>>> Building on macppc-1 under textproc/lttoolbox BDEPENDS = [devel/cmake/core;devel/utfcpp;archivers/bzip2;devel/ninja;textproc/icu4c;textproc/libxml] DIST = [textproc/lttoolbox:lttoolbox-3.8.2.tar.bz2] FULLPKGNAME = lttoolbox-3.8.2 RDEPENDS = [textproc/libxml;textproc/icu4c] (Junk lock obtained for macppc-1 at 1768047830.89) >>> Running depends in textproc/lttoolbox at 1768047831.49 last junk was in databases/ruby-hiera-eyaml,ruby34 /usr/sbin/pkg_add -aI -Drepair bzip2-1.0.8p0 icu4c-78.1p0v0 libxml-2.15.1p1 utfcpp-4.0.6 was: /usr/sbin/pkg_add -aI -Drepair bzip2-1.0.8p0 cmake-core-3.31.8p0 icu4c-78.1p0v0 libxml-2.15.1p1 ninja-1.11.1p1v1 utfcpp-4.0.6 /usr/sbin/pkg_add -aI -Drepair bzip2-1.0.8p0 icu4c-78.1p0v0 libxml-2.15.1p1 utfcpp-4.0.6 >>> Running show-prepare-results in textproc/lttoolbox at 1768047850.33 ===> textproc/lttoolbox ===> Building from scratch lttoolbox-3.8.2 ===> lttoolbox-3.8.2 depends on: utfcpp-* -> utfcpp-4.0.6 ===> lttoolbox-3.8.2 depends on: cmake-core-* -> cmake-core-3.31.8p0 ===> lttoolbox-3.8.2 depends on: ninja-* -> ninja-1.11.1p1v1 ===> lttoolbox-3.8.2 depends on: bzip2-* -> bzip2-1.0.8p0 ===> lttoolbox-3.8.2 depends on: icu4c-* -> icu4c-78.1p0v0 ===> lttoolbox-3.8.2 depends on: libxml-* -> libxml-2.15.1p1 ===> Verifying specs: c m pthread c++ c++abi pthread xml2 icui18n icuio icuuc ===> found c.102.2 m.10.1 pthread.28.1 c++.12.0 c++abi.9.0 xml2.22.1 icui18n.23.0 icuio.23.0 icuuc.23.0 bzip2-1.0.8p0 cmake-core-3.31.8p0 icu4c-78.1p0v0 libxml-2.15.1p1 ninja-1.11.1p1v1 utfcpp-4.0.6 (Junk lock released for macppc-1 at 1768047859.92) distfiles size=157342 >>> Running patch in textproc/lttoolbox at 1768047860.20 ===> textproc/lttoolbox ===> Checking files for lttoolbox-3.8.2 `/usr/ports/distfiles/lttoolbox-3.8.2.tar.bz2' is up to date. >> (SHA256) all files: OK ===> Extracting for lttoolbox-3.8.2 ===> Patching for lttoolbox-3.8.2 ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-CMakeLists_txt Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Use POSIX 2024 to work around a bug in our iostream header resulting in |compilation errors when old _POSIX_C_SOURCE is set. | |Set _BSD_SOURCE to expose pledge(). |Index: CMakeLists.txt |--- CMakeLists.txt.orig |+++ CMakeLists.txt -------------------------- Patching file CMakeLists.txt using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 102. Hunk #2 succeeded at 137. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-lttoolbox_lt_append_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: lttoolbox/lt_append.cc |--- lttoolbox/lt_append.cc.orig |+++ lttoolbox/lt_append.cc -------------------------- Patching file lttoolbox/lt_append.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 19. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-lttoolbox_lt_apply_acx_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: lttoolbox/lt_apply_acx.cc |--- lttoolbox/lt_apply_acx.cc.orig |+++ lttoolbox/lt_apply_acx.cc -------------------------- Patching file lttoolbox/lt_apply_acx.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 21. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-lttoolbox_lt_comp_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: lttoolbox/lt_comp.cc |--- lttoolbox/lt_comp.cc.orig |+++ lttoolbox/lt_comp.cc -------------------------- Patching file lttoolbox/lt_comp.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 21. Hunk #2 succeeded at 35. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-lttoolbox_lt_compose_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: lttoolbox/lt_compose.cc |--- lttoolbox/lt_compose.cc.orig |+++ lttoolbox/lt_compose.cc -------------------------- Patching file lttoolbox/lt_compose.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 22. Hunk #2 succeeded at 101. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-lttoolbox_lt_expand_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: lttoolbox/lt_expand.cc |--- lttoolbox/lt_expand.cc.orig |+++ lttoolbox/lt_expand.cc -------------------------- Patching file lttoolbox/lt_expand.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 20. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-lttoolbox_lt_invert_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: lttoolbox/lt_invert.cc |--- lttoolbox/lt_invert.cc.orig |+++ lttoolbox/lt_invert.cc -------------------------- Patching file lttoolbox/lt_invert.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 19. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-lttoolbox_lt_merge_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: lttoolbox/lt_merge.cc |--- lttoolbox/lt_merge.cc.orig |+++ lttoolbox/lt_merge.cc -------------------------- Patching file lttoolbox/lt_merge.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 19. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-lttoolbox_lt_print_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: lttoolbox/lt_print.cc |--- lttoolbox/lt_print.cc.orig |+++ lttoolbox/lt_print.cc -------------------------- Patching file lttoolbox/lt_print.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 19. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-lttoolbox_lt_proc_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: lttoolbox/lt_proc.cc |--- lttoolbox/lt_proc.cc.orig |+++ lttoolbox/lt_proc.cc -------------------------- Patching file lttoolbox/lt_proc.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 19. Hunk #2 succeeded at 31. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-lttoolbox_lt_restrict_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: lttoolbox/lt_restrict.cc |--- lttoolbox/lt_restrict.cc.orig |+++ lttoolbox/lt_restrict.cc -------------------------- Patching file lttoolbox/lt_restrict.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 20. Hunk #2 succeeded at 39. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-lttoolbox_lt_tmxcomp_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: lttoolbox/lt_tmxcomp.cc |--- lttoolbox/lt_tmxcomp.cc.orig |+++ lttoolbox/lt_tmxcomp.cc -------------------------- Patching file lttoolbox/lt_tmxcomp.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 21. Hunk #2 succeeded at 47. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-lttoolbox_lt_tmxproc_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: lttoolbox/lt_tmxproc.cc |--- lttoolbox/lt_tmxproc.cc.orig |+++ lttoolbox/lt_tmxproc.cc -------------------------- Patching file lttoolbox/lt_tmxproc.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 19. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-lttoolbox_lt_trim_cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: lttoolbox/lt_trim.cc |--- lttoolbox/lt_trim.cc.orig |+++ lttoolbox/lt_trim.cc -------------------------- Patching file lttoolbox/lt_trim.cc using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 19. Hunk #2 succeeded at 103. done ===> Compiler link: clang -> /usr/bin/clang ===> Compiler link: clang++ -> /usr/bin/clang++ ===> Compiler link: cc -> /usr/bin/cc ===> Compiler link: c++ -> /usr/bin/c++ >>> Running configure in textproc/lttoolbox at 1768047863.51 ===> textproc/lttoolbox ===> Generating configure for lttoolbox-3.8.2 ===> Configuring for lttoolbox-3.8.2 -- The CXX compiler identification is Clang 19.1.7 -- The C compiler identification is Clang 19.1.7 -- Detecting CXX compiler ABI info -- Detecting CXX compiler ABI info - done -- Check for working CXX compiler: /usr/obj/ports/lttoolbox-3.8.2/bin/c++ - skipped -- Detecting CXX compile features -- Detecting CXX compile features - done -- Detecting C compiler ABI info -- Detecting C compiler ABI info - done -- Check for working C compiler: /usr/obj/ports/lttoolbox-3.8.2/bin/cc - skipped -- Detecting C compile features -- Detecting C compile features - done -- Performing Test COMPILER_SUPPORTS_-Wno-unused-result -- Performing Test COMPILER_SUPPORTS_-Wno-unused-result - Success -- Performing Test COMPILER_SUPPORTS_-flto -- Performing Test COMPILER_SUPPORTS_-flto - Success -- Performing Test COMPILER_SUPPORTS_-std-c2x -- Performing Test COMPILER_SUPPORTS_-std-c2x - Success -- Performing Test COMPILER_SUPPORTS_-std-c--23 -- Performing Test COMPILER_SUPPORTS_-std-c--23 - Success -- Found PkgConfig: /usr/bin/pkg-config (found version "2.4.3") -- Found LibXml2: /usr/local/lib/libxml2.so.22.1 (found version "2.15.1") -- Performing Test CMAKE_HAVE_LIBC_PTHREAD -- Performing Test CMAKE_HAVE_LIBC_PTHREAD - Failed -- Looking for pthread_create in pthreads -- Looking for pthread_create in pthreads - not found -- Looking for pthread_create in pthread -- Looking for pthread_create in pthread - found -- Found Threads: TRUE -- Looking for fread_unlocked -- Looking for fread_unlocked - not found -- Looking for fwrite_unlocked -- Looking for fwrite_unlocked - not found -- Looking for fgetc_unlocked -- Looking for fgetc_unlocked - not found -- Looking for fputc_unlocked -- Looking for fputc_unlocked - not found -- Looking for fputs_unlocked -- Looking for fputs_unlocked - not found -- Looking for fmemopen -- Looking for fmemopen - not found -- Looking for getopt_long -- Looking for getopt_long - found -- Found ICU: /usr/local/include (found version "78.1") found components: i18n io uc CMake Error at /usr/local/share/cmake/Modules/FindPackageHandleStandardArgs.cmake:233 (message): Could NOT find Python (missing: Python_EXECUTABLE Interpreter) (Required is at least version "3.8") Call Stack (most recent call first): /usr/local/share/cmake/Modules/FindPackageHandleStandardArgs.cmake:603 (_FPHSA_FAILURE_MESSAGE) /usr/local/share/cmake/Modules/FindPython/Support.cmake:4000 (find_package_handle_standard_args) /usr/local/share/cmake/Modules/FindPython.cmake:631 (include) CMakeLists.txt:150 (find_package) -- Configuring incomplete, errors occurred! *** Error 1 in textproc/lttoolbox (/usr/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk:3028 'do-configure': @cd /usr/obj/ports/lttoolbox-3.8.2/build-po...) *** Error 2 in textproc/lttoolbox (/usr/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk:3048 '/usr/obj/ports/lttoolbox-3.8.2/build-powerpc/.configure_done') *** Error 2 in textproc/lttoolbox (/usr/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk:2710 'configure': @lock=lttoolbox-3.8.2; export _LOCKS_HELD=" l...) ===> Exiting textproc/lttoolbox with an error *** Error 1 in /usr/ports (infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.subdir.mk:144 'configure': @: ${echo_msg:=echo}; : ${target:=configure}; for i in ; ...) >>> Ended at 1768047896.50 max_stuck=0.00/depends=19.24/show-prepare-results=9.79/patch=3.40/configure=33.17 Error: job failed with 512 on macppc-1 at 1768047896