_os_integration_os_integration_manager_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/web_applications/os_integration/os_integration_manager.cc |--- chrome/browser/web_applications/os_integration/os_integration_manager.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/web_applications/os_integration/os_integration_manager.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/web_applications/os_integration/os_integration_manager.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 649. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_web_applications_os_integration_os_integration_test_override_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/web_applications/os_integration/os_integration_test_override.h |--- chrome/browser/web_applications/os_integration/os_integration_test_override.h.orig |+++ chrome/browser/web_applications/os_integration/os_integration_test_override.h -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/web_applications/os_integration/os_integration_test_override.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 99. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_web_applications_os_integration_run_on_os_login_sub_manager_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/web_applications/os_integration/run_on_os_login_sub_manager.cc |--- chrome/browser/web_applications/os_integration/run_on_os_login_sub_manager.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/web_applications/os_integration/run_on_os_login_sub_manager.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/web_applications/os_integration/run_on_os_login_sub_manager.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 54. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_web_applications_os_integration_shortcut_sub_manager_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/web_applications/os_integration/shortcut_sub_manager.cc |--- chrome/browser/web_applications/os_integration/shortcut_sub_manager.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/web_applications/os_integration/shortcut_sub_manager.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/web_applications/os_integration/shortcut_sub_manager.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 191. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_web_applications_os_integration_web_app_file_handler_registration_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/web_applications/os_integration/web_app_file_handler_registration.h |--- chrome/browser/web_applications/os_integration/web_app_file_handler_registration.h.orig |+++ chrome/browser/web_applications/os_integration/web_app_file_handler_registration.h -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/web_applications/os_integration/web_app_file_handler_registration.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 43. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_web_applications_os_integration_web_app_shortcut_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/web_applications/os_integration/web_app_shortcut.cc |--- chrome/browser/web_applications/os_integration/web_app_shortcut.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/web_applications/os_integration/web_app_shortcut.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/web_applications/os_integration/web_app_shortcut.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 65. Hunk #2 succeeded at 227. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_web_applications_os_integration_web_app_shortcut_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/web_applications/os_integration/web_app_shortcut.h |--- chrome/browser/web_applications/os_integration/web_app_shortcut.h.orig |+++ chrome/browser/web_applications/os_integration/web_app_shortcut.h -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/web_applications/os_integration/web_app_shortcut.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 21. Hunk #2 succeeded at 70. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_web_applications_policy_web_app_policy_manager_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/web_applications/policy/web_app_policy_manager.cc |--- chrome/browser/web_applications/policy/web_app_policy_manager.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/web_applications/policy/web_app_policy_manager.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/web_applications/policy/web_app_policy_manager.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 101. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_web_applications_test_os_integration_test_override_impl_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/web_applications/test/os_integration_test_override_impl.cc |--- chrome/browser/web_applications/test/os_integration_test_override_impl.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/web_applications/test/os_integration_test_override_impl.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/web_applications/test/os_integration_test_override_impl.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 46. Hunk #2 succeeded at 131. Hunk #3 succeeded at 266. Hunk #4 succeeded at 314. Hunk #5 succeeded at 328. Hunk #6 succeeded at 384. Hunk #7 succeeded at 427. Hunk #8 succeeded at 477. Hunk #9 succeeded at 502. Hunk #10 succeeded at 690. Hunk #11 succeeded at 741. Hunk #12 succeeded at 754. Hunk #13 succeeded at 826. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_web_applications_test_os_integration_test_override_impl_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/web_applications/test/os_integration_test_override_impl.h |--- chrome/browser/web_applications/test/os_integration_test_override_impl.h.orig |+++ chrome/browser/web_applications/test/os_integration_test_override_impl.h -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/web_applications/test/os_integration_test_override_impl.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 40. Hunk #2 succeeded at 122. Hunk #3 succeeded at 242. Hunk #4 succeeded at 322. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_web_applications_web_app_helpers_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/web_applications/web_app_helpers.cc |--- chrome/browser/web_applications/web_app_helpers.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/web_applications/web_app_helpers.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/web_applications/web_app_helpers.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 145. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_web_applications_web_app_install_info_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/web_applications/web_app_install_info.h |--- chrome/browser/web_applications/web_app_install_info.h.orig |+++ chrome/browser/web_applications/web_app_install_info.h -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/web_applications/web_app_install_info.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 38. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_webauthn_chrome_authenticator_request_delegate_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/webauthn/chrome_authenticator_request_delegate.cc |--- chrome/browser/webauthn/chrome_authenticator_request_delegate.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/webauthn/chrome_authenticator_request_delegate.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/webauthn/chrome_authenticator_request_delegate.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 1095. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_webauthn_enclave_manager_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/webauthn/enclave_manager.cc |--- chrome/browser/webauthn/enclave_manager.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/webauthn/enclave_manager.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/webauthn/enclave_manager.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 686. Hunk #2 succeeded at 696. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_webauthn_gpm_user_verification_policy_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/webauthn/gpm_user_verification_policy.cc |--- chrome/browser/webauthn/gpm_user_verification_policy.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/webauthn/gpm_user_verification_policy.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/webauthn/gpm_user_verification_policy.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 17. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_browser_webauthn_unexportable_key_utils_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/browser/webauthn/unexportable_key_utils.cc |--- chrome/browser/webauthn/unexportable_key_utils.cc.orig |+++ chrome/browser/webauthn/unexportable_key_utils.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/browser/webauthn/unexportable_key_utils.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 33. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_common_channel_info_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/common/channel_info.h |--- chrome/common/channel_info.h.orig |+++ chrome/common/channel_info.h -------------------------- Patching file chrome/common/channel_info.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 12. Hunk #2 succeeded at 100. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_common_channel_info_posix_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/common/channel_info_posix.cc |--- chrome/common/channel_info_posix.cc.orig |+++ chrome/common/channel_info_posix.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/common/channel_info_posix.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 93. Hunk #2 succeeded at 121. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_common_chrome_features_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/common/chrome_features.cc |--- chrome/common/chrome_features.cc.orig |+++ chrome/common/chrome_features.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/common/chrome_features.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 75. Hunk #2 succeeded at 93. Hunk #3 succeeded at 260. Hunk #4 succeeded at 309. Hunk #5 succeeded at 897. Hunk #6 succeeded at 910. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_common_chrome_features_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/common/chrome_features.h |--- chrome/common/chrome_features.h.orig |+++ chrome/common/chrome_features.h -------------------------- Patching file chrome/common/chrome_features.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 55. Hunk #2 succeeded at 192. Hunk #3 succeeded at 545. Hunk #4 succeeded at 553. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_common_chrome_paths_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/common/chrome_paths.cc |--- chrome/common/chrome_paths.cc.orig |+++ chrome/common/chrome_paths.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/common/chrome_paths.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 30. Hunk #2 succeeded at 52. Hunk #3 succeeded at 225. Hunk #4 succeeded at 541. Hunk #5 succeeded at 552. Hunk #6 succeeded at 561. Hunk #7 succeeded at 599. Hunk #8 succeeded at 613. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_common_chrome_paths_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/common/chrome_paths.h |--- chrome/common/chrome_paths.h.orig |+++ chrome/common/chrome_paths.h -------------------------- Patching file chrome/common/chrome_paths.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 59. Hunk #2 succeeded at 67. Hunk #3 succeeded at 126. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_common_chrome_paths_internal_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/common/chrome_paths_internal.h |--- chrome/common/chrome_paths_internal.h.orig |+++ chrome/common/chrome_paths_internal.h -------------------------- Patching file chrome/common/chrome_paths_internal.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 43. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_common_chrome_switches_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/common/chrome_switches.cc |--- chrome/common/chrome_switches.cc.orig |+++ chrome/common/chrome_switches.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/common/chrome_switches.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 898. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_common_chrome_switches_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/common/chrome_switches.h |--- chrome/common/chrome_switches.h.orig |+++ chrome/common/chrome_switches.h -------------------------- Patching file chrome/common/chrome_switches.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 279. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_common_extensions_permissions_chrome_permission_message_rules_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/common/extensions/permissions/chrome_permission_message_rules.cc |--- chrome/common/extensions/permissions/chrome_permission_message_rules.cc.orig |+++ chrome/common/extensions/permissions/chrome_permission_message_rules.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/common/extensions/permissions/chrome_permission_message_rules.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 285. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_common_media_cdm_host_file_path_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/common/media/cdm_host_file_path.cc |--- chrome/common/media/cdm_host_file_path.cc.orig |+++ chrome/common/media/cdm_host_file_path.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/common/media/cdm_host_file_path.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 90. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_common_media_cdm_registration_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/common/media/cdm_registration.cc |--- chrome/common/media/cdm_registration.cc.orig |+++ chrome/common/media/cdm_registration.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/common/media/cdm_registration.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 33. Hunk #2 succeeded at 86. Hunk #3 succeeded at 131. Hunk #4 succeeded at 185. Hunk #5 succeeded at 232. Hunk #6 succeeded at 493. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_common_media_cdm_registration_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/common/media/cdm_registration.h |--- chrome/common/media/cdm_registration.h.orig |+++ chrome/common/media/cdm_registration.h -------------------------- Patching file chrome/common/media/cdm_registration.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 16. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_common_media_component_widevine_cdm_hint_file_linux_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/common/media/component_widevine_cdm_hint_file_linux.h |--- chrome/common/media/component_widevine_cdm_hint_file_linux.h.orig |+++ chrome/common/media/component_widevine_cdm_hint_file_linux.h -------------------------- Patching file chrome/common/media/component_widevine_cdm_hint_file_linux.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 17. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_common_pref_names_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/common/pref_names.h |--- chrome/common/pref_names.h.orig |+++ chrome/common/pref_names.h -------------------------- Patching file chrome/common/pref_names.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 1364. Hunk #2 succeeded at 1507. Hunk #3 succeeded at 2112. Hunk #4 succeeded at 2549. Hunk #5 succeeded at 2634. Hunk #6 succeeded at 3164. Hunk #7 succeeded at 3760. Hunk #8 succeeded at 4034. Hunk #9 succeeded at 4128. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_common_url_constants_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/common/url_constants.h |--- chrome/common/url_constants.h.orig |+++ chrome/common/url_constants.h -------------------------- Patching file chrome/common/url_constants.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 927. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_common_webui_url_constants_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/common/webui_url_constants.cc |--- chrome/common/webui_url_constants.cc.orig |+++ chrome/common/webui_url_constants.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/common/webui_url_constants.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 197. Hunk #2 succeeded at 284. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_common_webui_url_constants_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/common/webui_url_constants.h |--- chrome/common/webui_url_constants.h.orig |+++ chrome/common/webui_url_constants.h -------------------------- Patching file chrome/common/webui_url_constants.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 564. Hunk #2 succeeded at 593. Hunk #3 succeeded at 621. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_enterprise_companion_enterprise_companion_client_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/enterprise_companion/enterprise_companion_client.cc |--- chrome/enterprise_companion/enterprise_companion_client.cc.orig |+++ chrome/enterprise_companion/enterprise_companion_client.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/enterprise_companion/enterprise_companion_client.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 33. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_enterprise_companion_lock_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/enterprise_companion/lock.cc |--- chrome/enterprise_companion/lock.cc.orig |+++ chrome/enterprise_companion/lock.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/enterprise_companion/lock.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 17. Hunk #2 succeeded at 42. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_services_printing_print_backend_service_impl_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/services/printing/print_backend_service_impl.cc |--- chrome/services/printing/print_backend_service_impl.cc.orig |+++ chrome/services/printing/print_backend_service_impl.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/services/printing/print_backend_service_impl.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 50. Hunk #2 succeeded at 77. Hunk #3 succeeded at 86. Hunk #4 succeeded at 470. Hunk #5 succeeded at 691. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_services_speech_audio_source_fetcher_impl_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/services/speech/audio_source_fetcher_impl.cc |--- chrome/services/speech/audio_source_fetcher_impl.cc.orig |+++ chrome/services/speech/audio_source_fetcher_impl.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/services/speech/audio_source_fetcher_impl.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 132. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_test_base_scoped_channel_override_posix_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/test/base/scoped_channel_override_posix.cc |--- chrome/test/base/scoped_channel_override_posix.cc.orig |+++ chrome/test/base/scoped_channel_override_posix.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/test/base/scoped_channel_override_posix.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 45. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_test_chromedriver_chrome_chrome_finder_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/test/chromedriver/chrome/chrome_finder.cc |--- chrome/test/chromedriver/chrome/chrome_finder.cc.orig |+++ chrome/test/chromedriver/chrome/chrome_finder.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/test/chromedriver/chrome/chrome_finder.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 58. Hunk #2 succeeded at 125. Hunk #3 succeeded at 141. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_test_chromedriver_chrome_launcher_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/test/chromedriver/chrome_launcher.cc |--- chrome/test/chromedriver/chrome_launcher.cc.orig |+++ chrome/test/chromedriver/chrome_launcher.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/test/chromedriver/chrome_launcher.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 73. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_test_chromedriver_key_converter_unittest_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/test/chromedriver/key_converter_unittest.cc |--- chrome/test/chromedriver/key_converter_unittest.cc.orig |+++ chrome/test/chromedriver/key_converter_unittest.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/test/chromedriver/key_converter_unittest.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 246. Hunk #2 succeeded at 303. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_test_chromedriver_keycode_text_conversion_unittest_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/test/chromedriver/keycode_text_conversion_unittest.cc |--- chrome/test/chromedriver/keycode_text_conversion_unittest.cc.orig |+++ chrome/test/chromedriver/keycode_text_conversion_unittest.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/test/chromedriver/keycode_text_conversion_unittest.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 67. Hunk #2 succeeded at 104. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_updater_configurator_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/updater/configurator.cc |--- chrome/updater/configurator.cc.orig |+++ chrome/updater/configurator.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/updater/configurator.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 67. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_updater_lock_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/updater/lock.cc |--- chrome/updater/lock.cc.orig |+++ chrome/updater/lock.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/updater/lock.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 26. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_updater_util_posix_util_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/updater/util/posix_util.cc |--- chrome/updater/util/posix_util.cc.orig |+++ chrome/updater/util/posix_util.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/updater/util/posix_util.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 20. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chrome_utility_services_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chrome/utility/services.cc |--- chrome/utility/services.cc.orig |+++ chrome/utility/services.cc -------------------------- Patching file chrome/utility/services.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 57. Hunk #2 succeeded at 214. Hunk #3 succeeded at 481. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chromecast_browser_cast_browser_main_parts_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chromecast/browser/cast_browser_main_parts.cc |--- chromecast/browser/cast_browser_main_parts.cc.orig |+++ chromecast/browser/cast_browser_main_parts.cc -------------------------- Patching file chromecast/browser/cast_browser_main_parts.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 94. Hunk #2 succeeded at 267. Hunk #3 succeeded at 313. Hunk #4 succeeded at 490. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chromecast_browser_cast_content_browser_client_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chromecast/browser/cast_content_browser_client.cc |--- chromecast/browser/cast_content_browser_client.cc.orig |+++ chromecast/browser/cast_content_browser_client.cc -------------------------- Patching file chromecast/browser/cast_content_browser_client.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 431. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chromecast_cast_core_runtime_browser_runtime_application_service_impl_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chromecast/cast_core/runtime/browser/runtime_application_service_impl.cc |--- chromecast/cast_core/runtime/browser/runtime_application_service_impl.cc.orig |+++ chromecast/cast_core/runtime/browser/runtime_application_service_impl.cc -------------------------- Patching file chromecast/cast_core/runtime/browser/runtime_application_service_impl.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 336. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-chromecast_media_base_default_monotonic_clock_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: chromecast/media/base/default_monotonic_clock.cc |--- chromecast/media/base/default_monotonic_clock.cc.orig |+++ chromecast/media/base/default_monotonic_clock.cc -------------------------- Patching file chromecast/media/base/default_monotonic_clock.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 11. Hunk #2 succeeded at 28. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_autofill_core_browser_payments_data_manager_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/autofill/core/browser/payments_data_manager.cc |--- components/autofill/core/browser/payments_data_manager.cc.orig |+++ components/autofill/core/browser/payments_data_manager.cc -------------------------- Patching file components/autofill/core/browser/payments_data_manager.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 1055. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_autofill_core_common_autofill_features_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/autofill/core/common/autofill_features.cc |--- components/autofill/core/common/autofill_features.cc.orig |+++ components/autofill/core/common/autofill_features.cc -------------------------- Patching file components/autofill/core/common/autofill_features.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 673. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_autofill_core_common_autofill_payments_features_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/autofill/core/common/autofill_payments_features.cc |--- components/autofill/core/common/autofill_payments_features.cc.orig |+++ components/autofill/core/common/autofill_payments_features.cc -------------------------- Patching file components/autofill/core/common/autofill_payments_features.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 8. Hunk #2 succeeded at 272. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_autofill_core_common_autofill_payments_features_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/autofill/core/common/autofill_payments_features.h |--- components/autofill/core/common/autofill_payments_features.h.orig |+++ components/autofill/core/common/autofill_payments_features.h -------------------------- Patching file components/autofill/core/common/autofill_payments_features.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 14. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_commerce_core_commerce_feature_list_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/commerce/core/commerce_feature_list.cc |--- components/commerce/core/commerce_feature_list.cc.orig |+++ components/commerce/core/commerce_feature_list.cc -------------------------- Patching file components/commerce/core/commerce_feature_list.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 168. Hunk #2 succeeded at 261. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_constrained_window_constrained_window_views_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/constrained_window/constrained_window_views.cc |--- components/constrained_window/constrained_window_views.cc.orig |+++ components/constrained_window/constrained_window_views.cc -------------------------- Patching file components/constrained_window/constrained_window_views.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 369. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_content_settings_core_browser_website_settings_registry_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/content_settings/core/browser/website_settings_registry.cc |--- components/content_settings/core/browser/website_settings_registry.cc.orig |+++ components/content_settings/core/browser/website_settings_registry.cc -------------------------- Patching file components/content_settings/core/browser/website_settings_registry.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 67. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_cookie_config_cookie_store_util_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/cookie_config/cookie_store_util.cc |--- components/cookie_config/cookie_store_util.cc.orig |+++ components/cookie_config/cookie_store_util.cc -------------------------- Patching file components/cookie_config/cookie_store_util.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 12. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_crash_core_app_BUILD_gn Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/crash/core/app/BUILD.gn |--- components/crash/core/app/BUILD.gn.orig |+++ components/crash/core/app/BUILD.gn -------------------------- Patching file components/crash/core/app/BUILD.gn using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 82. Hunk #2 succeeded at 99. Hunk #3 succeeded at 119. Hunk #4 succeeded at 249. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_crash_core_app_chrome_crashpad_handler_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/crash/core/app/chrome_crashpad_handler.cc |--- components/crash/core/app/chrome_crashpad_handler.cc.orig |+++ components/crash/core/app/chrome_crashpad_handler.cc -------------------------- Patching file components/crash/core/app/chrome_crashpad_handler.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 6. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_crash_core_app_crashpad_handler_main_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/crash/core/app/crashpad_handler_main.cc |--- components/crash/core/app/crashpad_handler_main.cc.orig |+++ components/crash/core/app/crashpad_handler_main.cc -------------------------- Patching file components/crash/core/app/crashpad_handler_main.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 10. Hunk #2 succeeded at 31. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_crash_core_browser_crash_upload_list_crashpad_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/crash/core/browser/crash_upload_list_crashpad.cc |--- components/crash/core/browser/crash_upload_list_crashpad.cc.orig |+++ components/crash/core/browser/crash_upload_list_crashpad.cc -------------------------- Patching file components/crash/core/browser/crash_upload_list_crashpad.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 38. Hunk #2 succeeded at 54. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_crash_core_common_BUILD_gn Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/crash/core/common/BUILD.gn |--- components/crash/core/common/BUILD.gn.orig |+++ components/crash/core/common/BUILD.gn -------------------------- Patching file components/crash/core/common/BUILD.gn using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 9. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_device_signals_core_browser_mock_signals_aggregator_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/device_signals/core/browser/mock_signals_aggregator.h |--- components/device_signals/core/browser/mock_signals_aggregator.h.orig |+++ components/device_signals/core/browser/mock_signals_aggregator.h -------------------------- Patching file components/device_signals/core/browser/mock_signals_aggregator.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 17. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_device_signals_core_browser_signals_aggregator_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/device_signals/core/browser/signals_aggregator.h |--- components/device_signals/core/browser/signals_aggregator.h.orig |+++ components/device_signals/core/browser/signals_aggregator.h -------------------------- Patching file components/device_signals/core/browser/signals_aggregator.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 22. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_device_signals_core_browser_signals_aggregator_impl_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/device_signals/core/browser/signals_aggregator_impl.cc |--- components/device_signals/core/browser/signals_aggregator_impl.cc.orig |+++ components/device_signals/core/browser/signals_aggregator_impl.cc -------------------------- Patching file components/device_signals/core/browser/signals_aggregator_impl.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 65. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_device_signals_core_browser_signals_aggregator_impl_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/device_signals/core/browser/signals_aggregator_impl.h |--- components/device_signals/core/browser/signals_aggregator_impl.h.orig |+++ components/device_signals/core/browser/signals_aggregator_impl.h -------------------------- Patching file components/device_signals/core/browser/signals_aggregator_impl.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 29. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_device_signals_core_browser_user_permission_service_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/device_signals/core/browser/user_permission_service.h |--- components/device_signals/core/browser/user_permission_service.h.orig |+++ components/device_signals/core/browser/user_permission_service.h -------------------------- Patching file components/device_signals/core/browser/user_permission_service.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 57. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_device_signals_core_browser_user_permission_service_impl_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/device_signals/core/browser/user_permission_service_impl.cc |--- components/device_signals/core/browser/user_permission_service_impl.cc.orig |+++ components/device_signals/core/browser/user_permission_service_impl.cc -------------------------- Patching file components/device_signals/core/browser/user_permission_service_impl.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 87. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_device_signals_core_browser_user_permission_service_impl_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/device_signals/core/browser/user_permission_service_impl.h |--- components/device_signals/core/browser/user_permission_service_impl.h.orig |+++ components/device_signals/core/browser/user_permission_service_impl.h -------------------------- Patching file components/device_signals/core/browser/user_permission_service_impl.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 38. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_device_signals_core_common_signals_features_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/device_signals/core/common/signals_features.cc |--- components/device_signals/core/common/signals_features.cc.orig |+++ components/device_signals/core/common/signals_features.cc -------------------------- Patching file components/device_signals/core/common/signals_features.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 46. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_device_signals_core_common_signals_features_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/device_signals/core/common/signals_features.h |--- components/device_signals/core/common/signals_features.h.orig |+++ components/device_signals/core/common/signals_features.h -------------------------- Patching file components/device_signals/core/common/signals_features.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 28. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_device_signals_core_system_signals_platform_delegate_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/device_signals/core/system_signals/platform_delegate.cc |--- components/device_signals/core/system_signals/platform_delegate.cc.orig |+++ components/device_signals/core/system_signals/platform_delegate.cc -------------------------- Patching file components/device_signals/core/system_signals/platform_delegate.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 11. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_device_signals_test_signals_contract_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/device_signals/test/signals_contract.cc |--- components/device_signals/test/signals_contract.cc.orig |+++ components/device_signals/test/signals_contract.cc -------------------------- Patching file components/device_signals/test/signals_contract.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 212. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_discardable_memory_service_discardable_shared_memory_manager_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/discardable_memory/service/discardable_shared_memory_manager.cc |--- components/discardable_memory/service/discardable_shared_memory_manager.cc.orig |+++ components/discardable_memory/service/discardable_shared_memory_manager.cc -------------------------- Patching file components/discardable_memory/service/discardable_shared_memory_manager.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 176. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_embedder_support_user_agent_utils_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/embedder_support/user_agent_utils.cc |--- components/embedder_support/user_agent_utils.cc.orig |+++ components/embedder_support/user_agent_utils.cc -------------------------- Patching file components/embedder_support/user_agent_utils.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 445. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_embedder_support_user_agent_utils_unittest_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/embedder_support/user_agent_utils_unittest.cc |--- components/embedder_support/user_agent_utils_unittest.cc.orig |+++ components/embedder_support/user_agent_utils_unittest.cc -------------------------- Patching file components/embedder_support/user_agent_utils_unittest.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 71. Hunk #2 succeeded at 171. Hunk #3 succeeded at 727. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_enterprise_watermarking_watermark_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/enterprise/watermarking/watermark.cc |--- components/enterprise/watermarking/watermark.cc.orig |+++ components/enterprise/watermarking/watermark.cc -------------------------- Patching file components/enterprise/watermarking/watermark.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 23. Hunk #2 succeeded at 34. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_eye_dropper_eye_dropper_view_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/eye_dropper/eye_dropper_view.cc |--- components/eye_dropper/eye_dropper_view.cc.orig |+++ components/eye_dropper/eye_dropper_view.cc -------------------------- Patching file components/eye_dropper/eye_dropper_view.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 202. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_feature_engagement_public_event_constants_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/feature_engagement/public/event_constants.cc |--- components/feature_engagement/public/event_constants.cc.orig |+++ components/feature_engagement/public/event_constants.cc -------------------------- Patching file components/feature_engagement/public/event_constants.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 11. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_feature_engagement_public_event_constants_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/feature_engagement/public/event_constants.h |--- components/feature_engagement/public/event_constants.h.orig |+++ components/feature_engagement/public/event_constants.h -------------------------- Patching file components/feature_engagement/public/event_constants.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 14. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_feature_engagement_public_feature_configurations_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/feature_engagement/public/feature_configurations.cc |--- components/feature_engagement/public/feature_configurations.cc.orig |+++ components/feature_engagement/public/feature_configurations.cc -------------------------- Patching file components/feature_engagement/public/feature_configurations.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 99. Hunk #2 succeeded at 118. Hunk #3 succeeded at 1599. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_feature_engagement_public_feature_constants_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/feature_engagement/public/feature_constants.cc |--- components/feature_engagement/public/feature_constants.cc.orig |+++ components/feature_engagement/public/feature_constants.cc -------------------------- Patching file components/feature_engagement/public/feature_constants.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 18. Hunk #2 succeeded at 637. Hunk #3 succeeded at 772. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_feature_engagement_public_feature_constants_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/feature_engagement/public/feature_constants.h |--- components/feature_engagement/public/feature_constants.h.orig |+++ components/feature_engagement/public/feature_constants.h -------------------------- Patching file components/feature_engagement/public/feature_constants.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 20. Hunk #2 succeeded at 264. Hunk #3 succeeded at 315. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_feature_engagement_public_feature_list_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/feature_engagement/public/feature_list.cc |--- components/feature_engagement/public/feature_list.cc.orig |+++ components/feature_engagement/public/feature_list.cc -------------------------- Patching file components/feature_engagement/public/feature_list.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 155. Hunk #2 succeeded at 223. Hunk #3 succeeded at 274. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_feature_engagement_public_feature_list_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/feature_engagement/public/feature_list.h |--- components/feature_engagement/public/feature_list.h.orig |+++ components/feature_engagement/public/feature_list.h -------------------------- Patching file components/feature_engagement/public/feature_list.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 278. Hunk #2 succeeded at 385. Hunk #3 succeeded at 475. Hunk #4 succeeded at 633. Hunk #5 succeeded at 691. Hunk #6 succeeded at 743. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_feed_core_proto_v2_wire_version_proto Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/feed/core/proto/v2/wire/version.proto |--- components/feed/core/proto/v2/wire/version.proto.orig |+++ components/feed/core/proto/v2/wire/version.proto -------------------------- Patching file components/feed/core/proto/v2/wire/version.proto using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 25. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_feed_core_v2_feed_network_impl_unittest_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/feed/core/v2/feed_network_impl_unittest.cc |--- components/feed/core/v2/feed_network_impl_unittest.cc.orig |+++ components/feed/core/v2/feed_network_impl_unittest.cc -------------------------- Patching file components/feed/core/v2/feed_network_impl_unittest.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 752. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_feed_core_v2_proto_util_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/feed/core/v2/proto_util.cc |--- components/feed/core/v2/proto_util.cc.orig |+++ components/feed/core/v2/proto_util.cc -------------------------- Patching file components/feed/core/v2/proto_util.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 93. Hunk #2 succeeded at 109. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_feed_core_v2_proto_util_unittest_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/feed/core/v2/proto_util_unittest.cc |--- components/feed/core/v2/proto_util_unittest.cc.orig |+++ components/feed/core/v2/proto_util_unittest.cc -------------------------- Patching file components/feed/core/v2/proto_util_unittest.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 43. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_feed_core_v2_test_proto_printer_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/feed/core/v2/test/proto_printer.cc |--- components/feed/core/v2/test/proto_printer.cc.orig |+++ components/feed/core/v2/test/proto_printer.cc -------------------------- Patching file components/feed/core/v2/test/proto_printer.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 158. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_flags_ui_flags_state_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/flags_ui/flags_state.cc |--- components/flags_ui/flags_state.cc.orig |+++ components/flags_ui/flags_state.cc -------------------------- Patching file components/flags_ui/flags_state.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 750. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_gwp_asan_BUILD_gn Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/gwp_asan/BUILD.gn |--- components/gwp_asan/BUILD.gn.orig |+++ components/gwp_asan/BUILD.gn -------------------------- Patching file components/gwp_asan/BUILD.gn using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 15. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_gwp_asan_client_guarded_page_allocator_posix_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/gwp_asan/client/guarded_page_allocator_posix.cc |--- components/gwp_asan/client/guarded_page_allocator_posix.cc.orig |+++ components/gwp_asan/client/guarded_page_allocator_posix.cc -------------------------- Patching file components/gwp_asan/client/guarded_page_allocator_posix.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 35. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_gwp_asan_client_gwp_asan_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/gwp_asan/client/gwp_asan.cc |--- components/gwp_asan/client/gwp_asan.cc.orig |+++ components/gwp_asan/client/gwp_asan.cc -------------------------- Patching file components/gwp_asan/client/gwp_asan.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 75. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_gwp_asan_client_gwp_asan_features_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/gwp_asan/client/gwp_asan_features.cc |--- components/gwp_asan/client/gwp_asan_features.cc.orig |+++ components/gwp_asan/client/gwp_asan_features.cc -------------------------- Patching file components/gwp_asan/client/gwp_asan_features.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 9. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_gwp_asan_crash_handler_crash_analyzer_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/gwp_asan/crash_handler/crash_analyzer.cc |--- components/gwp_asan/crash_handler/crash_analyzer.cc.orig |+++ components/gwp_asan/crash_handler/crash_analyzer.cc -------------------------- Patching file components/gwp_asan/crash_handler/crash_analyzer.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 30. Hunk #2 succeeded at 90. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_live_caption_caption_util_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/live_caption/caption_util.cc |--- components/live_caption/caption_util.cc.orig |+++ components/live_caption/caption_util.cc -------------------------- Patching file components/live_caption/caption_util.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 144. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_live_caption_caption_util_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/live_caption/caption_util.h |--- components/live_caption/caption_util.h.orig |+++ components/live_caption/caption_util.h -------------------------- Patching file components/live_caption/caption_util.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 15. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_media_router_common_media_source_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/media_router/common/media_source.cc |--- components/media_router/common/media_source.cc.orig |+++ components/media_router/common/media_source.cc -------------------------- Patching file components/media_router/common/media_source.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 57. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_media_router_common_providers_cast_channel_cast_message_util_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/media_router/common/providers/cast/channel/cast_message_util.cc |--- components/media_router/common/providers/cast/channel/cast_message_util.cc.orig |+++ components/media_router/common/providers/cast/channel/cast_message_util.cc -------------------------- Patching file components/media_router/common/providers/cast/channel/cast_message_util.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 169. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_metrics_drive_metrics_provider_linux_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/metrics/drive_metrics_provider_linux.cc |--- components/metrics/drive_metrics_provider_linux.cc.orig |+++ components/metrics/drive_metrics_provider_linux.cc -------------------------- Patching file components/metrics/drive_metrics_provider_linux.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 4. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_metrics_metrics_log_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/metrics/metrics_log.cc |--- components/metrics/metrics_log.cc.orig |+++ components/metrics/metrics_log.cc -------------------------- Patching file components/metrics/metrics_log.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 56. Hunk #2 succeeded at 146. Hunk #3 succeeded at 415. Hunk #4 succeeded at 432. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_metrics_motherboard_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/metrics/motherboard.cc |--- components/metrics/motherboard.cc.orig |+++ components/metrics/motherboard.cc -------------------------- Patching file components/metrics/motherboard.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 1. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_named_mojo_ipc_server_connection_info_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/named_mojo_ipc_server/connection_info.h |--- components/named_mojo_ipc_server/connection_info.h.orig |+++ components/named_mojo_ipc_server/connection_info.h -------------------------- Patching file components/named_mojo_ipc_server/connection_info.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 14. Hunk #2 succeeded at 33. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_named_mojo_ipc_server_named_mojo_ipc_server_client_util_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/named_mojo_ipc_server/named_mojo_ipc_server_client_util.cc |--- components/named_mojo_ipc_server/named_mojo_ipc_server_client_util.cc.orig |+++ components/named_mojo_ipc_server/named_mojo_ipc_server_client_util.cc -------------------------- Patching file components/named_mojo_ipc_server/named_mojo_ipc_server_client_util.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 22. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_named_system_lock_lock_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/named_system_lock/lock.h |--- components/named_system_lock/lock.h.orig |+++ components/named_system_lock/lock.h -------------------------- Patching file components/named_system_lock/lock.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 38. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_neterror_resources_neterror_js Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/neterror/resources/neterror.js |--- components/neterror/resources/neterror.js.orig |+++ components/neterror/resources/neterror.js -------------------------- Patching file components/neterror/resources/neterror.js using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 142. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_network_session_configurator_browser_network_session_configurator_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/network_session_configurator/browser/network_session_configurator.cc |--- components/network_session_configurator/browser/network_session_configurator.cc.orig |+++ components/network_session_configurator/browser/network_session_configurator.cc -------------------------- Patching file components/network_session_configurator/browser/network_session_configurator.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 825. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_network_session_configurator_browser_network_session_configurator_unittest_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/network_session_configurator/browser/network_session_configurator_unittest.cc |--- components/network_session_configurator/browser/network_session_configurator_unittest.cc.orig |+++ components/network_session_configurator/browser/network_session_configurator_unittest.cc -------------------------- Patching file components/network_session_configurator/browser/network_session_configurator_unittest.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 782. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_optimization_guide_core_optimization_guide_util_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/optimization_guide/core/optimization_guide_util.cc |--- components/optimization_guide/core/optimization_guide_util.cc.orig |+++ components/optimization_guide/core/optimization_guide_util.cc -------------------------- Patching file components/optimization_guide/core/optimization_guide_util.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 35. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_os_crypt_sync_libsecret_util_linux_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/os_crypt/sync/libsecret_util_linux.cc |--- components/os_crypt/sync/libsecret_util_linux.cc.orig |+++ components/os_crypt/sync/libsecret_util_linux.cc -------------------------- Patching file components/os_crypt/sync/libsecret_util_linux.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 176. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_os_crypt_sync_os_crypt_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/os_crypt/sync/os_crypt.h |--- components/os_crypt/sync/os_crypt.h.orig |+++ components/os_crypt/sync/os_crypt.h -------------------------- Patching file components/os_crypt/sync/os_crypt.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 14. Hunk #2 succeeded at 23. Hunk #3 succeeded at 36. Hunk #4 succeeded at 81. Hunk #5 succeeded at 108. Hunk #6 succeeded at 200. Hunk #7 succeeded at 225. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_paint_preview_browser_paint_preview_client_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/paint_preview/browser/paint_preview_client.cc |--- components/paint_preview/browser/paint_preview_client.cc.orig |+++ components/paint_preview/browser/paint_preview_client.cc -------------------------- Patching file components/paint_preview/browser/paint_preview_client.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 313. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_paint_preview_browser_paint_preview_client_unittest_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/paint_preview/browser/paint_preview_client_unittest.cc |--- components/paint_preview/browser/paint_preview_client_unittest.cc.orig |+++ components/paint_preview/browser/paint_preview_client_unittest.cc -------------------------- Patching file components/paint_preview/browser/paint_preview_client_unittest.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 174. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_paint_preview_common_proto_paint_preview_proto Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/paint_preview/common/proto/paint_preview.proto |--- components/paint_preview/common/proto/paint_preview.proto.orig |+++ components/paint_preview/common/proto/paint_preview.proto -------------------------- Patching file components/paint_preview/common/proto/paint_preview.proto using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 82. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_paint_preview_player_player_compositor_delegate_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/paint_preview/player/player_compositor_delegate.cc |--- components/paint_preview/player/player_compositor_delegate.cc.orig |+++ components/paint_preview/player/player_compositor_delegate.cc -------------------------- Patching file components/paint_preview/player/player_compositor_delegate.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 434. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_password_manager_core_browser_features_password_features_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/password_manager/core/browser/features/password_features.cc |--- components/password_manager/core/browser/features/password_features.cc.orig |+++ components/password_manager/core/browser/features/password_features.cc -------------------------- Patching file components/password_manager/core/browser/features/password_features.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 41. Hunk #2 succeeded at 90. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_password_manager_core_browser_features_password_features_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/password_manager/core/browser/features/password_features.h |--- components/password_manager/core/browser/features/password_features.h.orig |+++ components/password_manager/core/browser/features/password_features.h -------------------------- Patching file components/password_manager/core/browser/features/password_features.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 90. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_password_manager_core_browser_password_form_manager_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/password_manager/core/browser/password_form_manager.cc |--- components/password_manager/core/browser/password_form_manager.cc.orig |+++ components/password_manager/core/browser/password_form_manager.cc -------------------------- Patching file components/password_manager/core/browser/password_form_manager.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 58. Hunk #2 succeeded at 228. Hunk #3 succeeded at 885. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_password_manager_core_browser_password_manager_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/password_manager/core/browser/password_manager.cc |--- components/password_manager/core/browser/password_manager.cc.orig |+++ components/password_manager/core/browser/password_manager.cc -------------------------- Patching file components/password_manager/core/browser/password_manager.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 425. Hunk #2 succeeded at 438. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_password_manager_core_browser_password_manager_client_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/password_manager/core/browser/password_manager_client.h |--- components/password_manager/core/browser/password_manager_client.h.orig |+++ components/password_manager/core/browser/password_manager_client.h -------------------------- Patching file components/password_manager/core/browser/password_manager_client.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 30. Hunk #2 succeeded at 520. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_password_manager_core_browser_password_manager_switches_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/password_manager/core/browser/password_manager_switches.cc |--- components/password_manager/core/browser/password_manager_switches.cc.orig |+++ components/password_manager/core/browser/password_manager_switches.cc -------------------------- Patching file components/password_manager/core/browser/password_manager_switches.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 6. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_password_manager_core_browser_password_manager_switches_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/password_manager/core/browser/password_manager_switches.h |--- components/password_manager/core/browser/password_manager_switches.h.orig |+++ components/password_manager/core/browser/password_manager_switches.h -------------------------- Patching file components/password_manager/core/browser/password_manager_switches.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 10. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_password_manager_core_browser_password_manual_fallback_flow_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/password_manager/core/browser/password_manual_fallback_flow.cc |--- components/password_manager/core/browser/password_manual_fallback_flow.cc.orig |+++ components/password_manager/core/browser/password_manual_fallback_flow.cc -------------------------- Patching file components/password_manager/core/browser/password_manual_fallback_flow.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 204. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_password_manager_core_browser_password_manual_fallback_flow_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/password_manager/core/browser/password_manual_fallback_flow.h |--- components/password_manager/core/browser/password_manual_fallback_flow.h.orig |+++ components/password_manager/core/browser/password_manual_fallback_flow.h -------------------------- Patching file components/password_manager/core/browser/password_manual_fallback_flow.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 17. Hunk #2 succeeded at 161. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_password_manager_core_browser_password_store_login_database_async_helper_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/password_manager/core/browser/password_store/login_database_async_helper.cc |--- components/password_manager/core/browser/password_store/login_database_async_helper.cc.orig |+++ components/password_manager/core/browser/password_store/login_database_async_helper.cc -------------------------- Patching file components/password_manager/core/browser/password_store/login_database_async_helper.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 152. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_password_manager_core_browser_password_store_login_database_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/password_manager/core/browser/password_store/login_database.cc |--- components/password_manager/core/browser/password_store/login_database.cc.orig |+++ components/password_manager/core/browser/password_store/login_database.cc -------------------------- Patching file components/password_manager/core/browser/password_store/login_database.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 1028. Hunk #2 succeeded at 1047. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_password_manager_core_browser_password_store_login_database_unittest_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/password_manager/core/browser/password_store/login_database_unittest.cc |--- components/password_manager/core/browser/password_store/login_database_unittest.cc.orig |+++ components/password_manager/core/browser/password_store/login_database_unittest.cc -------------------------- Patching file components/password_manager/core/browser/password_store/login_database_unittest.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 2207. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_password_manager_core_browser_password_store_password_store_built_in_backend_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/password_manager/core/browser/password_store/password_store_built_in_backend.cc |--- components/password_manager/core/browser/password_store/password_store_built_in_backend.cc.orig |+++ components/password_manager/core/browser/password_store/password_store_built_in_backend.cc -------------------------- Patching file components/password_manager/core/browser/password_store/password_store_built_in_backend.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 211. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_password_manager_core_browser_stub_password_manager_client_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/password_manager/core/browser/stub_password_manager_client.cc |--- components/password_manager/core/browser/stub_password_manager_client.cc.orig |+++ components/password_manager/core/browser/stub_password_manager_client.cc -------------------------- Patching file components/password_manager/core/browser/stub_password_manager_client.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 180. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_password_manager_core_browser_stub_password_manager_client_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/password_manager/core/browser/stub_password_manager_client.h |--- components/password_manager/core/browser/stub_password_manager_client.h.orig |+++ components/password_manager/core/browser/stub_password_manager_client.h -------------------------- Patching file components/password_manager/core/browser/stub_password_manager_client.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 75. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_password_manager_core_common_password_manager_pref_names_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/password_manager/core/common/password_manager_pref_names.h |--- components/password_manager/core/common/password_manager_pref_names.h.orig |+++ components/password_manager/core/common/password_manager_pref_names.h -------------------------- Patching file components/password_manager/core/common/password_manager_pref_names.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 41. Hunk #2 succeeded at 370. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_performance_manager_public_features_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/performance_manager/public/features.h |--- components/performance_manager/public/features.h.orig |+++ components/performance_manager/public/features.h -------------------------- Patching file components/performance_manager/public/features.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 21. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_permissions_prediction_service_prediction_common_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/permissions/prediction_service/prediction_common.cc |--- components/permissions/prediction_service/prediction_common.cc.orig |+++ components/permissions/prediction_service/prediction_common.cc -------------------------- Patching file components/permissions/prediction_service/prediction_common.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 33. Hunk #2 succeeded at 44. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_policy_core_browser_policy_pref_mapping_test_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/policy/core/browser/policy_pref_mapping_test.cc |--- components/policy/core/browser/policy_pref_mapping_test.cc.orig |+++ components/policy/core/browser/policy_pref_mapping_test.cc -------------------------- Patching file components/policy/core/browser/policy_pref_mapping_test.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 411. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_policy_core_common_cloud_cloud_policy_client_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/policy/core/common/cloud/cloud_policy_client.cc |--- components/policy/core/common/cloud/cloud_policy_client.cc.orig |+++ components/policy/core/common/cloud/cloud_policy_client.cc -------------------------- Patching file components/policy/core/common/cloud/cloud_policy_client.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 647. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_policy_core_common_cloud_cloud_policy_util_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/policy/core/common/cloud/cloud_policy_util.cc |--- components/policy/core/common/cloud/cloud_policy_util.cc.orig |+++ components/policy/core/common/cloud/cloud_policy_util.cc -------------------------- Patching file components/policy/core/common/cloud/cloud_policy_util.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 20. Hunk #2 succeeded at 35. Hunk #3 succeeded at 93. Hunk #4 succeeded at 150. Hunk #5 succeeded at 173. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_policy_core_common_policy_loader_common_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/policy/core/common/policy_loader_common.cc |--- components/policy/core/common/policy_loader_common.cc.orig |+++ components/policy/core/common/policy_loader_common.cc -------------------------- Patching file components/policy/core/common/policy_loader_common.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 46. Hunk #2 succeeded at 56. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_policy_core_common_policy_paths_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/policy/core/common/policy_paths.cc |--- components/policy/core/common/policy_paths.cc.orig |+++ components/policy/core/common/policy_paths.cc -------------------------- Patching file components/policy/core/common/policy_paths.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 17. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_policy_core_common_policy_utils_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/policy/core/common/policy_utils.cc |--- components/policy/core/common/policy_utils.cc.orig |+++ components/policy/core/common/policy_utils.cc -------------------------- Patching file components/policy/core/common/policy_utils.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 28. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_policy_tools_generate_policy_source_py Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/policy/tools/generate_policy_source.py |--- components/policy/tools/generate_policy_source.py.orig |+++ components/policy/tools/generate_policy_source.py -------------------------- Patching file components/policy/tools/generate_policy_source.py using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 38. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_power_metrics_BUILD_gn Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/power_metrics/BUILD.gn |--- components/power_metrics/BUILD.gn.orig |+++ components/power_metrics/BUILD.gn -------------------------- Patching file components/power_metrics/BUILD.gn using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 41. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_power_metrics_energy_metrics_provider_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/power_metrics/energy_metrics_provider.cc |--- components/power_metrics/energy_metrics_provider.cc.orig |+++ components/power_metrics/energy_metrics_provider.cc -------------------------- Patching file components/power_metrics/energy_metrics_provider.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 9. Hunk #2 succeeded at 24. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_safe_browsing_content_common_file_type_policies_unittest_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/safe_browsing/content/common/file_type_policies_unittest.cc |--- components/safe_browsing/content/common/file_type_policies_unittest.cc.orig |+++ components/safe_browsing/content/common/file_type_policies_unittest.cc -------------------------- Patching file components/safe_browsing/content/common/file_type_policies_unittest.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 139. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_safe_browsing_content_resources_gen_file_type_proto_py Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/safe_browsing/content/resources/gen_file_type_proto.py |--- components/safe_browsing/content/resources/gen_file_type_proto.py.orig |+++ components/safe_browsing/content/resources/gen_file_type_proto.py -------------------------- Patching file components/safe_browsing/content/resources/gen_file_type_proto.py using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 37. Hunk #2 succeeded at 181. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_safe_browsing_core_browser_db_v4_protocol_manager_util_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/safe_browsing/core/browser/db/v4_protocol_manager_util.cc |--- components/safe_browsing/core/browser/db/v4_protocol_manager_util.cc.orig |+++ components/safe_browsing/core/browser/db/v4_protocol_manager_util.cc -------------------------- Patching file components/safe_browsing/core/browser/db/v4_protocol_manager_util.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 118. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_safe_browsing_core_browser_realtime_url_lookup_service_base_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/safe_browsing/core/browser/realtime/url_lookup_service_base.cc |--- components/safe_browsing/core/browser/realtime/url_lookup_service_base.cc.orig |+++ components/safe_browsing/core/browser/realtime/url_lookup_service_base.cc -------------------------- Patching file components/safe_browsing/core/browser/realtime/url_lookup_service_base.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 107. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_safe_browsing_core_common_features_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/safe_browsing/core/common/features.cc |--- components/safe_browsing/core/common/features.cc.orig |+++ components/safe_browsing/core/common/features.cc -------------------------- Patching file components/safe_browsing/core/common/features.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 186. Hunk #2 succeeded at 267. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_search_engines_search_engine_choice_search_engine_choice_service_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/search_engines/search_engine_choice/search_engine_choice_service.cc |--- components/search_engines/search_engine_choice/search_engine_choice_service.cc.orig |+++ components/search_engines/search_engine_choice/search_engine_choice_service.cc -------------------------- Patching file components/search_engines/search_engine_choice/search_engine_choice_service.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 610. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_search_engines_template_url_service_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/search_engines/template_url_service.cc |--- components/search_engines/template_url_service.cc.orig |+++ components/search_engines/template_url_service.cc -------------------------- Patching file components/search_engines/template_url_service.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 3081. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_security_interstitials_content_utils_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/security_interstitials/content/utils.cc |--- components/security_interstitials/content/utils.cc.orig |+++ components/security_interstitials/content/utils.cc -------------------------- Patching file components/security_interstitials/content/utils.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 38. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_segmentation_platform_embedder_default_model_cross_device_user_segment_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/segmentation_platform/embedder/default_model/cross_device_user_segment.cc |--- components/segmentation_platform/embedder/default_model/cross_device_user_segment.cc.orig |+++ components/segmentation_platform/embedder/default_model/cross_device_user_segment.cc -------------------------- Patching file components/segmentation_platform/embedder/default_model/cross_device_user_segment.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 148. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_services_paint_preview_compositor_paint_preview_compositor_collection_impl_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/services/paint_preview_compositor/paint_preview_compositor_collection_impl.cc |--- components/services/paint_preview_compositor/paint_preview_compositor_collection_impl.cc.orig |+++ components/services/paint_preview_compositor/paint_preview_compositor_collection_impl.cc -------------------------- Patching file components/services/paint_preview_compositor/paint_preview_compositor_collection_impl.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 22. Hunk #2 succeeded at 79. Hunk #3 succeeded at 102. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_soda_soda_util_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/soda/soda_util.cc |--- components/soda/soda_util.cc.orig |+++ components/soda/soda_util.cc -------------------------- Patching file components/soda/soda_util.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 20. Hunk #2 succeeded at 45. Hunk #3 succeeded at 76. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_startup_metric_utils_common_startup_metric_utils_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/startup_metric_utils/common/startup_metric_utils.cc |--- components/startup_metric_utils/common/startup_metric_utils.cc.orig |+++ components/startup_metric_utils/common/startup_metric_utils.cc -------------------------- Patching file components/startup_metric_utils/common/startup_metric_utils.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 94. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_storage_monitor_BUILD_gn Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/storage_monitor/BUILD.gn |--- components/storage_monitor/BUILD.gn.orig |+++ components/storage_monitor/BUILD.gn -------------------------- Patching file components/storage_monitor/BUILD.gn using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 77. Hunk #2 succeeded at 184. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_storage_monitor_removable_device_constants_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/storage_monitor/removable_device_constants.cc |--- components/storage_monitor/removable_device_constants.cc.orig |+++ components/storage_monitor/removable_device_constants.cc -------------------------- Patching file components/storage_monitor/removable_device_constants.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 10. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_storage_monitor_removable_device_constants_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/storage_monitor/removable_device_constants.h |--- components/storage_monitor/removable_device_constants.h.orig |+++ components/storage_monitor/removable_device_constants.h -------------------------- Patching file components/storage_monitor/removable_device_constants.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 14. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_supervised_user_core_browser_supervised_user_metrics_service_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/supervised_user/core/browser/supervised_user_metrics_service.cc |--- components/supervised_user/core/browser/supervised_user_metrics_service.cc.orig |+++ components/supervised_user/core/browser/supervised_user_metrics_service.cc -------------------------- Patching file components/supervised_user/core/browser/supervised_user_metrics_service.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 47. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_supervised_user_core_browser_supervised_user_preferences_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/supervised_user/core/browser/supervised_user_preferences.cc |--- components/supervised_user/core/browser/supervised_user_preferences.cc.orig |+++ components/supervised_user/core/browser/supervised_user_preferences.cc -------------------------- Patching file components/supervised_user/core/browser/supervised_user_preferences.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 154. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_supervised_user_core_browser_supervised_user_service_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/supervised_user/core/browser/supervised_user_service.cc |--- components/supervised_user/core/browser/supervised_user_service.cc.orig |+++ components/supervised_user/core/browser/supervised_user_service.cc -------------------------- Patching file components/supervised_user/core/browser/supervised_user_service.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 176. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_supervised_user_core_common_features_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/supervised_user/core/common/features.cc |--- components/supervised_user/core/common/features.cc.orig |+++ components/supervised_user/core/common/features.cc -------------------------- Patching file components/supervised_user/core/common/features.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 66. Hunk #2 succeeded at 81. Hunk #3 succeeded at 106. Hunk #4 succeeded at 122. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_supervised_user_core_common_features_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/supervised_user/core/common/features.h |--- components/supervised_user/core/common/features.h.orig |+++ components/supervised_user/core/common/features.h -------------------------- Patching file components/supervised_user/core/common/features.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 25. Hunk #2 succeeded at 62. Hunk #3 succeeded at 78. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_supervised_user_core_common_pref_names_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/supervised_user/core/common/pref_names.h |--- components/supervised_user/core/common/pref_names.h.orig |+++ components/supervised_user/core/common/pref_names.h -------------------------- Patching file components/supervised_user/core/common/pref_names.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 137. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_sync_device_info_local_device_info_util_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/sync_device_info/local_device_info_util.cc |--- components/sync_device_info/local_device_info_util.cc.orig |+++ components/sync_device_info/local_device_info_util.cc -------------------------- Patching file components/sync_device_info/local_device_info_util.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 84. Hunk #2 succeeded at 109. Hunk #3 succeeded at 128. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_sync_device_info_local_device_info_util_linux_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/sync_device_info/local_device_info_util_linux.cc |--- components/sync_device_info/local_device_info_util_linux.cc.orig |+++ components/sync_device_info/local_device_info_util_linux.cc -------------------------- Patching file components/sync_device_info/local_device_info_util_linux.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 9. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_system_cpu_cpu_probe_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/system_cpu/cpu_probe.cc |--- components/system_cpu/cpu_probe.cc.orig |+++ components/system_cpu/cpu_probe.cc -------------------------- Patching file components/system_cpu/cpu_probe.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 30. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_translate_core_common_translate_util_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/translate/core/common/translate_util.cc |--- components/translate/core/common/translate_util.cc.orig |+++ components/translate/core/common/translate_util.cc -------------------------- Patching file components/translate/core/common/translate_util.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 21. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_trusted_vault_trusted_vault_connection_impl_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/trusted_vault/trusted_vault_connection_impl.cc |--- components/trusted_vault/trusted_vault_connection_impl.cc.orig |+++ components/trusted_vault/trusted_vault_connection_impl.cc -------------------------- Patching file components/trusted_vault/trusted_vault_connection_impl.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 101. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_update_client_update_query_params_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/update_client/update_query_params.cc |--- components/update_client/update_query_params.cc.orig |+++ components/update_client/update_query_params.cc -------------------------- Patching file components/update_client/update_query_params.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 42. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_url_formatter_spoof_checks_idn_spoof_checker_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/url_formatter/spoof_checks/idn_spoof_checker.cc |--- components/url_formatter/spoof_checks/idn_spoof_checker.cc.orig |+++ components/url_formatter/spoof_checks/idn_spoof_checker.cc -------------------------- Patching file components/url_formatter/spoof_checks/idn_spoof_checker.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 294. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_user_education_views_help_bubble_view_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/user_education/views/help_bubble_view.cc |--- components/user_education/views/help_bubble_view.cc.orig |+++ components/user_education/views/help_bubble_view.cc -------------------------- Patching file components/user_education/views/help_bubble_view.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 856. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_variations_service_variations_service_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/variations/service/variations_service.cc |--- components/variations/service/variations_service.cc.orig |+++ components/variations/service/variations_service.cc -------------------------- Patching file components/variations/service/variations_service.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 101. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_visited_url_ranking_public_url_visit_util_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/visited_url_ranking/public/url_visit_util.cc |--- components/visited_url_ranking/public/url_visit_util.cc.orig |+++ components/visited_url_ranking/public/url_visit_util.cc -------------------------- Patching file components/visited_url_ranking/public/url_visit_util.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 62. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_viz_common_features_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/viz/common/features.cc |--- components/viz/common/features.cc.orig |+++ components/viz/common/features.cc -------------------------- Patching file components/viz/common/features.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 234. Hunk #2 succeeded at 500. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_viz_common_features_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/viz/common/features.h |--- components/viz/common/features.h.orig |+++ components/viz/common/features.h -------------------------- Patching file components/viz/common/features.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 72. Hunk #2 succeeded at 129. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_viz_host_host_display_client_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/viz/host/host_display_client.cc |--- components/viz/host/host_display_client.cc.orig |+++ components/viz/host/host_display_client.cc -------------------------- Patching file components/viz/host/host_display_client.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 65. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_viz_host_host_display_client_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/viz/host/host_display_client.h |--- components/viz/host/host_display_client.h.orig |+++ components/viz/host/host_display_client.h -------------------------- Patching file components/viz/host/host_display_client.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 52. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_viz_service_display_embedder_skia_output_device_buffer_queue_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/viz/service/display_embedder/skia_output_device_buffer_queue.cc |--- components/viz/service/display_embedder/skia_output_device_buffer_queue.cc.orig |+++ components/viz/service/display_embedder/skia_output_device_buffer_queue.cc -------------------------- Patching file components/viz/service/display_embedder/skia_output_device_buffer_queue.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 175. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_viz_service_display_embedder_skia_output_surface_impl_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/viz/service/display_embedder/skia_output_surface_impl.cc |--- components/viz/service/display_embedder/skia_output_surface_impl.cc.orig |+++ components/viz/service/display_embedder/skia_output_surface_impl.cc -------------------------- Patching file components/viz/service/display_embedder/skia_output_surface_impl.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 1663. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_viz_service_display_embedder_software_output_surface_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/viz/service/display_embedder/software_output_surface.cc |--- components/viz/service/display_embedder/software_output_surface.cc.orig |+++ components/viz/service/display_embedder/software_output_surface.cc -------------------------- Patching file components/viz/service/display_embedder/software_output_surface.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 119. Hunk #2 succeeded at 148. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_viz_service_display_embedder_software_output_surface_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/viz/service/display_embedder/software_output_surface.h |--- components/viz/service/display_embedder/software_output_surface.h.orig |+++ components/viz/service/display_embedder/software_output_surface.h -------------------------- Patching file components/viz/service/display_embedder/software_output_surface.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 45. Hunk #2 succeeded at 65. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_viz_service_display_skia_renderer_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/viz/service/display/skia_renderer.cc |--- components/viz/service/display/skia_renderer.cc.orig |+++ components/viz/service/display/skia_renderer.cc -------------------------- Patching file components/viz/service/display/skia_renderer.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 1441. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_viz_service_frame_sinks_root_compositor_frame_sink_impl_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/viz/service/frame_sinks/root_compositor_frame_sink_impl.cc |--- components/viz/service/frame_sinks/root_compositor_frame_sink_impl.cc.orig |+++ components/viz/service/frame_sinks/root_compositor_frame_sink_impl.cc -------------------------- Patching file components/viz/service/frame_sinks/root_compositor_frame_sink_impl.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 111. Hunk #2 succeeded at 673. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_viz_service_frame_sinks_root_compositor_frame_sink_impl_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/viz/service/frame_sinks/root_compositor_frame_sink_impl.h |--- components/viz/service/frame_sinks/root_compositor_frame_sink_impl.h.orig |+++ components/viz/service/frame_sinks/root_compositor_frame_sink_impl.h -------------------------- Patching file components/viz/service/frame_sinks/root_compositor_frame_sink_impl.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 214. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_viz_test_fake_display_client_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/viz/test/fake_display_client.cc |--- components/viz/test/fake_display_client.cc.orig |+++ components/viz/test/fake_display_client.cc -------------------------- Patching file components/viz/test/fake_display_client.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 27. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_viz_test_fake_display_client_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/viz/test/fake_display_client.h |--- components/viz/test/fake_display_client.h.orig |+++ components/viz/test/fake_display_client.h -------------------------- Patching file components/viz/test/fake_display_client.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 36. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_viz_test_mock_display_client_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/viz/test/mock_display_client.h |--- components/viz/test/mock_display_client.h.orig |+++ components/viz/test/mock_display_client.h -------------------------- Patching file components/viz/test/mock_display_client.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 43. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-components_webapps_browser_features_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: components/webapps/browser/features.cc |--- components/webapps/browser/features.cc.orig |+++ components/webapps/browser/features.cc -------------------------- Patching file components/webapps/browser/features.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 59. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-content_app_BUILD_gn Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: content/app/BUILD.gn |--- content/app/BUILD.gn.orig |+++ content/app/BUILD.gn -------------------------- Patching file content/app/BUILD.gn using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 96. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-content_app_content_main_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: content/app/content_main.cc |--- content/app/content_main.cc.orig |+++ content/app/content_main.cc -------------------------- Patching file content/app/content_main.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 207. Hunk #2 succeeded at 293. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-content_app_content_main_runner_impl_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: content/app/content_main_runner_impl.cc |--- content/app/content_main_runner_impl.cc.orig |+++ content/app/content_main_runner_impl.cc -------------------------- Patching file content/app/content_main_runner_impl.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 149. Hunk #2 succeeded at 196. Hunk #3 succeeded at 409. Hunk #4 succeeded at 447. Hunk #5 succeeded at 462. Hunk #6 succeeded at 893. Hunk #7 succeeded at 1073. Hunk #8 succeeded at 1160. Hunk #9 succeeded at 1195. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-content_browser_BUILD_gn Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: content/browser/BUILD.gn |--- content/browser/BUILD.gn.orig |+++ content/browser/BUILD.gn -------------------------- Patching file content/browser/BUILD.gn using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 2396. Hunk #2 succeeded at 2444. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-content_browser_audio_audio_service_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: content/browser/audio/audio_service.cc |--- content/browser/audio/audio_service.cc.orig |+++ content/browser/audio/audio_service.cc -------------------------- Patching file content/browser/audio/audio_service.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 32. Hunk #2 succeeded at 200. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-content_browser_browser_child_process_host_impl_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: content/browser/browser_child_process_host_impl.cc |--- content/browser/browser_child_process_host_impl.cc.orig |+++ content/browser/browser_child_process_host_impl.cc -------------------------- Patching file content/browser/browser_child_process_host_impl.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 324. Hunk #2 succeeded at 656. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-content_browser_browser_child_process_host_impl_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: content/browser/browser_child_process_host_impl.h |--- content/browser/browser_child_process_host_impl.h.orig |+++ content/browser/browser_child_process_host_impl.h -------------------------- Patching file content/browser/browser_child_process_host_impl.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 35. Hunk #2 succeeded at 269. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-content_browser_browser_child_process_host_impl_receiver_bindings_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: content/browser/browser_child_process_host_impl_receiver_bindings.cc |--- content/browser/browser_child_process_host_impl_receiver_bindings.cc.orig |+++ content/browser/browser_child_process_host_impl_receiver_bindings.cc -------------------------- Patching file content/browser/browser_child_process_host_impl_receiver_bindings.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 62. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-content_browser_browser_main_loop_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: content/browser/browser_main_loop.cc |--- content/browser/browser_main_loop.cc.orig |+++ content/browser/browser_main_loop.cc -------------------------- Patching file content/browser/browser_main_loop.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 254. Hunk #2 succeeded at 555. Hunk #3 succeeded at 598. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-content_browser_child_process_launcher_helper_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: content/browser/child_process_launcher_helper.h |--- content/browser/child_process_launcher_helper.h.orig |+++ content/browser/child_process_launcher_helper.h -------------------------- Patching file content/browser/child_process_launcher_helper.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 299. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-content_browser_child_process_launcher_helper_linux_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: content/browser/child_process_launcher_helper_linux.cc |--- content/browser/child_process_launcher_helper_linux.cc.orig |+++ content/browser/child_process_launcher_helper_linux.cc -------------------------- Patching file content/browser/child_process_launcher_helper_linux.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 22. Hunk #2 succeeded at 49. Hunk #3 succeeded at 74. Hunk #4 succeeded at 93. Hunk #5 succeeded at 104. Hunk #6 succeeded at 112. Hunk #7 succeeded at 146. Hunk #8 succeeded at 179. Hunk #9 succeeded at 202. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-content_browser_child_thread_type_switcher_linux_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: content/browser/child_thread_type_switcher_linux.cc |--- content/browser/child_thread_type_switcher_linux.cc.orig |+++ content/browser/child_thread_type_switcher_linux.cc -------------------------- Patching file content/browser/child_thread_type_switcher_linux.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 20. Hunk #2 succeeded at 41. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-content_browser_compositor_viz_process_transport_factory_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: content/browser/compositor/viz_process_transport_factory.cc |--- content/browser/compositor/viz_process_transport_factory.cc.orig |+++ content/browser/compositor/viz_process_transport_factory.cc -------------------------- Patching file content/browser/compositor/viz_process_transport_factory.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 110. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-content_browser_devtools_devtools_frontend_host_impl_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: content/browser/devtools/devtools_frontend_host_impl.cc |--- content/browser/devtools/devtools_frontend_host_impl.cc.orig |+++ content/browser/devtools/devtools_frontend_host_impl.cc -------------------------- Patching file content/browser/devtools/devtools_frontend_host_impl.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 27. Hunk #2 succeeded at 42. Hunk #3 succeeded at 112. Hunk #4 succeeded at 137. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-content_browser_devtools_devtools_frontend_host_impl_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: content/browser/devtools/devtools_frontend_host_impl.h |--- content/browser/devtools/devtools_frontend_host_impl.h.orig |+++ content/browser/devtools/devtools_frontend_host_impl.h -------------------------- Patching file content/browser/devtools/devtools_frontend_host_impl.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 34. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-content_browser_devtools_protocol_system_info_handler_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: content/browser/devtools/protocol/system_info_handler.cc |--- content/browser/devtools/protocol/system_info_handler.cc.orig |+++ content/browser/devtools/protocol/system_info_handler.cc -------------------------- Patching file content/browser/devtools/protocol/system_info_handler.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 51. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-content_browser_file_system_access_file_path_watcher_file_path_watcher_bsd_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: content/browser/file_system_access/file_path_watcher/file_path_watcher_bsd.cc |--- content/browser/file_system_access/file_path_watcher/file_path_watcher_bsd.cc.orig |+++ content/browser/file_system_access/file_path_watcher/file_path_watcher_bsd.cc -------------------------- (Creating file content/browser/file_system_access/file_path_watcher/file_path_watcher_bsd.cc...) Patching file content/browser/file_system_access/file_path_watcher/file_path_watcher_bsd.cc using Plan A... Empty context always matches. Hunk #1 succeeded at 1. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-content_browser_file_system_access_file_path_watcher_file_path_watcher_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: content/browser/file_system_access/file_path_watcher/file_path_watcher.h |--- content/browser/file_system_access/file_path_watcher/file_path_watcher.h.orig |+++ content/browser/file_system_access/file_path_watcher/file_path_watcher.h -------------------------- Patching file content/browser/file_system_access/file_path_watcher/file_path_watcher.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 125. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-content_browser_file_system_access_file_path_watcher_file_path_watcher_kqueue_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: content/browser/file_system_access/file_path_watcher/file_path_watcher_kqueue.h |--- content/browser/file_system_access/file_path_watcher/file_path_watcher_kqueue.h.orig |+++ content/browser/file_system_access/file_path_watcher/file_path_watcher_kqueue.h -------------------------- Patching file content/browser/file_system_access/file_path_watcher/file_path_watcher_kqueue.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 5. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-content_browser_file_system_access_file_system_access_local_path_watcher_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: content/browser/file_system_access/file_system_access_local_path_watcher.cc |--- content/browser/file_system_access/file_system_access_local_path_watcher.cc.orig |+++ content/browser/file_system_access/file_system_access_local_path_watcher.cc -------------------------- Patching file content/browser/file_system_access/file_system_access_local_path_watcher.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 62. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-content_browser_font_access_font_enumeration_data_source_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: content/browser/font_access/font_enumeration_data_source.cc |--- content/browser/font_access/font_enumeration_data_source.cc.orig |+++ content/browser/font_access/font_enumeration_data_source.cc -------------------------- Patching file content/browser/font_access/font_enumeration_data_source.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 16. Hunk #2 succeeded at 61. Hunk #3 succeeded at 76. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-content_browser_gpu_compositor_util_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: content/browser/gpu/compositor_util.cc |--- content/browser/gpu/compositor_util.cc.orig |+++ content/browser/gpu/compositor_util.cc -------------------------- Patching file content/browser/gpu/compositor_util.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 153. Hunk #2 succeeded at 165. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-content_browser_gpu_gpu_data_manager_impl_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: content/browser/gpu/gpu_data_manager_impl.cc |--- content/browser/gpu/gpu_data_manager_impl.cc.orig |+++ content/browser/gpu/gpu_data_manager_impl.cc -------------------------- Patching file content/browser/gpu/gpu_data_manager_impl.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 402. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-content_browser_gpu_gpu_data_manager_impl_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: content/browser/gpu/gpu_data_manager_impl.h |--- content/browser/gpu/gpu_data_manager_impl.h.orig |+++ content/browser/gpu/gpu_data_manager_impl.h -------------------------- Patching file content/browser/gpu/gpu_data_manager_impl.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 220. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-content_browser_gpu_gpu_data_manager_impl_private_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: content/browser/gpu/gpu_data_manager_impl_private.cc |--- content/browser/gpu/gpu_data_manager_impl_private.cc.orig |+++ content/browser/gpu/gpu_data_manager_impl_private.cc -------------------------- Patching file content/browser/gpu/gpu_data_manager_impl_private.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 1685. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-content_browser_gpu_gpu_data_manager_impl_private_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: content/browser/gpu/gpu_data_manager_impl_private.h |--- content/browser/gpu/gpu_data_manager_impl_private.h.orig |+++ content/browser/gpu/gpu_data_manager_impl_private.h -------------------------- Patching file content/browser/gpu/gpu_data_manager_impl_private.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 147. Hunk #2 succeeded at 303. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-content_browser_gpu_gpu_memory_buffer_manager_singleton_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: content/browser/gpu/gpu_memory_buffer_manager_singleton.cc |--- content/browser/gpu/gpu_memory_buffer_manager_singleton.cc.orig |+++ content/browser/gpu/gpu_memory_buffer_manager_singleton.cc -------------------------- Patching file content/browser/gpu/gpu_memory_buffer_manager_singleton.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 54. Hunk #2 succeeded at 117. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-content_browser_gpu_gpu_process_host_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: content/browser/gpu/gpu_process_host.cc |--- content/browser/gpu/gpu_process_host.cc.orig |+++ content/browser/gpu/gpu_process_host.cc -------------------------- Patching file content/browser/gpu/gpu_process_host.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 273. Hunk #2 succeeded at 301. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-content_browser_media_frameless_media_interface_proxy_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: content/browser/media/frameless_media_interface_proxy.h |--- content/browser/media/frameless_media_interface_proxy.h.orig |+++ content/browser/media/frameless_media_interface_proxy.h -------------------------- Patching file content/browser/media/frameless_media_interface_proxy.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 19. Hunk #2 succeeded at 105. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-content_browser_media_media_keys_listener_manager_impl_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: content/browser/media/media_keys_listener_manager_impl.cc |--- content/browser/media/media_keys_listener_manager_impl.cc.orig |+++ content/browser/media/media_keys_listener_manager_impl.cc -------------------------- Patching file content/browser/media/media_keys_listener_manager_impl.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 333. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-content_browser_network_service_instance_impl_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: content/browser/network_service_instance_impl.cc |--- content/browser/network_service_instance_impl.cc.orig |+++ content/browser/network_service_instance_impl.cc -------------------------- Patching file content/browser/network_service_instance_impl.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 85. Hunk #2 succeeded at 363. Hunk #3 succeeded at 432. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-content_browser_ppapi_plugin_process_host_receiver_bindings_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: content/browser/ppapi_plugin_process_host_receiver_bindings.cc |--- content/browser/ppapi_plugin_process_host_receiver_bindings.cc.orig |+++ content/browser/ppapi_plugin_process_host_receiver_bindings.cc -------------------------- Patching file content/browser/ppapi_plugin_process_host_receiver_bindings.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 8. Hunk #2 succeeded at 17. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-content_browser_renderer_host_delegated_frame_host_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: content/browser/renderer_host/delegated_frame_host.cc |--- content/browser/renderer_host/delegated_frame_host.cc.orig |+++ content/browser/renderer_host/delegated_frame_host.cc -------------------------- Patching file content/browser/renderer_host/delegated_frame_host.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 318. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-content_browser_renderer_host_input_input_device_change_observer_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: content/browser/renderer_host/input/input_device_change_observer.cc |--- content/browser/renderer_host/input/input_device_change_observer.cc.orig |+++ content/browser/renderer_host/input/input_device_change_observer.cc -------------------------- Patching file content/browser/renderer_host/input/input_device_change_observer.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 9. Hunk #2 succeeded at 21. Hunk #3 succeeded at 31. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-content_browser_renderer_host_media_service_video_capture_device_launcher_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: content/browser/renderer_host/media/service_video_capture_device_launcher.cc |--- content/browser/renderer_host/media/service_video_capture_device_launcher.cc.orig |+++ content/browser/renderer_host/media/service_video_capture_device_launcher.cc -------------------------- Patching file content/browser/renderer_host/media/service_video_capture_device_launcher.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 25. Hunk #2 succeeded at 173. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-content_browser_renderer_host_pepper_pepper_file_io_host_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: content/browser/renderer_host/pepper/pepper_file_io_host.cc |--- content/browser/renderer_host/pepper/pepper_file_io_host.cc.orig |+++ content/browser/renderer_host/pepper/pepper_file_io_host.cc -------------------------- Patching file content/browser/renderer_host/pepper/pepper_file_io_host.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 462. Hunk #2 succeeded at 496. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-content_browser_renderer_host_render_process_host_impl_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: content/browser/renderer_host/render_process_host_impl.cc |--- content/browser/renderer_host/render_process_host_impl.cc.orig |+++ content/browser/renderer_host/render_process_host_impl.cc -------------------------- Patching file content/browser/renderer_host/render_process_host_impl.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 218. Hunk #2 succeeded at 948. Hunk #3 succeeded at 1121. Hunk #4 succeeded at 3131. Hunk #5 succeeded at 3188. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-content_browser_renderer_host_render_process_host_impl_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: content/browser/renderer_host/render_process_host_impl.h |--- content/browser/renderer_host/render_process_host_impl.h.orig |+++ content/browser/renderer_host/render_process_host_impl.h -------------------------- Patching file content/browser/renderer_host/render_process_host_impl.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 102. Hunk #2 succeeded at 602. Hunk #3 succeeded at 967. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-content_browser_renderer_host_render_process_host_impl_receiver_bindings_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: content/browser/renderer_host/render_process_host_impl_receiver_bindings.cc |--- content/browser/renderer_host/render_process_host_impl_receiver_bindings.cc.orig |+++ content/browser/renderer_host/render_process_host_impl_receiver_bindings.cc -------------------------- Patching file content/browser/renderer_host/render_process_host_impl_receiver_bindings.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 52. Hunk #2 succeeded at 341. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-content_browser_renderer_host_render_view_host_impl_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: content/browser/renderer_host/render_view_host_impl.cc |--- content/browser/renderer_host/render_view_host_impl.cc.orig |+++ content/browser/renderer_host/render_view_host_impl.cc -------------------------- Patching file content/browser/renderer_host/render_view_host_impl.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 274. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-content_browser_renderer_host_render_widget_host_view_aura_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: content/browser/renderer_host/render_widget_host_view_aura.cc |--- content/browser/renderer_host/render_widget_host_view_aura.cc.orig |+++ content/browser/renderer_host/render_widget_host_view_aura.cc -------------------------- Patching file content/browser/renderer_host/render_widget_host_view_aura.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 120. Hunk #2 succeeded at 479. Hunk #3 succeeded at 1733. Hunk #4 succeeded at 2561. Hunk #5 succeeded at 2745. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-content_browser_renderer_host_render_widget_host_view_aura_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: content/browser/renderer_host/render_widget_host_view_aura.h |--- content/browser/renderer_host/render_widget_host_view_aura.h.orig |+++ content/browser/renderer_host/render_widget_host_view_aura.h -------------------------- Patching file content/browser/renderer_host/render_widget_host_view_aura.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 260. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-content_browser_renderer_host_render_widget_host_view_event_handler_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: content/browser/renderer_host/render_widget_host_view_event_handler.cc |--- content/browser/renderer_host/render_widget_host_view_event_handler.cc.orig |+++ content/browser/renderer_host/render_widget_host_view_event_handler.cc -------------------------- Patching file content/browser/renderer_host/render_widget_host_view_event_handler.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 602. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-content_browser_sandbox_host_linux_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: content/browser/sandbox_host_linux.cc |--- content/browser/sandbox_host_linux.cc.orig |+++ content/browser/sandbox_host_linux.cc -------------------------- Patching file content/browser/sandbox_host_linux.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 45. Hunk #2 succeeded at 56. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-content_browser_scheduler_responsiveness_jank_monitor_impl_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: content/browser/scheduler/responsiveness/jank_monitor_impl.cc |--- content/browser/scheduler/responsiveness/jank_monitor_impl.cc.orig |+++ content/browser/scheduler/responsiveness/jank_monitor_impl.cc -------------------------- Patching file content/browser/scheduler/responsiveness/jank_monitor_impl.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 340. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-content_browser_scheduler_responsiveness_native_event_observer_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: content/browser/scheduler/responsiveness/native_event_observer.cc |--- content/browser/scheduler/responsiveness/native_event_observer.cc.orig |+++ content/browser/scheduler/responsiveness/native_event_observer.cc -------------------------- Patching file content/browser/scheduler/responsiveness/native_event_observer.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 15. Hunk #2 succeeded at 39. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-content_browser_scheduler_responsiveness_native_event_observer_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: content/browser/scheduler/responsiveness/native_event_observer.h |--- content/browser/scheduler/responsiveness/native_event_observer.h.orig |+++ content/browser/scheduler/responsiveness/native_event_observer.h -------------------------- Patching file content/browser/scheduler/responsiveness/native_event_observer.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 16. Hunk #2 succeeded at 41. Hunk #3 succeeded at 58. Hunk #4 succeeded at 74. Hunk #5 succeeded at 91. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-content_browser_utility_process_host_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: content/browser/utility_process_host.cc |--- content/browser/utility_process_host.cc.orig |+++ content/browser/utility_process_host.cc -------------------------- Patching file content/browser/utility_process_host.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 61. Hunk #2 succeeded at 74. Hunk #3 succeeded at 85. Hunk #4 succeeded at 150. Hunk #5 succeeded at 209. Hunk #6 succeeded at 407. Hunk #7 succeeded at 418. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-content_browser_utility_process_host_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: content/browser/utility_process_host.h |--- content/browser/utility_process_host.h.orig |+++ content/browser/utility_process_host.h -------------------------- Patching file content/browser/utility_process_host.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 33. Hunk #2 succeeded at 200. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-content_browser_utility_process_host_receiver_bindings_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: content/browser/utility_process_host_receiver_bindings.cc |--- content/browser/utility_process_host_receiver_bindings.cc.orig |+++ content/browser/utility_process_host_receiver_bindings.cc -------------------------- Patching file content/browser/utility_process_host_receiver_bindings.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 10. Hunk #2 succeeded at 24. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-content_browser_utility_sandbox_delegate_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: content/browser/utility_sandbox_delegate.cc |--- content/browser/utility_sandbox_delegate.cc.orig |+++ content/browser/utility_sandbox_delegate.cc -------------------------- Patching file content/browser/utility_sandbox_delegate.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 76. Hunk #2 succeeded at 136. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-content_browser_v8_snapshot_files_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: content/browser/v8_snapshot_files.cc |--- content/browser/v8_snapshot_files.cc.orig |+++ content/browser/v8_snapshot_files.cc -------------------------- Patching file content/browser/v8_snapshot_files.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 17. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-content_browser_web_contents_web_contents_view_aura_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: content/browser/web_contents/web_contents_view_aura.cc |--- content/browser/web_contents/web_contents_view_aura.cc.orig |+++ content/browser/web_contents/web_contents_view_aura.cc -------------------------- Patching file content/browser/web_contents/web_contents_view_aura.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 174. Hunk #2 succeeded at 258. Hunk #3 succeeded at 1319. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-content_browser_webui_web_ui_main_frame_observer_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: content/browser/webui/web_ui_main_frame_observer.cc |--- content/browser/webui/web_ui_main_frame_observer.cc.orig |+++ content/browser/webui/web_ui_main_frame_observer.cc -------------------------- Patching file content/browser/webui/web_ui_main_frame_observer.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 13. Hunk #2 succeeded at 31. Hunk #3 succeeded at 55. Hunk #4 succeeded at 167. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-content_browser_webui_web_ui_main_frame_observer_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: content/browser/webui/web_ui_main_frame_observer.h |--- content/browser/webui/web_ui_main_frame_observer.h.orig |+++ content/browser/webui/web_ui_main_frame_observer.h -------------------------- Patching file content/browser/webui/web_ui_main_frame_observer.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 44. Hunk #2 succeeded at 60. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-content_browser_zygote_host_zygote_host_impl_linux_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: content/browser/zygote_host/zygote_host_impl_linux.cc |--- content/browser/zygote_host/zygote_host_impl_linux.cc.orig |+++ content/browser/zygote_host/zygote_host_impl_linux.cc -------------------------- Patching file content/browser/zygote_host/zygote_host_impl_linux.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 18. Hunk #2 succeeded at 39. Hunk #3 succeeded at 61. Hunk #4 succeeded at 71. Hunk #5 succeeded at 90. Hunk #6 succeeded at 141. Hunk #7 succeeded at 166. Hunk #8 succeeded at 235. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-content_browser_zygote_host_zygote_host_impl_linux_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: content/browser/zygote_host/zygote_host_impl_linux.h |--- content/browser/zygote_host/zygote_host_impl_linux.h.orig |+++ content/browser/zygote_host/zygote_host_impl_linux.h -------------------------- Patching file content/browser/zygote_host/zygote_host_impl_linux.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 47. Hunk #2 succeeded at 69. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-content_child_BUILD_gn Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: content/child/BUILD.gn |--- content/child/BUILD.gn.orig |+++ content/child/BUILD.gn -------------------------- Patching file content/child/BUILD.gn using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 130. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-content_child_child_process_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: content/child/child_process.cc |--- content/child/child_process.cc.orig |+++ content/child/child_process.cc -------------------------- Patching file content/child/child_process.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 35. Hunk #2 succeeded at 70. Hunk #3 succeeded at 199. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-content_child_child_process_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: content/child/child_process.h |--- content/child/child_process.h.orig |+++ content/child/child_process.h -------------------------- Patching file content/child/child_process.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 79. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-content_common_BUILD_gn Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: content/common/BUILD.gn |--- content/common/BUILD.gn.orig |+++ content/common/BUILD.gn -------------------------- Patching file content/common/BUILD.gn using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 388. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-content_common_features_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: content/common/features.cc |--- content/common/features.cc.orig |+++ content/common/features.cc -------------------------- Patching file content/common/features.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 158. Hunk #2 succeeded at 308. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-content_common_features_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: content/common/features.h |--- content/common/features.h.orig |+++ content/common/features.h -------------------------- Patching file content/common/features.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 35. Hunk #2 succeeded at 76. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-content_common_font_list_unittest_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: content/common/font_list_unittest.cc |--- content/common/font_list_unittest.cc.orig |+++ content/common/font_list_unittest.cc -------------------------- Patching file content/common/font_list_unittest.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 48. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-content_common_gpu_pre_sandbox_hook_bsd_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: content/common/gpu_pre_sandbox_hook_bsd.cc |--- content/common/gpu_pre_sandbox_hook_bsd.cc.orig |+++ content/common/gpu_pre_sandbox_hook_bsd.cc -------------------------- (Creating file content/common/gpu_pre_sandbox_hook_bsd.cc...) Patching file content/common/gpu_pre_sandbox_hook_bsd.cc using Plan A... Empty context always matches. Hunk #1 succeeded at 1. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-content_common_gpu_pre_sandbox_hook_bsd_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: content/common/gpu_pre_sandbox_hook_bsd.h |--- content/common/gpu_pre_sandbox_hook_bsd.h.orig |+++ content/common/gpu_pre_sandbox_hook_bsd.h -------------------------- (Creating file content/common/gpu_pre_sandbox_hook_bsd.h...) Patching file content/common/gpu_pre_sandbox_hook_bsd.h using Plan A... Empty context always matches. Hunk #1 succeeded at 1. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-content_common_gpu_pre_sandbox_hook_linux_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: content/common/gpu_pre_sandbox_hook_linux.h |--- content/common/gpu_pre_sandbox_hook_linux.h.orig |+++ content/common/gpu_pre_sandbox_hook_linux.h -------------------------- Patching file content/common/gpu_pre_sandbox_hook_linux.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 5. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-content_common_mojo_core_library_support_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: content/common/mojo_core_library_support.cc |--- content/common/mojo_core_library_support.cc.orig |+++ content/common/mojo_core_library_support.cc -------------------------- Patching file content/common/mojo_core_library_support.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 15. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-content_common_user_agent_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: content/common/user_agent.cc |--- content/common/user_agent.cc.orig |+++ content/common/user_agent.cc -------------------------- Patching file content/common/user_agent.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 45. Hunk #2 succeeded at 71. Hunk #3 succeeded at 296. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-content_gpu_gpu_child_thread_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: content/gpu/gpu_child_thread.cc |--- content/gpu/gpu_child_thread.cc.orig |+++ content/gpu/gpu_child_thread.cc -------------------------- Patching file content/gpu/gpu_child_thread.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 58. Hunk #2 succeeded at 142. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-content_gpu_gpu_main_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: content/gpu/gpu_main.cc |--- content/gpu/gpu_main.cc.orig |+++ content/gpu/gpu_main.cc -------------------------- Patching file content/gpu/gpu_main.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 94. Hunk #2 succeeded at 120. Hunk #3 succeeded at 178. Hunk #4 succeeded at 288. Hunk #5 succeeded at 310. Hunk #6 succeeded at 441. Hunk #7 succeeded at 481. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-content_ppapi_plugin_ppapi_blink_platform_impl_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: content/ppapi_plugin/ppapi_blink_platform_impl.cc |--- content/ppapi_plugin/ppapi_blink_platform_impl.cc.orig |+++ content/ppapi_plugin/ppapi_blink_platform_impl.cc -------------------------- Patching file content/ppapi_plugin/ppapi_blink_platform_impl.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 21. Hunk #2 succeeded at 36. Hunk #3 succeeded at 55. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-content_ppapi_plugin_ppapi_blink_platform_impl_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: content/ppapi_plugin/ppapi_blink_platform_impl.h |--- content/ppapi_plugin/ppapi_blink_platform_impl.h.orig |+++ content/ppapi_plugin/ppapi_blink_platform_impl.h -------------------------- Patching file content/ppapi_plugin/ppapi_blink_platform_impl.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 36. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-content_ppapi_plugin_ppapi_plugin_main_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: content/ppapi_plugin/ppapi_plugin_main.cc |--- content/ppapi_plugin/ppapi_plugin_main.cc.orig |+++ content/ppapi_plugin/ppapi_plugin_main.cc -------------------------- Patching file content/ppapi_plugin/ppapi_plugin_main.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 52. Hunk #2 succeeded at 146. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-content_public_browser_content_browser_client_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: content/public/browser/content_browser_client.cc |--- content/public/browser/content_browser_client.cc.orig |+++ content/public/browser/content_browser_client.cc -------------------------- Patching file content/public/browser/content_browser_client.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 1325. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-content_public_browser_service_process_host_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: content/public/browser/service_process_host.cc |--- content/public/browser/service_process_host.cc.orig |+++ content/public/browser/service_process_host.cc -------------------------- Patching file content/public/browser/service_process_host.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 70. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-content_public_browser_zygote_host_zygote_host_linux_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: content/public/browser/zygote_host/zygote_host_linux.h |--- content/public/browser/zygote_host/zygote_host_linux.h.orig |+++ content/public/browser/zygote_host/zygote_host_linux.h -------------------------- Patching file content/public/browser/zygote_host/zygote_host_linux.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 35. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-content_public_common_content_features_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: content/public/common/content_features.cc |--- content/public/common/content_features.cc.orig |+++ content/public/common/content_features.cc -------------------------- Patching file content/public/common/content_features.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 36. Hunk #2 succeeded at 1128. Hunk #3 succeeded at 1167. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-content_public_common_content_switches_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: content/public/common/content_switches.cc |--- content/public/common/content_switches.cc.orig |+++ content/public/common/content_switches.cc -------------------------- Patching file content/public/common/content_switches.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 349. Hunk #2 succeeded at 989. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-content_public_common_content_switches_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: content/public/common/content_switches.h |--- content/public/common/content_switches.h.orig |+++ content/public/common/content_switches.h -------------------------- Patching file content/public/common/content_switches.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 110. Hunk #2 succeeded at 269. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-content_public_common_zygote_features_gni Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: content/public/common/zygote/features.gni |--- content/public/common/zygote/features.gni.orig |+++ content/public/common/zygote/features.gni -------------------------- Patching file content/public/common/zygote/features.gni using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 2. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-content_renderer_render_thread_impl_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: content/renderer/render_thread_impl.cc |--- content/renderer/render_thread_impl.cc.orig |+++ content/renderer/render_thread_impl.cc -------------------------- Patching file content/renderer/render_thread_impl.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 214. Hunk #2 succeeded at 1019. Hunk #3 succeeded at 1028. Hunk #4 succeeded at 1803. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-content_renderer_renderer_blink_platform_impl_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: content/renderer/renderer_blink_platform_impl.cc |--- content/renderer/renderer_blink_platform_impl.cc.orig |+++ content/renderer/renderer_blink_platform_impl.cc -------------------------- Patching file content/renderer/renderer_blink_platform_impl.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 127. Hunk #2 succeeded at 197. Hunk #3 succeeded at 223. Hunk #4 succeeded at 284. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-content_renderer_renderer_blink_platform_impl_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: content/renderer/renderer_blink_platform_impl.h |--- content/renderer/renderer_blink_platform_impl.h.orig |+++ content/renderer/renderer_blink_platform_impl.h -------------------------- Patching file content/renderer/renderer_blink_platform_impl.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 253. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-content_renderer_renderer_main_platform_delegate_linux_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: content/renderer/renderer_main_platform_delegate_linux.cc |--- content/renderer/renderer_main_platform_delegate_linux.cc.orig |+++ content/renderer/renderer_main_platform_delegate_linux.cc -------------------------- Patching file content/renderer/renderer_main_platform_delegate_linux.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 44. Hunk #2 succeeded at 66. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-content_shell_BUILD_gn Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: content/shell/BUILD.gn |--- content/shell/BUILD.gn.orig |+++ content/shell/BUILD.gn -------------------------- Patching file content/shell/BUILD.gn using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 1084. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-content_shell_app_shell_main_delegate_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: content/shell/app/shell_main_delegate.cc |--- content/shell/app/shell_main_delegate.cc.orig |+++ content/shell/app/shell_main_delegate.cc -------------------------- Patching file content/shell/app/shell_main_delegate.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 276. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-content_shell_browser_shell_browser_main_parts_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: content/shell/browser/shell_browser_main_parts.cc |--- content/shell/browser/shell_browser_main_parts.cc.orig |+++ content/shell/browser/shell_browser_main_parts.cc -------------------------- Patching file content/shell/browser/shell_browser_main_parts.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 51. Hunk #2 succeeded at 68. Hunk #3 succeeded at 139. Hunk #4 succeeded at 168. Hunk #5 succeeded at 215. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-content_shell_browser_shell_paths_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: content/shell/browser/shell_paths.cc |--- content/shell/browser/shell_paths.cc.orig |+++ content/shell/browser/shell_paths.cc -------------------------- Patching file content/shell/browser/shell_paths.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 13. Hunk #2 succeeded at 25. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-content_shell_renderer_shell_content_renderer_client_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: content/shell/renderer/shell_content_renderer_client.cc |--- content/shell/renderer/shell_content_renderer_client.cc.orig |+++ content/shell/renderer/shell_content_renderer_client.cc -------------------------- Patching file content/shell/renderer/shell_content_renderer_client.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 54. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-content_shell_utility_shell_content_utility_client_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: content/shell/utility/shell_content_utility_client.cc |--- content/shell/utility/shell_content_utility_client.cc.orig |+++ content/shell/utility/shell_content_utility_client.cc -------------------------- Patching file content/shell/utility/shell_content_utility_client.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 38. Hunk #2 succeeded at 187. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-content_utility_services_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: content/utility/services.cc |--- content/utility/services.cc.orig |+++ content/utility/services.cc -------------------------- Patching file content/utility/services.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 74. Hunk #2 succeeded at 97. Hunk #3 succeeded at 115. Hunk #4 succeeded at 239. Hunk #5 succeeded at 328. Hunk #6 succeeded at 384. Hunk #7 succeeded at 395. Hunk #8 succeeded at 418. Hunk #9 succeeded at 470. Hunk #10 succeeded at 479. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-content_utility_speech_speech_recognition_sandbox_hook_linux_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: content/utility/speech/speech_recognition_sandbox_hook_linux.cc |--- content/utility/speech/speech_recognition_sandbox_hook_linux.cc.orig |+++ content/utility/speech/speech_recognition_sandbox_hook_linux.cc -------------------------- Patching file content/utility/speech/speech_recognition_sandbox_hook_linux.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 12. Hunk #2 succeeded at 53. Hunk #3 succeeded at 80. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-content_utility_speech_speech_recognition_sandbox_hook_linux_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: content/utility/speech/speech_recognition_sandbox_hook_linux.h |--- content/utility/speech/speech_recognition_sandbox_hook_linux.h.orig |+++ content/utility/speech/speech_recognition_sandbox_hook_linux.h -------------------------- Patching file content/utility/speech/speech_recognition_sandbox_hook_linux.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 5. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-content_utility_utility_blink_platform_with_sandbox_support_impl_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: content/utility/utility_blink_platform_with_sandbox_support_impl.cc |--- content/utility/utility_blink_platform_with_sandbox_support_impl.cc.orig |+++ content/utility/utility_blink_platform_with_sandbox_support_impl.cc -------------------------- Patching file content/utility/utility_blink_platform_with_sandbox_support_impl.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 9. Hunk #2 succeeded at 17. Hunk #3 succeeded at 35. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-content_utility_utility_blink_platform_with_sandbox_support_impl_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: content/utility/utility_blink_platform_with_sandbox_support_impl.h |--- content/utility/utility_blink_platform_with_sandbox_support_impl.h.orig |+++ content/utility/utility_blink_platform_with_sandbox_support_impl.h -------------------------- Patching file content/utility/utility_blink_platform_with_sandbox_support_impl.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 33. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-content_utility_utility_main_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: content/utility/utility_main.cc |--- content/utility/utility_main.cc.orig |+++ content/utility/utility_main.cc -------------------------- Patching file content/utility/utility_main.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 36. Hunk #2 succeeded at 62. Hunk #3 succeeded at 82. Hunk #4 succeeded at 110. Hunk #5 succeeded at 137. Hunk #6 succeeded at 155. Hunk #7 succeeded at 253. Hunk #8 succeeded at 266. Hunk #9 succeeded at 304. Hunk #10 succeeded at 331. Hunk #11 succeeded at 339. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-content_utility_utility_thread_impl_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: content/utility/utility_thread_impl.cc |--- content/utility/utility_thread_impl.cc.orig |+++ content/utility/utility_thread_impl.cc -------------------------- Patching file content/utility/utility_thread_impl.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 31. Hunk #2 succeeded at 251. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-content_zygote_BUILD_gn Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: content/zygote/BUILD.gn |--- content/zygote/BUILD.gn.orig |+++ content/zygote/BUILD.gn -------------------------- Patching file content/zygote/BUILD.gn using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 5. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-content_zygote_zygote_linux_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: content/zygote/zygote_linux.cc |--- content/zygote/zygote_linux.cc.orig |+++ content/zygote/zygote_linux.cc -------------------------- Patching file content/zygote/zygote_linux.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 1. Hunk #2 succeeded at 724. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-content_zygote_zygote_main_linux_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: content/zygote/zygote_main_linux.cc |--- content/zygote/zygote_main_linux.cc.orig |+++ content/zygote/zygote_main_linux.cc -------------------------- Patching file content/zygote/zygote_main_linux.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 11. Hunk #2 succeeded at 43. Hunk #3 succeeded at 54. Hunk #4 succeeded at 163. Hunk #5 succeeded at 232. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-device_bluetooth_bluetooth_adapter_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: device/bluetooth/bluetooth_adapter.cc |--- device/bluetooth/bluetooth_adapter.cc.orig |+++ device/bluetooth/bluetooth_adapter.cc -------------------------- Patching file device/bluetooth/bluetooth_adapter.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 32. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-device_bluetooth_cast_bluetooth_gni Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: device/bluetooth/cast_bluetooth.gni |--- device/bluetooth/cast_bluetooth.gni.orig |+++ device/bluetooth/cast_bluetooth.gni -------------------------- Patching file device/bluetooth/cast_bluetooth.gni using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 2. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-device_fido_fido_discovery_factory_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: device/fido/fido_discovery_factory.cc |--- device/fido/fido_discovery_factory.cc.orig |+++ device/fido/fido_discovery_factory.cc -------------------------- Patching file device/fido/fido_discovery_factory.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 127. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-device_gamepad_BUILD_gn Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: device/gamepad/BUILD.gn |--- device/gamepad/BUILD.gn.orig |+++ device/gamepad/BUILD.gn -------------------------- Patching file device/gamepad/BUILD.gn using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 99. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-device_gamepad_gamepad_provider_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: device/gamepad/gamepad_provider.cc |--- device/gamepad/gamepad_provider.cc.orig |+++ device/gamepad/gamepad_provider.cc -------------------------- Patching file device/gamepad/gamepad_provider.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 224. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-device_gamepad_hid_writer_linux_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: device/gamepad/hid_writer_linux.cc |--- device/gamepad/hid_writer_linux.cc.orig |+++ device/gamepad/hid_writer_linux.cc -------------------------- Patching file device/gamepad/hid_writer_linux.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 2. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-extensions_browser_api_api_browser_context_keyed_service_factories_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: extensions/browser/api/api_browser_context_keyed_service_factories.cc |--- extensions/browser/api/api_browser_context_keyed_service_factories.cc.orig |+++ extensions/browser/api/api_browser_context_keyed_service_factories.cc -------------------------- Patching file extensions/browser/api/api_browser_context_keyed_service_factories.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 102. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-extensions_browser_api_management_management_api_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: extensions/browser/api/management/management_api.cc |--- extensions/browser/api/management/management_api.cc.orig |+++ extensions/browser/api/management/management_api.cc -------------------------- Patching file extensions/browser/api/management/management_api.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 285. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-extensions_browser_api_messaging_message_service_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: extensions/browser/api/messaging/message_service.cc |--- extensions/browser/api/messaging/message_service.cc.orig |+++ extensions/browser/api/messaging/message_service.cc -------------------------- Patching file extensions/browser/api/messaging/message_service.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 78. Hunk #2 succeeded at 551. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-extensions_browser_api_networking_private_networking_private_delegate_factory_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: extensions/browser/api/networking_private/networking_private_delegate_factory.cc |--- extensions/browser/api/networking_private/networking_private_delegate_factory.cc.orig |+++ extensions/browser/api/networking_private/networking_private_delegate_factory.cc -------------------------- Patching file extensions/browser/api/networking_private/networking_private_delegate_factory.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 14. Hunk #2 succeeded at 67. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-extensions_common_api__permission_features_json Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: extensions/common/api/_permission_features.json |--- extensions/common/api/_permission_features.json.orig |+++ extensions/common/api/_permission_features.json -------------------------- Patching file extensions/common/api/_permission_features.json using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 138. Hunk #2 succeeded at 432. Hunk #3 succeeded at 476. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-extensions_common_api_runtime_json Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: extensions/common/api/runtime.json |--- extensions/common/api/runtime.json.orig |+++ extensions/common/api/runtime.json -------------------------- Patching file extensions/common/api/runtime.json using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 86. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-extensions_common_command_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: extensions/common/command.cc |--- extensions/common/command.cc.orig |+++ extensions/common/command.cc -------------------------- Patching file extensions/common/command.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 285. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-extensions_common_features_feature_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: extensions/common/features/feature.cc |--- extensions/common/features/feature.cc.orig |+++ extensions/common/features/feature.cc -------------------------- Patching file extensions/common/features/feature.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 34. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-extensions_renderer_bindings_api_binding_util_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: extensions/renderer/bindings/api_binding_util.cc |--- extensions/renderer/bindings/api_binding_util.cc.orig |+++ extensions/renderer/bindings/api_binding_util.cc -------------------------- Patching file extensions/renderer/bindings/api_binding_util.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 132. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-extensions_renderer_bindings_argument_spec_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: extensions/renderer/bindings/argument_spec.cc |--- extensions/renderer/bindings/argument_spec.cc.orig |+++ extensions/renderer/bindings/argument_spec.cc -------------------------- Patching file extensions/renderer/bindings/argument_spec.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 18. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-extensions_shell_app_shell_main_delegate_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: extensions/shell/app/shell_main_delegate.cc |--- extensions/shell/app/shell_main_delegate.cc.orig |+++ extensions/shell/app/shell_main_delegate.cc -------------------------- Patching file extensions/shell/app/shell_main_delegate.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 43. Hunk #2 succeeded at 63. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-extensions_shell_browser_api_runtime_shell_runtime_api_delegate_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: extensions/shell/browser/api/runtime/shell_runtime_api_delegate.cc |--- extensions/shell/browser/api/runtime/shell_runtime_api_delegate.cc.orig |+++ extensions/shell/browser/api/runtime/shell_runtime_api_delegate.cc -------------------------- Patching file extensions/shell/browser/api/runtime/shell_runtime_api_delegate.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 44. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-extensions_shell_browser_shell_browser_main_parts_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: extensions/shell/browser/shell_browser_main_parts.cc |--- extensions/shell/browser/shell_browser_main_parts.cc.orig |+++ extensions/shell/browser/shell_browser_main_parts.cc -------------------------- Patching file extensions/shell/browser/shell_browser_main_parts.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 150. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-extensions_shell_browser_shell_extensions_api_client_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: extensions/shell/browser/shell_extensions_api_client.cc |--- extensions/shell/browser/shell_extensions_api_client.cc.orig |+++ extensions/shell/browser/shell_extensions_api_client.cc -------------------------- Patching file extensions/shell/browser/shell_extensions_api_client.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 58. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-extensions_shell_browser_shell_extensions_api_client_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: extensions/shell/browser/shell_extensions_api_client.h |--- extensions/shell/browser/shell_extensions_api_client.h.orig |+++ extensions/shell/browser/shell_extensions_api_client.h -------------------------- Patching file extensions/shell/browser/shell_extensions_api_client.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 36. Hunk #2 succeeded at 45. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-google_apis_gcm_engine_heartbeat_manager_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: google_apis/gcm/engine/heartbeat_manager.cc |--- google_apis/gcm/engine/heartbeat_manager.cc.orig |+++ google_apis/gcm/engine/heartbeat_manager.cc -------------------------- Patching file google_apis/gcm/engine/heartbeat_manager.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 32. Hunk #2 succeeded at 191. Hunk #3 succeeded at 214. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-gpu_command_buffer_service_dawn_context_provider_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: gpu/command_buffer/service/dawn_context_provider.cc |--- gpu/command_buffer/service/dawn_context_provider.cc.orig |+++ gpu/command_buffer/service/dawn_context_provider.cc -------------------------- Patching file gpu/command_buffer/service/dawn_context_provider.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 175. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-gpu_command_buffer_service_gles2_cmd_decoder_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: gpu/command_buffer/service/gles2_cmd_decoder.cc |--- gpu/command_buffer/service/gles2_cmd_decoder.cc.orig |+++ gpu/command_buffer/service/gles2_cmd_decoder.cc -------------------------- Patching file gpu/command_buffer/service/gles2_cmd_decoder.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 2902. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-gpu_command_buffer_service_shared_image_angle_vulkan_image_backing_factory_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: gpu/command_buffer/service/shared_image/angle_vulkan_image_backing_factory.cc |--- gpu/command_buffer/service/shared_image/angle_vulkan_image_backing_factory.cc.orig |+++ gpu/command_buffer/service/shared_image/angle_vulkan_image_backing_factory.cc -------------------------- Patching file gpu/command_buffer/service/shared_image/angle_vulkan_image_backing_factory.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 20. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-gpu_command_buffer_service_shared_image_external_vk_image_backing_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: gpu/command_buffer/service/shared_image/external_vk_image_backing.cc |--- gpu/command_buffer/service/shared_image/external_vk_image_backing.cc.orig |+++ gpu/command_buffer/service/shared_image/external_vk_image_backing.cc -------------------------- Patching file gpu/command_buffer/service/shared_image/external_vk_image_backing.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 54. Hunk #2 succeeded at 734. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-gpu_command_buffer_service_shared_image_shared_image_factory_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: gpu/command_buffer/service/shared_image/shared_image_factory.cc |--- gpu/command_buffer/service/shared_image/shared_image_factory.cc.orig |+++ gpu/command_buffer/service/shared_image/shared_image_factory.cc -------------------------- Patching file gpu/command_buffer/service/shared_image/shared_image_factory.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 148. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-gpu_command_buffer_service_shared_image_shared_image_manager_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: gpu/command_buffer/service/shared_image/shared_image_manager.cc |--- gpu/command_buffer/service/shared_image/shared_image_manager.cc.orig |+++ gpu/command_buffer/service/shared_image/shared_image_manager.cc -------------------------- Patching file gpu/command_buffer/service/shared_image/shared_image_manager.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 572. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-gpu_command_buffer_service_shared_image_wrapped_sk_image_backing_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: gpu/command_buffer/service/shared_image/wrapped_sk_image_backing.cc |--- gpu/command_buffer/service/shared_image/wrapped_sk_image_backing.cc.orig |+++ gpu/command_buffer/service/shared_image/wrapped_sk_image_backing.cc -------------------------- Patching file gpu/command_buffer/service/shared_image/wrapped_sk_image_backing.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 214. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-gpu_command_buffer_service_webgpu_decoder_impl_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: gpu/command_buffer/service/webgpu_decoder_impl.cc |--- gpu/command_buffer/service/webgpu_decoder_impl.cc.orig |+++ gpu/command_buffer/service/webgpu_decoder_impl.cc -------------------------- Patching file gpu/command_buffer/service/webgpu_decoder_impl.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 1303. Hunk #2 succeeded at 1972. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-gpu_command_buffer_tests_gl_gpu_memory_buffer_unittest_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: gpu/command_buffer/tests/gl_gpu_memory_buffer_unittest.cc |--- gpu/command_buffer/tests/gl_gpu_memory_buffer_unittest.cc.orig |+++ gpu/command_buffer/tests/gl_gpu_memory_buffer_unittest.cc -------------------------- Patching file gpu/command_buffer/tests/gl_gpu_memory_buffer_unittest.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 27. Hunk #2 succeeded at 70. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-gpu_config_gpu_control_list_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: gpu/config/gpu_control_list.cc |--- gpu/config/gpu_control_list.cc.orig |+++ gpu/config/gpu_control_list.cc -------------------------- Patching file gpu/config/gpu_control_list.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 277. Hunk #2 succeeded at 814. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-gpu_config_gpu_finch_features_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: gpu/config/gpu_finch_features.cc |--- gpu/config/gpu_finch_features.cc.orig |+++ gpu/config/gpu_finch_features.cc -------------------------- Patching file gpu/config/gpu_finch_features.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 157. Hunk #2 succeeded at 170. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-gpu_config_gpu_info_collector_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: gpu/config/gpu_info_collector.cc |--- gpu/config/gpu_info_collector.cc.orig |+++ gpu/config/gpu_info_collector.cc -------------------------- Patching file gpu/config/gpu_info_collector.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 364. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-gpu_config_gpu_test_config_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: gpu/config/gpu_test_config.cc |--- gpu/config/gpu_test_config.cc.orig |+++ gpu/config/gpu_test_config.cc -------------------------- Patching file gpu/config/gpu_test_config.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 29. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-gpu_ipc_common_gpu_memory_buffer_support_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: gpu/ipc/common/gpu_memory_buffer_support.cc |--- gpu/ipc/common/gpu_memory_buffer_support.cc.orig |+++ gpu/ipc/common/gpu_memory_buffer_support.cc -------------------------- Patching file gpu/ipc/common/gpu_memory_buffer_support.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 26. Hunk #2 succeeded at 56. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-gpu_ipc_common_gpu_memory_buffer_support_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: gpu/ipc/common/gpu_memory_buffer_support.h |--- gpu/ipc/common/gpu_memory_buffer_support.h.orig |+++ gpu/ipc/common/gpu_memory_buffer_support.h -------------------------- Patching file gpu/ipc/common/gpu_memory_buffer_support.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 21. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-gpu_ipc_service_gpu_init_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: gpu/ipc/service/gpu_init.cc |--- gpu/ipc/service/gpu_init.cc.orig |+++ gpu/ipc/service/gpu_init.cc -------------------------- Patching file gpu/ipc/service/gpu_init.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 398. Hunk #2 succeeded at 435. Hunk #3 succeeded at 544. Hunk #4 succeeded at 626. Hunk #5 succeeded at 777. Hunk #6 succeeded at 832. Hunk #7 succeeded at 1022. Hunk #8 succeeded at 1077. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-gpu_ipc_service_gpu_memory_buffer_factory_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: gpu/ipc/service/gpu_memory_buffer_factory.cc |--- gpu/ipc/service/gpu_memory_buffer_factory.cc.orig |+++ gpu/ipc/service/gpu_memory_buffer_factory.cc -------------------------- Patching file gpu/ipc/service/gpu_memory_buffer_factory.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 14. Hunk #2 succeeded at 37. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-gpu_ipc_service_x_util_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: gpu/ipc/service/x_util.h |--- gpu/ipc/service/x_util.h.orig |+++ gpu/ipc/service/x_util.h -------------------------- Patching file gpu/ipc/service/x_util.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 12. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-gpu_vulkan_generate_bindings_py Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: gpu/vulkan/generate_bindings.py |--- gpu/vulkan/generate_bindings.py.orig |+++ gpu/vulkan/generate_bindings.py -------------------------- Patching file gpu/vulkan/generate_bindings.py using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 271. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-gpu_vulkan_semaphore_handle_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: gpu/vulkan/semaphore_handle.cc |--- gpu/vulkan/semaphore_handle.cc.orig |+++ gpu/vulkan/semaphore_handle.cc -------------------------- Patching file gpu/vulkan/semaphore_handle.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 39. Hunk #2 succeeded at 64. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-gpu_vulkan_vulkan_device_queue_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: gpu/vulkan/vulkan_device_queue.cc |--- gpu/vulkan/vulkan_device_queue.cc.orig |+++ gpu/vulkan/vulkan_device_queue.cc -------------------------- Patching file gpu/vulkan/vulkan_device_queue.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 149. Hunk #2 succeeded at 292. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-gpu_vulkan_vulkan_device_queue_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: gpu/vulkan/vulkan_device_queue.h |--- gpu/vulkan/vulkan_device_queue.h.orig |+++ gpu/vulkan/vulkan_device_queue.h -------------------------- Patching file gpu/vulkan/vulkan_device_queue.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 179. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-gpu_vulkan_vulkan_function_pointers_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: gpu/vulkan/vulkan_function_pointers.cc |--- gpu/vulkan/vulkan_function_pointers.cc.orig |+++ gpu/vulkan/vulkan_function_pointers.cc -------------------------- Patching file gpu/vulkan/vulkan_function_pointers.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 1297. Hunk #2 succeeded at 1498. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-gpu_vulkan_vulkan_function_pointers_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: gpu/vulkan/vulkan_function_pointers.h |--- gpu/vulkan/vulkan_function_pointers.h.orig |+++ gpu/vulkan/vulkan_function_pointers.h -------------------------- Patching file gpu/vulkan/vulkan_function_pointers.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 322. Hunk #2 succeeded at 1336. Hunk #3 succeeded at 1346. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-gpu_vulkan_vulkan_image_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: gpu/vulkan/vulkan_image.h |--- gpu/vulkan/vulkan_image.h.orig |+++ gpu/vulkan/vulkan_image.h -------------------------- Patching file gpu/vulkan/vulkan_image.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 87. Hunk #2 succeeded at 199. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-gpu_vulkan_vulkan_util_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: gpu/vulkan/vulkan_util.cc |--- gpu/vulkan/vulkan_util.cc.orig |+++ gpu/vulkan/vulkan_util.cc -------------------------- Patching file gpu/vulkan/vulkan_util.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 468. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-headless_lib_browser_headless_browser_main_parts_posix_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: headless/lib/browser/headless_browser_main_parts_posix.cc |--- headless/lib/browser/headless_browser_main_parts_posix.cc.orig |+++ headless/lib/browser/headless_browser_main_parts_posix.cc -------------------------- Patching file headless/lib/browser/headless_browser_main_parts_posix.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 21. Hunk #2 succeeded at 161. Hunk #3 succeeded at 169. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-headless_lib_browser_headless_content_browser_client_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: headless/lib/browser/headless_content_browser_client.h |--- headless/lib/browser/headless_content_browser_client.h.orig |+++ headless/lib/browser/headless_content_browser_client.h -------------------------- Patching file headless/lib/browser/headless_content_browser_client.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 45. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-headless_lib_browser_headless_request_context_manager_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: headless/lib/browser/headless_request_context_manager.cc |--- headless/lib/browser/headless_request_context_manager.cc.orig |+++ headless/lib/browser/headless_request_context_manager.cc -------------------------- Patching file headless/lib/browser/headless_request_context_manager.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 66. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-headless_lib_browser_headless_web_contents_impl_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: headless/lib/browser/headless_web_contents_impl.cc |--- headless/lib/browser/headless_web_contents_impl.cc.orig |+++ headless/lib/browser/headless_web_contents_impl.cc -------------------------- Patching file headless/lib/browser/headless_web_contents_impl.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 62. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-headless_lib_headless_content_main_delegate_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: headless/lib/headless_content_main_delegate.cc |--- headless/lib/headless_content_main_delegate.cc.orig |+++ headless/lib/headless_content_main_delegate.cc -------------------------- Patching file headless/lib/headless_content_main_delegate.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 409. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ipc_ipc_channel_common_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ipc/ipc_channel_common.cc |--- ipc/ipc_channel_common.cc.orig |+++ ipc/ipc_channel_common.cc -------------------------- Patching file ipc/ipc_channel_common.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 10. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ipc_ipc_channel_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ipc/ipc_channel.h |--- ipc/ipc_channel.h.orig |+++ ipc/ipc_channel.h -------------------------- Patching file ipc/ipc_channel.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 218. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ipc_ipc_channel_mojo_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ipc/ipc_channel_mojo.cc |--- ipc/ipc_channel_mojo.cc.orig |+++ ipc/ipc_channel_mojo.cc -------------------------- Patching file ipc/ipc_channel_mojo.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 105. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ipc_ipc_message_utils_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ipc/ipc_message_utils.cc |--- ipc/ipc_message_utils.cc.orig |+++ ipc/ipc_message_utils.cc -------------------------- Patching file ipc/ipc_message_utils.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 400. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ipc_ipc_message_utils_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ipc/ipc_message_utils.h |--- ipc/ipc_message_utils.h.orig |+++ ipc/ipc_message_utils.h -------------------------- Patching file ipc/ipc_message_utils.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 214. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-media_BUILD_gn Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: media/BUILD.gn |--- media/BUILD.gn.orig |+++ media/BUILD.gn -------------------------- Patching file media/BUILD.gn using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 96. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-media_audio_BUILD_gn Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: media/audio/BUILD.gn |--- media/audio/BUILD.gn.orig |+++ media/audio/BUILD.gn -------------------------- Patching file media/audio/BUILD.gn using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 270. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-media_audio_alsa_audio_manager_alsa_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: media/audio/alsa/audio_manager_alsa.cc |--- media/audio/alsa/audio_manager_alsa.cc.orig |+++ media/audio/alsa/audio_manager_alsa.cc -------------------------- Patching file media/audio/alsa/audio_manager_alsa.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 95. Hunk #2 succeeded at 109. Hunk #3 succeeded at 194. Hunk #4 succeeded at 250. Hunk #5 succeeded at 276. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-media_audio_audio_input_device_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: media/audio/audio_input_device.cc |--- media/audio/audio_input_device.cc.orig |+++ media/audio/audio_input_device.cc -------------------------- Patching file media/audio/audio_input_device.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 264. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-media_audio_audio_output_proxy_unittest_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: media/audio/audio_output_proxy_unittest.cc |--- media/audio/audio_output_proxy_unittest.cc.orig |+++ media/audio/audio_output_proxy_unittest.cc -------------------------- Patching file media/audio/audio_output_proxy_unittest.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 443. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-media_audio_pulse_pulse_util_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: media/audio/pulse/pulse_util.cc |--- media/audio/pulse/pulse_util.cc.orig |+++ media/audio/pulse/pulse_util.cc -------------------------- Patching file media/audio/pulse/pulse_util.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 45. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-media_audio_sndio_audio_manager_sndio_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: media/audio/sndio/audio_manager_sndio.cc |--- media/audio/sndio/audio_manager_sndio.cc.orig |+++ media/audio/sndio/audio_manager_sndio.cc -------------------------- (Creating file media/audio/sndio/audio_manager_sndio.cc...) Patching file media/audio/sndio/audio_manager_sndio.cc using Plan A... Empty context always matches. Hunk #1 succeeded at 1. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-media_audio_sndio_audio_manager_sndio_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: media/audio/sndio/audio_manager_sndio.h |--- media/audio/sndio/audio_manager_sndio.h.orig |+++ media/audio/sndio/audio_manager_sndio.h -------------------------- (Creating file media/audio/sndio/audio_manager_sndio.h...) Patching file media/audio/sndio/audio_manager_sndio.h using Plan A... Empty context always matches. Hunk #1 succeeded at 1. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-media_audio_sndio_sndio_input_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: media/audio/sndio/sndio_input.cc |--- media/audio/sndio/sndio_input.cc.orig |+++ media/audio/sndio/sndio_input.cc -------------------------- (Creating file media/audio/sndio/sndio_input.cc...) Patching file media/audio/sndio/sndio_input.cc using Plan A... Empty context always matches. Hunk #1 succeeded at 1. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-media_audio_sndio_sndio_input_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: media/audio/sndio/sndio_input.h |--- media/audio/sndio/sndio_input.h.orig |+++ media/audio/sndio/sndio_input.h -------------------------- (Creating file media/audio/sndio/sndio_input.h...) Patching file media/audio/sndio/sndio_input.h using Plan A... Empty context always matches. Hunk #1 succeeded at 1. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-media_audio_sndio_sndio_output_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: media/audio/sndio/sndio_output.cc |--- media/audio/sndio/sndio_output.cc.orig |+++ media/audio/sndio/sndio_output.cc -------------------------- (Creating file media/audio/sndio/sndio_output.cc...) Patching file media/audio/sndio/sndio_output.cc using Plan A... Empty context always matches. Hunk #1 succeeded at 1. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-media_audio_sndio_sndio_output_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: media/audio/sndio/sndio_output.h |--- media/audio/sndio/sndio_output.h.orig |+++ media/audio/sndio/sndio_output.h -------------------------- (Creating file media/audio/sndio/sndio_output.h...) Patching file media/audio/sndio/sndio_output.h using Plan A... Empty context always matches. Hunk #1 succeeded at 1. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-media_base_audio_latency_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: media/base/audio_latency.cc |--- media/base/audio_latency.cc.orig |+++ media/base/audio_latency.cc -------------------------- Patching file media/base/audio_latency.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 147. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-media_base_libaom_thread_wrapper_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: media/base/libaom_thread_wrapper.cc |--- media/base/libaom_thread_wrapper.cc.orig |+++ media/base/libaom_thread_wrapper.cc -------------------------- Patching file media/base/libaom_thread_wrapper.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 5. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-media_base_libvpx_thread_wrapper_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: media/base/libvpx_thread_wrapper.cc |--- media/base/libvpx_thread_wrapper.cc.orig |+++ media/base/libvpx_thread_wrapper.cc -------------------------- Patching file media/base/libvpx_thread_wrapper.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 5. Hunk #2 succeeded at 20. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-media_base_media_switches_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: media/base/media_switches.cc |--- media/base/media_switches.cc.orig |+++ media/base/media_switches.cc -------------------------- Patching file media/base/media_switches.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 21. Hunk #2 succeeded at 368. Hunk #3 succeeded at 379. Hunk #4 succeeded at 698. Hunk #5 succeeded at 726. Hunk #6 succeeded at 738. Hunk #7 succeeded at 767. Hunk #8 succeeded at 858. Hunk #9 succeeded at 985. Hunk #10 succeeded at 1015. Hunk #11 succeeded at 1490. Hunk #12 succeeded at 1570. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-media_base_media_switches_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: media/base/media_switches.h |--- media/base/media_switches.h.orig |+++ media/base/media_switches.h -------------------------- Patching file media/base/media_switches.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 325. Hunk #2 succeeded at 358. Hunk #3 succeeded at 377. Hunk #4 succeeded at 522. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-media_base_user_input_monitor_unittest_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: media/base/user_input_monitor_unittest.cc |--- media/base/user_input_monitor_unittest.cc.orig |+++ media/base/user_input_monitor_unittest.cc -------------------------- Patching file media/base/user_input_monitor_unittest.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 13. Hunk #2 succeeded at 49. Hunk #3 succeeded at 72. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-media_base_video_frame_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: media/base/video_frame.cc |--- media/base/video_frame.cc.orig |+++ media/base/video_frame.cc -------------------------- Patching file media/base/video_frame.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 83. Hunk #2 succeeded at 98. Hunk #3 succeeded at 396. Hunk #4 succeeded at 817. Hunk #5 succeeded at 1528. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-media_base_video_frame_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: media/base/video_frame.h |--- media/base/video_frame.h.orig |+++ media/base/video_frame.h -------------------------- Patching file media/base/video_frame.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 45. Hunk #2 succeeded at 111. Hunk #3 succeeded at 402. Hunk #4 succeeded at 721. Hunk #5 succeeded at 963. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-media_capture_video_create_video_capture_device_factory_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: media/capture/video/create_video_capture_device_factory.cc |--- media/capture/video/create_video_capture_device_factory.cc.orig |+++ media/capture/video/create_video_capture_device_factory.cc -------------------------- Patching file media/capture/video/create_video_capture_device_factory.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 13. Hunk #2 succeeded at 56. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-media_capture_video_fake_video_capture_device_factory_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: media/capture/video/fake_video_capture_device_factory.cc |--- media/capture/video/fake_video_capture_device_factory.cc.orig |+++ media/capture/video/fake_video_capture_device_factory.cc -------------------------- Patching file media/capture/video/fake_video_capture_device_factory.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 231. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-media_capture_video_file_video_capture_device_factory_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: media/capture/video/file_video_capture_device_factory.cc |--- media/capture/video/file_video_capture_device_factory.cc.orig |+++ media/capture/video/file_video_capture_device_factory.cc -------------------------- Patching file media/capture/video/file_video_capture_device_factory.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 52. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-media_capture_video_linux_fake_v4l2_impl_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: media/capture/video/linux/fake_v4l2_impl.cc |--- media/capture/video/linux/fake_v4l2_impl.cc.orig |+++ media/capture/video/linux/fake_v4l2_impl.cc -------------------------- Patching file media/capture/video/linux/fake_v4l2_impl.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 562. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-media_capture_video_linux_fake_v4l2_impl_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: media/capture/video/linux/fake_v4l2_impl.h |--- media/capture/video/linux/fake_v4l2_impl.h.orig |+++ media/capture/video/linux/fake_v4l2_impl.h -------------------------- Patching file media/capture/video/linux/fake_v4l2_impl.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 8. Hunk #2 succeeded at 44. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-media_capture_video_linux_v4l2_capture_delegate_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: media/capture/video/linux/v4l2_capture_delegate.cc |--- media/capture/video/linux/v4l2_capture_delegate.cc.orig |+++ media/capture/video/linux/v4l2_capture_delegate.cc -------------------------- Patching file media/capture/video/linux/v4l2_capture_delegate.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 5. Hunk #2 succeeded at 29. Hunk #3 succeeded at 51. Hunk #4 succeeded at 276. Hunk #5 succeeded at 332. Hunk #6 succeeded at 459. Hunk #7 succeeded at 809. Hunk #8 succeeded at 819. Hunk #9 succeeded at 830. Hunk #10 succeeded at 858. Hunk #11 succeeded at 1039. Hunk #12 succeeded at 1081. Hunk #13 succeeded at 1117. Hunk #14 succeeded at 1171. Hunk #15 succeeded at 1244. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-media_capture_video_linux_v4l2_capture_delegate_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: media/capture/video/linux/v4l2_capture_delegate.h |--- media/capture/video/linux/v4l2_capture_delegate.h.orig |+++ media/capture/video/linux/v4l2_capture_delegate.h -------------------------- Patching file media/capture/video/linux/v4l2_capture_delegate.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 35. Hunk #2 succeeded at 86. Hunk #3 succeeded at 100. Hunk #4 succeeded at 133. Hunk #5 succeeded at 167. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-media_capture_video_linux_v4l2_capture_device_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: media/capture/video/linux/v4l2_capture_device.h |--- media/capture/video/linux/v4l2_capture_device.h.orig |+++ media/capture/video/linux/v4l2_capture_device.h -------------------------- Patching file media/capture/video/linux/v4l2_capture_device.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 21. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-media_capture_video_linux_v4l2_capture_device_impl_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: media/capture/video/linux/v4l2_capture_device_impl.cc |--- media/capture/video/linux/v4l2_capture_device_impl.cc.orig |+++ media/capture/video/linux/v4l2_capture_device_impl.cc -------------------------- Patching file media/capture/video/linux/v4l2_capture_device_impl.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 22. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-media_capture_video_linux_v4l2_capture_device_impl_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: media/capture/video/linux/v4l2_capture_device_impl.h |--- media/capture/video/linux/v4l2_capture_device_impl.h.orig |+++ media/capture/video/linux/v4l2_capture_device_impl.h -------------------------- Patching file media/capture/video/linux/v4l2_capture_device_impl.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 19. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-media_capture_video_linux_video_capture_device_factory_v4l2_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: media/capture/video/linux/video_capture_device_factory_v4l2.cc |--- media/capture/video/linux/video_capture_device_factory_v4l2.cc.orig |+++ media/capture/video/linux/video_capture_device_factory_v4l2.cc -------------------------- Patching file media/capture/video/linux/video_capture_device_factory_v4l2.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 38. Hunk #2 succeeded at 71. Hunk #3 succeeded at 87. Hunk #4 succeeded at 110. Hunk #5 succeeded at 127. Hunk #6 succeeded at 233. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-media_capture_video_linux_video_capture_device_factory_v4l2_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: media/capture/video/linux/video_capture_device_factory_v4l2.h |--- media/capture/video/linux/video_capture_device_factory_v4l2.h.orig |+++ media/capture/video/linux/video_capture_device_factory_v4l2.h -------------------------- Patching file media/capture/video/linux/video_capture_device_factory_v4l2.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 51. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-media_capture_video_video_capture_buffer_tracker_factory_impl_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: media/capture/video/video_capture_buffer_tracker_factory_impl.cc |--- media/capture/video/video_capture_buffer_tracker_factory_impl.cc.orig |+++ media/capture/video/video_capture_buffer_tracker_factory_impl.cc -------------------------- Patching file media/capture/video/video_capture_buffer_tracker_factory_impl.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 14. Hunk #2 succeeded at 42. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-media_capture_video_video_capture_device_client_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: media/capture/video/video_capture_device_client.cc |--- media/capture/video/video_capture_device_client.cc.orig |+++ media/capture/video/video_capture_device_client.cc -------------------------- Patching file media/capture/video/video_capture_device_client.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 164. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-media_cdm_cdm_paths_unittest_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: media/cdm/cdm_paths_unittest.cc |--- media/cdm/cdm_paths_unittest.cc.orig |+++ media/cdm/cdm_paths_unittest.cc -------------------------- Patching file media/cdm/cdm_paths_unittest.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 27. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-media_cdm_library_cdm_cdm_paths_gni Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: media/cdm/library_cdm/cdm_paths.gni |--- media/cdm/library_cdm/cdm_paths.gni.orig |+++ media/cdm/library_cdm/cdm_paths.gni -------------------------- Patching file media/cdm/library_cdm/cdm_paths.gni using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 15. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-media_ffmpeg_scripts_build_ffmpeg_py Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: media/ffmpeg/scripts/build_ffmpeg.py |--- media/ffmpeg/scripts/build_ffmpeg.py.orig |+++ media/ffmpeg/scripts/build_ffmpeg.py -------------------------- Patching file media/ffmpeg/scripts/build_ffmpeg.py using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 33. Hunk #2 succeeded at 43. Hunk #3 succeeded at 124. Hunk #4 succeeded at 477. Hunk #5 succeeded at 600. Hunk #6 succeeded at 714. Hunk #7 succeeded at 829. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-media_ffmpeg_scripts_robo_lib_config_py Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: media/ffmpeg/scripts/robo_lib/config.py |--- media/ffmpeg/scripts/robo_lib/config.py.orig |+++ media/ffmpeg/scripts/robo_lib/config.py -------------------------- Patching file media/ffmpeg/scripts/robo_lib/config.py using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 55. Hunk #2 succeeded at 180. Hunk #3 succeeded at 217. Hunk #4 succeeded at 229. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-media_gpu_buffer_validation_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: media/gpu/buffer_validation.cc |--- media/gpu/buffer_validation.cc.orig |+++ media/gpu/buffer_validation.cc -------------------------- Patching file media/gpu/buffer_validation.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 16. Hunk #2 succeeded at 29. Hunk #3 succeeded at 55. Hunk #4 succeeded at 109. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-media_gpu_chromeos_gl_image_processor_backend_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: media/gpu/chromeos/gl_image_processor_backend.cc |--- media/gpu/chromeos/gl_image_processor_backend.cc.orig |+++ media/gpu/chromeos/gl_image_processor_backend.cc -------------------------- Patching file media/gpu/chromeos/gl_image_processor_backend.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 28. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-media_gpu_chromeos_libyuv_image_processor_backend_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: media/gpu/chromeos/libyuv_image_processor_backend.cc |--- media/gpu/chromeos/libyuv_image_processor_backend.cc.orig |+++ media/gpu/chromeos/libyuv_image_processor_backend.cc -------------------------- Patching file media/gpu/chromeos/libyuv_image_processor_backend.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 48. Hunk #2 succeeded at 415. Hunk #3 succeeded at 577. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-media_gpu_chromeos_mailbox_video_frame_converter_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: media/gpu/chromeos/mailbox_video_frame_converter.cc |--- media/gpu/chromeos/mailbox_video_frame_converter.cc.orig |+++ media/gpu/chromeos/mailbox_video_frame_converter.cc -------------------------- Patching file media/gpu/chromeos/mailbox_video_frame_converter.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 67. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-media_gpu_chromeos_native_pixmap_frame_resource_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: media/gpu/chromeos/native_pixmap_frame_resource.cc |--- media/gpu/chromeos/native_pixmap_frame_resource.cc.orig |+++ media/gpu/chromeos/native_pixmap_frame_resource.cc -------------------------- Patching file media/gpu/chromeos/native_pixmap_frame_resource.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 176. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-media_gpu_chromeos_platform_video_frame_utils_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: media/gpu/chromeos/platform_video_frame_utils.cc |--- media/gpu/chromeos/platform_video_frame_utils.cc.orig |+++ media/gpu/chromeos/platform_video_frame_utils.cc -------------------------- Patching file media/gpu/chromeos/platform_video_frame_utils.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 68. Hunk #2 succeeded at 196. Hunk #3 succeeded at 350. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-media_gpu_chromeos_video_decoder_pipeline_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: media/gpu/chromeos/video_decoder_pipeline.cc |--- media/gpu/chromeos/video_decoder_pipeline.cc.orig |+++ media/gpu/chromeos/video_decoder_pipeline.cc -------------------------- Patching file media/gpu/chromeos/video_decoder_pipeline.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 1096. Hunk #2 succeeded at 1105. Hunk #3 succeeded at 1287. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-media_gpu_gpu_video_encode_accelerator_factory_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: media/gpu/gpu_video_encode_accelerator_factory.cc |--- media/gpu/gpu_video_encode_accelerator_factory.cc.orig |+++ media/gpu/gpu_video_encode_accelerator_factory.cc -------------------------- Patching file media/gpu/gpu_video_encode_accelerator_factory.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 118. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-media_gpu_sandbox_hardware_video_decoding_sandbox_hook_linux_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: media/gpu/sandbox/hardware_video_decoding_sandbox_hook_linux.cc |--- media/gpu/sandbox/hardware_video_decoding_sandbox_hook_linux.cc.orig |+++ media/gpu/sandbox/hardware_video_decoding_sandbox_hook_linux.cc -------------------------- Patching file media/gpu/sandbox/hardware_video_decoding_sandbox_hook_linux.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 16. Hunk #2 succeeded at 34. Hunk #3 succeeded at 179. Hunk #4 succeeded at 195. Hunk #5 succeeded at 241. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-media_gpu_sandbox_hardware_video_decoding_sandbox_hook_linux_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: media/gpu/sandbox/hardware_video_decoding_sandbox_hook_linux.h |--- media/gpu/sandbox/hardware_video_decoding_sandbox_hook_linux.h.orig |+++ media/gpu/sandbox/hardware_video_decoding_sandbox_hook_linux.h -------------------------- Patching file media/gpu/sandbox/hardware_video_decoding_sandbox_hook_linux.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 5. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-media_gpu_sandbox_hardware_video_encoding_sandbox_hook_linux_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: media/gpu/sandbox/hardware_video_encoding_sandbox_hook_linux.cc |--- media/gpu/sandbox/hardware_video_encoding_sandbox_hook_linux.cc.orig |+++ media/gpu/sandbox/hardware_video_encoding_sandbox_hook_linux.cc -------------------------- Patching file media/gpu/sandbox/hardware_video_encoding_sandbox_hook_linux.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 18. Hunk #2 succeeded at 123. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-media_gpu_sandbox_hardware_video_encoding_sandbox_hook_linux_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: media/gpu/sandbox/hardware_video_encoding_sandbox_hook_linux.h |--- media/gpu/sandbox/hardware_video_encoding_sandbox_hook_linux.h.orig |+++ media/gpu/sandbox/hardware_video_encoding_sandbox_hook_linux.h -------------------------- Patching file media/gpu/sandbox/hardware_video_encoding_sandbox_hook_linux.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 5. Hunk #2 succeeded at 20. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-media_gpu_vaapi_vaapi_video_decoder_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: media/gpu/vaapi/vaapi_video_decoder.cc |--- media/gpu/vaapi/vaapi_video_decoder.cc.orig |+++ media/gpu/vaapi/vaapi_video_decoder.cc -------------------------- Patching file media/gpu/vaapi/vaapi_video_decoder.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 782. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-media_gpu_vaapi_vaapi_wrapper_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: media/gpu/vaapi/vaapi_wrapper.cc |--- media/gpu/vaapi/vaapi_wrapper.cc.orig |+++ media/gpu/vaapi/vaapi_wrapper.cc -------------------------- Patching file media/gpu/vaapi/vaapi_wrapper.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 72. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-media_media_options_gni Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: media/media_options.gni |--- media/media_options.gni.orig |+++ media/media_options.gni -------------------------- Patching file media/media_options.gni using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 190. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-media_mojo_mojom_stable_stable_video_decoder_types_mojom_traits_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: media/mojo/mojom/stable/stable_video_decoder_types_mojom_traits.cc |--- media/mojo/mojom/stable/stable_video_decoder_types_mojom_traits.cc.orig |+++ media/mojo/mojom/stable/stable_video_decoder_types_mojom_traits.cc -------------------------- Patching file media/mojo/mojom/stable/stable_video_decoder_types_mojom_traits.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 837. Hunk #2 succeeded at 858. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-media_mojo_mojom_stable_stable_video_decoder_types_mojom_traits_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: media/mojo/mojom/stable/stable_video_decoder_types_mojom_traits.h |--- media/mojo/mojom/stable/stable_video_decoder_types_mojom_traits.h.orig |+++ media/mojo/mojom/stable/stable_video_decoder_types_mojom_traits.h -------------------------- Patching file media/mojo/mojom/stable/stable_video_decoder_types_mojom_traits.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 690. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-media_mojo_mojom_video_frame_mojom_traits_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: media/mojo/mojom/video_frame_mojom_traits.cc |--- media/mojo/mojom/video_frame_mojom_traits.cc.orig |+++ media/mojo/mojom/video_frame_mojom_traits.cc -------------------------- Patching file media/mojo/mojom/video_frame_mojom_traits.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 22. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-media_video_fake_gpu_memory_buffer_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: media/video/fake_gpu_memory_buffer.cc |--- media/video/fake_gpu_memory_buffer.cc.orig |+++ media/video/fake_gpu_memory_buffer.cc -------------------------- Patching file media/video/fake_gpu_memory_buffer.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 9. Hunk #2 succeeded at 52. Hunk #3 succeeded at 82. Hunk #4 succeeded at 144. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-media_video_gpu_memory_buffer_video_frame_pool_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: media/video/gpu_memory_buffer_video_frame_pool.cc |--- media/video/gpu_memory_buffer_video_frame_pool.cc.orig |+++ media/video/gpu_memory_buffer_video_frame_pool.cc -------------------------- Patching file media/video/gpu_memory_buffer_video_frame_pool.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 106. Hunk #2 succeeded at 795. Hunk #3 succeeded at 1340. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-media_video_video_encode_accelerator_adapter_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: media/video/video_encode_accelerator_adapter.cc |--- media/video/video_encode_accelerator_adapter.cc.orig |+++ media/video/video_encode_accelerator_adapter.cc -------------------------- Patching file media/video/video_encode_accelerator_adapter.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 158. Hunk #2 succeeded at 484. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-media_video_video_encode_accelerator_adapter_test_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: media/video/video_encode_accelerator_adapter_test.cc |--- media/video/video_encode_accelerator_adapter_test.cc.orig |+++ media/video/video_encode_accelerator_adapter_test.cc -------------------------- Patching file media/video/video_encode_accelerator_adapter_test.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 457. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-media_webrtc_audio_processor_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: media/webrtc/audio_processor.cc |--- media/webrtc/audio_processor.cc.orig |+++ media/webrtc/audio_processor.cc -------------------------- Patching file media/webrtc/audio_processor.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 513. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-media_webrtc_helpers_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: media/webrtc/helpers.cc |--- media/webrtc/helpers.cc.orig |+++ media/webrtc/helpers.cc -------------------------- Patching file media/webrtc/helpers.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 41. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-media_webrtc_helpers_unittests_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: media/webrtc/helpers_unittests.cc |--- media/webrtc/helpers_unittests.cc.orig |+++ media/webrtc/helpers_unittests.cc -------------------------- Patching file media/webrtc/helpers_unittests.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 40. Hunk #2 succeeded at 73. Hunk #3 succeeded at 89. Hunk #4 succeeded at 106. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-mojo_core_BUILD_gn Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: mojo/core/BUILD.gn |--- mojo/core/BUILD.gn.orig |+++ mojo/core/BUILD.gn -------------------------- Patching file mojo/core/BUILD.gn using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 166. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-mojo_core_channel_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: mojo/core/channel.cc |--- mojo/core/channel.cc.orig |+++ mojo/core/channel.cc -------------------------- Patching file mojo/core/channel.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 79. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-mojo_core_embedder_features_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: mojo/core/embedder/features.h |--- mojo/core/embedder/features.h.orig |+++ mojo/core/embedder/features.h -------------------------- Patching file mojo/core/embedder/features.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 16. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-mojo_public_c_system_thunks_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: mojo/public/c/system/thunks.cc |--- mojo/public/c/system/thunks.cc.orig |+++ mojo/public/c/system/thunks.cc -------------------------- Patching file mojo/public/c/system/thunks.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 30. Hunk #2 succeeded at 77. Hunk #3 succeeded at 91. Hunk #4 succeeded at 147. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-mojo_public_tools_bindings_mojom_gni Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: mojo/public/tools/bindings/mojom.gni |--- mojo/public/tools/bindings/mojom.gni.orig |+++ mojo/public/tools/bindings/mojom.gni -------------------------- Patching file mojo/public/tools/bindings/mojom.gni using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 763. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-net_BUILD_gn Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: net/BUILD.gn |--- net/BUILD.gn.orig |+++ net/BUILD.gn -------------------------- Patching file net/BUILD.gn using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 123. Hunk #2 succeeded at 1246. Hunk #3 succeeded at 1420. Hunk #4 succeeded at 2896. Hunk #5 succeeded at 2987. Hunk #6 succeeded at 3051. Hunk #7 succeeded at 3190. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-net_base_features_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: net/base/features.cc |--- net/base/features.cc.orig |+++ net/base/features.cc -------------------------- Patching file net/base/features.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 26. Hunk #2 succeeded at 506. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-net_base_mock_network_change_notifier_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: net/base/mock_network_change_notifier.cc |--- net/base/mock_network_change_notifier.cc.orig |+++ net/base/mock_network_change_notifier.cc -------------------------- Patching file net/base/mock_network_change_notifier.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 103. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-net_base_mock_network_change_notifier_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: net/base/mock_network_change_notifier.h |--- net/base/mock_network_change_notifier.h.orig |+++ net/base/mock_network_change_notifier.h -------------------------- Patching file net/base/mock_network_change_notifier.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 84. Hunk #2 succeeded at 104. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-net_base_network_change_notifier_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: net/base/network_change_notifier.cc |--- net/base/network_change_notifier.cc.orig |+++ net/base/network_change_notifier.cc -------------------------- Patching file net/base/network_change_notifier.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 42. Hunk #2 succeeded at 329. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-net_base_network_change_notifier_passive_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: net/base/network_change_notifier_passive.cc |--- net/base/network_change_notifier_passive.cc.orig |+++ net/base/network_change_notifier_passive.cc -------------------------- Patching file net/base/network_change_notifier_passive.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 107. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-net_base_network_interfaces_posix_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: net/base/network_interfaces_posix.h |--- net/base/network_interfaces_posix.h.orig |+++ net/base/network_interfaces_posix.h -------------------------- Patching file net/base/network_interfaces_posix.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 8. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-net_base_sockaddr_util_posix_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: net/base/sockaddr_util_posix.cc |--- net/base/sockaddr_util_posix.cc.orig |+++ net/base/sockaddr_util_posix.cc -------------------------- Patching file net/base/sockaddr_util_posix.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 46. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-net_base_sockaddr_util_posix_unittest_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: net/base/sockaddr_util_posix_unittest.cc |--- net/base/sockaddr_util_posix_unittest.cc.orig |+++ net/base/sockaddr_util_posix_unittest.cc -------------------------- Patching file net/base/sockaddr_util_posix_unittest.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 88. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-net_cert_cert_verify_proc_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: net/cert/cert_verify_proc.h |--- net/cert/cert_verify_proc.h.orig |+++ net/cert/cert_verify_proc.h -------------------------- Patching file net/cert/cert_verify_proc.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 176. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-net_disk_cache_simple_simple_file_tracker_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: net/disk_cache/simple/simple_file_tracker.cc |--- net/disk_cache/simple/simple_file_tracker.cc.orig |+++ net/disk_cache/simple/simple_file_tracker.cc -------------------------- Patching file net/disk_cache/simple/simple_file_tracker.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 35. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-net_dns_BUILD_gn Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: net/dns/BUILD.gn |--- net/dns/BUILD.gn.orig |+++ net/dns/BUILD.gn -------------------------- Patching file net/dns/BUILD.gn using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 138. Hunk #2 succeeded at 179. Hunk #3 succeeded at 448. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-net_dns_address_info_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: net/dns/address_info.cc |--- net/dns/address_info.cc.orig |+++ net/dns/address_info.cc -------------------------- Patching file net/dns/address_info.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 83. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-net_dns_address_sorter_posix_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: net/dns/address_sorter_posix.cc |--- net/dns/address_sorter_posix.cc.orig |+++ net/dns/address_sorter_posix.cc -------------------------- Patching file net/dns/address_sorter_posix.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 32. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-net_dns_dns_config_service_posix_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: net/dns/dns_config_service_posix.cc |--- net/dns/dns_config_service_posix.cc.orig |+++ net/dns/dns_config_service_posix.cc -------------------------- Patching file net/dns/dns_config_service_posix.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 39. Hunk #2 succeeded at 140. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-net_dns_dns_reloader_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: net/dns/dns_reloader.cc |--- net/dns/dns_reloader.cc.orig |+++ net/dns/dns_reloader.cc -------------------------- Patching file net/dns/dns_reloader.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 10. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-net_dns_dns_util_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: net/dns/dns_util.cc |--- net/dns/dns_util.cc.orig |+++ net/dns/dns_util.cc -------------------------- Patching file net/dns/dns_util.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 29. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-net_dns_host_resolver_proc_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: net/dns/host_resolver_proc.cc |--- net/dns/host_resolver_proc.cc.orig |+++ net/dns/host_resolver_proc.cc -------------------------- Patching file net/dns/host_resolver_proc.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 15. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-net_dns_public_BUILD_gn Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: net/dns/public/BUILD.gn |--- net/dns/public/BUILD.gn.orig |+++ net/dns/public/BUILD.gn -------------------------- Patching file net/dns/public/BUILD.gn using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 78. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-net_dns_public_resolv_reader_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: net/dns/public/resolv_reader.h |--- net/dns/public/resolv_reader.h.orig |+++ net/dns/public/resolv_reader.h -------------------------- Patching file net/dns/public/resolv_reader.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 5. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-net_dns_public_scoped_res_state_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: net/dns/public/scoped_res_state.h |--- net/dns/public/scoped_res_state.h.orig |+++ net/dns/public/scoped_res_state.h -------------------------- Patching file net/dns/public/scoped_res_state.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 5. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-net_filter_zstd_source_stream_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: net/filter/zstd_source_stream.cc |--- net/filter/zstd_source_stream.cc.orig |+++ net/filter/zstd_source_stream.cc -------------------------- Patching file net/filter/zstd_source_stream.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 7. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-net_http_http_auth_gssapi_posix_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: net/http/http_auth_gssapi_posix.cc |--- net/http/http_auth_gssapi_posix.cc.orig |+++ net/http/http_auth_gssapi_posix.cc -------------------------- Patching file net/http/http_auth_gssapi_posix.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 375. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-net_http_http_auth_gssapi_posix_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: net/http/http_auth_gssapi_posix.h |--- net/http/http_auth_gssapi_posix.h.orig |+++ net/http/http_auth_gssapi_posix.h -------------------------- Patching file net/http/http_auth_gssapi_posix.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 21. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-net_http_http_auth_handler_negotiate_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: net/http/http_auth_handler_negotiate.cc |--- net/http/http_auth_handler_negotiate.cc.orig |+++ net/http/http_auth_handler_negotiate.cc -------------------------- Patching file net/http/http_auth_handler_negotiate.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 120. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-net_http_http_auth_preferences_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: net/http/http_auth_preferences.cc |--- net/http/http_auth_preferences.cc.orig |+++ net/http/http_auth_preferences.cc -------------------------- Patching file net/http/http_auth_preferences.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 39. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-net_http_http_auth_preferences_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: net/http/http_auth_preferences.h |--- net/http/http_auth_preferences.h.orig |+++ net/http/http_auth_preferences.h -------------------------- Patching file net/http/http_auth_preferences.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 50. Hunk #2 succeeded at 86. Hunk #3 succeeded at 137. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-net_http_http_network_session_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: net/http/http_network_session.cc |--- net/http/http_network_session.cc.orig |+++ net/http/http_network_session.cc -------------------------- Patching file net/http/http_network_session.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 19. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-net_proxy_resolution_proxy_config_service_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: net/proxy_resolution/proxy_config_service.cc |--- net/proxy_resolution/proxy_config_service.cc.orig |+++ net/proxy_resolution/proxy_config_service.cc -------------------------- Patching file net/proxy_resolution/proxy_config_service.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 19. Hunk #2 succeeded at 108. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-net_proxy_resolution_proxy_config_service_linux_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: net/proxy_resolution/proxy_config_service_linux.cc |--- net/proxy_resolution/proxy_config_service_linux.cc.orig |+++ net/proxy_resolution/proxy_config_service_linux.cc -------------------------- Patching file net/proxy_resolution/proxy_config_service_linux.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 11. Hunk #2 succeeded at 512. Hunk #3 succeeded at 1041. Hunk #4 succeeded at 1260. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-net_socket_socket_posix_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: net/socket/socket_posix.cc |--- net/socket/socket_posix.cc.orig |+++ net/socket/socket_posix.cc -------------------------- Patching file net/socket/socket_posix.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 516. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-net_socket_socks5_client_socket_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: net/socket/socks5_client_socket.cc |--- net/socket/socks5_client_socket.cc.orig |+++ net/socket/socks5_client_socket.cc -------------------------- Patching file net/socket/socks5_client_socket.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 24. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-net_socket_tcp_socket_posix_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: net/socket/tcp_socket_posix.cc |--- net/socket/tcp_socket_posix.cc.orig |+++ net/socket/tcp_socket_posix.cc -------------------------- Patching file net/socket/tcp_socket_posix.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 97. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-net_socket_udp_socket_posix_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: net/socket/udp_socket_posix.cc |--- net/socket/udp_socket_posix.cc.orig |+++ net/socket/udp_socket_posix.cc -------------------------- Patching file net/socket/udp_socket_posix.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 521. Hunk #2 succeeded at 552. Hunk #3 succeeded at 890. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-net_socket_udp_socket_unittest_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: net/socket/udp_socket_unittest.cc |--- net/socket/udp_socket_unittest.cc.orig |+++ net/socket/udp_socket_unittest.cc -------------------------- Patching file net/socket/udp_socket_unittest.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 358. Hunk #2 succeeded at 669. Hunk #3 succeeded at 697. Hunk #4 succeeded at 762. Hunk #5 succeeded at 816. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-net_third_party_quiche_BUILD_gn Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: net/third_party/quiche/BUILD.gn |--- net/third_party/quiche/BUILD.gn.orig |+++ net/third_party/quiche/BUILD.gn -------------------------- Patching file net/third_party/quiche/BUILD.gn using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 29. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-net_tools_cert_verify_tool_cert_verify_tool_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: net/tools/cert_verify_tool/cert_verify_tool.cc |--- net/tools/cert_verify_tool/cert_verify_tool.cc.orig |+++ net/tools/cert_verify_tool/cert_verify_tool.cc -------------------------- Patching file net/tools/cert_verify_tool/cert_verify_tool.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 35. Hunk #2 succeeded at 67. Hunk #3 succeeded at 579. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-net_tools_net_watcher_net_watcher_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: net/tools/net_watcher/net_watcher.cc |--- net/tools/net_watcher/net_watcher.cc.orig |+++ net/tools/net_watcher/net_watcher.cc -------------------------- Patching file net/tools/net_watcher/net_watcher.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 32. Hunk #2 succeeded at 44. Hunk #3 succeeded at 163. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-net_traffic_annotation_network_traffic_annotation_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: net/traffic_annotation/network_traffic_annotation.h |--- net/traffic_annotation/network_traffic_annotation.h.orig |+++ net/traffic_annotation/network_traffic_annotation.h -------------------------- Patching file net/traffic_annotation/network_traffic_annotation.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 378. Hunk #2 succeeded at 392. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-net_url_request_url_request_context_builder_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: net/url_request/url_request_context_builder.cc |--- net/url_request/url_request_context_builder.cc.orig |+++ net/url_request/url_request_context_builder.cc -------------------------- Patching file net/url_request/url_request_context_builder.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 441. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-net_url_request_url_request_context_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: net/url_request/url_request_context.cc |--- net/url_request/url_request_context.cc.orig |+++ net/url_request/url_request_context.cc -------------------------- Patching file net/url_request/url_request_context.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 121. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-net_url_request_url_request_context_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: net/url_request/url_request_context.h |--- net/url_request/url_request_context.h.orig |+++ net/url_request/url_request_context.h -------------------------- Patching file net/url_request/url_request_context.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 91. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-pdf_pdfium_pdfium_engine_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: pdf/pdfium/pdfium_engine.cc |--- pdf/pdfium/pdfium_engine.cc.orig |+++ pdf/pdfium/pdfium_engine.cc -------------------------- Patching file pdf/pdfium/pdfium_engine.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 93. Hunk #2 succeeded at 524. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-printing_backend_cups_ipp_helper_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: printing/backend/cups_ipp_helper.cc |--- printing/backend/cups_ipp_helper.cc.orig |+++ printing/backend/cups_ipp_helper.cc -------------------------- Patching file printing/backend/cups_ipp_helper.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 202. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-printing_backend_print_backend_cups_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: printing/backend/print_backend_cups.cc |--- printing/backend/print_backend_cups.cc.orig |+++ printing/backend/print_backend_cups.cc -------------------------- Patching file printing/backend/print_backend_cups.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 32. Hunk #2 succeeded at 283. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-printing_mojom_printing_context_mojom_traits_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: printing/mojom/printing_context_mojom_traits.cc |--- printing/mojom/printing_context_mojom_traits.cc.orig |+++ printing/mojom/printing_context_mojom_traits.cc -------------------------- Patching file printing/mojom/printing_context_mojom_traits.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 19. Hunk #2 succeeded at 161. Hunk #3 succeeded at 238. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-printing_mojom_printing_context_mojom_traits_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: printing/mojom/printing_context_mojom_traits.h |--- printing/mojom/printing_context_mojom_traits.h.orig |+++ printing/mojom/printing_context_mojom_traits.h -------------------------- Patching file printing/mojom/printing_context_mojom_traits.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 166. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-printing_print_settings_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: printing/print_settings.cc |--- printing/print_settings.cc.orig |+++ printing/print_settings.cc -------------------------- Patching file printing/print_settings.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 320. Hunk #2 succeeded at 350. Hunk #3 succeeded at 374. Hunk #4 succeeded at 414. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-printing_print_settings_conversion_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: printing/print_settings_conversion.cc |--- printing/print_settings_conversion.cc.orig |+++ printing/print_settings_conversion.cc -------------------------- Patching file printing/print_settings_conversion.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 285. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-printing_print_settings_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: printing/print_settings.h |--- printing/print_settings.h.orig |+++ printing/print_settings.h -------------------------- Patching file printing/print_settings.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 25. Hunk #2 succeeded at 51. Hunk #3 succeeded at 101. Hunk #4 succeeded at 276. Hunk #5 succeeded at 429. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-printing_printing_context_linux_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: printing/printing_context_linux.cc |--- printing/printing_context_linux.cc.orig |+++ printing/printing_context_linux.cc -------------------------- Patching file printing/printing_context_linux.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 23. Hunk #2 succeeded at 68. Hunk #3 succeeded at 84. Hunk #4 succeeded at 97. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-printing_printing_features_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: printing/printing_features.cc |--- printing/printing_features.cc.orig |+++ printing/printing_features.cc -------------------------- Patching file printing/printing_features.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 21. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-printing_printing_features_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: printing/printing_features.h |--- printing/printing_features.h.orig |+++ printing/printing_features.h -------------------------- Patching file printing/printing_features.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 22. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-printing_sandbox_print_backend_sandbox_hook_linux_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: printing/sandbox/print_backend_sandbox_hook_linux.cc |--- printing/sandbox/print_backend_sandbox_hook_linux.cc.orig |+++ printing/sandbox/print_backend_sandbox_hook_linux.cc -------------------------- Patching file printing/sandbox/print_backend_sandbox_hook_linux.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 10. Hunk #2 succeeded at 83. Hunk #3 succeeded at 100. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-printing_sandbox_print_backend_sandbox_hook_linux_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: printing/sandbox/print_backend_sandbox_hook_linux.h |--- printing/sandbox/print_backend_sandbox_hook_linux.h.orig |+++ printing/sandbox/print_backend_sandbox_hook_linux.h -------------------------- Patching file printing/sandbox/print_backend_sandbox_hook_linux.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 5. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-remoting_base_chromoting_event_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: remoting/base/chromoting_event.cc |--- remoting/base/chromoting_event.cc.orig |+++ remoting/base/chromoting_event.cc -------------------------- Patching file remoting/base/chromoting_event.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 192. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-remoting_base_host_settings_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: remoting/base/host_settings.cc |--- remoting/base/host_settings.cc.orig |+++ remoting/base/host_settings.cc -------------------------- Patching file remoting/base/host_settings.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 7. Hunk #2 succeeded at 44. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-remoting_client_display_sys_opengl_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: remoting/client/display/sys_opengl.h |--- remoting/client/display/sys_opengl.h.orig |+++ remoting/client/display/sys_opengl.h -------------------------- Patching file remoting/client/display/sys_opengl.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 9. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-remoting_codec_webrtc_video_encoder_vpx_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: remoting/codec/webrtc_video_encoder_vpx.cc |--- remoting/codec/webrtc_video_encoder_vpx.cc.orig |+++ remoting/codec/webrtc_video_encoder_vpx.cc -------------------------- Patching file remoting/codec/webrtc_video_encoder_vpx.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 88. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-remoting_host_base_desktop_environment_options_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: remoting/host/base/desktop_environment_options.cc |--- remoting/host/base/desktop_environment_options.cc.orig |+++ remoting/host/base/desktop_environment_options.cc -------------------------- Patching file remoting/host/base/desktop_environment_options.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 124. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-remoting_host_base_switches_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: remoting/host/base/switches.cc |--- remoting/host/base/switches.cc.orig |+++ remoting/host/base/switches.cc -------------------------- Patching file remoting/host/base/switches.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 23. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-remoting_host_base_switches_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: remoting/host/base/switches.h |--- remoting/host/base/switches.h.orig |+++ remoting/host/base/switches.h -------------------------- Patching file remoting/host/base/switches.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 35. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-remoting_host_basic_desktop_environment_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: remoting/host/basic_desktop_environment.cc |--- remoting/host/basic_desktop_environment.cc.orig |+++ remoting/host/basic_desktop_environment.cc -------------------------- Patching file remoting/host/basic_desktop_environment.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 195. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-remoting_host_chromoting_host_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: remoting/host/chromoting_host.cc |--- remoting/host/chromoting_host.cc.orig |+++ remoting/host/chromoting_host.cc -------------------------- Patching file remoting/host/chromoting_host.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 129. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-remoting_host_chromoting_host_context_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: remoting/host/chromoting_host_context.cc |--- remoting/host/chromoting_host_context.cc.orig |+++ remoting/host/chromoting_host_context.cc -------------------------- Patching file remoting/host/chromoting_host_context.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 294. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-remoting_host_chromoting_host_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: remoting/host/chromoting_host.h |--- remoting/host/chromoting_host.h.orig |+++ remoting/host/chromoting_host.h -------------------------- Patching file remoting/host/chromoting_host.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 32. Hunk #2 succeeded at 97. Hunk #3 succeeded at 206. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-remoting_host_chromoting_host_services_client_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: remoting/host/chromoting_host_services_client.cc |--- remoting/host/chromoting_host_services_client.cc.orig |+++ remoting/host/chromoting_host_services_client.cc -------------------------- Patching file remoting/host/chromoting_host_services_client.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 59. Hunk #2 succeeded at 136. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-remoting_host_client_session_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: remoting/host/client_session.cc |--- remoting/host/client_session.cc.orig |+++ remoting/host/client_session.cc -------------------------- Patching file remoting/host/client_session.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 157. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-remoting_host_crash_crash_file_uploader_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: remoting/host/crash/crash_file_uploader.cc |--- remoting/host/crash/crash_file_uploader.cc.orig |+++ remoting/host/crash/crash_file_uploader.cc -------------------------- Patching file remoting/host/crash/crash_file_uploader.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 44. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-remoting_host_desktop_and_cursor_conditional_composer_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: remoting/host/desktop_and_cursor_conditional_composer.cc |--- remoting/host/desktop_and_cursor_conditional_composer.cc.orig |+++ remoting/host/desktop_and_cursor_conditional_composer.cc -------------------------- Patching file remoting/host/desktop_and_cursor_conditional_composer.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 7. Hunk #2 succeeded at 96. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-remoting_host_desktop_capturer_proxy_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: remoting/host/desktop_capturer_proxy.cc |--- remoting/host/desktop_capturer_proxy.cc.orig |+++ remoting/host/desktop_capturer_proxy.cc -------------------------- Patching file remoting/host/desktop_capturer_proxy.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 26. Hunk #2 succeeded at 91. Hunk #3 succeeded at 298. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-remoting_host_desktop_capturer_wrapper_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: remoting/host/desktop_capturer_wrapper.cc |--- remoting/host/desktop_capturer_wrapper.cc.orig |+++ remoting/host/desktop_capturer_wrapper.cc -------------------------- Patching file remoting/host/desktop_capturer_wrapper.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 13. Hunk #2 succeeded at 33. Hunk #3 succeeded at 112. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-remoting_host_evaluate_capability_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: remoting/host/evaluate_capability.cc |--- remoting/host/evaluate_capability.cc.orig |+++ remoting/host/evaluate_capability.cc -------------------------- Patching file remoting/host/evaluate_capability.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 56. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-remoting_host_host_attributes_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: remoting/host/host_attributes.cc |--- remoting/host/host_attributes.cc.orig |+++ remoting/host/host_attributes.cc -------------------------- Patching file remoting/host/host_attributes.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 105. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-remoting_host_host_details_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: remoting/host/host_details.cc |--- remoting/host/host_details.cc.orig |+++ remoting/host/host_details.cc -------------------------- Patching file remoting/host/host_details.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 23. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-remoting_host_host_main_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: remoting/host/host_main.cc |--- remoting/host/host_main.cc.orig |+++ remoting/host/host_main.cc -------------------------- Patching file remoting/host/host_main.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 50. Hunk #2 succeeded at 63. Hunk #3 succeeded at 156. Hunk #4 succeeded at 222. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-remoting_host_ipc_constants_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: remoting/host/ipc_constants.cc |--- remoting/host/ipc_constants.cc.orig |+++ remoting/host/ipc_constants.cc -------------------------- Patching file remoting/host/ipc_constants.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 17. Hunk #2 succeeded at 68. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-remoting_host_it2me_it2me_host_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: remoting/host/it2me/it2me_host.cc |--- remoting/host/it2me/it2me_host.cc.orig |+++ remoting/host/it2me/it2me_host.cc -------------------------- Patching file remoting/host/it2me/it2me_host.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 52. Hunk #2 succeeded at 180. Hunk #3 succeeded at 340. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-remoting_host_it2me_it2me_native_messaging_host_main_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: remoting/host/it2me/it2me_native_messaging_host_main.cc |--- remoting/host/it2me/it2me_native_messaging_host_main.cc.orig |+++ remoting/host/it2me/it2me_native_messaging_host_main.cc -------------------------- Patching file remoting/host/it2me/it2me_native_messaging_host_main.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 30. Hunk #2 succeeded at 77. Hunk #3 succeeded at 125. Hunk #4 succeeded at 257. Hunk #5 succeeded at 284. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-remoting_host_me2me_desktop_environment_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: remoting/host/me2me_desktop_environment.cc |--- remoting/host/me2me_desktop_environment.cc.orig |+++ remoting/host/me2me_desktop_environment.cc -------------------------- Patching file remoting/host/me2me_desktop_environment.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 119. Hunk #2 succeeded at 161. Hunk #3 succeeded at 170. Hunk #4 succeeded at 195. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-remoting_host_mouse_cursor_monitor_proxy_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: remoting/host/mouse_cursor_monitor_proxy.cc |--- remoting/host/mouse_cursor_monitor_proxy.cc.orig |+++ remoting/host/mouse_cursor_monitor_proxy.cc -------------------------- Patching file remoting/host/mouse_cursor_monitor_proxy.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 73. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-remoting_host_policy_watcher_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: remoting/host/policy_watcher.cc |--- remoting/host/policy_watcher.cc.orig |+++ remoting/host/policy_watcher.cc -------------------------- Patching file remoting/host/policy_watcher.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 178. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-remoting_host_remote_open_url_remote_open_url_client_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: remoting/host/remote_open_url/remote_open_url_client.cc |--- remoting/host/remote_open_url/remote_open_url_client.cc.orig |+++ remoting/host/remote_open_url/remote_open_url_client.cc -------------------------- Patching file remoting/host/remote_open_url/remote_open_url_client.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 18. Hunk #2 succeeded at 31. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-remoting_host_remote_open_url_remote_open_url_util_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: remoting/host/remote_open_url/remote_open_url_util.cc |--- remoting/host/remote_open_url/remote_open_url_util.cc.orig |+++ remoting/host/remote_open_url/remote_open_url_util.cc -------------------------- Patching file remoting/host/remote_open_url/remote_open_url_util.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 29. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-remoting_host_remote_open_url_url_forwarder_configurator_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: remoting/host/remote_open_url/url_forwarder_configurator.cc |--- remoting/host/remote_open_url/url_forwarder_configurator.cc.orig |+++ remoting/host/remote_open_url/url_forwarder_configurator.cc -------------------------- Patching file remoting/host/remote_open_url/url_forwarder_configurator.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 12. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-remoting_host_remoting_me2me_host_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: remoting/host/remoting_me2me_host.cc |--- remoting/host/remoting_me2me_host.cc.orig |+++ remoting/host/remoting_me2me_host.cc -------------------------- Patching file remoting/host/remoting_me2me_host.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 129. Hunk #2 succeeded at 140. Hunk #3 succeeded at 159. Hunk #4 succeeded at 189. Hunk #5 succeeded at 397. Hunk #6 succeeded at 466. Hunk #7 succeeded at 773. Hunk #8 succeeded at 808. Hunk #9 succeeded at 953. Hunk #10 succeeded at 1036. Hunk #11 succeeded at 1044. Hunk #12 succeeded at 1401. Hunk #13 succeeded at 1849. Hunk #14 succeeded at 1882. Hunk #15 succeeded at 1914. Hunk #16 succeeded at 2048. Hunk #17 succeeded at 2097. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-remoting_host_setup_start_host_main_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: remoting/host/setup/start_host_main.cc |--- remoting/host/setup/start_host_main.cc.orig |+++ remoting/host/setup/start_host_main.cc -------------------------- Patching file remoting/host/setup/start_host_main.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 37. Hunk #2 succeeded at 339. Hunk #3 succeeded at 364. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-remoting_host_webauthn_remote_webauthn_caller_security_utils_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: remoting/host/webauthn/remote_webauthn_caller_security_utils.cc |--- remoting/host/webauthn/remote_webauthn_caller_security_utils.cc.orig |+++ remoting/host/webauthn/remote_webauthn_caller_security_utils.cc -------------------------- Patching file remoting/host/webauthn/remote_webauthn_caller_security_utils.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 10. Hunk #2 succeeded at 38. Hunk #3 succeeded at 82. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-remoting_host_webauthn_remote_webauthn_extension_notifier_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: remoting/host/webauthn/remote_webauthn_extension_notifier.cc |--- remoting/host/webauthn/remote_webauthn_extension_notifier.cc.orig |+++ remoting/host/webauthn/remote_webauthn_extension_notifier.cc -------------------------- Patching file remoting/host/webauthn/remote_webauthn_extension_notifier.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 24. Hunk #2 succeeded at 69. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-remoting_protocol_webrtc_video_stream_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: remoting/protocol/webrtc_video_stream.cc |--- remoting/protocol/webrtc_video_stream.cc.orig |+++ remoting/protocol/webrtc_video_stream.cc -------------------------- Patching file remoting/protocol/webrtc_video_stream.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 267. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-sandbox_BUILD_gn Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: sandbox/BUILD.gn |--- sandbox/BUILD.gn.orig |+++ sandbox/BUILD.gn -------------------------- Patching file sandbox/BUILD.gn using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 49. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-sandbox_features_gni Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: sandbox/features.gni |--- sandbox/features.gni.orig |+++ sandbox/features.gni -------------------------- Patching file sandbox/features.gni using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 6. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-sandbox_linux_BUILD_gn Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: sandbox/linux/BUILD.gn |--- sandbox/linux/BUILD.gn.orig |+++ sandbox/linux/BUILD.gn -------------------------- Patching file sandbox/linux/BUILD.gn using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 12. Hunk #2 succeeded at 379. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-sandbox_linux_services_init_process_reaper_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: sandbox/linux/services/init_process_reaper.cc |--- sandbox/linux/services/init_process_reaper.cc.orig |+++ sandbox/linux/services/init_process_reaper.cc -------------------------- Patching file sandbox/linux/services/init_process_reaper.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 2. Hunk #2 succeeded at 101. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-sandbox_linux_services_libc_interceptor_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: sandbox/linux/services/libc_interceptor.cc |--- sandbox/linux/services/libc_interceptor.cc.orig |+++ sandbox/linux/services/libc_interceptor.cc -------------------------- Patching file sandbox/linux/services/libc_interceptor.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 17. Hunk #2 succeeded at 175. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-sandbox_policy_BUILD_gn Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: sandbox/policy/BUILD.gn |--- sandbox/policy/BUILD.gn.orig |+++ sandbox/policy/BUILD.gn -------------------------- Patching file sandbox/policy/BUILD.gn using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 49. Hunk #2 succeeded at 122. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-sandbox_policy_features_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: sandbox/policy/features.cc |--- sandbox/policy/features.cc.orig |+++ sandbox/policy/features.cc -------------------------- Patching file sandbox/policy/features.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 20. Hunk #2 succeeded at 151. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-sandbox_policy_features_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: sandbox/policy/features.h |--- sandbox/policy/features.h.orig |+++ sandbox/policy/features.h -------------------------- Patching file sandbox/policy/features.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 47. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-sandbox_policy_freebsd_sandbox_freebsd_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: sandbox/policy/freebsd/sandbox_freebsd.cc |--- sandbox/policy/freebsd/sandbox_freebsd.cc.orig |+++ sandbox/policy/freebsd/sandbox_freebsd.cc -------------------------- (Creating file sandbox/policy/freebsd/sandbox_freebsd.cc...) Patching file sandbox/policy/freebsd/sandbox_freebsd.cc using Plan A... Empty context always matches. Hunk #1 succeeded at 1. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-sandbox_policy_freebsd_sandbox_freebsd_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: sandbox/policy/freebsd/sandbox_freebsd.h |--- sandbox/policy/freebsd/sandbox_freebsd.h.orig |+++ sandbox/policy/freebsd/sandbox_freebsd.h -------------------------- (Creating file sandbox/policy/freebsd/sandbox_freebsd.h...) Patching file sandbox/policy/freebsd/sandbox_freebsd.h using Plan A... Empty context always matches. Hunk #1 succeeded at 1. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-sandbox_policy_mojom_sandbox_mojom Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: sandbox/policy/mojom/sandbox.mojom |--- sandbox/policy/mojom/sandbox.mojom.orig |+++ sandbox/policy/mojom/sandbox.mojom -------------------------- Patching file sandbox/policy/mojom/sandbox.mojom using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 77. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-sandbox_policy_openbsd_sandbox_openbsd_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: sandbox/policy/openbsd/sandbox_openbsd.cc |--- sandbox/policy/openbsd/sandbox_openbsd.cc.orig |+++ sandbox/policy/openbsd/sandbox_openbsd.cc -------------------------- (Creating file sandbox/policy/openbsd/sandbox_openbsd.cc...) Patching file sandbox/policy/openbsd/sandbox_openbsd.cc using Plan A... Empty context always matches. Hunk #1 succeeded at 1. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-sandbox_policy_openbsd_sandbox_openbsd_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: sandbox/policy/openbsd/sandbox_openbsd.h |--- sandbox/policy/openbsd/sandbox_openbsd.h.orig |+++ sandbox/policy/openbsd/sandbox_openbsd.h -------------------------- (Creating file sandbox/policy/openbsd/sandbox_openbsd.h...) Patching file sandbox/policy/openbsd/sandbox_openbsd.h using Plan A... Empty context always matches. Hunk #1 succeeded at 1. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-sandbox_policy_sandbox_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: sandbox/policy/sandbox.cc |--- sandbox/policy/sandbox.cc.orig |+++ sandbox/policy/sandbox.cc -------------------------- Patching file sandbox/policy/sandbox.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 18. Hunk #2 succeeded at 36. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-sandbox_policy_sandbox_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: sandbox/policy/sandbox.h |--- sandbox/policy/sandbox.h.orig |+++ sandbox/policy/sandbox.h -------------------------- Patching file sandbox/policy/sandbox.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 12. Hunk #2 succeeded at 38. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-sandbox_policy_sandbox_type_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: sandbox/policy/sandbox_type.cc |--- sandbox/policy/sandbox_type.cc.orig |+++ sandbox/policy/sandbox_type.cc -------------------------- Patching file sandbox/policy/sandbox_type.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 38. Hunk #2 succeeded at 63. Hunk #3 succeeded at 74. Hunk #4 succeeded at 131. Hunk #5 succeeded at 142. Hunk #6 succeeded at 174. Hunk #7 succeeded at 218. Hunk #8 succeeded at 266. Hunk #9 succeeded at 296. Hunk #10 succeeded at 322. Hunk #11 succeeded at 394. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-sandbox_policy_switches_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: sandbox/policy/switches.cc |--- sandbox/policy/switches.cc.orig |+++ sandbox/policy/switches.cc -------------------------- Patching file sandbox/policy/switches.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 54. Hunk #2 succeeded at 97. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-sandbox_policy_switches_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: sandbox/policy/switches.h |--- sandbox/policy/switches.h.orig |+++ sandbox/policy/switches.h -------------------------- Patching file sandbox/policy/switches.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 57. Hunk #2 succeeded at 82. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-services_audio_audio_sandbox_hook_linux_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: services/audio/audio_sandbox_hook_linux.cc |--- services/audio/audio_sandbox_hook_linux.cc.orig |+++ services/audio/audio_sandbox_hook_linux.cc -------------------------- Patching file services/audio/audio_sandbox_hook_linux.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 143. Hunk #2 succeeded at 172. Hunk #3 succeeded at 195. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-services_audio_audio_sandbox_hook_linux_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: services/audio/audio_sandbox_hook_linux.h |--- services/audio/audio_sandbox_hook_linux.h.orig |+++ services/audio/audio_sandbox_hook_linux.h -------------------------- Patching file services/audio/audio_sandbox_hook_linux.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 5. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-services_device_BUILD_gn Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: services/device/BUILD.gn |--- services/device/BUILD.gn.orig |+++ services/device/BUILD.gn -------------------------- Patching file services/device/BUILD.gn using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 14. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-services_device_geolocation_location_provider_manager_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: services/device/geolocation/location_provider_manager.cc |--- services/device/geolocation/location_provider_manager.cc.orig |+++ services/device/geolocation/location_provider_manager.cc -------------------------- Patching file services/device/geolocation/location_provider_manager.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 51. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-services_device_hid_BUILD_gn Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: services/device/hid/BUILD.gn |--- services/device/hid/BUILD.gn.orig |+++ services/device/hid/BUILD.gn -------------------------- Patching file services/device/hid/BUILD.gn using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 36. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-services_device_hid_hid_connection_fido_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: services/device/hid/hid_connection_fido.cc |--- services/device/hid/hid_connection_fido.cc.orig |+++ services/device/hid/hid_connection_fido.cc -------------------------- (Creating file services/device/hid/hid_connection_fido.cc...) Patching file services/device/hid/hid_connection_fido.cc using Plan A... Empty context always matches. Hunk #1 succeeded at 1. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-services_device_hid_hid_connection_fido_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: services/device/hid/hid_connection_fido.h |--- services/device/hid/hid_connection_fido.h.orig |+++ services/device/hid/hid_connection_fido.h -------------------------- (Creating file services/device/hid/hid_connection_fido.h...) Patching file services/device/hid/hid_connection_fido.h using Plan A... Empty context always matches. Hunk #1 succeeded at 1. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-services_device_hid_hid_connection_freebsd_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: services/device/hid/hid_connection_freebsd.cc |--- services/device/hid/hid_connection_freebsd.cc.orig |+++ services/device/hid/hid_connection_freebsd.cc -------------------------- (Creating file services/device/hid/hid_connection_freebsd.cc...) Patching file services/device/hid/hid_connection_freebsd.cc using Plan A... Empty context always matches. Hunk #1 succeeded at 1. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-services_device_hid_hid_connection_freebsd_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: services/device/hid/hid_connection_freebsd.h |--- services/device/hid/hid_connection_freebsd.h.orig |+++ services/device/hid/hid_connection_freebsd.h -------------------------- (Creating file services/device/hid/hid_connection_freebsd.h...) Patching file services/device/hid/hid_connection_freebsd.h using Plan A... Empty context always matches. Hunk #1 succeeded at 1. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-services_device_hid_hid_service_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: services/device/hid/hid_service.cc |--- services/device/hid/hid_service.cc.orig |+++ services/device/hid/hid_service.cc -------------------------- Patching file services/device/hid/hid_service.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 20. Hunk #2 succeeded at 72. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-services_device_hid_hid_service_fido_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: services/device/hid/hid_service_fido.cc |--- services/device/hid/hid_service_fido.cc.orig |+++ services/device/hid/hid_service_fido.cc -------------------------- (Creating file services/device/hid/hid_service_fido.cc...) Patching file services/device/hid/hid_service_fido.cc using Plan A... Empty context always matches. Hunk #1 succeeded at 1. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-services_device_hid_hid_service_fido_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: services/device/hid/hid_service_fido.h |--- services/device/hid/hid_service_fido.h.orig |+++ services/device/hid/hid_service_fido.h -------------------------- (Creating file services/device/hid/hid_service_fido.h...) Patching file services/device/hid/hid_service_fido.h using Plan A... Empty context always matches. Hunk #1 succeeded at 1. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-services_device_hid_hid_service_freebsd_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: services/device/hid/hid_service_freebsd.cc |--- services/device/hid/hid_service_freebsd.cc.orig |+++ services/device/hid/hid_service_freebsd.cc -------------------------- (Creating file services/device/hid/hid_service_freebsd.cc...) Patching file services/device/hid/hid_service_freebsd.cc using Plan A... Empty context always matches. Hunk #1 succeeded at 1. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-services_device_hid_hid_service_freebsd_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: services/device/hid/hid_service_freebsd.h |--- services/device/hid/hid_service_freebsd.h.orig |+++ services/device/hid/hid_service_freebsd.h -------------------------- (Creating file services/device/hid/hid_service_freebsd.h...) Patching file services/device/hid/hid_service_freebsd.h using Plan A... Empty context always matches. Hunk #1 succeeded at 1. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-services_device_public_cpp_generic_sensor_sensor_reading_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: services/device/public/cpp/generic_sensor/sensor_reading.h |--- services/device/public/cpp/generic_sensor/sensor_reading.h.orig |+++ services/device/public/cpp/generic_sensor/sensor_reading.h -------------------------- Patching file services/device/public/cpp/generic_sensor/sensor_reading.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 8. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-services_device_public_mojom_BUILD_gn Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: services/device/public/mojom/BUILD.gn |--- services/device/public/mojom/BUILD.gn.orig |+++ services/device/public/mojom/BUILD.gn -------------------------- Patching file services/device/public/mojom/BUILD.gn using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 97. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-services_device_serial_BUILD_gn Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: services/device/serial/BUILD.gn |--- services/device/serial/BUILD.gn.orig |+++ services/device/serial/BUILD.gn -------------------------- Patching file services/device/serial/BUILD.gn using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 5. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-services_device_serial_serial_device_enumerator_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: services/device/serial/serial_device_enumerator.cc |--- services/device/serial/serial_device_enumerator.cc.orig |+++ services/device/serial/serial_device_enumerator.cc -------------------------- Patching file services/device/serial/serial_device_enumerator.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 13. Hunk #2 succeeded at 26. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-services_device_serial_serial_io_handler_posix_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: services/device/serial/serial_io_handler_posix.cc |--- services/device/serial/serial_io_handler_posix.cc.orig |+++ services/device/serial/serial_io_handler_posix.cc -------------------------- Patching file services/device/serial/serial_io_handler_posix.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 73. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-services_device_time_zone_monitor_time_zone_monitor_linux_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: services/device/time_zone_monitor/time_zone_monitor_linux.cc |--- services/device/time_zone_monitor/time_zone_monitor_linux.cc.orig |+++ services/device/time_zone_monitor/time_zone_monitor_linux.cc -------------------------- Patching file services/device/time_zone_monitor/time_zone_monitor_linux.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 136. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-services_device_usb_BUILD_gn Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: services/device/usb/BUILD.gn |--- services/device/usb/BUILD.gn.orig |+++ services/device/usb/BUILD.gn -------------------------- Patching file services/device/usb/BUILD.gn using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 91. Hunk #2 succeeded at 114. Hunk #3 succeeded at 142. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-services_device_usb_usb_service_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: services/device/usb/usb_service.cc |--- services/device/usb/usb_service.cc.orig |+++ services/device/usb/usb_service.cc -------------------------- Patching file services/device/usb/usb_service.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 21. Hunk #2 succeeded at 53. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-services_device_usb_usb_service_fake_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: services/device/usb/usb_service_fake.cc |--- services/device/usb/usb_service_fake.cc.orig |+++ services/device/usb/usb_service_fake.cc -------------------------- (Creating file services/device/usb/usb_service_fake.cc...) Patching file services/device/usb/usb_service_fake.cc using Plan A... Empty context always matches. Hunk #1 succeeded at 1. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-services_device_usb_usb_service_fake_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: services/device/usb/usb_service_fake.h |--- services/device/usb/usb_service_fake.h.orig |+++ services/device/usb/usb_service_fake.h -------------------------- (Creating file services/device/usb/usb_service_fake.h...) Patching file services/device/usb/usb_service_fake.h using Plan A... Empty context always matches. Hunk #1 succeeded at 1. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-services_network_BUILD_gn Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: services/network/BUILD.gn |--- services/network/BUILD.gn.orig |+++ services/network/BUILD.gn -------------------------- Patching file services/network/BUILD.gn using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 411. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-services_network_network_context_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: services/network/network_context.cc |--- services/network/network_context.cc.orig |+++ services/network/network_context.cc -------------------------- Patching file services/network/network_context.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 589. Hunk #2 succeeded at 2384. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-services_network_network_context_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: services/network/network_context.h |--- services/network/network_context.h.orig |+++ services/network/network_context.h -------------------------- Patching file services/network/network_context.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 692. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-services_network_network_sandbox_hook_linux_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: services/network/network_sandbox_hook_linux.cc |--- services/network/network_sandbox_hook_linux.cc.orig |+++ services/network/network_sandbox_hook_linux.cc -------------------------- Patching file services/network/network_sandbox_hook_linux.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 15. Hunk #2 succeeded at 106. Hunk #3 succeeded at 123. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-services_network_network_sandbox_hook_linux_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: services/network/network_sandbox_hook_linux.h |--- services/network/network_sandbox_hook_linux.h.orig |+++ services/network/network_sandbox_hook_linux.h -------------------------- Patching file services/network/network_sandbox_hook_linux.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 6. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-services_network_network_service_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: services/network/network_service.cc |--- services/network/network_service.cc.orig |+++ services/network/network_service.cc -------------------------- Patching file services/network/network_service.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 99. Hunk #2 succeeded at 975. Hunk #3 succeeded at 1057. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-services_network_network_service_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: services/network/network_service.h |--- services/network/network_service.h.orig |+++ services/network/network_service.h -------------------------- Patching file services/network/network_service.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 238. Hunk #2 succeeded at 264. Hunk #3 succeeded at 494. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-services_network_public_cpp_BUILD_gn Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: services/network/public/cpp/BUILD.gn |--- services/network/public/cpp/BUILD.gn.orig |+++ services/network/public/cpp/BUILD.gn -------------------------- Patching file services/network/public/cpp/BUILD.gn using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 497. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-services_network_public_cpp_features_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: services/network/public/cpp/features.cc |--- services/network/public/cpp/features.cc.orig |+++ services/network/public/cpp/features.cc -------------------------- Patching file services/network/public/cpp/features.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 127. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-services_network_public_mojom_BUILD_gn Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: services/network/public/mojom/BUILD.gn |--- services/network/public/mojom/BUILD.gn.orig |+++ services/network/public/mojom/BUILD.gn -------------------------- Patching file services/network/public/mojom/BUILD.gn using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 493. Hunk #2 succeeded at 1490. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-services_network_shared_dictionary_shared_dictionary_writer_in_memory_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: services/network/shared_dictionary/shared_dictionary_writer_in_memory.h |--- services/network/shared_dictionary/shared_dictionary_writer_in_memory.h.orig |+++ services/network/shared_dictionary/shared_dictionary_writer_in_memory.h -------------------------- Patching file services/network/shared_dictionary/shared_dictionary_writer_in_memory.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 9. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-services_on_device_model_on_device_model_service_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: services/on_device_model/on_device_model_service.h |--- services/on_device_model/on_device_model_service.h.orig |+++ services/on_device_model/on_device_model_service.h -------------------------- Patching file services/on_device_model/on_device_model_service.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 22. Hunk #2 succeeded at 39. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-services_on_device_model_pre_sandbox_init_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: services/on_device_model/pre_sandbox_init.cc |--- services/on_device_model/pre_sandbox_init.cc.orig |+++ services/on_device_model/pre_sandbox_init.cc -------------------------- Patching file services/on_device_model/pre_sandbox_init.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 14. Hunk #2 succeeded at 25. Hunk #3 succeeded at 74. Hunk #4 succeeded at 101. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-services_resource_coordinator_memory_instrumentation_queued_request_dispatcher_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: services/resource_coordinator/memory_instrumentation/queued_request_dispatcher.cc |--- services/resource_coordinator/memory_instrumentation/queued_request_dispatcher.cc.orig |+++ services/resource_coordinator/memory_instrumentation/queued_request_dispatcher.cc -------------------------- Patching file services/resource_coordinator/memory_instrumentation/queued_request_dispatcher.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 54. Hunk #2 succeeded at 83. Hunk #3 succeeded at 219. Hunk #4 succeeded at 234. Hunk #5 succeeded at 280. Hunk #6 succeeded at 330. Hunk #7 succeeded at 391. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-services_resource_coordinator_public_cpp_memory_instrumentation_BUILD_gn Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: services/resource_coordinator/public/cpp/memory_instrumentation/BUILD.gn |--- services/resource_coordinator/public/cpp/memory_instrumentation/BUILD.gn.orig |+++ services/resource_coordinator/public/cpp/memory_instrumentation/BUILD.gn -------------------------- Patching file services/resource_coordinator/public/cpp/memory_instrumentation/BUILD.gn using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 29. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-services_resource_coordinator_public_cpp_memory_instrumentation_os_metrics_bsd_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: services/resource_coordinator/public/cpp/memory_instrumentation/os_metrics_bsd.cc |--- services/resource_coordinator/public/cpp/memory_instrumentation/os_metrics_bsd.cc.orig |+++ services/resource_coordinator/public/cpp/memory_instrumentation/os_metrics_bsd.cc -------------------------- (Creating file services/resource_coordinator/public/cpp/memory_instrumentation/os_metrics_bsd.cc...) Patching file services/resource_coordinator/public/cpp/memory_instrumentation/os_metrics_bsd.cc using Plan A... Empty context always matches. Hunk #1 succeeded at 1. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-services_resource_coordinator_public_cpp_memory_instrumentation_os_metrics_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: services/resource_coordinator/public/cpp/memory_instrumentation/os_metrics.h |--- services/resource_coordinator/public/cpp/memory_instrumentation/os_metrics.h.orig |+++ services/resource_coordinator/public/cpp/memory_instrumentation/os_metrics.h -------------------------- Patching file services/resource_coordinator/public/cpp/memory_instrumentation/os_metrics.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 53. Hunk #2 succeeded at 70. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-services_screen_ai_public_cpp_utilities_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: services/screen_ai/public/cpp/utilities.cc |--- services/screen_ai/public/cpp/utilities.cc.orig |+++ services/screen_ai/public/cpp/utilities.cc -------------------------- Patching file services/screen_ai/public/cpp/utilities.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 18. Hunk #2 succeeded at 39. Hunk #3 succeeded at 128. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-services_screen_ai_sandbox_screen_ai_sandbox_hook_linux_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: services/screen_ai/sandbox/screen_ai_sandbox_hook_linux.cc |--- services/screen_ai/sandbox/screen_ai_sandbox_hook_linux.cc.orig |+++ services/screen_ai/sandbox/screen_ai_sandbox_hook_linux.cc -------------------------- Patching file services/screen_ai/sandbox/screen_ai_sandbox_hook_linux.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 53. Hunk #2 succeeded at 76. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-services_screen_ai_sandbox_screen_ai_sandbox_hook_linux_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: services/screen_ai/sandbox/screen_ai_sandbox_hook_linux.h |--- services/screen_ai/sandbox/screen_ai_sandbox_hook_linux.h.orig |+++ services/screen_ai/sandbox/screen_ai_sandbox_hook_linux.h -------------------------- Patching file services/screen_ai/sandbox/screen_ai_sandbox_hook_linux.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 6. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-services_service_manager_BUILD_gn Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: services/service_manager/BUILD.gn |--- services/service_manager/BUILD.gn.orig |+++ services/service_manager/BUILD.gn -------------------------- Patching file services/service_manager/BUILD.gn using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 66. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-services_service_manager_public_cpp_service_executable_BUILD_gn Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: services/service_manager/public/cpp/service_executable/BUILD.gn |--- services/service_manager/public/cpp/service_executable/BUILD.gn.orig |+++ services/service_manager/public/cpp/service_executable/BUILD.gn -------------------------- Patching file services/service_manager/public/cpp/service_executable/BUILD.gn using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 22. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-services_tracing_public_cpp_stack_sampling_tracing_sampler_profiler_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: services/tracing/public/cpp/stack_sampling/tracing_sampler_profiler.cc |--- services/tracing/public/cpp/stack_sampling/tracing_sampler_profiler.cc.orig |+++ services/tracing/public/cpp/stack_sampling/tracing_sampler_profiler.cc -------------------------- Patching file services/tracing/public/cpp/stack_sampling/tracing_sampler_profiler.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 38. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-services_video_capture_public_mojom_video_capture_service_mojom Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: services/video_capture/public/mojom/video_capture_service.mojom |--- services/video_capture/public/mojom/video_capture_service.mojom.orig |+++ services/video_capture/public/mojom/video_capture_service.mojom -------------------------- Patching file services/video_capture/public/mojom/video_capture_service.mojom using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 25. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-services_video_capture_video_capture_service_impl_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: services/video_capture/video_capture_service_impl.cc |--- services/video_capture/video_capture_service_impl.cc.orig |+++ services/video_capture/video_capture_service_impl.cc -------------------------- Patching file services/video_capture/video_capture_service_impl.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 42. Hunk #2 succeeded at 110. Hunk #3 succeeded at 323. Hunk #4 succeeded at 455. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-services_video_capture_video_capture_service_impl_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: services/video_capture/video_capture_service_impl.h |--- services/video_capture/video_capture_service_impl.h.orig |+++ services/video_capture/video_capture_service_impl.h -------------------------- Patching file services/video_capture/video_capture_service_impl.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 27. Hunk #2 succeeded at 75. Hunk #3 succeeded at 120. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-skia_ext_SkMemory_new_handler_cpp Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: skia/ext/SkMemory_new_handler.cpp |--- skia/ext/SkMemory_new_handler.cpp.orig |+++ skia/ext/SkMemory_new_handler.cpp -------------------------- Patching file skia/ext/SkMemory_new_handler.cpp using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 19. Hunk #2 succeeded at 105. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-skia_ext_font_utils_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: skia/ext/font_utils.cc |--- skia/ext/font_utils.cc.orig |+++ skia/ext/font_utils.cc -------------------------- Patching file skia/ext/font_utils.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 19. Hunk #2 succeeded at 60. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-skia_ext_skcolorspace_trfn_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: skia/ext/skcolorspace_trfn.cc |--- skia/ext/skcolorspace_trfn.cc.orig |+++ skia/ext/skcolorspace_trfn.cc -------------------------- Patching file skia/ext/skcolorspace_trfn.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 7. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_abseil-cpp_absl_base_config_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/abseil-cpp/absl/base/config.h |--- third_party/abseil-cpp/absl/base/config.h.orig |+++ third_party/abseil-cpp/absl/base/config.h -------------------------- Patching file third_party/abseil-cpp/absl/base/config.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 412. Hunk #2 succeeded at 427. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_abseil-cpp_absl_base_internal_sysinfo_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/abseil-cpp/absl/base/internal/sysinfo.cc |--- third_party/abseil-cpp/absl/base/internal/sysinfo.cc.orig |+++ third_party/abseil-cpp/absl/base/internal/sysinfo.cc -------------------------- Patching file third_party/abseil-cpp/absl/base/internal/sysinfo.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 30. Hunk #2 succeeded at 194. Hunk #3 succeeded at 227. Hunk #4 succeeded at 327. Hunk #5 succeeded at 350. Hunk #6 succeeded at 465. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_abseil-cpp_absl_debugging_internal_elf_mem_image_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/abseil-cpp/absl/debugging/internal/elf_mem_image.h |--- third_party/abseil-cpp/absl/debugging/internal/elf_mem_image.h.orig |+++ third_party/abseil-cpp/absl/debugging/internal/elf_mem_image.h -------------------------- Patching file third_party/abseil-cpp/absl/debugging/internal/elf_mem_image.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 35. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_angle_BUILD_gn Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/angle/BUILD.gn |--- third_party/angle/BUILD.gn.orig |+++ third_party/angle/BUILD.gn -------------------------- Patching file third_party/angle/BUILD.gn using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 347. Hunk #2 succeeded at 523. Hunk #3 succeeded at 678. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_angle_src_common_platform_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/angle/src/common/platform.h |--- third_party/angle/src/common/platform.h.orig |+++ third_party/angle/src/common/platform.h -------------------------- Patching file third_party/angle/src/common/platform.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 26. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_angle_src_common_platform_helpers_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/angle/src/common/platform_helpers.h |--- third_party/angle/src/common/platform_helpers.h.orig |+++ third_party/angle/src/common/platform_helpers.h -------------------------- Patching file third_party/angle/src/common/platform_helpers.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 62. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_angle_src_common_system_utils_cpp Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/angle/src/common/system_utils.cpp |--- third_party/angle/src/common/system_utils.cpp.orig |+++ third_party/angle/src/common/system_utils.cpp -------------------------- Patching file third_party/angle/src/common/system_utils.cpp using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 25. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_angle_src_common_system_utils_linux_cpp Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/angle/src/common/system_utils_linux.cpp |--- third_party/angle/src/common/system_utils_linux.cpp.orig |+++ third_party/angle/src/common/system_utils_linux.cpp -------------------------- Patching file third_party/angle/src/common/system_utils_linux.cpp using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 15. Hunk #2 succeeded at 37. Hunk #3 succeeded at 62. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_angle_src_gpu_info_util_SystemInfo_internal_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/angle/src/gpu_info_util/SystemInfo_internal.h |--- third_party/angle/src/gpu_info_util/SystemInfo_internal.h.orig |+++ third_party/angle/src/gpu_info_util/SystemInfo_internal.h -------------------------- Patching file third_party/angle/src/gpu_info_util/SystemInfo_internal.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 15. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_angle_src_gpu_info_util_SystemInfo_libpci_cpp Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/angle/src/gpu_info_util/SystemInfo_libpci.cpp |--- third_party/angle/src/gpu_info_util/SystemInfo_libpci.cpp.orig |+++ third_party/angle/src/gpu_info_util/SystemInfo_libpci.cpp -------------------------- Patching file third_party/angle/src/gpu_info_util/SystemInfo_libpci.cpp using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 12. Hunk #2 succeeded at 90. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_angle_src_gpu_info_util_SystemInfo_linux_cpp Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/angle/src/gpu_info_util/SystemInfo_linux.cpp |--- third_party/angle/src/gpu_info_util/SystemInfo_linux.cpp.orig |+++ third_party/angle/src/gpu_info_util/SystemInfo_linux.cpp -------------------------- Patching file third_party/angle/src/gpu_info_util/SystemInfo_linux.cpp using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 71. Hunk #2 succeeded at 103. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_angle_src_gpu_info_util_SystemInfo_x11_cpp Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/angle/src/gpu_info_util/SystemInfo_x11.cpp |--- third_party/angle/src/gpu_info_util/SystemInfo_x11.cpp.orig |+++ third_party/angle/src/gpu_info_util/SystemInfo_x11.cpp -------------------------- Patching file third_party/angle/src/gpu_info_util/SystemInfo_x11.cpp using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 8. Hunk #2 succeeded at 22. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_angle_src_libANGLE_Display_cpp Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/angle/src/libANGLE/Display.cpp |--- third_party/angle/src/libANGLE/Display.cpp.orig |+++ third_party/angle/src/libANGLE/Display.cpp -------------------------- Patching file third_party/angle/src/libANGLE/Display.cpp using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 60. Hunk #2 succeeded at 416. Hunk #3 succeeded at 462. Hunk #4 succeeded at 513. Hunk #5 succeeded at 2158. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_angle_src_libANGLE_formatutils_cpp Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/angle/src/libANGLE/formatutils.cpp |--- third_party/angle/src/libANGLE/formatutils.cpp.orig |+++ third_party/angle/src/libANGLE/formatutils.cpp -------------------------- Patching file third_party/angle/src/libANGLE/formatutils.cpp using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 1475. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_angle_src_libANGLE_renderer_gl_glx_FunctionsGLX_cpp Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/angle/src/libANGLE/renderer/gl/glx/FunctionsGLX.cpp |--- third_party/angle/src/libANGLE/renderer/gl/glx/FunctionsGLX.cpp.orig |+++ third_party/angle/src/libANGLE/renderer/gl/glx/FunctionsGLX.cpp -------------------------- Patching file third_party/angle/src/libANGLE/renderer/gl/glx/FunctionsGLX.cpp using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 144. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_angle_src_libANGLE_renderer_vulkan_DisplayVk_api_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/angle/src/libANGLE/renderer/vulkan/DisplayVk_api.h |--- third_party/angle/src/libANGLE/renderer/vulkan/DisplayVk_api.h.orig |+++ third_party/angle/src/libANGLE/renderer/vulkan/DisplayVk_api.h -------------------------- Patching file third_party/angle/src/libANGLE/renderer/vulkan/DisplayVk_api.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 23. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_angle_util_BUILD_gn Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/angle/util/BUILD.gn |--- third_party/angle/util/BUILD.gn.orig |+++ third_party/angle/util/BUILD.gn -------------------------- Patching file third_party/angle/util/BUILD.gn using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 311. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_blink_common_renderer_preferences_renderer_preferences_mojom_traits_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/blink/common/renderer_preferences/renderer_preferences_mojom_traits.cc |--- third_party/blink/common/renderer_preferences/renderer_preferences_mojom_traits.cc.orig |+++ third_party/blink/common/renderer_preferences/renderer_preferences_mojom_traits.cc -------------------------- Patching file third_party/blink/common/renderer_preferences/renderer_preferences_mojom_traits.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 68. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_blink_public_common_renderer_preferences_renderer_preferences_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/blink/public/common/renderer_preferences/renderer_preferences.h |--- third_party/blink/public/common/renderer_preferences/renderer_preferences.h.orig |+++ third_party/blink/public/common/renderer_preferences/renderer_preferences.h -------------------------- Patching file third_party/blink/public/common/renderer_preferences/renderer_preferences.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 65. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_blink_public_common_renderer_preferences_renderer_preferences_mojom_traits_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/blink/public/common/renderer_preferences/renderer_preferences_mojom_traits.h |--- third_party/blink/public/common/renderer_preferences/renderer_preferences_mojom_traits.h.orig |+++ third_party/blink/public/common/renderer_preferences/renderer_preferences_mojom_traits.h -------------------------- Patching file third_party/blink/public/common/renderer_preferences/renderer_preferences_mojom_traits.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 166. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_blink_public_platform_platform_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/blink/public/platform/platform.h |--- third_party/blink/public/platform/platform.h.orig |+++ third_party/blink/public/platform/platform.h -------------------------- Patching file third_party/blink/public/platform/platform.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 368. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_blink_public_platform_web_vector_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/blink/public/platform/web_vector.h |--- third_party/blink/public/platform/web_vector.h.orig |+++ third_party/blink/public/platform/web_vector.h -------------------------- Patching file third_party/blink/public/platform/web_vector.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 91. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_blink_renderer_bindings_scripts_bind_gen_style_format_py Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/blink/renderer/bindings/scripts/bind_gen/style_format.py |--- third_party/blink/renderer/bindings/scripts/bind_gen/style_format.py.orig |+++ third_party/blink/renderer/bindings/scripts/bind_gen/style_format.py -------------------------- Patching file third_party/blink/renderer/bindings/scripts/bind_gen/style_format.py using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 30. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_blink_renderer_build_scripts_run_with_pythonpath_py Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/blink/renderer/build/scripts/run_with_pythonpath.py |--- third_party/blink/renderer/build/scripts/run_with_pythonpath.py.orig |+++ third_party/blink/renderer/build/scripts/run_with_pythonpath.py -------------------------- Patching file third_party/blink/renderer/build/scripts/run_with_pythonpath.py using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 22. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_blink_renderer_controller_blink_initializer_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/blink/renderer/controller/blink_initializer.cc |--- third_party/blink/renderer/controller/blink_initializer.cc.orig |+++ third_party/blink/renderer/controller/blink_initializer.cc -------------------------- Patching file third_party/blink/renderer/controller/blink_initializer.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 81. Hunk #2 succeeded at 256. Hunk #3 succeeded at 303. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_blink_renderer_controller_memory_usage_monitor_posix_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/blink/renderer/controller/memory_usage_monitor_posix.cc |--- third_party/blink/renderer/controller/memory_usage_monitor_posix.cc.orig |+++ third_party/blink/renderer/controller/memory_usage_monitor_posix.cc -------------------------- Patching file third_party/blink/renderer/controller/memory_usage_monitor_posix.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 133. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_blink_renderer_controller_memory_usage_monitor_posix_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/blink/renderer/controller/memory_usage_monitor_posix.h |--- third_party/blink/renderer/controller/memory_usage_monitor_posix.h.orig |+++ third_party/blink/renderer/controller/memory_usage_monitor_posix.h -------------------------- Patching file third_party/blink/renderer/controller/memory_usage_monitor_posix.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 13. Hunk #2 succeeded at 22. Hunk #3 succeeded at 30. Hunk #4 succeeded at 48. Hunk #5 succeeded at 66. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_blink_renderer_core_editing_editing_behavior_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/blink/renderer/core/editing/editing_behavior.cc |--- third_party/blink/renderer/core/editing/editing_behavior.cc.orig |+++ third_party/blink/renderer/core/editing/editing_behavior.cc -------------------------- Patching file third_party/blink/renderer/core/editing/editing_behavior.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 304. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_blink_renderer_core_execution_context_navigator_base_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/blink/renderer/core/execution_context/navigator_base.cc |--- third_party/blink/renderer/core/execution_context/navigator_base.cc.orig |+++ third_party/blink/renderer/core/execution_context/navigator_base.cc -------------------------- Patching file third_party/blink/renderer/core/execution_context/navigator_base.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 31. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_blink_renderer_core_exported_web_view_impl_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/blink/renderer/core/exported/web_view_impl.cc |--- third_party/blink/renderer/core/exported/web_view_impl.cc.orig |+++ third_party/blink/renderer/core/exported/web_view_impl.cc -------------------------- Patching file third_party/blink/renderer/core/exported/web_view_impl.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 427. Hunk #2 succeeded at 3418. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_blink_renderer_core_frame_web_frame_test_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/blink/renderer/core/frame/web_frame_test.cc |--- third_party/blink/renderer/core/frame/web_frame_test.cc.orig |+++ third_party/blink/renderer/core/frame/web_frame_test.cc -------------------------- Patching file third_party/blink/renderer/core/frame/web_frame_test.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 6477. Hunk #2 succeeded at 6886. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_blink_renderer_core_html_canvas_canvas_async_blob_creator_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/blink/renderer/core/html/canvas/canvas_async_blob_creator.cc |--- third_party/blink/renderer/core/html/canvas/canvas_async_blob_creator.cc.orig |+++ third_party/blink/renderer/core/html/canvas/canvas_async_blob_creator.cc -------------------------- Patching file third_party/blink/renderer/core/html/canvas/canvas_async_blob_creator.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 55. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_blink_renderer_core_inspector_inspector_memory_agent_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/blink/renderer/core/inspector/inspector_memory_agent.cc |--- third_party/blink/renderer/core/inspector/inspector_memory_agent.cc.orig |+++ third_party/blink/renderer/core/inspector/inspector_memory_agent.cc -------------------------- Patching file third_party/blink/renderer/core/inspector/inspector_memory_agent.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 192. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_blink_renderer_core_layout_layout_view_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/layout_view.cc |--- third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/layout_view.cc.orig |+++ third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/layout_view.cc -------------------------- Patching file third_party/blink/renderer/core/layout/layout_view.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 72. Hunk #2 succeeded at 775. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_blink_renderer_core_paint_paint_layer_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/blink/renderer/core/paint/paint_layer.cc |--- third_party/blink/renderer/core/paint/paint_layer.cc.orig |+++ third_party/blink/renderer/core/paint/paint_layer.cc -------------------------- Patching file third_party/blink/renderer/core/paint/paint_layer.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 120. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_blink_renderer_core_scroll_scrollbar_theme_aura_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/blink/renderer/core/scroll/scrollbar_theme_aura.cc |--- third_party/blink/renderer/core/scroll/scrollbar_theme_aura.cc.orig |+++ third_party/blink/renderer/core/scroll/scrollbar_theme_aura.cc -------------------------- Patching file third_party/blink/renderer/core/scroll/scrollbar_theme_aura.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 149. Hunk #2 succeeded at 372. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_blink_renderer_core_xml_xslt_processor_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/blink/renderer/core/xml/xslt_processor.h |--- third_party/blink/renderer/core/xml/xslt_processor.h.orig |+++ third_party/blink/renderer/core/xml/xslt_processor.h -------------------------- Patching file third_party/blink/renderer/core/xml/xslt_processor.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 77. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_blink_renderer_core_xml_xslt_processor_libxslt_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/blink/renderer/core/xml/xslt_processor_libxslt.cc |--- third_party/blink/renderer/core/xml/xslt_processor_libxslt.cc.orig |+++ third_party/blink/renderer/core/xml/xslt_processor_libxslt.cc -------------------------- Patching file third_party/blink/renderer/core/xml/xslt_processor_libxslt.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 71. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_blink_renderer_modules_media_audio_audio_device_factory_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/blink/renderer/modules/media/audio/audio_device_factory.cc |--- third_party/blink/renderer/modules/media/audio/audio_device_factory.cc.orig |+++ third_party/blink/renderer/modules/media/audio/audio_device_factory.cc -------------------------- Patching file third_party/blink/renderer/modules/media/audio/audio_device_factory.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 35. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_blink_renderer_modules_media_audio_audio_renderer_mixer_manager_test_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/blink/renderer/modules/media/audio/audio_renderer_mixer_manager_test.cc |--- third_party/blink/renderer/modules/media/audio/audio_renderer_mixer_manager_test.cc.orig |+++ third_party/blink/renderer/modules/media/audio/audio_renderer_mixer_manager_test.cc -------------------------- Patching file third_party/blink/renderer/modules/media/audio/audio_renderer_mixer_manager_test.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 813. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_blink_renderer_modules_peerconnection_webrtc_audio_renderer_test_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/blink/renderer/modules/peerconnection/webrtc_audio_renderer_test.cc |--- third_party/blink/renderer/modules/peerconnection/webrtc_audio_renderer_test.cc.orig |+++ third_party/blink/renderer/modules/peerconnection/webrtc_audio_renderer_test.cc -------------------------- Patching file third_party/blink/renderer/modules/peerconnection/webrtc_audio_renderer_test.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 302. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_blink_renderer_modules_webaudio_audio_worklet_thread_test_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/blink/renderer/modules/webaudio/audio_worklet_thread_test.cc |--- third_party/blink/renderer/modules/webaudio/audio_worklet_thread_test.cc.orig |+++ third_party/blink/renderer/modules/webaudio/audio_worklet_thread_test.cc -------------------------- Patching file third_party/blink/renderer/modules/webaudio/audio_worklet_thread_test.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 468. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_blink_renderer_modules_webgl_webgl_rendering_context_base_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/blink/renderer/modules/webgl/webgl_rendering_context_base.cc |--- third_party/blink/renderer/modules/webgl/webgl_rendering_context_base.cc.orig |+++ third_party/blink/renderer/modules/webgl/webgl_rendering_context_base.cc -------------------------- Patching file third_party/blink/renderer/modules/webgl/webgl_rendering_context_base.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 6304. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_blink_renderer_modules_webgpu_gpu_queue_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/blink/renderer/modules/webgpu/gpu_queue.cc |--- third_party/blink/renderer/modules/webgpu/gpu_queue.cc.orig |+++ third_party/blink/renderer/modules/webgpu/gpu_queue.cc -------------------------- Patching file third_party/blink/renderer/modules/webgpu/gpu_queue.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 788. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_blink_renderer_platform_BUILD_gn Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/blink/renderer/platform/BUILD.gn |--- third_party/blink/renderer/platform/BUILD.gn.orig |+++ third_party/blink/renderer/platform/BUILD.gn -------------------------- Patching file third_party/blink/renderer/platform/BUILD.gn using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 2003. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_blink_renderer_platform_fonts_font_cache_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/blink/renderer/platform/fonts/font_cache.cc |--- third_party/blink/renderer/platform/fonts/font_cache.cc.orig |+++ third_party/blink/renderer/platform/fonts/font_cache.cc -------------------------- Patching file third_party/blink/renderer/platform/fonts/font_cache.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 79. Hunk #2 succeeded at 130. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_blink_renderer_platform_fonts_font_cache_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/blink/renderer/platform/fonts/font_cache.h |--- third_party/blink/renderer/platform/fonts/font_cache.h.orig |+++ third_party/blink/renderer/platform/fonts/font_cache.h -------------------------- Patching file third_party/blink/renderer/platform/fonts/font_cache.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 55. Hunk #2 succeeded at 165. Hunk #3 succeeded at 241. Hunk #4 succeeded at 314. Hunk #5 succeeded at 351. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_blink_renderer_platform_fonts_font_description_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/blink/renderer/platform/fonts/font_description.cc |--- third_party/blink/renderer/platform/fonts/font_description.cc.orig |+++ third_party/blink/renderer/platform/fonts/font_description.cc -------------------------- Patching file third_party/blink/renderer/platform/fonts/font_description.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 44. Hunk #2 succeeded at 282. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_blink_renderer_platform_fonts_font_metrics_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/blink/renderer/platform/fonts/font_metrics.cc |--- third_party/blink/renderer/platform/fonts/font_metrics.cc.orig |+++ third_party/blink/renderer/platform/fonts/font_metrics.cc -------------------------- Patching file third_party/blink/renderer/platform/fonts/font_metrics.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 39. Hunk #2 succeeded at 67. Hunk #3 succeeded at 111. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_blink_renderer_platform_fonts_font_platform_data_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/blink/renderer/platform/fonts/font_platform_data.cc |--- third_party/blink/renderer/platform/fonts/font_platform_data.cc.orig |+++ third_party/blink/renderer/platform/fonts/font_platform_data.cc -------------------------- Patching file third_party/blink/renderer/platform/fonts/font_platform_data.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 54. Hunk #2 succeeded at 133. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_blink_renderer_platform_fonts_font_unique_name_lookup_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/blink/renderer/platform/fonts/font_unique_name_lookup.cc |--- third_party/blink/renderer/platform/fonts/font_unique_name_lookup.cc.orig |+++ third_party/blink/renderer/platform/fonts/font_unique_name_lookup.cc -------------------------- Patching file third_party/blink/renderer/platform/fonts/font_unique_name_lookup.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 9. Hunk #2 succeeded at 24. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_blink_renderer_platform_fonts_skia_font_cache_skia_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/blink/renderer/platform/fonts/skia/font_cache_skia.cc |--- third_party/blink/renderer/platform/fonts/skia/font_cache_skia.cc.orig |+++ third_party/blink/renderer/platform/fonts/skia/font_cache_skia.cc -------------------------- Patching file third_party/blink/renderer/platform/fonts/skia/font_cache_skia.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 65. Hunk #2 succeeded at 246. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_blink_renderer_platform_graphics_begin_frame_provider_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/blink/renderer/platform/graphics/begin_frame_provider.cc |--- third_party/blink/renderer/platform/graphics/begin_frame_provider.cc.orig |+++ third_party/blink/renderer/platform/graphics/begin_frame_provider.cc -------------------------- Patching file third_party/blink/renderer/platform/graphics/begin_frame_provider.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 71. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_blink_renderer_platform_graphics_video_frame_submitter_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/blink/renderer/platform/graphics/video_frame_submitter.cc |--- third_party/blink/renderer/platform/graphics/video_frame_submitter.cc.orig |+++ third_party/blink/renderer/platform/graphics/video_frame_submitter.cc -------------------------- Patching file third_party/blink/renderer/platform/graphics/video_frame_submitter.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 418. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_blink_renderer_platform_instrumentation_partition_alloc_memory_dump_provider_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/blink/renderer/platform/instrumentation/partition_alloc_memory_dump_provider.cc |--- third_party/blink/renderer/platform/instrumentation/partition_alloc_memory_dump_provider.cc.orig |+++ third_party/blink/renderer/platform/instrumentation/partition_alloc_memory_dump_provider.cc -------------------------- Patching file third_party/blink/renderer/platform/instrumentation/partition_alloc_memory_dump_provider.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 14. Hunk #2 succeeded at 26. Hunk #3 succeeded at 52. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_blink_renderer_platform_peerconnection_rtc_video_encoder_factory_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/blink/renderer/platform/peerconnection/rtc_video_encoder_factory.cc |--- third_party/blink/renderer/platform/peerconnection/rtc_video_encoder_factory.cc.orig |+++ third_party/blink/renderer/platform/peerconnection/rtc_video_encoder_factory.cc -------------------------- Patching file third_party/blink/renderer/platform/peerconnection/rtc_video_encoder_factory.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 254. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_blink_renderer_platform_runtime_enabled_features_json5 Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/blink/renderer/platform/runtime_enabled_features.json5 |--- third_party/blink/renderer/platform/runtime_enabled_features.json5.orig |+++ third_party/blink/renderer/platform/runtime_enabled_features.json5 -------------------------- Patching file third_party/blink/renderer/platform/runtime_enabled_features.json5 using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 344. Hunk #2 succeeded at 1703. Hunk #3 succeeded at 3105. Hunk #4 succeeded at 3232. Hunk #5 succeeded at 4195. Hunk #6 succeeded at 4364. Hunk #7 succeeded at 4407. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_blink_renderer_platform_scheduler_common_thread_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/blink/renderer/platform/scheduler/common/thread.cc |--- third_party/blink/renderer/platform/scheduler/common/thread.cc.orig |+++ third_party/blink/renderer/platform/scheduler/common/thread.cc -------------------------- Patching file third_party/blink/renderer/platform/scheduler/common/thread.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 82. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_blink_renderer_platform_widget_compositing_blink_categorized_worker_pool_delegate_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/blink/renderer/platform/widget/compositing/blink_categorized_worker_pool_delegate.cc |--- third_party/blink/renderer/platform/widget/compositing/blink_categorized_worker_pool_delegate.cc.orig |+++ third_party/blink/renderer/platform/widget/compositing/blink_categorized_worker_pool_delegate.cc -------------------------- Patching file third_party/blink/renderer/platform/widget/compositing/blink_categorized_worker_pool_delegate.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 27. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_blink_renderer_platform_wtf_container_annotations_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/blink/renderer/platform/wtf/container_annotations.h |--- third_party/blink/renderer/platform/wtf/container_annotations.h.orig |+++ third_party/blink/renderer/platform/wtf/container_annotations.h -------------------------- Patching file third_party/blink/renderer/platform/wtf/container_annotations.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 12. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_blink_renderer_platform_wtf_math_extras_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/blink/renderer/platform/wtf/math_extras.h |--- third_party/blink/renderer/platform/wtf/math_extras.h.orig |+++ third_party/blink/renderer/platform/wtf/math_extras.h -------------------------- Patching file third_party/blink/renderer/platform/wtf/math_extras.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 128. Hunk #2 succeeded at 139. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_blink_renderer_platform_wtf_stack_util_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/blink/renderer/platform/wtf/stack_util.cc |--- third_party/blink/renderer/platform/wtf/stack_util.cc.orig |+++ third_party/blink/renderer/platform/wtf/stack_util.cc -------------------------- Patching file third_party/blink/renderer/platform/wtf/stack_util.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 23. Hunk #2 succeeded at 72. Hunk #3 succeeded at 161. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_blink_renderer_platform_wtf_text_text_codec_icu_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/blink/renderer/platform/wtf/text/text_codec_icu.cc |--- third_party/blink/renderer/platform/wtf/text/text_codec_icu.cc.orig |+++ third_party/blink/renderer/platform/wtf/text/text_codec_icu.cc -------------------------- Patching file third_party/blink/renderer/platform/wtf/text/text_codec_icu.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 615. Hunk #2 succeeded at 633. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_brotli_common_platform_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/brotli/common/platform.h |--- third_party/brotli/common/platform.h.orig |+++ third_party/brotli/common/platform.h -------------------------- Patching file third_party/brotli/common/platform.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 28. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_cpuinfo_cpuinfo_gni Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/cpuinfo/cpuinfo.gni |--- third_party/cpuinfo/cpuinfo.gni.orig |+++ third_party/cpuinfo/cpuinfo.gni -------------------------- Patching file third_party/cpuinfo/cpuinfo.gni using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 8. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_crashpad_crashpad_build_crashpad_buildconfig_gni Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/crashpad/crashpad/build/crashpad_buildconfig.gni |--- third_party/crashpad/crashpad/build/crashpad_buildconfig.gni.orig |+++ third_party/crashpad/crashpad/build/crashpad_buildconfig.gni -------------------------- Patching file third_party/crashpad/crashpad/build/crashpad_buildconfig.gni using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 61. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_crashpad_crashpad_client_BUILD_gn Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/crashpad/crashpad/client/BUILD.gn |--- third_party/crashpad/crashpad/client/BUILD.gn.orig |+++ third_party/crashpad/crashpad/client/BUILD.gn -------------------------- Patching file third_party/crashpad/crashpad/client/BUILD.gn using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 137. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_crashpad_crashpad_client_crashpad_client_posix_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/crashpad/crashpad/client/crashpad_client_posix.cc |--- third_party/crashpad/crashpad/client/crashpad_client_posix.cc.orig |+++ third_party/crashpad/crashpad/client/crashpad_client_posix.cc -------------------------- (Creating file third_party/crashpad/crashpad/client/crashpad_client_posix.cc...) Patching file third_party/crashpad/crashpad/client/crashpad_client_posix.cc using Plan A... Empty context always matches. Hunk #1 succeeded at 1. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_crashpad_crashpad_minidump_minidump_misc_info_writer_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/crashpad/crashpad/minidump/minidump_misc_info_writer.cc |--- third_party/crashpad/crashpad/minidump/minidump_misc_info_writer.cc.orig |+++ third_party/crashpad/crashpad/minidump/minidump_misc_info_writer.cc -------------------------- Patching file third_party/crashpad/crashpad/minidump/minidump_misc_info_writer.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 159. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_crashpad_crashpad_util_misc_address_types_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/crashpad/crashpad/util/misc/address_types.h |--- third_party/crashpad/crashpad/util/misc/address_types.h.orig |+++ third_party/crashpad/crashpad/util/misc/address_types.h -------------------------- Patching file third_party/crashpad/crashpad/util/misc/address_types.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 25. Hunk #2 succeeded at 55. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_crashpad_crashpad_util_misc_capture_context_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/crashpad/crashpad/util/misc/capture_context.h |--- third_party/crashpad/crashpad/util/misc/capture_context.h.orig |+++ third_party/crashpad/crashpad/util/misc/capture_context.h -------------------------- Patching file third_party/crashpad/crashpad/util/misc/capture_context.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 21. Hunk #2 succeeded at 36. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_crashpad_crashpad_util_misc_metrics_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/crashpad/crashpad/util/misc/metrics.cc |--- third_party/crashpad/crashpad/util/misc/metrics.cc.orig |+++ third_party/crashpad/crashpad/util/misc/metrics.cc -------------------------- Patching file third_party/crashpad/crashpad/util/misc/metrics.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 25. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_crashpad_crashpad_util_misc_uuid_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/crashpad/crashpad/util/misc/uuid.cc |--- third_party/crashpad/crashpad/util/misc/uuid.cc.orig |+++ third_party/crashpad/crashpad/util/misc/uuid.cc -------------------------- Patching file third_party/crashpad/crashpad/util/misc/uuid.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 110. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_crashpad_crashpad_util_posix_close_multiple_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/crashpad/crashpad/util/posix/close_multiple.cc |--- third_party/crashpad/crashpad/util/posix/close_multiple.cc.orig |+++ third_party/crashpad/crashpad/util/posix/close_multiple.cc -------------------------- Patching file third_party/crashpad/crashpad/util/posix/close_multiple.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 73. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_crashpad_crashpad_util_posix_drop_privileges_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/crashpad/crashpad/util/posix/drop_privileges.cc |--- third_party/crashpad/crashpad/util/posix/drop_privileges.cc.orig |+++ third_party/crashpad/crashpad/util/posix/drop_privileges.cc -------------------------- Patching file third_party/crashpad/crashpad/util/posix/drop_privileges.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 25. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_crashpad_crashpad_util_posix_signals_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/crashpad/crashpad/util/posix/signals.cc |--- third_party/crashpad/crashpad/util/posix/signals.cc.orig |+++ third_party/crashpad/crashpad/util/posix/signals.cc -------------------------- Patching file third_party/crashpad/crashpad/util/posix/signals.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 51. Hunk #2 succeeded at 91. Hunk #3 succeeded at 251. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_crashpad_crashpad_util_posix_symbolic_constants_posix_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/crashpad/crashpad/util/posix/symbolic_constants_posix.cc |--- third_party/crashpad/crashpad/util/posix/symbolic_constants_posix.cc.orig |+++ third_party/crashpad/crashpad/util/posix/symbolic_constants_posix.cc -------------------------- Patching file third_party/crashpad/crashpad/util/posix/symbolic_constants_posix.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 68. Hunk #2 succeeded at 139. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_crc32c_BUILD_gn Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/crc32c/BUILD.gn |--- third_party/crc32c/BUILD.gn.orig |+++ third_party/crc32c/BUILD.gn -------------------------- Patching file third_party/crc32c/BUILD.gn using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 46. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_dawn_include_dawn_native_VulkanBackend_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/dawn/include/dawn/native/VulkanBackend.h |--- third_party/dawn/include/dawn/native/VulkanBackend.h.orig |+++ third_party/dawn/include/dawn/native/VulkanBackend.h -------------------------- Patching file third_party/dawn/include/dawn/native/VulkanBackend.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 83. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_dawn_src_dawn_common_Platform_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/dawn/src/dawn/common/Platform.h |--- third_party/dawn/src/dawn/common/Platform.h.orig |+++ third_party/dawn/src/dawn/common/Platform.h -------------------------- Patching file third_party/dawn/src/dawn/common/Platform.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 59. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_dawn_src_dawn_native_vulkan_BackendVk_cpp Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/dawn/src/dawn/native/vulkan/BackendVk.cpp |--- third_party/dawn/src/dawn/native/vulkan/BackendVk.cpp.orig |+++ third_party/dawn/src/dawn/native/vulkan/BackendVk.cpp -------------------------- Patching file third_party/dawn/src/dawn/native/vulkan/BackendVk.cpp using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 56. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_ffmpeg_BUILD_gn Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/ffmpeg/BUILD.gn |--- third_party/ffmpeg/BUILD.gn.orig |+++ third_party/ffmpeg/BUILD.gn -------------------------- Patching file third_party/ffmpeg/BUILD.gn using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 343. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_ffmpeg_configure Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/ffmpeg/configure |--- third_party/ffmpeg/configure.orig |+++ third_party/ffmpeg/configure -------------------------- Patching file third_party/ffmpeg/configure using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 6818. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_ffmpeg_libavcodec_x86_cabac_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/ffmpeg/libavcodec/x86/cabac.h |--- third_party/ffmpeg/libavcodec/x86/cabac.h.orig |+++ third_party/ffmpeg/libavcodec/x86/cabac.h -------------------------- Patching file third_party/ffmpeg/libavcodec/x86/cabac.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 31. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_ffmpeg_libavutil_cpu_c Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/ffmpeg/libavutil/cpu.c |--- third_party/ffmpeg/libavutil/cpu.c.orig |+++ third_party/ffmpeg/libavutil/cpu.c -------------------------- Patching file third_party/ffmpeg/libavutil/cpu.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 38. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_ffmpeg_libavutil_mem_c Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/ffmpeg/libavutil/mem.c |--- third_party/ffmpeg/libavutil/mem.c.orig |+++ third_party/ffmpeg/libavutil/mem.c -------------------------- Patching file third_party/ffmpeg/libavutil/mem.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 33. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_ffmpeg_libavutil_random_seed_c Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/ffmpeg/libavutil/random_seed.c |--- third_party/ffmpeg/libavutil/random_seed.c.orig |+++ third_party/ffmpeg/libavutil/random_seed.c -------------------------- Patching file third_party/ffmpeg/libavutil/random_seed.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 35. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_ffmpeg_libavutil_x86_x86inc_asm Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/ffmpeg/libavutil/x86/x86inc.asm |--- third_party/ffmpeg/libavutil/x86/x86inc.asm.orig |+++ third_party/ffmpeg/libavutil/x86/x86inc.asm -------------------------- Patching file third_party/ffmpeg/libavutil/x86/x86inc.asm using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 46. Hunk #2 succeeded at 867. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_fontconfig_include_config_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/fontconfig/include/config.h |--- third_party/fontconfig/include/config.h.orig |+++ third_party/fontconfig/include/config.h -------------------------- Patching file third_party/fontconfig/include/config.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 13. Hunk #2 succeeded at 66. Hunk #3 succeeded at 74. Hunk #4 succeeded at 95. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_fontconfig_src_src_fccompat_c Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/fontconfig/src/src/fccompat.c |--- third_party/fontconfig/src/src/fccompat.c.orig |+++ third_party/fontconfig/src/src/fccompat.c -------------------------- Patching file third_party/fontconfig/src/src/fccompat.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 184. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_ipcz_src_reference_drivers_random_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/ipcz/src/reference_drivers/random.cc |--- third_party/ipcz/src/reference_drivers/random.cc.orig |+++ third_party/ipcz/src/reference_drivers/random.cc -------------------------- Patching file third_party/ipcz/src/reference_drivers/random.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 14. Hunk #2 succeeded at 86. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_ipcz_src_standalone_base_logging_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/ipcz/src/standalone/base/logging.cc |--- third_party/ipcz/src/standalone/base/logging.cc.orig |+++ third_party/ipcz/src/standalone/base/logging.cc -------------------------- Patching file third_party/ipcz/src/standalone/base/logging.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 50. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_leveldatabase_env_chromium_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/leveldatabase/env_chromium.cc |--- third_party/leveldatabase/env_chromium.cc.orig |+++ third_party/leveldatabase/env_chromium.cc -------------------------- Patching file third_party/leveldatabase/env_chromium.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 326. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_libaom_source_libaom_aom_ports_aarch64_cpudetect_c Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/libaom/source/libaom/aom_ports/aarch64_cpudetect.c |--- third_party/libaom/source/libaom/aom_ports/aarch64_cpudetect.c.orig |+++ third_party/libaom/source/libaom/aom_ports/aarch64_cpudetect.c -------------------------- Patching file third_party/libaom/source/libaom/aom_ports/aarch64_cpudetect.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 99. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_libc++_src_src_chrono_cpp Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/libc++/src/src/chrono.cpp |--- third_party/libc++/src/src/chrono.cpp.orig |+++ third_party/libc++/src/src/chrono.cpp -------------------------- Patching file third_party/libc++/src/src/chrono.cpp using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 33. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_libc++_src_src_filesystem_filesystem_clock_cpp Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/libc++/src/src/filesystem/filesystem_clock.cpp |--- third_party/libc++/src/src/filesystem/filesystem_clock.cpp.orig |+++ third_party/libc++/src/src/filesystem/filesystem_clock.cpp -------------------------- Patching file third_party/libc++/src/src/filesystem/filesystem_clock.cpp using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 29. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_libphonenumber_dist_cpp_src_phonenumbers_base_memory_singleton_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/libphonenumber/dist/cpp/src/phonenumbers/base/memory/singleton.h |--- third_party/libphonenumber/dist/cpp/src/phonenumbers/base/memory/singleton.h.orig |+++ third_party/libphonenumber/dist/cpp/src/phonenumbers/base/memory/singleton.h -------------------------- Patching file third_party/libphonenumber/dist/cpp/src/phonenumbers/base/memory/singleton.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 22. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_libphonenumber_dist_cpp_src_phonenumbers_base_synchronization_lock_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/libphonenumber/dist/cpp/src/phonenumbers/base/synchronization/lock.h |--- third_party/libphonenumber/dist/cpp/src/phonenumbers/base/synchronization/lock.h.orig |+++ third_party/libphonenumber/dist/cpp/src/phonenumbers/base/synchronization/lock.h -------------------------- Patching file third_party/libphonenumber/dist/cpp/src/phonenumbers/base/synchronization/lock.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 22. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_libphonenumber_dist_cpp_src_phonenumbers_base_thread_checker_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/libphonenumber/dist/cpp/src/phonenumbers/base/thread_checker.h |--- third_party/libphonenumber/dist/cpp/src/phonenumbers/base/thread_checker.h.orig |+++ third_party/libphonenumber/dist/cpp/src/phonenumbers/base/thread_checker.h -------------------------- Patching file third_party/libphonenumber/dist/cpp/src/phonenumbers/base/thread_checker.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 22. Hunk #2 succeeded at 33. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_libsync_src_include_sync_sync_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/libsync/src/include/sync/sync.h |--- third_party/libsync/src/include/sync/sync.h.orig |+++ third_party/libsync/src/include/sync/sync.h -------------------------- Patching file third_party/libsync/src/include/sync/sync.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 22. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_libsync_src_sync_c Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/libsync/src/sync.c |--- third_party/libsync/src/sync.c.orig |+++ third_party/libsync/src/sync.c -------------------------- Patching file third_party/libsync/src/sync.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 17. Hunk #2 succeeded at 29. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_libusb_BUILD_gn Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/libusb/BUILD.gn |--- third_party/libusb/BUILD.gn.orig |+++ third_party/libusb/BUILD.gn -------------------------- Patching file third_party/libusb/BUILD.gn using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 3. Hunk #2 succeeded at 103. Hunk #3 succeeded at 114. Hunk #4 succeeded at 137. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_libusb_src_libusb_core_c Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/libusb/src/libusb/core.c |--- third_party/libusb/src/libusb/core.c.orig |+++ third_party/libusb/src/libusb/core.c -------------------------- Patching file third_party/libusb/src/libusb/core.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 448. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_libusb_src_libusb_os_threads_posix_c Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/libusb/src/libusb/os/threads_posix.c |--- third_party/libusb/src/libusb/os/threads_posix.c.orig |+++ third_party/libusb/src/libusb/os/threads_posix.c -------------------------- Patching file third_party/libusb/src/libusb/os/threads_posix.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 19. Hunk #2 succeeded at 67. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_libvpx_source_libvpx_vpx_ports_aarch64_cpudetect_c Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/libvpx/source/libvpx/vpx_ports/aarch64_cpudetect.c |--- third_party/libvpx/source/libvpx/vpx_ports/aarch64_cpudetect.c.orig |+++ third_party/libvpx/source/libvpx/vpx_ports/aarch64_cpudetect.c -------------------------- Patching file third_party/libvpx/source/libvpx/vpx_ports/aarch64_cpudetect.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 92. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_lzma_sdk_C_CpuArch_c Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/lzma_sdk/C/CpuArch.c |--- third_party/lzma_sdk/C/CpuArch.c.orig |+++ third_party/lzma_sdk/C/CpuArch.c -------------------------- Patching file third_party/lzma_sdk/C/CpuArch.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 412. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_material_color_utilities_src_cpp_palettes_tones_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/material_color_utilities/src/cpp/palettes/tones.cc |--- third_party/material_color_utilities/src/cpp/palettes/tones.cc.orig |+++ third_party/material_color_utilities/src/cpp/palettes/tones.cc -------------------------- Patching file third_party/material_color_utilities/src/cpp/palettes/tones.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 14. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_nasm_BUILD_gn Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/nasm/BUILD.gn |--- third_party/nasm/BUILD.gn.orig |+++ third_party/nasm/BUILD.gn -------------------------- Patching file third_party/nasm/BUILD.gn using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 63. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_nasm_config_config-linux_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/nasm/config/config-linux.h |--- third_party/nasm/config/config-linux.h.orig |+++ third_party/nasm/config/config-linux.h -------------------------- Patching file third_party/nasm/config/config-linux.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 160. Hunk #2 succeeded at 183. Hunk #3 succeeded at 327. Hunk #4 succeeded at 357. Hunk #5 succeeded at 384. Hunk #6 succeeded at 411. Hunk #7 succeeded at 486. Hunk #8 succeeded at 620. Hunk #9 succeeded at 637. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_node_node_gni Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/node/node.gni |--- third_party/node/node.gni.orig |+++ third_party/node/node.gni -------------------------- Patching file third_party/node/node.gni using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 22. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_node_node_py Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/node/node.py |--- third_party/node/node.py.orig |+++ third_party/node/node.py -------------------------- Patching file third_party/node/node.py using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 20. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_pdfium_core_fxge_cfx_fontmapper_cpp Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/pdfium/core/fxge/cfx_fontmapper.cpp |--- third_party/pdfium/core/fxge/cfx_fontmapper.cpp.orig |+++ third_party/pdfium/core/fxge/cfx_fontmapper.cpp -------------------------- Patching file third_party/pdfium/core/fxge/cfx_fontmapper.cpp using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 157. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_pdfium_core_fxge_linux_fx_linux_impl_cpp Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/pdfium/core/fxge/linux/fx_linux_impl.cpp |--- third_party/pdfium/core/fxge/linux/fx_linux_impl.cpp.orig |+++ third_party/pdfium/core/fxge/linux/fx_linux_impl.cpp -------------------------- Patching file third_party/pdfium/core/fxge/linux/fx_linux_impl.cpp using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 20. Hunk #2 succeeded at 173. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_pdfium_fxjs_fx_date_helpers_cpp Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/pdfium/fxjs/fx_date_helpers.cpp |--- third_party/pdfium/fxjs/fx_date_helpers.cpp.orig |+++ third_party/pdfium/fxjs/fx_date_helpers.cpp -------------------------- Patching file third_party/pdfium/fxjs/fx_date_helpers.cpp using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 39. Hunk #2 succeeded at 52. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_pdfium_pdfium_gni Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/pdfium/pdfium.gni |--- third_party/pdfium/pdfium.gni.orig |+++ third_party/pdfium/pdfium.gni -------------------------- Patching file third_party/pdfium/pdfium.gni using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 42. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_pdfium_xfa_fxfa_parser_cxfa_timezoneprovider_cpp Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/pdfium/xfa/fxfa/parser/cxfa_timezoneprovider.cpp |--- third_party/pdfium/xfa/fxfa/parser/cxfa_timezoneprovider.cpp.orig |+++ third_party/pdfium/xfa/fxfa/parser/cxfa_timezoneprovider.cpp -------------------------- Patching file third_party/pdfium/xfa/fxfa/parser/cxfa_timezoneprovider.cpp using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 6. Hunk #2 succeeded at 28. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_perfetto_include_perfetto_base_build_config_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/perfetto/include/perfetto/base/build_config.h |--- third_party/perfetto/include/perfetto/base/build_config.h.orig |+++ third_party/perfetto/include/perfetto/base/build_config.h -------------------------- Patching file third_party/perfetto/include/perfetto/base/build_config.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 27. Hunk #2 succeeded at 39. Hunk #3 succeeded at 53. Hunk #4 succeeded at 67. Hunk #5 succeeded at 79. Hunk #6 succeeded at 94. Hunk #7 succeeded at 103. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_perfetto_include_perfetto_base_thread_utils_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/perfetto/include/perfetto/base/thread_utils.h |--- third_party/perfetto/include/perfetto/base/thread_utils.h.orig |+++ third_party/perfetto/include/perfetto/base/thread_utils.h -------------------------- Patching file third_party/perfetto/include/perfetto/base/thread_utils.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 34. Hunk #2 succeeded at 46. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_perfetto_include_perfetto_base_time_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/perfetto/include/perfetto/base/time.h |--- third_party/perfetto/include/perfetto/base/time.h.orig |+++ third_party/perfetto/include/perfetto/base/time.h -------------------------- Patching file third_party/perfetto/include/perfetto/base/time.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 199. Hunk #2 succeeded at 209. Hunk #3 succeeded at 217. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_perfetto_include_perfetto_ext_base_event_fd_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/perfetto/include/perfetto/ext/base/event_fd.h |--- third_party/perfetto/include/perfetto/ext/base/event_fd.h.orig |+++ third_party/perfetto/include/perfetto/ext/base/event_fd.h -------------------------- Patching file third_party/perfetto/include/perfetto/ext/base/event_fd.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 55. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_perfetto_include_perfetto_ext_base_thread_utils_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/perfetto/include/perfetto/ext/base/thread_utils.h |--- third_party/perfetto/include/perfetto/ext/base/thread_utils.h.orig |+++ third_party/perfetto/include/perfetto/ext/base/thread_utils.h -------------------------- Patching file third_party/perfetto/include/perfetto/ext/base/thread_utils.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 41. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_perfetto_include_perfetto_tracing_internal_track_event_legacy_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/perfetto/include/perfetto/tracing/internal/track_event_legacy.h |--- third_party/perfetto/include/perfetto/tracing/internal/track_event_legacy.h.orig |+++ third_party/perfetto/include/perfetto/tracing/internal/track_event_legacy.h -------------------------- Patching file third_party/perfetto/include/perfetto/tracing/internal/track_event_legacy.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 249. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_perfetto_protos_perfetto_trace_ftrace_v4l2_proto Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/perfetto/protos/perfetto/trace/ftrace/v4l2.proto |--- third_party/perfetto/protos/perfetto/trace/ftrace/v4l2.proto.orig |+++ third_party/perfetto/protos/perfetto/trace/ftrace/v4l2.proto -------------------------- Patching file third_party/perfetto/protos/perfetto/trace/ftrace/v4l2.proto using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 10. Hunk #2 succeeded at 30. Hunk #3 succeeded at 48. Hunk #4 succeeded at 65. Hunk #5 succeeded at 82. Hunk #6 succeeded at 99. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_perfetto_src_base_event_fd_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/perfetto/src/base/event_fd.cc |--- third_party/perfetto/src/base/event_fd.cc.orig |+++ third_party/perfetto/src/base/event_fd.cc -------------------------- Patching file third_party/perfetto/src/base/event_fd.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 22. Hunk #2 succeeded at 58. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_perfetto_src_base_periodic_task_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/perfetto/src/base/periodic_task.cc |--- third_party/perfetto/src/base/periodic_task.cc.orig |+++ third_party/perfetto/src/base/periodic_task.cc -------------------------- Patching file third_party/perfetto/src/base/periodic_task.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 24. Hunk #2 succeeded at 44. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_perfetto_src_base_string_utils_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/perfetto/src/base/string_utils.cc |--- third_party/perfetto/src/base/string_utils.cc.orig |+++ third_party/perfetto/src/base/string_utils.cc -------------------------- Patching file third_party/perfetto/src/base/string_utils.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 38. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_perfetto_src_base_subprocess_posix_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/perfetto/src/base/subprocess_posix.cc |--- third_party/perfetto/src/base/subprocess_posix.cc.orig |+++ third_party/perfetto/src/base/subprocess_posix.cc -------------------------- Patching file third_party/perfetto/src/base/subprocess_posix.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 35. Hunk #2 succeeded at 65. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_perfetto_src_base_test_vm_test_utils_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/perfetto/src/base/test/vm_test_utils.cc |--- third_party/perfetto/src/base/test/vm_test_utils.cc.orig |+++ third_party/perfetto/src/base/test/vm_test_utils.cc -------------------------- Patching file third_party/perfetto/src/base/test/vm_test_utils.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 91. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_perfetto_src_base_thread_task_runner_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/perfetto/src/base/thread_task_runner.cc |--- third_party/perfetto/src/base/thread_task_runner.cc.orig |+++ third_party/perfetto/src/base/thread_task_runner.cc -------------------------- Patching file third_party/perfetto/src/base/thread_task_runner.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 27. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_perfetto_src_base_unix_socket_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/perfetto/src/base/unix_socket.cc |--- third_party/perfetto/src/base/unix_socket.cc.orig |+++ third_party/perfetto/src/base/unix_socket.cc -------------------------- Patching file third_party/perfetto/src/base/unix_socket.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 44. Hunk #2 succeeded at 917. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_perfetto_src_base_utils_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/perfetto/src/base/utils.cc |--- third_party/perfetto/src/base/utils.cc.orig |+++ third_party/perfetto/src/base/utils.cc -------------------------- Patching file third_party/perfetto/src/base/utils.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 38. Hunk #2 succeeded at 339. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_perfetto_src_tracing_core_clock_snapshots_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/perfetto/src/tracing/core/clock_snapshots.cc |--- third_party/perfetto/src/tracing/core/clock_snapshots.cc.orig |+++ third_party/perfetto/src/tracing/core/clock_snapshots.cc -------------------------- Patching file third_party/perfetto/src/tracing/core/clock_snapshots.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 26. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_perfetto_src_tracing_ipc_memfd_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/perfetto/src/tracing/ipc/memfd.cc |--- third_party/perfetto/src/tracing/ipc/memfd.cc.orig |+++ third_party/perfetto/src/tracing/ipc/memfd.cc -------------------------- Patching file third_party/perfetto/src/tracing/ipc/memfd.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 20. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_perfetto_src_tracing_track_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/perfetto/src/tracing/track.cc |--- third_party/perfetto/src/tracing/track.cc.orig |+++ third_party/perfetto/src/tracing/track.cc -------------------------- Patching file third_party/perfetto/src/tracing/track.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 155. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_protobuf_src_google_protobuf_stubs_platform_macros_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/protobuf/src/google/protobuf/stubs/platform_macros.h |--- third_party/protobuf/src/google/protobuf/stubs/platform_macros.h.orig |+++ third_party/protobuf/src/google/protobuf/stubs/platform_macros.h -------------------------- Patching file third_party/protobuf/src/google/protobuf/stubs/platform_macros.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 122. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_skia_src_ports_SkMemory_malloc_cpp Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/skia/src/ports/SkMemory_malloc.cpp |--- third_party/skia/src/ports/SkMemory_malloc.cpp.orig |+++ third_party/skia/src/ports/SkMemory_malloc.cpp -------------------------- Patching file third_party/skia/src/ports/SkMemory_malloc.cpp using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 15. Hunk #2 succeeded at 126. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_skia_src_ports_SkOSFile_posix_cpp Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/skia/src/ports/SkOSFile_posix.cpp |--- third_party/skia/src/ports/SkOSFile_posix.cpp.orig |+++ third_party/skia/src/ports/SkOSFile_posix.cpp -------------------------- Patching file third_party/skia/src/ports/SkOSFile_posix.cpp using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 25. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_speech-dispatcher_libspeechd_version_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/speech-dispatcher/libspeechd_version.h |--- third_party/speech-dispatcher/libspeechd_version.h.orig |+++ third_party/speech-dispatcher/libspeechd_version.h -------------------------- (Creating file third_party/speech-dispatcher/libspeechd_version.h...) Patching file third_party/speech-dispatcher/libspeechd_version.h using Plan A... Empty context always matches. Hunk #1 succeeded at 1. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_speech-dispatcher_speechd_types_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/speech-dispatcher/speechd_types.h |--- third_party/speech-dispatcher/speechd_types.h.orig |+++ third_party/speech-dispatcher/speechd_types.h -------------------------- Patching file third_party/speech-dispatcher/speechd_types.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 119. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_sqlite_BUILD_gn Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/sqlite/BUILD.gn |--- third_party/sqlite/BUILD.gn.orig |+++ third_party/sqlite/BUILD.gn -------------------------- Patching file third_party/sqlite/BUILD.gn using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 142. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_sqlite_src_amalgamation_sqlite3_c Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/sqlite/src/amalgamation/sqlite3.c |--- third_party/sqlite/src/amalgamation/sqlite3.c.orig |+++ third_party/sqlite/src/amalgamation/sqlite3.c -------------------------- Patching file third_party/sqlite/src/amalgamation/sqlite3.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 14119. Hunk #2 succeeded at 44777. Hunk #3 succeeded at 44797. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_swiftshader_src_Reactor_Debug_cpp Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/swiftshader/src/Reactor/Debug.cpp |--- third_party/swiftshader/src/Reactor/Debug.cpp.orig |+++ third_party/swiftshader/src/Reactor/Debug.cpp -------------------------- Patching file third_party/swiftshader/src/Reactor/Debug.cpp using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 46. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_swiftshader_src_System_Configurator_cpp Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/swiftshader/src/System/Configurator.cpp |--- third_party/swiftshader/src/System/Configurator.cpp.orig |+++ third_party/swiftshader/src/System/Configurator.cpp -------------------------- Patching file third_party/swiftshader/src/System/Configurator.cpp using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 38. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_swiftshader_src_System_Linux_MemFd_cpp Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/swiftshader/src/System/Linux/MemFd.cpp |--- third_party/swiftshader/src/System/Linux/MemFd.cpp.orig |+++ third_party/swiftshader/src/System/Linux/MemFd.cpp -------------------------- Patching file third_party/swiftshader/src/System/Linux/MemFd.cpp using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 25. Hunk #2 succeeded at 37. Hunk #3 succeeded at 65. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_swiftshader_src_Vulkan_VkSemaphoreExternalLinux_hpp Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/swiftshader/src/Vulkan/VkSemaphoreExternalLinux.hpp |--- third_party/swiftshader/src/Vulkan/VkSemaphoreExternalLinux.hpp.orig |+++ third_party/swiftshader/src/Vulkan/VkSemaphoreExternalLinux.hpp -------------------------- Patching file third_party/swiftshader/src/Vulkan/VkSemaphoreExternalLinux.hpp using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 49. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_swiftshader_src_WSI_libXCB_cpp Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/swiftshader/src/WSI/libXCB.cpp |--- third_party/swiftshader/src/WSI/libXCB.cpp.orig |+++ third_party/swiftshader/src/WSI/libXCB.cpp -------------------------- Patching file third_party/swiftshader/src/WSI/libXCB.cpp using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 57. Hunk #2 succeeded at 66. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_swiftshader_third_party_llvm-10_0_configs_linux_include_llvm_Config_config_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/swiftshader/third_party/llvm-10.0/configs/linux/include/llvm/Config/config.h |--- third_party/swiftshader/third_party/llvm-10.0/configs/linux/include/llvm/Config/config.h.orig |+++ third_party/swiftshader/third_party/llvm-10.0/configs/linux/include/llvm/Config/config.h -------------------------- Patching file third_party/swiftshader/third_party/llvm-10.0/configs/linux/include/llvm/Config/config.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 29. Hunk #2 succeeded at 53. Hunk #3 succeeded at 92. Hunk #4 succeeded at 110. Hunk #5 succeeded at 125. Hunk #6 succeeded at 134. Hunk #7 succeeded at 161. Hunk #8 succeeded at 182. Hunk #9 succeeded at 209. Hunk #10 succeeded at 218. Hunk #11 succeeded at 292. Hunk #12 succeeded at 317. Hunk #13 succeeded at 339. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_swiftshader_third_party_llvm-subzero_build_Linux_include_llvm_Config_config_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/swiftshader/third_party/llvm-subzero/build/Linux/include/llvm/Config/config.h |--- third_party/swiftshader/third_party/llvm-subzero/build/Linux/include/llvm/Config/config.h.orig |+++ third_party/swiftshader/third_party/llvm-subzero/build/Linux/include/llvm/Config/config.h -------------------------- Patching file third_party/swiftshader/third_party/llvm-subzero/build/Linux/include/llvm/Config/config.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 5. Hunk #2 succeeded at 25. Hunk #3 succeeded at 122. Hunk #4 succeeded at 131. Hunk #5 succeeded at 161. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_swiftshader_third_party_marl_src_memory_cpp Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/swiftshader/third_party/marl/src/memory.cpp |--- third_party/swiftshader/third_party/marl/src/memory.cpp.orig |+++ third_party/swiftshader/third_party/marl/src/memory.cpp -------------------------- Patching file third_party/swiftshader/third_party/marl/src/memory.cpp using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 19. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_swiftshader_third_party_marl_src_thread_cpp Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/swiftshader/third_party/marl/src/thread.cpp |--- third_party/swiftshader/third_party/marl/src/thread.cpp.orig |+++ third_party/swiftshader/third_party/marl/src/thread.cpp -------------------------- Patching file third_party/swiftshader/third_party/marl/src/thread.cpp using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 444. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_test_fonts_fontconfig_BUILD_gn Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/test_fonts/fontconfig/BUILD.gn |--- third_party/test_fonts/fontconfig/BUILD.gn.orig |+++ third_party/test_fonts/fontconfig/BUILD.gn -------------------------- Patching file third_party/test_fonts/fontconfig/BUILD.gn using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 26. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_test_fonts_fontconfig_fontconfig_util_linux_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/test_fonts/fontconfig/fontconfig_util_linux.cc |--- third_party/test_fonts/fontconfig/fontconfig_util_linux.cc.orig |+++ third_party/test_fonts/fontconfig/fontconfig_util_linux.cc -------------------------- Patching file third_party/test_fonts/fontconfig/fontconfig_util_linux.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 2. Hunk #2 succeeded at 18. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_test_fonts_fontconfig_generate_fontconfig_caches_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/test_fonts/fontconfig/generate_fontconfig_caches.cc |--- third_party/test_fonts/fontconfig/generate_fontconfig_caches.cc.orig |+++ third_party/test_fonts/fontconfig/generate_fontconfig_caches.cc -------------------------- Patching file third_party/test_fonts/fontconfig/generate_fontconfig_caches.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 56. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_tflite_features_gni Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/tflite/features.gni |--- third_party/tflite/features.gni.orig |+++ third_party/tflite/features.gni -------------------------- Patching file third_party/tflite/features.gni using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 9. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_unrar_src_crypt_cpp Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/unrar/src/crypt.cpp |--- third_party/unrar/src/crypt.cpp.orig |+++ third_party/unrar/src/crypt.cpp -------------------------- Patching file third_party/unrar/src/crypt.cpp using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 116. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_vulkan-loader_src_BUILD_gn Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/vulkan-loader/src/BUILD.gn |--- third_party/vulkan-loader/src/BUILD.gn.orig |+++ third_party/vulkan-loader/src/BUILD.gn -------------------------- Patching file third_party/vulkan-loader/src/BUILD.gn using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 59. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_vulkan-loader_src_loader_vk_loader_platform_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/vulkan-loader/src/loader/vk_loader_platform.h |--- third_party/vulkan-loader/src/loader/vk_loader_platform.h.orig |+++ third_party/vulkan-loader/src/loader/vk_loader_platform.h -------------------------- Patching file third_party/vulkan-loader/src/loader/vk_loader_platform.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 327. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_vulkan-validation-layers_src_layers_external_vma_vk_mem_alloc_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/vulkan-validation-layers/src/layers/external/vma/vk_mem_alloc.h |--- third_party/vulkan-validation-layers/src/layers/external/vma/vk_mem_alloc.h.orig |+++ third_party/vulkan-validation-layers/src/layers/external/vma/vk_mem_alloc.h -------------------------- Patching file third_party/vulkan-validation-layers/src/layers/external/vma/vk_mem_alloc.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 2740. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_vulkan_memory_allocator_include_vk_mem_alloc_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/vulkan_memory_allocator/include/vk_mem_alloc.h |--- third_party/vulkan_memory_allocator/include/vk_mem_alloc.h.orig |+++ third_party/vulkan_memory_allocator/include/vk_mem_alloc.h -------------------------- Patching file third_party/vulkan_memory_allocator/include/vk_mem_alloc.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 2760. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_wayland_BUILD_gn Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/wayland/BUILD.gn |--- third_party/wayland/BUILD.gn.orig |+++ third_party/wayland/BUILD.gn -------------------------- Patching file third_party/wayland/BUILD.gn using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 24. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_wayland_include_config_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/wayland/include/config.h |--- third_party/wayland/include/config.h.orig |+++ third_party/wayland/include/config.h -------------------------- Patching file third_party/wayland/include/config.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 9. Hunk #2 succeeded at 32. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_webrtc_BUILD_gn Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/webrtc/BUILD.gn |--- third_party/webrtc/BUILD.gn.orig |+++ third_party/webrtc/BUILD.gn -------------------------- Patching file third_party/webrtc/BUILD.gn using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 215. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_webrtc_modules_audio_device_BUILD_gn Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/webrtc/modules/audio_device/BUILD.gn |--- third_party/webrtc/modules/audio_device/BUILD.gn.orig |+++ third_party/webrtc/modules/audio_device/BUILD.gn -------------------------- Patching file third_party/webrtc/modules/audio_device/BUILD.gn using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 333. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_webrtc_modules_desktop_capture_linux_wayland_egl_dmabuf_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/webrtc/modules/desktop_capture/linux/wayland/egl_dmabuf.cc |--- third_party/webrtc/modules/desktop_capture/linux/wayland/egl_dmabuf.cc.orig |+++ third_party/webrtc/modules/desktop_capture/linux/wayland/egl_dmabuf.cc -------------------------- Patching file third_party/webrtc/modules/desktop_capture/linux/wayland/egl_dmabuf.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 10. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_webrtc_modules_desktop_capture_linux_x11_x_server_pixel_buffer_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/webrtc/modules/desktop_capture/linux/x11/x_server_pixel_buffer.cc |--- third_party/webrtc/modules/desktop_capture/linux/x11/x_server_pixel_buffer.cc.orig |+++ third_party/webrtc/modules/desktop_capture/linux/x11/x_server_pixel_buffer.cc -------------------------- Patching file third_party/webrtc/modules/desktop_capture/linux/x11/x_server_pixel_buffer.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 203. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_webrtc_rtc_base_byte_order_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/webrtc/rtc_base/byte_order.h |--- third_party/webrtc/rtc_base/byte_order.h.orig |+++ third_party/webrtc/rtc_base/byte_order.h -------------------------- Patching file third_party/webrtc/rtc_base/byte_order.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 90. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_webrtc_rtc_base_ip_address_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/webrtc/rtc_base/ip_address.cc |--- third_party/webrtc/rtc_base/ip_address.cc.orig |+++ third_party/webrtc/rtc_base/ip_address.cc -------------------------- Patching file third_party/webrtc/rtc_base/ip_address.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 13. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_webrtc_rtc_base_net_test_helpers_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/webrtc/rtc_base/net_test_helpers.cc |--- third_party/webrtc/rtc_base/net_test_helpers.cc.orig |+++ third_party/webrtc/rtc_base/net_test_helpers.cc -------------------------- Patching file third_party/webrtc/rtc_base/net_test_helpers.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 21. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_webrtc_rtc_base_network_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/webrtc/rtc_base/network.cc |--- third_party/webrtc/rtc_base/network.cc.orig |+++ third_party/webrtc/rtc_base/network.cc -------------------------- Patching file third_party/webrtc/rtc_base/network.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 290. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_webrtc_rtc_base_physical_socket_server_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/webrtc/rtc_base/physical_socket_server.cc |--- third_party/webrtc/rtc_base/physical_socket_server.cc.orig |+++ third_party/webrtc/rtc_base/physical_socket_server.cc -------------------------- Patching file third_party/webrtc/rtc_base/physical_socket_server.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 54. Hunk #2 succeeded at 74. Hunk #3 succeeded at 329. Hunk #4 succeeded at 358. Hunk #5 succeeded at 389. Hunk #6 succeeded at 418. Hunk #7 succeeded at 697. Hunk #8 succeeded at 746. Hunk #9 succeeded at 766. Hunk #10 succeeded at 786. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_webrtc_rtc_base_physical_socket_server_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/webrtc/rtc_base/physical_socket_server.h |--- third_party/webrtc/rtc_base/physical_socket_server.h.orig |+++ third_party/webrtc/rtc_base/physical_socket_server.h -------------------------- Patching file third_party/webrtc/rtc_base/physical_socket_server.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 18. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_webrtc_rtc_base_platform_thread_types_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/webrtc/rtc_base/platform_thread_types.cc |--- third_party/webrtc/rtc_base/platform_thread_types.cc.orig |+++ third_party/webrtc/rtc_base/platform_thread_types.cc -------------------------- Patching file third_party/webrtc/rtc_base/platform_thread_types.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 11. Hunk #2 succeeded at 46. Hunk #3 succeeded at 78. Hunk #4 succeeded at 125. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_webrtc_rtc_base_third_party_sigslot_sigslot_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/webrtc/rtc_base/third_party/sigslot/sigslot.h |--- third_party/webrtc/rtc_base/third_party/sigslot/sigslot.h.orig |+++ third_party/webrtc/rtc_base/third_party/sigslot/sigslot.h -------------------------- Patching file third_party/webrtc/rtc_base/third_party/sigslot/sigslot.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 178. Hunk #2 succeeded at 205. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_webrtc_system_wrappers_BUILD_gn Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/webrtc/system_wrappers/BUILD.gn |--- third_party/webrtc/system_wrappers/BUILD.gn.orig |+++ third_party/webrtc/system_wrappers/BUILD.gn -------------------------- Patching file third_party/webrtc/system_wrappers/BUILD.gn using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 63. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_widevine_cdm_widevine_gni Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/widevine/cdm/widevine.gni |--- third_party/widevine/cdm/widevine.gni.orig |+++ third_party/widevine/cdm/widevine.gni -------------------------- Patching file third_party/widevine/cdm/widevine.gni using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 28. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_zlib_BUILD_gn Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/zlib/BUILD.gn |--- third_party/zlib/BUILD.gn.orig |+++ third_party/zlib/BUILD.gn -------------------------- Patching file third_party/zlib/BUILD.gn using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 128. Hunk #2 succeeded at 138. Hunk #3 succeeded at 417. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-third_party_zlib_cpu_features_c Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: third_party/zlib/cpu_features.c |--- third_party/zlib/cpu_features.c.orig |+++ third_party/zlib/cpu_features.c -------------------------- Patching file third_party/zlib/cpu_features.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 39. Hunk #2 succeeded at 57. Hunk #3 succeeded at 74. Hunk #4 succeeded at 128. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-tools_generate_shim_headers_generate_shim_headers_py Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: tools/generate_shim_headers/generate_shim_headers.py |--- tools/generate_shim_headers/generate_shim_headers.py.orig |+++ tools/generate_shim_headers/generate_shim_headers.py -------------------------- Patching file tools/generate_shim_headers/generate_shim_headers.py using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 18. Hunk #2 succeeded at 65. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-tools_generate_stubs_rules_gni Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: tools/generate_stubs/rules.gni |--- tools/generate_stubs/rules.gni.orig |+++ tools/generate_stubs/rules.gni -------------------------- Patching file tools/generate_stubs/rules.gni using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 110. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-tools_gn_build_build_linux_ninja_template Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: tools/gn/build/build_linux.ninja.template |--- tools/gn/build/build_linux.ninja.template.orig |+++ tools/gn/build/build_linux.ninja.template -------------------------- Patching file tools/gn/build/build_linux.ninja.template using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 5. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-tools_gn_build_gen_py Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: tools/gn/build/gen.py |--- tools/gn/build/gen.py.orig |+++ tools/gn/build/gen.py -------------------------- Patching file tools/gn/build/gen.py using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 94. Hunk #2 succeeded at 310. Hunk #3 succeeded at 545. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-tools_gn_src_base_files_file_posix_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: tools/gn/src/base/files/file_posix.cc |--- tools/gn/src/base/files/file_posix.cc.orig |+++ tools/gn/src/base/files/file_posix.cc -------------------------- Patching file tools/gn/src/base/files/file_posix.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 371. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-tools_gn_src_gn_version_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: tools/gn/src/gn/version.h |--- tools/gn/src/gn/version.h.orig |+++ tools/gn/src/gn/version.h -------------------------- Patching file tools/gn/src/gn/version.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 22. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-tools_gn_src_util_exe_path_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: tools/gn/src/util/exe_path.cc |--- tools/gn/src/util/exe_path.cc.orig |+++ tools/gn/src/util/exe_path.cc -------------------------- Patching file tools/gn/src/util/exe_path.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 15. Hunk #2 succeeded at 26. Hunk #3 succeeded at 106. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-tools_grit_grit_node_base_py Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: tools/grit/grit/node/base.py |--- tools/grit/grit/node/base.py.orig |+++ tools/grit/grit/node/base.py -------------------------- Patching file tools/grit/grit/node/base.py using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 498. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-tools_json_schema_compiler_cpp_bundle_generator_py Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: tools/json_schema_compiler/cpp_bundle_generator.py |--- tools/json_schema_compiler/cpp_bundle_generator.py.orig |+++ tools/json_schema_compiler/cpp_bundle_generator.py -------------------------- Patching file tools/json_schema_compiler/cpp_bundle_generator.py using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 149. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-tools_json_schema_compiler_feature_compiler_py Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: tools/json_schema_compiler/feature_compiler.py |--- tools/json_schema_compiler/feature_compiler.py.orig |+++ tools/json_schema_compiler/feature_compiler.py -------------------------- Patching file tools/json_schema_compiler/feature_compiler.py using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 277. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-tools_memory_partition_allocator_inspect_utils_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: tools/memory/partition_allocator/inspect_utils.h |--- tools/memory/partition_allocator/inspect_utils.h.orig |+++ tools/memory/partition_allocator/inspect_utils.h -------------------------- Patching file tools/memory/partition_allocator/inspect_utils.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 61. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-tools_perf_chrome_telemetry_build_BUILD_gn Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: tools/perf/chrome_telemetry_build/BUILD.gn |--- tools/perf/chrome_telemetry_build/BUILD.gn.orig |+++ tools/perf/chrome_telemetry_build/BUILD.gn -------------------------- Patching file tools/perf/chrome_telemetry_build/BUILD.gn using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 47. Hunk #2 succeeded at 178. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-tools_protoc_wrapper_protoc_wrapper_py Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: tools/protoc_wrapper/protoc_wrapper.py |--- tools/protoc_wrapper/protoc_wrapper.py.orig |+++ tools/protoc_wrapper/protoc_wrapper.py -------------------------- Patching file tools/protoc_wrapper/protoc_wrapper.py using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 183. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-tools_variations_fieldtrial_to_struct_py Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: tools/variations/fieldtrial_to_struct.py |--- tools/variations/fieldtrial_to_struct.py.orig |+++ tools/variations/fieldtrial_to_struct.py -------------------------- Patching file tools/variations/fieldtrial_to_struct.py using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 41. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_aura_client_drag_drop_client_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/aura/client/drag_drop_client.h |--- ui/aura/client/drag_drop_client.h.orig |+++ ui/aura/client/drag_drop_client.h -------------------------- Patching file ui/aura/client/drag_drop_client.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 44. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_aura_screen_ozone_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/aura/screen_ozone.cc |--- ui/aura/screen_ozone.cc.orig |+++ ui/aura/screen_ozone.cc -------------------------- Patching file ui/aura/screen_ozone.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 107. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_aura_screen_ozone_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/aura/screen_ozone.h |--- ui/aura/screen_ozone.h.orig |+++ ui/aura/screen_ozone.h -------------------------- Patching file ui/aura/screen_ozone.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 45. Hunk #2 succeeded at 74. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_base_clipboard_clipboard_constants_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/base/clipboard/clipboard_constants.cc |--- ui/base/clipboard/clipboard_constants.cc.orig |+++ ui/base/clipboard/clipboard_constants.cc -------------------------- Patching file ui/base/clipboard/clipboard_constants.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 25. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_base_clipboard_clipboard_constants_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/base/clipboard/clipboard_constants.h |--- ui/base/clipboard/clipboard_constants.h.orig |+++ ui/base/clipboard/clipboard_constants.h -------------------------- Patching file ui/base/clipboard/clipboard_constants.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 48. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_base_clipboard_clipboard_non_backed_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/base/clipboard/clipboard_non_backed.cc |--- ui/base/clipboard/clipboard_non_backed.cc.orig |+++ ui/base/clipboard/clipboard_non_backed.cc -------------------------- Patching file ui/base/clipboard/clipboard_non_backed.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 461. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_base_cursor_cursor_factory_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/base/cursor/cursor_factory.cc |--- ui/base/cursor/cursor_factory.cc.orig |+++ ui/base/cursor/cursor_factory.cc -------------------------- Patching file ui/base/cursor/cursor_factory.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 97. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_base_cursor_cursor_factory_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/base/cursor/cursor_factory.h |--- ui/base/cursor/cursor_factory.h.orig |+++ ui/base/cursor/cursor_factory.h -------------------------- Patching file ui/base/cursor/cursor_factory.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 93. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_base_dragdrop_os_exchange_data_provider_factory_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/base/dragdrop/os_exchange_data_provider_factory.cc |--- ui/base/dragdrop/os_exchange_data_provider_factory.cc.orig |+++ ui/base/dragdrop/os_exchange_data_provider_factory.cc -------------------------- Patching file ui/base/dragdrop/os_exchange_data_provider_factory.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 7. Hunk #2 succeeded at 21. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_base_dragdrop_os_exchange_data_provider_non_backed_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/base/dragdrop/os_exchange_data_provider_non_backed.cc |--- ui/base/dragdrop/os_exchange_data_provider_non_backed.cc.orig |+++ ui/base/dragdrop/os_exchange_data_provider_non_backed.cc -------------------------- Patching file ui/base/dragdrop/os_exchange_data_provider_non_backed.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 99. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_base_ime_dummy_text_input_client_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/base/ime/dummy_text_input_client.cc |--- ui/base/ime/dummy_text_input_client.cc.orig |+++ ui/base/ime/dummy_text_input_client.cc -------------------------- Patching file ui/base/ime/dummy_text_input_client.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 159. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_base_ime_dummy_text_input_client_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/base/ime/dummy_text_input_client.h |--- ui/base/ime/dummy_text_input_client.h.orig |+++ ui/base/ime/dummy_text_input_client.h -------------------------- Patching file ui/base/ime/dummy_text_input_client.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 65. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_base_ime_fake_text_input_client_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/base/ime/fake_text_input_client.cc |--- ui/base/ime/fake_text_input_client.cc.orig |+++ ui/base/ime/fake_text_input_client.cc -------------------------- Patching file ui/base/ime/fake_text_input_client.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 210. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_base_ime_fake_text_input_client_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/base/ime/fake_text_input_client.h |--- ui/base/ime/fake_text_input_client.h.orig |+++ ui/base/ime/fake_text_input_client.h -------------------------- Patching file ui/base/ime/fake_text_input_client.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 98. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_base_ime_init_input_method_initializer_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/base/ime/init/input_method_initializer.cc |--- ui/base/ime/init/input_method_initializer.cc.orig |+++ ui/base/ime/init/input_method_initializer.cc -------------------------- Patching file ui/base/ime/init/input_method_initializer.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 10. Hunk #2 succeeded at 33. Hunk #3 succeeded at 46. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_base_ime_linux_linux_input_method_context_factory_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/base/ime/linux/linux_input_method_context_factory.cc |--- ui/base/ime/linux/linux_input_method_context_factory.cc.orig |+++ ui/base/ime/linux/linux_input_method_context_factory.cc -------------------------- Patching file ui/base/ime/linux/linux_input_method_context_factory.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 9. Hunk #2 succeeded at 32. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_base_ime_text_input_client_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/base/ime/text_input_client.h |--- ui/base/ime/text_input_client.h.orig |+++ ui/base/ime/text_input_client.h -------------------------- Patching file ui/base/ime/text_input_client.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 266. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_base_resource_resource_bundle_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/base/resource/resource_bundle.cc |--- ui/base/resource/resource_bundle.cc.orig |+++ ui/base/resource/resource_bundle.cc -------------------------- Patching file ui/base/resource/resource_bundle.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 926. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_base_test_skia_gold_pixel_diff_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/base/test/skia_gold_pixel_diff.cc |--- ui/base/test/skia_gold_pixel_diff.cc.orig |+++ ui/base/test/skia_gold_pixel_diff.cc -------------------------- Patching file ui/base/test/skia_gold_pixel_diff.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 115. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_base_test_ui_controls_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/base/test/ui_controls.h |--- ui/base/test/ui_controls.h.orig |+++ ui/base/test/ui_controls.h -------------------------- Patching file ui/base/test/ui_controls.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 186. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_base_ui_base_features_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/base/ui_base_features.cc |--- ui/base/ui_base_features.cc.orig |+++ ui/base/ui_base_features.cc -------------------------- Patching file ui/base/ui_base_features.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 157. Hunk #2 succeeded at 259. Hunk #3 succeeded at 363. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_base_ui_base_features_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/base/ui_base_features.h |--- ui/base/ui_base_features.h.orig |+++ ui/base/ui_base_features.h -------------------------- Patching file ui/base/ui_base_features.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 138. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_base_ui_base_switches_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/base/ui_base_switches.cc |--- ui/base/ui_base_switches.cc.orig |+++ ui/base/ui_base_switches.cc -------------------------- Patching file ui/base/ui_base_switches.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 31. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_base_ui_base_switches_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/base/ui_base_switches.h |--- ui/base/ui_base_switches.h.orig |+++ ui/base/ui_base_switches.h -------------------------- Patching file ui/base/ui_base_switches.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 27. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_base_webui_web_ui_util_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/base/webui/web_ui_util.cc |--- ui/base/webui/web_ui_util.cc.orig |+++ ui/base/webui/web_ui_util.cc -------------------------- Patching file ui/base/webui/web_ui_util.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 39. Hunk #2 succeeded at 216. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_base_x_x11_cursor_factory_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/base/x/x11_cursor_factory.cc |--- ui/base/x/x11_cursor_factory.cc.orig |+++ ui/base/x/x11_cursor_factory.cc -------------------------- Patching file ui/base/x/x11_cursor_factory.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 13. Hunk #2 succeeded at 70. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_base_x_x11_cursor_factory_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/base/x/x11_cursor_factory.h |--- ui/base/x/x11_cursor_factory.h.orig |+++ ui/base/x/x11_cursor_factory.h -------------------------- Patching file ui/base/x/x11_cursor_factory.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 20. Hunk #2 succeeded at 62. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_base_x_x11_cursor_loader_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/base/x/x11_cursor_loader.cc |--- ui/base/x/x11_cursor_loader.cc.orig |+++ ui/base/x/x11_cursor_loader.cc -------------------------- Patching file ui/base/x/x11_cursor_loader.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 34. Hunk #2 succeeded at 59. Hunk #3 succeeded at 174. Hunk #4 succeeded at 363. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_base_x_x11_display_manager_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/base/x/x11_display_manager.cc |--- ui/base/x/x11_display_manager.cc.orig |+++ ui/base/x/x11_display_manager.cc -------------------------- Patching file ui/base/x/x11_display_manager.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 16. Hunk #2 succeeded at 92. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_base_x_x11_shm_image_pool_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/base/x/x11_shm_image_pool.cc |--- ui/base/x/x11_shm_image_pool.cc.orig |+++ ui/base/x/x11_shm_image_pool.cc -------------------------- Patching file ui/base/x/x11_shm_image_pool.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 16. Hunk #2 succeeded at 46. Hunk #3 succeeded at 62. Hunk #4 succeeded at 103. Hunk #5 succeeded at 194. Hunk #6 succeeded at 213. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_color_color_id_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/color/color_id.h |--- ui/color/color_id.h.orig |+++ ui/color/color_id.h -------------------------- Patching file ui/color/color_id.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 621. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_color_color_provider_utils_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/color/color_provider_utils.cc |--- ui/color/color_provider_utils.cc.orig |+++ ui/color/color_provider_utils.cc -------------------------- Patching file ui/color/color_provider_utils.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 187. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_color_system_theme_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/color/system_theme.h |--- ui/color/system_theme.h.orig |+++ ui/color/system_theme.h -------------------------- Patching file ui/color/system_theme.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 15. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_compositor_compositor_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/compositor/compositor.cc |--- ui/compositor/compositor.cc.orig |+++ ui/compositor/compositor.cc -------------------------- Patching file ui/compositor/compositor.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 923. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_compositor_compositor_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/compositor/compositor.h |--- ui/compositor/compositor.h.orig |+++ ui/compositor/compositor.h -------------------------- Patching file ui/compositor/compositor.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 456. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_compositor_compositor_observer_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/compositor/compositor_observer.h |--- ui/compositor/compositor_observer.h.orig |+++ ui/compositor/compositor_observer.h -------------------------- Patching file ui/compositor/compositor_observer.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 52. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_display_screen_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/display/screen.cc |--- ui/display/screen.cc.orig |+++ ui/display/screen.cc -------------------------- Patching file ui/display/screen.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 86. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_display_screen_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/display/screen.h |--- ui/display/screen.h.orig |+++ ui/display/screen.h -------------------------- Patching file ui/display/screen.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 140. Hunk #2 succeeded at 248. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_events_devices_x11_device_data_manager_x11_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/events/devices/x11/device_data_manager_x11.cc |--- ui/events/devices/x11/device_data_manager_x11.cc.orig |+++ ui/events/devices/x11/device_data_manager_x11.cc -------------------------- Patching file ui/events/devices/x11/device_data_manager_x11.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 844. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_events_event_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/events/event.cc |--- ui/events/event.cc.orig |+++ ui/events/event.cc -------------------------- Patching file ui/events/event.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 365. Hunk #2 succeeded at 621. Hunk #3 succeeded at 881. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_events_event_switches_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/events/event_switches.cc |--- ui/events/event_switches.cc.orig |+++ ui/events/event_switches.cc -------------------------- Patching file ui/events/event_switches.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 21. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_events_event_switches_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/events/event_switches.h |--- ui/events/event_switches.h.orig |+++ ui/events/event_switches.h -------------------------- Patching file ui/events/event_switches.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 13. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_events_keycodes_dom_keycode_converter_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/events/keycodes/dom/keycode_converter.cc |--- ui/events/keycodes/dom/keycode_converter.cc.orig |+++ ui/events/keycodes/dom/keycode_converter.cc -------------------------- Patching file ui/events/keycodes/dom/keycode_converter.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 13. Hunk #2 succeeded at 26. Hunk #3 succeeded at 65. Hunk #4 succeeded at 186. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_events_keycodes_dom_keycode_converter_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/events/keycodes/dom/keycode_converter.h |--- ui/events/keycodes/dom/keycode_converter.h.orig |+++ ui/events/keycodes/dom/keycode_converter.h -------------------------- Patching file ui/events/keycodes/dom/keycode_converter.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 64. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_gfx_BUILD_gn Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/gfx/BUILD.gn |--- ui/gfx/BUILD.gn.orig |+++ ui/gfx/BUILD.gn -------------------------- Patching file ui/gfx/BUILD.gn using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 664. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_gfx_canvas_skia_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/gfx/canvas_skia.cc |--- ui/gfx/canvas_skia.cc.orig |+++ ui/gfx/canvas_skia.cc -------------------------- Patching file ui/gfx/canvas_skia.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 213. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_gfx_font_fallback_linux_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/gfx/font_fallback_linux.cc |--- ui/gfx/font_fallback_linux.cc.orig |+++ ui/gfx/font_fallback_linux.cc -------------------------- Patching file ui/gfx/font_fallback_linux.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 27. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_gfx_font_render_params_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/gfx/font_render_params.h |--- ui/gfx/font_render_params.h.orig |+++ ui/gfx/font_render_params.h -------------------------- Patching file ui/gfx/font_render_params.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 115. Hunk #2 succeeded at 125. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_gfx_font_render_params_linux_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/gfx/font_render_params_linux.cc |--- ui/gfx/font_render_params_linux.cc.orig |+++ ui/gfx/font_render_params_linux.cc -------------------------- Patching file ui/gfx/font_render_params_linux.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 25. Hunk #2 succeeded at 212. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_gfx_font_util_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/gfx/font_util.cc |--- ui/gfx/font_util.cc.orig |+++ ui/gfx/font_util.cc -------------------------- Patching file ui/gfx/font_util.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 6. Hunk #2 succeeded at 24. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_gfx_gpu_memory_buffer_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/gfx/gpu_memory_buffer.cc |--- ui/gfx/gpu_memory_buffer.cc.orig |+++ ui/gfx/gpu_memory_buffer.cc -------------------------- Patching file ui/gfx/gpu_memory_buffer.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 55. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_gfx_gpu_memory_buffer_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/gfx/gpu_memory_buffer.h |--- ui/gfx/gpu_memory_buffer.h.orig |+++ ui/gfx/gpu_memory_buffer.h -------------------------- Patching file ui/gfx/gpu_memory_buffer.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 15. Hunk #2 succeeded at 76. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_gfx_linux_dmabuf_uapi_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/gfx/linux/dmabuf_uapi.h |--- ui/gfx/linux/dmabuf_uapi.h.orig |+++ ui/gfx/linux/dmabuf_uapi.h -------------------------- Patching file ui/gfx/linux/dmabuf_uapi.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 5. Hunk #2 succeeded at 25. Hunk #3 succeeded at 40. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_gfx_linux_gbm_wrapper_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/gfx/linux/gbm_wrapper.cc |--- ui/gfx/linux/gbm_wrapper.cc.orig |+++ ui/gfx/linux/gbm_wrapper.cc -------------------------- Patching file ui/gfx/linux/gbm_wrapper.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 314. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_gfx_mojom_buffer_types_mojom_traits_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/gfx/mojom/buffer_types_mojom_traits.cc |--- ui/gfx/mojom/buffer_types_mojom_traits.cc.orig |+++ ui/gfx/mojom/buffer_types_mojom_traits.cc -------------------------- Patching file ui/gfx/mojom/buffer_types_mojom_traits.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 33. Hunk #2 succeeded at 115. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_gfx_mojom_native_handle_types_mojom_traits_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/gfx/mojom/native_handle_types_mojom_traits.cc |--- ui/gfx/mojom/native_handle_types_mojom_traits.cc.orig |+++ ui/gfx/mojom/native_handle_types_mojom_traits.cc -------------------------- Patching file ui/gfx/mojom/native_handle_types_mojom_traits.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 8. Hunk #2 succeeded at 28. Hunk #3 succeeded at 54. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_gfx_mojom_native_handle_types_mojom_traits_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/gfx/mojom/native_handle_types_mojom_traits.h |--- ui/gfx/mojom/native_handle_types_mojom_traits.h.orig |+++ ui/gfx/mojom/native_handle_types_mojom_traits.h -------------------------- Patching file ui/gfx/mojom/native_handle_types_mojom_traits.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 16. Hunk #2 succeeded at 26. Hunk #3 succeeded at 54. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_gfx_native_pixmap_handle_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/gfx/native_pixmap_handle.cc |--- ui/gfx/native_pixmap_handle.cc.orig |+++ ui/gfx/native_pixmap_handle.cc -------------------------- Patching file ui/gfx/native_pixmap_handle.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 11. Hunk #2 succeeded at 23. Hunk #3 succeeded at 40. Hunk #4 succeeded at 51. Hunk #5 succeeded at 79. Hunk #6 succeeded at 117. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_gfx_native_pixmap_handle_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/gfx/native_pixmap_handle.h |--- ui/gfx/native_pixmap_handle.h.orig |+++ ui/gfx/native_pixmap_handle.h -------------------------- Patching file ui/gfx/native_pixmap_handle.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 14. Hunk #2 succeeded at 34. Hunk #3 succeeded at 55. Hunk #4 succeeded at 78. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_gfx_native_widget_types_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/gfx/native_widget_types.h |--- ui/gfx/native_widget_types.h.orig |+++ ui/gfx/native_widget_types.h -------------------------- Patching file ui/gfx/native_widget_types.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 104. Hunk #2 succeeded at 219. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_gfx_platform_font_skia_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/gfx/platform_font_skia.cc |--- ui/gfx/platform_font_skia.cc.orig |+++ ui/gfx/platform_font_skia.cc -------------------------- Patching file ui/gfx/platform_font_skia.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 29. Hunk #2 succeeded at 167. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_gfx_render_text_api_fuzzer_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/gfx/render_text_api_fuzzer.cc |--- ui/gfx/render_text_api_fuzzer.cc.orig |+++ ui/gfx/render_text_api_fuzzer.cc -------------------------- Patching file ui/gfx/render_text_api_fuzzer.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 20. Hunk #2 succeeded at 47. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_gfx_render_text_fuzzer_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/gfx/render_text_fuzzer.cc |--- ui/gfx/render_text_fuzzer.cc.orig |+++ ui/gfx/render_text_fuzzer.cc -------------------------- Patching file ui/gfx/render_text_fuzzer.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 17. Hunk #2 succeeded at 40. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_gfx_switches_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/gfx/switches.cc |--- ui/gfx/switches.cc.orig |+++ ui/gfx/switches.cc -------------------------- Patching file ui/gfx/switches.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 32. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_gfx_switches_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/gfx/switches.h |--- ui/gfx/switches.h.orig |+++ ui/gfx/switches.h -------------------------- Patching file ui/gfx/switches.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 19. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_gfx_x_generated_protos_dri3_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/gfx/x/generated_protos/dri3.cc |--- ui/gfx/x/generated_protos/dri3.cc.orig |+++ ui/gfx/x/generated_protos/dri3.cc -------------------------- Patching file ui/gfx/x/generated_protos/dri3.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 27. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_gfx_x_generated_protos_shm_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/gfx/x/generated_protos/shm.cc |--- ui/gfx/x/generated_protos/shm.cc.orig |+++ ui/gfx/x/generated_protos/shm.cc -------------------------- Patching file ui/gfx/x/generated_protos/shm.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 27. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_gfx_x_xlib_support_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/gfx/x/xlib_support.cc |--- ui/gfx/x/xlib_support.cc.orig |+++ ui/gfx/x/xlib_support.cc -------------------------- Patching file ui/gfx/x/xlib_support.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 39. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_gl_BUILD_gn Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/gl/BUILD.gn |--- ui/gl/BUILD.gn.orig |+++ ui/gl/BUILD.gn -------------------------- Patching file ui/gl/BUILD.gn using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 149. Hunk #2 succeeded at 163. Hunk #3 succeeded at 310. Hunk #4 succeeded at 534. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_gl_gl_context_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/gl/gl_context.cc |--- ui/gl/gl_context.cc.orig |+++ ui/gl/gl_context.cc -------------------------- Patching file ui/gl/gl_context.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 509. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_gl_gl_fence_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/gl/gl_fence.cc |--- ui/gl/gl_fence.cc.orig |+++ ui/gl/gl_fence.cc -------------------------- Patching file ui/gl/gl_fence.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 17. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_gl_gl_implementation_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/gl/gl_implementation.cc |--- ui/gl/gl_implementation.cc.orig |+++ ui/gl/gl_implementation.cc -------------------------- Patching file ui/gl/gl_implementation.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 254. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_gl_gl_switches_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/gl/gl_switches.cc |--- ui/gl/gl_switches.cc.orig |+++ ui/gl/gl_switches.cc -------------------------- Patching file ui/gl/gl_switches.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 11. Hunk #2 succeeded at 299. Hunk #3 succeeded at 311. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_gl_sync_control_vsync_provider_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/gl/sync_control_vsync_provider.cc |--- ui/gl/sync_control_vsync_provider.cc.orig |+++ ui/gl/sync_control_vsync_provider.cc -------------------------- Patching file ui/gl/sync_control_vsync_provider.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 11. Hunk #2 succeeded at 26. Hunk #3 succeeded at 48. Hunk #4 succeeded at 160. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_gl_sync_control_vsync_provider_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/gl/sync_control_vsync_provider.h |--- ui/gl/sync_control_vsync_provider.h.orig |+++ ui/gl/sync_control_vsync_provider.h -------------------------- Patching file ui/gl/sync_control_vsync_provider.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 31. Hunk #2 succeeded at 46. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_gtk_gtk_compat_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/gtk/gtk_compat.cc |--- ui/gtk/gtk_compat.cc.orig |+++ ui/gtk/gtk_compat.cc -------------------------- Patching file ui/gtk/gtk_compat.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 62. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_gtk_printing_print_dialog_gtk_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/gtk/printing/print_dialog_gtk.cc |--- ui/gtk/printing/print_dialog_gtk.cc.orig |+++ ui/gtk/printing/print_dialog_gtk.cc -------------------------- Patching file ui/gtk/printing/print_dialog_gtk.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 434. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_message_center_views_message_popup_view_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/message_center/views/message_popup_view.cc |--- ui/message_center/views/message_popup_view.cc.orig |+++ ui/message_center/views/message_popup_view.cc -------------------------- Patching file ui/message_center/views/message_popup_view.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 137. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_native_theme_native_theme_base_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/native_theme/native_theme_base.cc |--- ui/native_theme/native_theme_base.cc.orig |+++ ui/native_theme/native_theme_base.cc -------------------------- Patching file ui/native_theme/native_theme_base.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 236. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_native_theme_native_theme_features_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/native_theme/native_theme_features.cc |--- ui/native_theme/native_theme_features.cc.orig |+++ ui/native_theme/native_theme_features.cc -------------------------- Patching file ui/native_theme/native_theme_features.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 54. Hunk #2 succeeded at 63. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_native_theme_native_theme_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/native_theme/native_theme.h |--- ui/native_theme/native_theme.h.orig |+++ ui/native_theme/native_theme.h -------------------------- Patching file ui/native_theme/native_theme.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 63. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_ozone_common_egl_util_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/ozone/common/egl_util.cc |--- ui/ozone/common/egl_util.cc.orig |+++ ui/ozone/common/egl_util.cc -------------------------- Patching file ui/ozone/common/egl_util.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 26. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_ozone_common_features_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/ozone/common/features.cc |--- ui/ozone/common/features.cc.orig |+++ ui/ozone/common/features.cc -------------------------- Patching file ui/ozone/common/features.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 30. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_ozone_platform_headless_headless_surface_factory_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/ozone/platform/headless/headless_surface_factory.cc |--- ui/ozone/platform/headless/headless_surface_factory.cc.orig |+++ ui/ozone/platform/headless/headless_surface_factory.cc -------------------------- Patching file ui/ozone/platform/headless/headless_surface_factory.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 34. Hunk #2 succeeded at 280. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_ozone_platform_headless_ozone_platform_headless_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/ozone/platform/headless/ozone_platform_headless.cc |--- ui/ozone/platform/headless/ozone_platform_headless.cc.orig |+++ ui/ozone/platform/headless/ozone_platform_headless.cc -------------------------- Patching file ui/ozone/platform/headless/ozone_platform_headless.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 103. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_ozone_platform_headless_vulkan_implementation_headless_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/ozone/platform/headless/vulkan_implementation_headless.cc |--- ui/ozone/platform/headless/vulkan_implementation_headless.cc.orig |+++ ui/ozone/platform/headless/vulkan_implementation_headless.cc -------------------------- Patching file ui/ozone/platform/headless/vulkan_implementation_headless.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 118. Hunk #2 succeeded at 128. Hunk #3 succeeded at 151. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_ozone_platform_wayland_common_wayland_util_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/ozone/platform/wayland/common/wayland_util.cc |--- ui/ozone/platform/wayland/common/wayland_util.cc.orig |+++ ui/ozone/platform/wayland/common/wayland_util.cc -------------------------- Patching file ui/ozone/platform/wayland/common/wayland_util.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 336. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_ozone_platform_wayland_emulate_wayland_input_emulate_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/ozone/platform/wayland/emulate/wayland_input_emulate.cc |--- ui/ozone/platform/wayland/emulate/wayland_input_emulate.cc.orig |+++ ui/ozone/platform/wayland/emulate/wayland_input_emulate.cc -------------------------- Patching file ui/ozone/platform/wayland/emulate/wayland_input_emulate.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 284. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_ozone_platform_wayland_emulate_wayland_input_emulate_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/ozone/platform/wayland/emulate/wayland_input_emulate.h |--- ui/ozone/platform/wayland/emulate/wayland_input_emulate.h.orig |+++ ui/ozone/platform/wayland/emulate/wayland_input_emulate.h -------------------------- Patching file ui/ozone/platform/wayland/emulate/wayland_input_emulate.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 68. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_ozone_platform_wayland_gpu_vulkan_implementation_wayland_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/ozone/platform/wayland/gpu/vulkan_implementation_wayland.cc |--- ui/ozone/platform/wayland/gpu/vulkan_implementation_wayland.cc.orig |+++ ui/ozone/platform/wayland/gpu/vulkan_implementation_wayland.cc -------------------------- Patching file ui/ozone/platform/wayland/gpu/vulkan_implementation_wayland.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 38. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_ozone_platform_wayland_host_wayland_connection_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/ozone/platform/wayland/host/wayland_connection.cc |--- ui/ozone/platform/wayland/host/wayland_connection.cc.orig |+++ ui/ozone/platform/wayland/host/wayland_connection.cc -------------------------- Patching file ui/ozone/platform/wayland/host/wayland_connection.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 532. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_ozone_platform_wayland_host_wayland_input_method_context_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/ozone/platform/wayland/host/wayland_input_method_context.cc |--- ui/ozone/platform/wayland/host/wayland_input_method_context.cc.orig |+++ ui/ozone/platform/wayland/host/wayland_input_method_context.cc -------------------------- Patching file ui/ozone/platform/wayland/host/wayland_input_method_context.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 55. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_ozone_platform_wayland_host_wayland_popup_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/ozone/platform/wayland/host/wayland_popup.cc |--- ui/ozone/platform/wayland/host/wayland_popup.cc.orig |+++ ui/ozone/platform/wayland/host/wayland_popup.cc -------------------------- Patching file ui/ozone/platform/wayland/host/wayland_popup.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 34. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_ozone_platform_wayland_host_wayland_toplevel_window_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/ozone/platform/wayland/host/wayland_toplevel_window.cc |--- ui/ozone/platform/wayland/host/wayland_toplevel_window.cc.orig |+++ ui/ozone/platform/wayland/host/wayland_toplevel_window.cc -------------------------- Patching file ui/ozone/platform/wayland/host/wayland_toplevel_window.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 620. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_ozone_platform_wayland_host_wayland_toplevel_window_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/ozone/platform/wayland/host/wayland_toplevel_window.h |--- ui/ozone/platform/wayland/host/wayland_toplevel_window.h.orig |+++ ui/ozone/platform/wayland/host/wayland_toplevel_window.h -------------------------- Patching file ui/ozone/platform/wayland/host/wayland_toplevel_window.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 259. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_ozone_platform_wayland_host_wayland_window_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/ozone/platform/wayland/host/wayland_window.cc |--- ui/ozone/platform/wayland/host/wayland_window.cc.orig |+++ ui/ozone/platform/wayland/host/wayland_window.cc -------------------------- Patching file ui/ozone/platform/wayland/host/wayland_window.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 317. Hunk #2 succeeded at 575. Hunk #3 succeeded at 786. Hunk #4 succeeded at 1274. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_ozone_platform_wayland_host_wayland_window_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/ozone/platform/wayland/host/wayland_window.h |--- ui/ozone/platform/wayland/host/wayland_window.h.orig |+++ ui/ozone/platform/wayland/host/wayland_window.h -------------------------- Patching file ui/ozone/platform/wayland/host/wayland_window.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 41. Hunk #2 succeeded at 283. Hunk #3 succeeded at 561. Hunk #4 succeeded at 630. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_ozone_platform_wayland_host_xdg_toplevel_wrapper_impl_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/ozone/platform/wayland/host/xdg_toplevel_wrapper_impl.cc |--- ui/ozone/platform/wayland/host/xdg_toplevel_wrapper_impl.cc.orig |+++ ui/ozone/platform/wayland/host/xdg_toplevel_wrapper_impl.cc -------------------------- Patching file ui/ozone/platform/wayland/host/xdg_toplevel_wrapper_impl.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 316. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_ozone_platform_wayland_host_zwp_text_input_wrapper_v1_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/ozone/platform/wayland/host/zwp_text_input_wrapper_v1.cc |--- ui/ozone/platform/wayland/host/zwp_text_input_wrapper_v1.cc.orig |+++ ui/ozone/platform/wayland/host/zwp_text_input_wrapper_v1.cc -------------------------- Patching file ui/ozone/platform/wayland/host/zwp_text_input_wrapper_v1.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 256. Hunk #2 succeeded at 272. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_ozone_platform_wayland_ozone_platform_wayland_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/ozone/platform/wayland/ozone_platform_wayland.cc |--- ui/ozone/platform/wayland/ozone_platform_wayland.cc.orig |+++ ui/ozone/platform/wayland/ozone_platform_wayland.cc -------------------------- Patching file ui/ozone/platform/wayland/ozone_platform_wayland.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 66. Hunk #2 succeeded at 267. Hunk #3 succeeded at 277. Hunk #4 succeeded at 343. Hunk #5 succeeded at 538. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_ozone_platform_x11_vulkan_implementation_x11_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/ozone/platform/x11/vulkan_implementation_x11.cc |--- ui/ozone/platform/x11/vulkan_implementation_x11.cc.orig |+++ ui/ozone/platform/x11/vulkan_implementation_x11.cc -------------------------- Patching file ui/ozone/platform/x11/vulkan_implementation_x11.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 59. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_ozone_platform_x11_x11_screen_ozone_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/ozone/platform/x11/x11_screen_ozone.cc |--- ui/ozone/platform/x11/x11_screen_ozone.cc.orig |+++ ui/ozone/platform/x11/x11_screen_ozone.cc -------------------------- Patching file ui/ozone/platform/x11/x11_screen_ozone.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 22. Hunk #2 succeeded at 97. Hunk #3 succeeded at 260. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_ozone_platform_x11_x11_screen_ozone_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/ozone/platform/x11/x11_screen_ozone.h |--- ui/ozone/platform/x11/x11_screen_ozone.h.orig |+++ ui/ozone/platform/x11/x11_screen_ozone.h -------------------------- Patching file ui/ozone/platform/x11/x11_screen_ozone.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 16. Hunk #2 succeeded at 29. Hunk #3 succeeded at 97. Hunk #4 succeeded at 109. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_ozone_platform_x11_x11_window_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/ozone/platform/x11/x11_window.cc |--- ui/ozone/platform/x11/x11_window.cc.orig |+++ ui/ozone/platform/x11/x11_window.cc -------------------------- Patching file ui/ozone/platform/x11/x11_window.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 1499. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_ozone_test_mock_platform_window_delegate_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/ozone/test/mock_platform_window_delegate.h |--- ui/ozone/test/mock_platform_window_delegate.h.orig |+++ ui/ozone/test/mock_platform_window_delegate.h -------------------------- Patching file ui/ozone/test/mock_platform_window_delegate.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 35. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_platform_window_platform_window_delegate_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/platform_window/platform_window_delegate.cc |--- ui/platform_window/platform_window_delegate.cc.orig |+++ ui/platform_window/platform_window_delegate.cc -------------------------- Patching file ui/platform_window/platform_window_delegate.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 61. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_platform_window_platform_window_delegate_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/platform_window/platform_window_delegate.h |--- ui/platform_window/platform_window_delegate.h.orig |+++ ui/platform_window/platform_window_delegate.h -------------------------- Patching file ui/platform_window/platform_window_delegate.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 181. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_platform_window_platform_window_init_properties_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/platform_window/platform_window_init_properties.h |--- ui/platform_window/platform_window_init_properties.h.orig |+++ ui/platform_window/platform_window_init_properties.h -------------------------- Patching file ui/platform_window/platform_window_init_properties.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 56. Hunk #2 succeeded at 121. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_qt_BUILD_gn Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/qt/BUILD.gn |--- ui/qt/BUILD.gn.orig |+++ ui/qt/BUILD.gn -------------------------- Patching file ui/qt/BUILD.gn using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 20. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_strings_translations_app_locale_settings_bn_xtb Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/strings/translations/app_locale_settings_bn.xtb |--- ui/strings/translations/app_locale_settings_bn.xtb.orig |+++ ui/strings/translations/app_locale_settings_bn.xtb -------------------------- Patching file ui/strings/translations/app_locale_settings_bn.xtb using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 10. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_strings_translations_app_locale_settings_ja_xtb Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/strings/translations/app_locale_settings_ja.xtb |--- ui/strings/translations/app_locale_settings_ja.xtb.orig |+++ ui/strings/translations/app_locale_settings_ja.xtb -------------------------- Patching file ui/strings/translations/app_locale_settings_ja.xtb using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 12. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_strings_translations_app_locale_settings_ko_xtb Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/strings/translations/app_locale_settings_ko.xtb |--- ui/strings/translations/app_locale_settings_ko.xtb.orig |+++ ui/strings/translations/app_locale_settings_ko.xtb -------------------------- Patching file ui/strings/translations/app_locale_settings_ko.xtb using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 12. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_strings_translations_app_locale_settings_ml_xtb Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/strings/translations/app_locale_settings_ml.xtb |--- ui/strings/translations/app_locale_settings_ml.xtb.orig |+++ ui/strings/translations/app_locale_settings_ml.xtb -------------------------- Patching file ui/strings/translations/app_locale_settings_ml.xtb using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 9. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_strings_translations_app_locale_settings_th_xtb Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/strings/translations/app_locale_settings_th.xtb |--- ui/strings/translations/app_locale_settings_th.xtb.orig |+++ ui/strings/translations/app_locale_settings_th.xtb -------------------------- Patching file ui/strings/translations/app_locale_settings_th.xtb using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 6. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_strings_translations_app_locale_settings_zh-CN_xtb Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/strings/translations/app_locale_settings_zh-CN.xtb |--- ui/strings/translations/app_locale_settings_zh-CN.xtb.orig |+++ ui/strings/translations/app_locale_settings_zh-CN.xtb -------------------------- Patching file ui/strings/translations/app_locale_settings_zh-CN.xtb using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 12. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_strings_translations_app_locale_settings_zh-TW_xtb Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/strings/translations/app_locale_settings_zh-TW.xtb |--- ui/strings/translations/app_locale_settings_zh-TW.xtb.orig |+++ ui/strings/translations/app_locale_settings_zh-TW.xtb -------------------------- Patching file ui/strings/translations/app_locale_settings_zh-TW.xtb using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 12. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_views_controls_prefix_selector_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/views/controls/prefix_selector.cc |--- ui/views/controls/prefix_selector.cc.orig |+++ ui/views/controls/prefix_selector.cc -------------------------- Patching file ui/views/controls/prefix_selector.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 174. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_views_controls_prefix_selector_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/views/controls/prefix_selector.h |--- ui/views/controls/prefix_selector.h.orig |+++ ui/views/controls/prefix_selector.h -------------------------- Patching file ui/views/controls/prefix_selector.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 83. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_views_controls_textfield_textfield_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/views/controls/textfield/textfield.cc |--- ui/views/controls/textfield/textfield.cc.orig |+++ ui/views/controls/textfield/textfield.cc -------------------------- Patching file ui/views/controls/textfield/textfield.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 85. Hunk #2 succeeded at 183. Hunk #3 succeeded at 756. Hunk #4 succeeded at 939. Hunk #5 succeeded at 1999. Hunk #6 succeeded at 2505. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_views_controls_textfield_textfield_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/views/controls/textfield/textfield.h |--- ui/views/controls/textfield/textfield.h.orig |+++ ui/views/controls/textfield/textfield.h -------------------------- Patching file ui/views/controls/textfield/textfield.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 47. Hunk #2 succeeded at 462. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_views_corewm_tooltip_aura_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/views/corewm/tooltip_aura.cc |--- ui/views/corewm/tooltip_aura.cc.orig |+++ ui/views/corewm/tooltip_aura.cc -------------------------- Patching file ui/views/corewm/tooltip_aura.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 36. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_views_examples_widget_example_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/views/examples/widget_example.cc |--- ui/views/examples/widget_example.cc.orig |+++ ui/views/examples/widget_example.cc -------------------------- Patching file ui/views/examples/widget_example.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 49. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_views_focus_focus_manager_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/views/focus/focus_manager.cc |--- ui/views/focus/focus_manager.cc.orig |+++ ui/views/focus/focus_manager.cc -------------------------- Patching file ui/views/focus/focus_manager.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 585. Hunk #2 succeeded at 602. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_views_style_platform_style_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/views/style/platform_style.cc |--- ui/views/style/platform_style.cc.orig |+++ ui/views/style/platform_style.cc -------------------------- Patching file ui/views/style/platform_style.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 17. Hunk #2 succeeded at 50. Hunk #3 succeeded at 59. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_views_test_ui_controls_factory_desktop_aura_ozone_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/views/test/ui_controls_factory_desktop_aura_ozone.cc |--- ui/views/test/ui_controls_factory_desktop_aura_ozone.cc.orig |+++ ui/views/test/ui_controls_factory_desktop_aura_ozone.cc -------------------------- Patching file ui/views/test/ui_controls_factory_desktop_aura_ozone.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 296. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_views_views_delegate_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/views/views_delegate.cc |--- ui/views/views_delegate.cc.orig |+++ ui/views/views_delegate.cc -------------------------- Patching file ui/views/views_delegate.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 95. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_views_views_delegate_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/views/views_delegate.h |--- ui/views/views_delegate.h.orig |+++ ui/views/views_delegate.h -------------------------- Patching file ui/views/views_delegate.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 146. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_views_widget_desktop_aura_desktop_drag_drop_client_ozone_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/views/widget/desktop_aura/desktop_drag_drop_client_ozone.cc |--- ui/views/widget/desktop_aura/desktop_drag_drop_client_ozone.cc.orig |+++ ui/views/widget/desktop_aura/desktop_drag_drop_client_ozone.cc -------------------------- Patching file ui/views/widget/desktop_aura/desktop_drag_drop_client_ozone.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 197. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_views_widget_desktop_aura_desktop_drag_drop_client_ozone_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/views/widget/desktop_aura/desktop_drag_drop_client_ozone.h |--- ui/views/widget/desktop_aura/desktop_drag_drop_client_ozone.h.orig |+++ ui/views/widget/desktop_aura/desktop_drag_drop_client_ozone.h -------------------------- Patching file ui/views/widget/desktop_aura/desktop_drag_drop_client_ozone.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 65. Hunk #2 succeeded at 86. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_views_widget_desktop_aura_desktop_window_tree_host_platform_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/views/widget/desktop_aura/desktop_window_tree_host_platform.cc |--- ui/views/widget/desktop_aura/desktop_window_tree_host_platform.cc.orig |+++ ui/views/widget/desktop_aura/desktop_window_tree_host_platform.cc -------------------------- Patching file ui/views/widget/desktop_aura/desktop_window_tree_host_platform.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 48. Hunk #2 succeeded at 358. Hunk #3 succeeded at 1174. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_views_widget_desktop_aura_desktop_window_tree_host_platform_impl_interactive_uitest_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/views/widget/desktop_aura/desktop_window_tree_host_platform_impl_interactive_uitest.cc |--- ui/views/widget/desktop_aura/desktop_window_tree_host_platform_impl_interactive_uitest.cc.orig |+++ ui/views/widget/desktop_aura/desktop_window_tree_host_platform_impl_interactive_uitest.cc -------------------------- Patching file ui/views/widget/desktop_aura/desktop_window_tree_host_platform_impl_interactive_uitest.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 23. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_views_widget_root_view_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/views/widget/root_view.cc |--- ui/views/widget/root_view.cc.orig |+++ ui/views/widget/root_view.cc -------------------------- Patching file ui/views/widget/root_view.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 129. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_views_widget_widget_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/views/widget/widget.cc |--- ui/views/widget/widget.cc.orig |+++ ui/views/widget/widget.cc -------------------------- Patching file ui/views/widget/widget.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 57. Hunk #2 succeeded at 2182. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_views_window_custom_frame_view_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/views/window/custom_frame_view.cc |--- ui/views/window/custom_frame_view.cc.orig |+++ ui/views/window/custom_frame_view.cc -------------------------- Patching file ui/views/window/custom_frame_view.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 268. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_views_window_dialog_delegate_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/views/window/dialog_delegate.cc |--- ui/views/window/dialog_delegate.cc.orig |+++ ui/views/window/dialog_delegate.cc -------------------------- Patching file ui/views/window/dialog_delegate.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 103. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-ui_views_window_frame_background_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: ui/views/window/frame_background.cc |--- ui/views/window/frame_background.cc.orig |+++ ui/views/window/frame_background.cc -------------------------- Patching file ui/views/window/frame_background.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 110. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-v8_BUILD_gn Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: v8/BUILD.gn |--- v8/BUILD.gn.orig |+++ v8/BUILD.gn -------------------------- Patching file v8/BUILD.gn using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 896. Hunk #2 succeeded at 974. Hunk #3 succeeded at 2485. Hunk #4 succeeded at 6573. Hunk #5 succeeded at 6584. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-v8_include_v8-internal_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: v8/include/v8-internal.h |--- v8/include/v8-internal.h.orig |+++ v8/include/v8-internal.h -------------------------- Patching file v8/include/v8-internal.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 213. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-v8_include_v8config_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: v8/include/v8config.h |--- v8/include/v8config.h.orig |+++ v8/include/v8config.h -------------------------- Patching file v8/include/v8config.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 201. Hunk #2 succeeded at 215. Hunk #3 succeeded at 240. Hunk #4 succeeded at 395. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-v8_src_api_api_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: v8/src/api/api.cc |--- v8/src/api/api.cc.orig |+++ v8/src/api/api.cc -------------------------- Patching file v8/src/api/api.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 148. Hunk #2 succeeded at 6511. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-v8_src_base_atomicops_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: v8/src/base/atomicops.h |--- v8/src/base/atomicops.h.orig |+++ v8/src/base/atomicops.h -------------------------- Patching file v8/src/base/atomicops.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 57. Hunk #2 succeeded at 266. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-v8_src_base_platform_memory_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: v8/src/base/platform/memory.h |--- v8/src/base/platform/memory.h.orig |+++ v8/src/base/platform/memory.h -------------------------- Patching file v8/src/base/platform/memory.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 19. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-v8_src_base_platform_platform-freebsd_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: v8/src/base/platform/platform-freebsd.cc |--- v8/src/base/platform/platform-freebsd.cc.orig |+++ v8/src/base/platform/platform-freebsd.cc -------------------------- Patching file v8/src/base/platform/platform-freebsd.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 43. Hunk #2 succeeded at 78. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-v8_src_base_platform_platform-openbsd_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: v8/src/base/platform/platform-openbsd.cc |--- v8/src/base/platform/platform-openbsd.cc.orig |+++ v8/src/base/platform/platform-openbsd.cc -------------------------- Patching file v8/src/base/platform/platform-openbsd.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 6. Hunk #2 succeeded at 122. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-v8_src_base_platform_platform-posix_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: v8/src/base/platform/platform-posix.cc |--- v8/src/base/platform/platform-posix.cc.orig |+++ v8/src/base/platform/platform-posix.cc -------------------------- Patching file v8/src/base/platform/platform-posix.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 54. Hunk #2 succeeded at 72. Hunk #3 succeeded at 311. Hunk #4 succeeded at 414. Hunk #5 succeeded at 689. Hunk #6 succeeded at 1334. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-v8_src_base_small-vector_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: v8/src/base/small-vector.h |--- v8/src/base/small-vector.h.orig |+++ v8/src/base/small-vector.h -------------------------- Patching file v8/src/base/small-vector.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 22. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-v8_src_base_sys-info_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: v8/src/base/sys-info.cc |--- v8/src/base/sys-info.cc.orig |+++ v8/src/base/sys-info.cc -------------------------- Patching file v8/src/base/sys-info.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 38. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-v8_src_diagnostics_perf-jit_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: v8/src/diagnostics/perf-jit.cc |--- v8/src/diagnostics/perf-jit.cc.orig |+++ v8/src/diagnostics/perf-jit.cc -------------------------- Patching file v8/src/diagnostics/perf-jit.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 31. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-v8_src_diagnostics_perf-jit_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: v8/src/diagnostics/perf-jit.h |--- v8/src/diagnostics/perf-jit.h.orig |+++ v8/src/diagnostics/perf-jit.h -------------------------- Patching file v8/src/diagnostics/perf-jit.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 31. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-v8_src_execution_isolate_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: v8/src/execution/isolate.cc |--- v8/src/execution/isolate.cc.orig |+++ v8/src/execution/isolate.cc -------------------------- Patching file v8/src/execution/isolate.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 159. Hunk #2 succeeded at 4789. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-v8_src_flags_flags_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: v8/src/flags/flags.cc |--- v8/src/flags/flags.cc.orig |+++ v8/src/flags/flags.cc -------------------------- Patching file v8/src/flags/flags.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 15. Hunk #2 succeeded at 38. Hunk #3 succeeded at 814. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-v8_src_sandbox_sandbox_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: v8/src/sandbox/sandbox.cc |--- v8/src/sandbox/sandbox.cc.orig |+++ v8/src/sandbox/sandbox.cc -------------------------- Patching file v8/src/sandbox/sandbox.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 48. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-v8_src_snapshot_embedded_platform-embedded-file-writer-base_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: v8/src/snapshot/embedded/platform-embedded-file-writer-base.cc |--- v8/src/snapshot/embedded/platform-embedded-file-writer-base.cc.orig |+++ v8/src/snapshot/embedded/platform-embedded-file-writer-base.cc -------------------------- Patching file v8/src/snapshot/embedded/platform-embedded-file-writer-base.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 148. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-v8_src_snapshot_embedded_platform-embedded-file-writer-base_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: v8/src/snapshot/embedded/platform-embedded-file-writer-base.h |--- v8/src/snapshot/embedded/platform-embedded-file-writer-base.h.orig |+++ v8/src/snapshot/embedded/platform-embedded-file-writer-base.h -------------------------- Patching file v8/src/snapshot/embedded/platform-embedded-file-writer-base.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 32. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-v8_src_snapshot_embedded_platform-embedded-file-writer-generic_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: v8/src/snapshot/embedded/platform-embedded-file-writer-generic.cc |--- v8/src/snapshot/embedded/platform-embedded-file-writer-generic.cc.orig |+++ v8/src/snapshot/embedded/platform-embedded-file-writer-generic.cc -------------------------- Patching file v8/src/snapshot/embedded/platform-embedded-file-writer-generic.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 9. Hunk #2 succeeded at 39. Hunk #3 succeeded at 74. Hunk #4 succeeded at 96. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-v8_src_trap-handler_handler-inside-posix_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: v8/src/trap-handler/handler-inside-posix.cc |--- v8/src/trap-handler/handler-inside-posix.cc.orig |+++ v8/src/trap-handler/handler-inside-posix.cc -------------------------- Patching file v8/src/trap-handler/handler-inside-posix.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 61. Hunk #2 succeeded at 82. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-v8_src_trap-handler_handler-inside-posix_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: v8/src/trap-handler/handler-inside-posix.h |--- v8/src/trap-handler/handler-inside-posix.h.orig |+++ v8/src/trap-handler/handler-inside-posix.h -------------------------- Patching file v8/src/trap-handler/handler-inside-posix.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 13. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-v8_src_trap-handler_trap-handler_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: v8/src/trap-handler/trap-handler.h |--- v8/src/trap-handler/trap-handler.h.orig |+++ v8/src/trap-handler/trap-handler.h -------------------------- Patching file v8/src/trap-handler/trap-handler.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 20. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-v8_src_wasm_baseline_ia32_liftoff-assembler-ia32-inl_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: v8/src/wasm/baseline/ia32/liftoff-assembler-ia32-inl.h |--- v8/src/wasm/baseline/ia32/liftoff-assembler-ia32-inl.h.orig |+++ v8/src/wasm/baseline/ia32/liftoff-assembler-ia32-inl.h -------------------------- Patching file v8/src/wasm/baseline/ia32/liftoff-assembler-ia32-inl.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 503. Hunk #2 succeeded at 583. Hunk #3 succeeded at 662. Hunk #4 succeeded at 680. Hunk #5 succeeded at 750. Hunk #6 succeeded at 818. Hunk #7 succeeded at 933. Hunk #8 succeeded at 1029. Hunk #9 succeeded at 1043. Hunk #10 succeeded at 1056. Hunk #11 succeeded at 1070. Hunk #12 succeeded at 1084. Hunk #13 succeeded at 1098. Hunk #14 succeeded at 1113. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-v8_tools_run_py Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: v8/tools/run.py |--- v8/tools/run.py.orig |+++ v8/tools/run.py -------------------------- Patching file v8/tools/run.py using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 9. done /usr/bin/perl /usr/ports/infrastructure/bin/pkg_subst -DMODPY_PYCACHE=__pycache__/ -DMODPY_COMMENT= -DMODPY_ABI3SO=.abi3 -DMODPY_PYC_MAGIC_TAG=cpython-311. -DMODPY_BIN=/usr/local/bin/python3.11 -DMODPY_EGG_VERSION= -DMODPY_VERSION=3.11 -DMODPY_BIN_SUFFIX= -DMODPY_PY_PREFIX=py3- -DMODPY_PYOEXTENSION=opt-1.pyc -DWRKSRC=/local/pobj/chromium-128.0.6613.113/chromium-128.0.6613.113 -DWRKDIR=/local/pobj/chromium-128.0.6613.113 -DDEBUGFLAG= -DMODCLANG_VERSION=17 -DMODQT5_COMMENT=\"@comment\ \" -DARCH=riscv64 -DBASE_PKGPATH=www/chromium -DFLAVOR_EXT= -DFULLPKGNAME=chromium-128.0.6613.113 -DHOMEPAGE=https://www.chromium.org/Home -DLOCALBASE=/usr/local -DLOCALSTATEDIR=/var -DMACHINE_ARCH=riscv64 -DMAINTAINER=Robert\ Nagy\ \ -DPREFIX=/usr/local -DRCDIR=/etc/rc.d -DSYSCONFDIR=/etc -DTRUEPREFIX=/usr/local -DX11BASE=/usr/X11R6 -DPKGSTEM=chromium -i -B /local/pobj/chromium-128.0.6613.113 /local/pobj/chromium-128.0.6613.113/chromium-128.0.6613.113/build/gn_run_binary.py /local/pobj/chromium-128.0.6613.113/chromium-128.0.6613.113/build/rust/rust_bindgen.gni /local/pobj/chromium-128.0.6613.113/chromium-128.0.6613.113/v8/tools/run.py /local/pobj/chromium-128.0.6613.113/chromium-128.0.6613.113/tools/protoc_wrapper/protoc_wrapper.py /local/pobj/chromium-128.0.6613.113/chromium-128.0.6613.113/third_party/blink/renderer/build/scripts/run_with_pythonpath.py ===> Compiler link: gcc -> /usr/local/bin/clang-17 ===> Compiler link: cc -> /usr/local/bin/clang-17 ===> Compiler link: clang -> /usr/local/bin/clang-17 ===> Compiler link: g++ -> /usr/local/bin/clang++-17 ===> Compiler link: c++ -> /usr/local/bin/clang++-17 ===> Compiler link: clang++ -> /usr/local/bin/clang++-17 >>> Running configure in www/chromium at 1726244800.54 ===> www/chromium ===> Generating configure for chromium-128.0.6613.113 ===> Configuring for chromium-128.0.6613.113 # Regenerate build and perlasm files (force json to not overwrite our local gn patches) # @cd /local/pobj/chromium-128.0.6613.113/chromium-128.0.6613.113/third_party/boringssl && /usr/local/bin/python3.11 src/util/generate_build_files.py json Traceback (most recent call last): File "/local/pobj/chromium-128.0.6613.113/chromium-128.0.6613.113/media/ffmpeg/scripts/build_ffmpeg.py", line 25, in ROBO_CONFIGURATION = config.RoboConfiguration() ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ File "/local/pobj/chromium-128.0.6613.113/chromium-128.0.6613.113/media/ffmpeg/scripts/robo_lib/config.py", line 46, in __init__ self.EnsureHostInfo() File "/local/pobj/chromium-128.0.6613.113/chromium-128.0.6613.113/media/ffmpeg/scripts/robo_lib/config.py", line 194, in EnsureHostInfo raise ValueError( ValueError: Unrecognized CPU architecture: riscv64 *** Error 1 in www/chromium (Makefile:279 'do-configure': @cd /local/pobj/chromium-128.0.6613.113/chromium-128.0.6613.113/media/ffmpeg && /...) *** Error 2 in www/chromium (/usr/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk:3042 '/local/pobj/chromium-128.0.6613.113/.configure_done': @cd /usr/p...) *** Error 2 in www/chromium (/usr/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk:2704 'configure': @lock=chromium-128.0.6613.113; export _LOCKS_HELD="...) ===> Exiting www/chromium with an error *** Error 1 in /usr/ports (infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.subdir.mk:144 'configure': @: ${echo_msg:=echo}; : ${target:=configure}; for i in ; ...) >>> Ended at 1726244803.80 max_stuck=2200.52/depends=322.60/show-prepare-results=46.56/patch=3076.53/configure=3.42 Error: job failed with 512 on riscv64-3 at 1726244803